A&A 376, 393-401 (2001)
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20010995
W. Pietsch1 - H. Arp2
1 - Max-Planck-Institut für extraterrestrische Physik, 85741 Garching, Germany
2 -
Max-Planck-Institut für Astrophysik, 85741 Garching, Germany
Received 19 April 2001 / Accepted 6 July 2001
Abstract
Deep ROSAT PSPC and HRI observations of the nuclear starburst, UV
flat spectrum spiral NGC 6217 reveal a jet-like
X-ray filament extending out 2
7 (18.8 kpc) to the SW of the galaxy.
Radio images of NGC 6217 show an extent in the same direction, giving further
evidence for a one-sided X-ray jet interpretation of this feature.
Its X-ray spectrum is harder than that of NGC 6217 and the
luminosity in the 0.5-2.0 keV band is
1.7
ergs-1. We compare our findings
to parameters of other X-ray jets from other active galaxies.
We also give positions of a total of 91 X-ray sources detected in the field
to a limiting 0.5-2.0 keV flux of
2.2
erg cm-2s-1 and propose
optical and radio identifications. Some of these sources have been
identified in the RIXOS program.
Key words: galaxies: individual: NGC 6217 - galaxies: jets - galaxies: quasars: general - galaxies: Seyfert - radio continuum: galaxies - X-rays: galaxies
Subsequently the galaxy was described as "nuclear star burst, UV flat spectrum, infra-red bright" Seyfert 3 (Bonatto et al. 1998; Veron-Cetty & Veron 1998). Observations of optical spectra dominated by stellar photoionization (Kennicutt 1992) and of extended radio emission at 1.46 and 4.9 GHz (Hummel et al. 1984) and CO emission strongly peaked towards the center of the galaxy (Elfhag et al. 1996) support this classification. In a Hubble Space Telescope imaging survey of nearby active galactic nuclei, Malkan et al. (1998) classify the nuclear region (inner few arcsec) as CL, i.e. cluster, lumpy H II region, knots, and DC, i.e. dust disk/dust lane passing close or through center.
NGC 6217 was detected in X-rays with the satellites Ginga and ROSAT (2-10 keV
and 0.1-2.4 keV, respectively)
as discussed in a multi-wavelength catalog of Seyfert 2 galaxies observed in
the 2-10 keV energy band by Polletta et al. (1996). In addition,
the galaxy is identified in one of the fields selected for the ROSAT
International X-ray/Optical
Survey (RIXOS, Mason et al. 2000) as source number 122-16.
The narrow emission line galaxy (NELG) has been classified as a weak [O I] LINER with a
power law photon index of the ROSAT spectrum of
and time
variability below 14% (Nicholson et al. 1997; Mittaz et al. 1999).
In this paper we will report on a careful analysis of all ROSAT observations
of the NGC 6217 field aiming for the highest sensitivity well beyond the
RIXOS threshold of 3
erg cm-2s-1 (0.5-2.0 keV) for point sources
and diffuse emission. This led to the detection of a possible one-sided X-ray jet
from NGC 6217 and a serendipitous PSPC survey at a Galactic viewing angle with
moderate foreground absorption (
= 111
2,
= 33
5,
= 4.1
cm-2;
Dickey & Lockman 1990)
nearly as deep as dedicated ROSAT PSPC surveys
(e.g. Hasinger et al. 1998).
Throughout the paper we will assume
a distance to NGC 6217 of 24.6 Mpc, i.e. 1
kpc
(Condon et al. 1990).
![]() |
Figure 1:
Contour plot of the field around NGC 6217 for ROSAT PSPC hard band
(0.5-2.0 keV) superimposed on an optical image extracted from the digitized
sky survey II blue. The X-ray image has been smoothed according to the
on-axis point spread function, X-ray contours are given in units of ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 2:
Spatial distribution of surface brightness along position angle 226![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 3:
Contour plot of the field around NGC 6217 from an adaptively smoothed
ROSAT HRI image (see text) superimposed on a ROSAT PSPC hard band (0.5-2.0 keV)
image. The PSPC image has been smoothed according to the
on-axis point spread function. HRI X-ray contours are given in units of ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 4: Two component fit to the emission of NGC 6217. Count rate at the detector normalized to the energy, in counts s-1cm-2, the crosses represent the measured count rates, the solid curve gives the best fit, the dotted curve represents the thin thermal, the dashed to the power law component (cf. Sect. 2). |
Open with DEXTER |
During the ROSAT Wide Field Camera (WFC) "first light'' observations
the white-dwarf binary system RE J1629+780 was serendipitously
detected as a bright source (Cooke et al. 1992). RE J1629+780
was then used throughout the entire ROSAT mission (Trümper 1982)
as a WFC calibration source to monitor the gain and about a hundred PSPC and HRI (Pfeffermann et al. 1987) exposures were taken in parallel to the WFC
observations. The total PSPC exposure
time on RE J1629+780 is 129930 s made up of 31 pointings. Observation
142566p listed in the archive for the same pointing direction was rejected
due to an offset from this nominal pointing direction of 6
4 mainly
in right ascension. We also did not include two short observations in February
1998 to avoid detector degradation effects. The total HRI exposure time on
RE J1629+780 is 247247 s made
up of 67 pointings. NGC 6217 is offset from RE J1629+780
by
12
to the NE and therefore during RE J1629+780
exposures well inside the ROSAT PSPC
inner support ring and also inside the HRI field.
Source detection and position determination were performed over the inner
40
field of view for each of the PSPC observations in the
0.5-2.0 keV band (Zimmermann et al. 1998).
The event sets had to be individually shifted by up to 10
in right
ascension and 5
in declination with respect to an average
position of the bright X-ray sources detected in each observation to correct
residual boresight errors. The position-corrected data sets were then merged together.
Though the PSPC observations were in general of rather low background, we
removed times of high background in the 0.5-2.0 keV band to increase the
sensitivity for faint structures which reduced the useful exposure time
by
10% to 117058 s. The source detection procedures were re-run and source positions
corrected using the RIXOS identifications (Mason et al. 2000)
in the field reducing the systematic absolute position error to 0
8
if one does not include an error due to the optically determined RIXOS
positions. As Mason et al. (2000) state that the positional accuracy in the
RIXOS catalog is better than 1
,
the residual systematic error will
only give a significant contribution to the position error of the brightest
sources and is not corrected for in the 90% uncertainty position error r90.
We also determined the likelihood of existence in the 0.5-2.0 keV band
and for the best position hardness ratios defined as
HR1 = (H-S)/(S+H) and HR2 = (H2-H1)/(H1+H2) where S, H, H1, and H2
denote count rates in the 0.1-0.4 keV, 0.5-2.0 keV, 0.5-0.9 keV
and 0.9-2.0 keV bands, respectively. Taking into account the Galactic
foreground absorption and folding a power law spectrum with a photon
index of 2 through the instrument response, we determine a energy to count rates
conversion factor in cts-1 in the 0.5-2.0 keV band of 0.777 for a
source with a flux of 1.0
erg cm-2s-1. Because the PSPC sensitivity is close to one
in the hard band and variable foreground absorption mainly influences the
soft band, this factor is almost insensitive to the assumed spectral shape
and a wide range of
.
The resulting list of 91 sources detected with
in the
field
centered on RE J1629+780 is only a by-product of the analysis
of the field around NGC 6217. It reaches, however, much deeper than the published
RIXOS catalog entries of the field and we therefore included it in the appendix
(Table 2) together with an exposure-corrected hard band X-ray image
(Fig. A.1) with numbered boxes marking the catalog entries.
Table 2 gives ROSAT name (Col. 1), source number (Col. 2),
X-ray position (Cols. 3-4), r90 (Col. 5),
and count rate for the
0.5-2.0 keV PSPC band (Cols. 6-7), hardness ratios HR1 and HR2 (Cols. 8-9), and
some comments on possible identifications (Col. 10). The faintest sources
in the catalog have a 0.5-2.0 keV flux of
2.2
erg cm-2s-1.
The galaxy NGC 6217 is 13
3 from the center of the field. There
seems to be an X-ray jet, emanating from the galaxy to about 2
7 projected at
a position angle of
(Figs. A.1 and 1). The X-ray surface brightness along the feature was integrated in
boxes for the 0.5-2.0 keV PSPC band (Fig. 2).
From the surface brightness distribution we determine background-corrected count
rates of (162, 8.5, 9.6)
ct s-1 integrating the brightness at distances -1
5-1
0, 1
0-2
25, 2
25-3
5, respectively, which
can be attributed to NGC 6217, an intermediate region, and the SW "knot''. These
count rates are in good agreement with the source detection results (see
sources 73, 75, 78, and 80 of Table 2) and correspond to
(151, 7.9, 9.0)
ergs-1 at the distance of NGC 6217. Source 80 represents
NGC 6217, 73 the SW knot. Sources 75 and 78 are found in the bridge and at
the "tongue'' extending from the galaxy. Though we chose a small extraction
radius for the source detection, specifically the results derived for
source 78 and to a lesser amount for 75 may suffer from cross talk from
sources 80 and 73.
The count rate detected for NGC 6217 is within the errors
the same as reported in the RIXOS survey (Mason et al. 2000)
supporting the lack of time variability quoted by Nicholson et al. (1997).
Mittaz et al. (1999) characterized the X-ray spectra of the
extragalactic objects in the RIXOS survey based on power law fits on three broad-band X-ray colors assuming galactic absorption. This method only gives
reasonable fits if the intrinsic spectrum really can be described by a power
law. The number of photons of the RIXOS AGN identifications (source 39, 60, 68,
and 88) as well as in NGC 6217 were sufficient to do fits with more than 10 and up
to 52 data points in NGC 6217.
For the AGN sample power law models gave acceptable
fits with parameters coinciding within the errors with the RIXOS results. For
NGC 6217 however, simple power law (and also thermal bremsstrahlung or thin
thermal) models did not give acceptable fits (reduced
)
even if
the absorption column was not fixed to galactic. A combination of a thin thermal
plasma of solar abundance and a power law with absorption for both components
fixed to the galactic foreground resulted in an acceptable fit
(reduced
). The temperature of the thermal component was
keV and the power law photon index
with absorption
corrected luminosities in the 0.1-2.4 keV band of (1.1 and 1.0)
ergs-1 (Fig. 4).
There are not enough counts in the jet-like feature to do a detailed spectral
analysis. However, the hardness ratios in Table 2 of the sources
detected therein indicate a somewhat harder spectrum than the power law
spectrum with photon index of 1.7 of NGC 6217 (see Mittaz et al. 1999 and HR1 1.0, HR2
compared to 0.89 and 0.00). While the feature
is clearly extended from NGC 6217 to the SW it cannot be resolved by the
PSPC in the perpendicular direction. As Fig. 2 demonstrates, there is
no indication of a similar feature on the opposite side of the galaxy.
To analyze the HRI observations we merged the event sets, correcting the pointing
directions with a time resolution of 40 s using the bright soft source
RE J1629+780 as reference. Finally, we screened the data for times of
high background which reduced the useful time of exposure by more than 27% to
179793 s. Because the PSPC collects at least 2.5 times the photons
and in addition has a lower background than the HRI, the faint emission to the
SW of NGC 6217 is just marginally detected. Due to the relatively large off-axis
position of NGC 6217 one also does not gain much due to the better intrinsic spatial
resolution of the HRI as the point spread function is dominated by the X-ray
telescope (Aschenbach 1988). However, the HRI results still can
be used to confirm the PSPC result.
To further reduce the background due to UV emission and cosmic rays, we
used HRI raw channels 2-8. An HRI image (0.1-2.4 keV) was constructed
with a bin size of 2
5 and adaptively smoothed by convolution with a circular
top hat kernel using 100 counts. Iso-intensity contours of the resulting HRI image
are superimposed on a PSPC 0.5-2.0 keV gray-scale image in Fig. 3 and
nicely confirm the brighter PSPC structures with slightly better resolution.
![]() |
Figure 5:
Contour plot of the field around NGC 6217 from the NVSS Stokes I
image (restoring beam width 45
![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
Source | Distance | Extent | ![]() |
Comments | Ref. | |
[Mpc] | [
![]() |
[kpc] | [erg s-1] | |||
Cen A | 3.5 | 240 | 2.8 |
![]() |
0.1-2.4 keV band, radio, faint X-ray counter-jet | 1,2 |
M87 | 17.0 | 11.5 | 1.0 |
![]() |
2-10 keV band, radio, optical, one-sided | 3 |
NGC 6217 | 24.6 | 160 | 18.8 |
![]() |
0.5-2.0 keV band, radio, one-sided | this work |
Pictor A | 151 | 115 | 85 |
![]() |
2-10 keV band, radio, one-sided, hot spot | 4 |
3C273 | 550 | 22 | 60 |
![]() |
0.5-8 keV band, radio, optical, one-sided | 5 |
PKS 0637-752 | 1200 | 12 | 70 |
![]() |
2-10 keV band, radio, optical, one-sided | 6 |
Both in the PSPC and the HRI the main part (at least 80%) of the X-ray emission of
NGC 6217 is not resolved and appears as a point-like source with a jet-like feature emanating
to the SW. The thin thermal component of the unabsorbed X-ray spectrum of
NGC 6217 most likely arises in the nuclear starburst area of the galaxy,
while the power law may reflect the unabsorbed jet component
within a few kpc of the nucleus. The active nucleus most likely is heavily obscured and
- similar to many other Seyfert 2 nuclei - not detected in the ROSAT band
(see e.g. Moran et al. 2001). The radio flux density of NGC 6217 is close to that of the
optical flux density and the galaxy therefore has to be
classified as radio quiet (Kellermann et al. 1989).
Before discussing the X-ray feature to the SW of NGC 6217 as an X-ray jet we want to investigate the question as to whether the extent could be an accidental alignment of unrelated X-ray sources. Figures 1, A.1, and also Fig. 3 show that this could be possible. However, it would require at least three very closely spaced sources to be aligned rather exactly with the nucleus of the galaxy. This seems rather unlikely but certainly can not be excluded by the PSPC and HRI observations. Therefore we have to look for additional arguments from other wavelengths.
Radio observations provide additional evidence for jet-like emission from NGC 6217.
There is not only arcsec-scale extended emission from the nuclear area
(Hummel et al. 1984), but also VLA radio maps at 1.49 GHz
(Condon 1987)
and NRAO VLA Sky Survey (NVSS, Condon et al. 1998)
reveal a complicated extended radio source on arcmin-scale with an extension
coming out to 2
,
exactly along the
line of the X-ray extension (see Fig. 5) which might represent
a radio jet. Unfortunately, the resolution and sensitivity of the observations
is not sufficient to make a clear radio jet identification.
There is no optical correspondence at the position of the X-ray feature
on either the POSS II plates
(see Fig. 1 for an overlay of PSPC 0.5-2.0 keV band contours on
the digitized POSS II blue image) or the 200-inch telescope photograph.
Also the Hubble Space Telescope imaging survey of nearby
active galactic nuclei (Malkan et al. 1998) reveals no clear hint of a jet
from the inner few arcsec around the nucleus. Since the interior of the
galaxy is barred, it is difficult to judge the position of the minor axis. But
using the outer isophotes of the Schmidt plates it is possible to estimate that
the direction of the X-ray feature is in the quadrant in which the minor axis
lies (and also perpendicular to the bar). On the other hand, there are also no
clear optical counterparts along the X-ray feature, as might be expected if
it were an accidental alignment of unrelated sources. Such
counterparts have been found for many of the other sources of similar
X-ray brightness in the field (see Table 2).
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
Source name | No | RA (J2000.0) Dec | r90 |
![]() |
Count rate | HR1 | HR2 | Identifications | log(![]() |
|
[h m s] | [![]() ![]() ![]() |
[
![]() |
[ct s-1] | |||||||
RX J162300.6+781315 | 1 | 16 23 00.64 | 78 13 16.0 | 19.5 | 20.8 | 5.08e![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
U56154(17.0,0.5,23.9) | -2.2 |
RX J162327.7+775453 | 2 | 16 23 27.78 | 77 54 53.2 | 6.6 | 266.1 | 2.17e
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
RX J162335.8+780740 | 3 | 16 23 35.89 | 78 07 40.0 | 17.3 | 12.7 | 2.54e
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
U56725(19.3,-0.1,14.9) | -1.4 |
RX J162341.7+782114 | 4 | 16 23 41.79 | 78 21 14.2 | 21.7 | 19.0 | 6.96e
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
U56892(16.0,0.6,10.5) | -2.5 |
RX J162420.6+775408 | 5 | 16 24 20.63 | 77 54 08.4 | 1.1 | 14673.9 | 4.31e
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
U57802(14.8,1.9,4.3) | -1.7 |
RX J162441.2+774520 | 6 | 16 24 41.29 | 77 45 20.1 | 20.2 | 17.3 | 6.73e
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
RX J162457.6+780918 | 7 | 16 24 57.66 | 78 09 18.2 | 15.9 | 12.0 | 2.53e
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
U58672(16.6,0.6,14.1) | -2.7 |
RX J162459.0+780127 | 8 | 16 24 59.05 | 78 01 27.8 | 16.2 | 14.2 | 2.99e
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
RX J162500.2+781814 | 9 | 16 25 00.29 | 78 18 15.0 | 17.8 | 14.3 | 3.35e
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
RX J162504.4+781152 | 10 | 16 25 04.43 | 78 11 52.6 | 10.0 | 46.2 | 6.37e
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
RX J162513.0+780300 | 11 | 16 25 13.02 | 78 03 00.0 | 11.2 | 19.5 | 2.92e
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
U58965(18.2,0.6,12.6) | -2.0 |
RX J162515.4+775542 | 12 | 16 25 15.49 | 77 55 42.1 | 14.9 | 12.7 | 2.75e
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
NVSS(9.2,1.9) | |
RX J162515.6+780113 | 13 | 16 25 15.67 | 78 01 13.6 | 13.6 | 13.6 | 2.37e
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
RX J162517.0+775914 | 14 | 16 25 17.10 | 77 59 14.7 | 13.0 | 16.4 | 3.09e
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
U59114(19.2,0.3,22.2) | -1.5 |
RX J162531.3+775111 | 15 | 16 25 31.32 | 77 51 11.3 | 10.3 | 48.5 | 7.99e
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
U59260(18.7,-0.3,8.8) | -1.0 |
RX J162534.4+774838 | 16 | 16 25 34.43 | 77 48 38.5 | 18.8 | 13.8 | 3.98e
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
RX J162538.4+775002 | 17 | 16 25 38.46 | 77 50 02.7 | 14.0 | 33.0 | 6.77e
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
U59471(17.9,-0.2,6.5) | -1.5 |
RX J162547.3+775816 | 18 | 16 25 47.31 | 77 58 16.1 | 6.6 | 64.3 | 6.47e
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
U59661(13.8,0.8,5.7) | -3.5 |
RX J162547.6+781417 | 19 | 16 25 47.60 | 78 14 17.7 | 14.4 | 16.8 | 3.55e
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
RX J162610.8+781045 | 20 | 16 26 10.87 | 78 10 45.7 | 4.5 | 140.6 | 1.05e
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
RX J162613.2+775730 | 21 | 16 26 13.25 | 77 57 30.2 | 13.8 | 10.5 | 2.25e
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
U60332(16.9,0.4,10.1) | -2.6 |
RX J162624.7+781659 | 22 | 16 26 24.77 | 78 16 59.7 | 4.6 | 327.7 | 2.86e
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
F122_552 R20.3 :GClustr :z=0.5 | 0.1 |
RX J162636.9+775838 | 23 | 16 26 36.99 | 77 58 38.5 | 10.8 | 18.4 | 2.94e
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
RX J162639.6+781944 | 24 | 16 26 39.64 | 78 19 44.2 | 6.2 | 193.3 | 1.91e
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
U60881(17.9,-0.2,15.1) | -1.0 |
RX J162643.5+775757 | 25 | 16 26 43.52 | 77 57 57.3 | 10.6 | 16.6 | 2.53e
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
RX J162646.7+780735 | 26 | 16 26 46.80 | 78 07 35.9 | 7.8 | 24.3 | 3.00e
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
RX J162703.2+775534 | 27 | 16 27 03.27 | 77 55 34.4 | 5.5 | 101.3 | 8.94e
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
RX J162703.7+782218 | 28 | 16 27 03.75 | 78 22 18.4 | 21.8 | 10.1 | 2.60e
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
RX J162718.9+775628 | 29 | 16 27 18.91 | 77 56 28.2 | 3.5 | 227.7 | 1.43e
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
U61755(17.9,2.1,4.6), WN B1629.5+7802, NVSS(52.6,4.8) | -2.0 |
RX J162746.4+775411 | 30 | 16 27 46.45 | 77 54 11.3 | 5.3 | 89.4 | 8.02e
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
RX J162754.0+775130 | 31 | 16 27 54.03 | 77 51 30.5 | 12.3 | 15.5 | 3.00e
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
RX J162808.0+780437 | 32 | 16 28 08.05 | 78 04 37.2 | 5.6 | 84.4 | 7.66e
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
NVSS(4.8,3.2) | |
RX J162813.3+782100 | 33 | 16 28 13.30 | 78 21 00.2 | 10.3 | 57.7 | 7.94e
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
RX J162814.2+780336 | 34 | 16 28 14.25 | 78 03 36.2 | 1.1 | 3308.8 | 9.51e
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
U62860(17.6,-0.4,3.3),AGN z=0.64(Y.Chu,priv.comm.) | -0.3 |
RX J162822.4+782221 | 35 | 16 28 22.46 | 78 22 21.8 | 11.4 | 56.8 | 8.18e
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
RX J162824.8+781033 | 36 | 16 28 24.81 | 78 10 33.9 | 7.7 | 26.9 | 3.12e
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
U63068(14.8,1.5,7.9) | -3.7 |
RX J162826.5+780236 | 37 | 16 28 26.55 | 78 02 36.4 | 12.6 | 13.7 | 2.07e
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
RX J162834.8+780810 | 38 | 16 28 34.84 | 78 08 10.4 | 11.0 | 11.1 | 1.78e
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
RX J162835.4+781917 | 39 | 16 28 35.50 | 78 19 17.9 | 4.3 | 306.9 | 2.12e
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
U63298(18.3,0.0,5.0), F122_001 AGN z=1.134 | -0.9 |
RX J162904.8+781030 | 40 | 16 29 04.83 | 78 10 30.0 | 4.2 | 127.5 | 8.59e
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
RX J162910.4+780441 | 41 | 16 29 10.47 | 78 04 41.0 | 1.1 | 4240.2 | 1.23e
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
U64063(13.3,0.0,2.3), RE J1629+780 WD binary | -2.1 |
RX J162913.3+780033 | 42 | 16 29 13.34 | 78 00 33.5 | 6.2 | 48.6 | 4.69e
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
APM(20.7,0.7,4.6) | -0.8 |
RX J162923.9+781304 | 43 | 16 29 23.90 | 78 13 04.0 | 6.2 | 67.9 | 6.34e
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
RX J162928.5+780528 | 44 | 16 29 28.57 | 78 05 28.5 | 4.7 | 123.6 | 1.58e
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
RX J162930.6+781545 | 45 | 16 29 30.69 | 78 15 45.5 | 8.3 | 47.2 | 5.14e
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
RX J162936.6+775814 | 46 | 16 29 36.67 | 77 58 14.9 | 5.5 | 62.7 | 5.59e
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
RX J162938.0+775711 | 47 | 16 29 38.06 | 77 57 11.9 | 10.7 | 10.1 | 1.68e
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
RX J162945.0+781126 | 48 | 16 29 45.04 | 78 11 26.9 | 2.0 | 861.7 | 3.28e
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
U64758(17.7,2.0,1.0), F122_10 Star M5.5e | -1.7 |
RX J162956.3+781302 | 49 | 16 29 56.39 | 78 13 02.7 | 3.5 | 241.0 | 1.31e
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
RX J162956.5+781705 | 50 | 16 29 56.51 | 78 17 05.3 | 12.2 | 16.9 | 2.68e
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
U65068(19.4,0.6,6.5) | -1.6 |
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
Source name | No | RA (J2000.0) Dec | r90 |
![]() |
Count rate | HR1 | HR2 | Identifications | log(
![]() |
|
[h m s] | [![]() ![]() ![]() |
[
![]() |
[ct s-1] | |||||||
RX J162957.2+775746 | 51 | 16 29 57.26 | 77 57 46.2 | 4.7 | 106.7 | 8.50e
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
RX J163003.8+781905 | 52 | 16 30 03.89 | 78 19 05.7 | 9.7 | 53.0 | 7.65e
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
RX J163005.9+780814 | 53 | 16 30 05.95 | 78 08 14.6 | 9.9 | 12.6 | 1.81e
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
RX J163016.8+781539 | 54 | 16 30 16.89 | 78 15 39.0 | 8.7 | 43.9 | 4.87e
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
U65426(17.5,0.9,5.3), U65470(18.2,-0.5,5.6) | -2.2 |
RX J163019.9+775943 | 55 | 16 30 20.00 | 77 59 43.9 | 6.0 | 44.2 | 4.38e
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
RX J163030.6+775757 | 56 | 16 30 30.69 | 77 57 57.7 | 5.9 | 54.4 | 5.24e
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
U65771(19.5,0.5,1.4), U65814(17.3,0.9,5.3) | -1.2 |
RX J163038.4+781111 | 57 | 16 30 38.43 | 78 11 11.6 | 3.6 | 285.5 | 2.00e
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
RX J163050.4+780740 | 58 | 16 30 50.46 | 78 07 40.8 | 10.9 | 10.4 | 1.68e
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
U66177(15.9,0.6,9.2) | -3.2 |
RX J163052.7+781636 | 59 | 16 30 52.75 | 78 16 36.8 | 12.4 | 16.9 | 2.63e
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
RX J163054.5+781102 | 60 | 16 30 54.53 | 78 11 02.3 | 1.6 | 1819.4 | 5.82e
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
U66298(19.7,0.7,1.9), F122_13 AGN z=0.358 | -0.2 |
RX J163102.6+780058 | 61 | 16 31 02.67 | 78 00 58.0 | 10.3 | 18.8 | 2.70e
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
U66448(13.3,1.4,13.9) | -4.3 |
RX J163105.4+782212 | 62 | 16 31 05.49 | 78 22 12.0 | 18.3 | 11.4 | 3.60e
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
U66507(18.0,1.2,16.9), U66551(18.2,-0.1,20.6) | -2.2 |
RX J163108.2+774930 | 63 | 16 31 08.30 | 77 49 30.4 | 9.6 | 45.8 | 6.37e
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
U66635(16.0,1.3,6.5) | -2.8 |
RX J163111.7+780028 | 64 | 16 31 11.73 | 78 00 28.3 | 6.3 | 47.4 | 4.73e
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
RX J163114.9+780419 | 65 | 16 31 14.98 | 78 04 19.2 | 6.9 | 40.3 | 4.65e
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
RX J163124.7+781445 | 66 | 16 31 24.70 | 78 14 45.4 | 15.2 | 14.2 | 2.55e
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
U67034(19.7,0.9,9.5) | -1.6 |
RX J163129.6+781642 | 67 | 16 31 29.68 | 78 16 42.3 | 14.6 | 20.3 | 3.43e
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
RX J163140.9+781236 | 68 | 16 31 40.93 | 78 12 36.4 | 1.9 | 1695.9 | 6.05e
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
U67345(18.4,-0.1,1.1), F122_14 AGN z=0.380 | -0.3 |
RX J163151.9+781756 | 69 | 16 31 51.95 | 78 17 56.6 | 9.6 | 55.5 | 7.01e
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
RX J163152.7+780602 | 70 | 16 31 52.79 | 78 06 03.0 | 7.0 | 31.4 | 3.43e
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
RX J163155.7+780443 | 71 | 16 31 55.72 | 78 04 43.9 | 10.7 | 21.7 | 3.41e
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
RX J163157.0+775723 | 72 | 16 31 57.06 | 77 57 23.3 | 11.9 | 11.9 | 2.40e
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
RX J163159.8+780958 | 73 | 16 31 59.88 | 78 09 58.2 | 4.8 | 144.2 | 1.03e
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
RX J163207.3+781319 | 74 | 16 32 07.38 | 78 13 19.5 | 3.4 | 398.3 | 2.07e
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
U67910(19.7,0.7,2.6) | -0.6 |
RX J163213.5+781029 | 75 | 16 32 13.50 | 78 10 29.7 | 10.5 | 47.6 | 6.49e
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
U67986(19.8,0.4,5.8) | -0.9 |
RX J163216.6+775411 | 76 | 16 32 16.68 | 77 54 11.5 | 2.0 | 1485.4 | 6.28e
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
U68106(13.1,1.1,0.5), F122_31 Star K0e | -2.9 |
RX J163220.5+781640 | 77 | 16 32 20.54 | 78 16 40.4 | 7.2 | 98.8 | 9.49e
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
RX J163225.4+781118 | 78 | 16 32 25.44 | 78 11 18.2 | 5.2 | 423.8 | 4.26e
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
RX J163238.1+781508 | 79 | 16 32 38.13 | 78 15 08.2 | 18.2 | 11.8 | 2.85e
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
NVSS(3.0,9.9) | |
RX J163238.7+781151 | 80 | 16 32 38.79 | 78 11 51.1 | 1.3 | 5375.9 | 1.56e
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
NGC 6217, F122_16 R11.2 ELG LINER, NVSS(79.9,2.4) | -2.8 |
RX J163245.5+780620 | 81 | 16 32 45.59 | 78 06 20.8 | 8.8 | 26.3 | 3.58e
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
RX J163307.1+780849 | 82 | 16 33 07.12 | 78 08 49.7 | 10.9 | 16.5 | 2.74e
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
RX J163316.3+780432 | 83 | 16 33 16.34 | 78 04 32.2 | 4.9 | 127.0 | 1.09e
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
RX J163329.5+780847 | 84 | 16 33 29.51 | 78 08 47.9 | 9.7 | 33.3 | 4.64e
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
U69617(19.4,0.9,8.5) | -1.5 |
RX J163348.0+775644 | 85 | 16 33 48.01 | 77 56 44.7 | 12.4 | 21.1 | 4.14e
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
RX J163354.5+775329 | 86 | 16 33 54.56 | 77 53 29.7 | 10.1 | 62.2 | 8.45e
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
RX J163423.1+775651 | 87 | 16 34 23.18 | 77 56 51.4 | 5.6 | 207.1 | 1.87e
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
U70795(18.2,-0.3,8.1) | -0.8 |
RX J163425.5+781002 | 88 | 16 34 25.57 | 78 10 02.9 | 3.5 | 636.9 | 3.93e
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
F122_21 R19.2 AGN z=0.376 | -0.2 |
RX J163432.5+775334 | 89 | 16 34 32.58 | 77 53 34.1 | 10.6 | 80.9 | 1.22e
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
RX J163439.6+780127 | 90 | 16 34 39.65 | 78 01 27.7 | 12.1 | 25.5 | 4.81e
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
RX J163503.3+780420 | 91 | 16 35 03.39 | 78 04 20.5 | 11.2 | 47.7 | 7.96e
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
References:
Un: source 1650-018n from USNO-A2 Catalogue (Monet et al. 1998);
Fn: Mason et al. (2000);
WN Bn: source in Westerbork Northern Sky Survey (WENSS, Rengelink et al. 1997);
NVSS: Condon et al. (1998);
APM: Irwin et al. (1994).
For the further discussion we assume that the X-ray feature originates from the nuclear area of NGC 6217. This then would point towards two possible explanations for the feature, a galactic superwind driven by a nuclear starburst or a one-sided jet originating from an active nucleus in NGC 6217.
Nuclear starbursts have been observed for several nearby galaxies leading to X-ray emission far out in the halos of galaxies (e.g. Dahlem et al. 1998). However, there the X-ray emission only stays collimated within the disk of the galaxies and fills large parts of the galaxy halos, as e.g. the plume and outer halo emission in NGC 253 (Pietsch et al. 2000) or the nuclear superbubble and halo emission of NGC 3079 (Pietsch et al. 1998) show. Also the spectrum of the emission in the halo in general is significantly softer than the emission from the galaxy nuclear area and disk. No knot-like radio emission has been reported from X-ray halos fed by starbursts. Therefore a galactic superwind is a rather unlikely explanation.
This leaves the interpretation as a one-sided X-ray jet.
The X-ray morphology would indicate that at least three knots with distances of
1
,
1
8, and 2
7 from the nucleus contribute to the emission.
The knot at 1
8 also shows up as a radio knot (see Fig. 5).
X-ray jets with and without knot-like substructure have been reported for several AGN. The most famous X-ray jets are those in Cen A, M 87, Pictor A, 3C273, and PKS 0637-752, all radio-loud objects. However there is also the precessing jet in the radio-quiet galaxy NGC 4258 (Pietsch et al. 1994; Cecil et al. 2000) that also manifests itself in X-rays in the anomalous arm structure seen in projection onto the disk in the halo of this LINER/Seyfert galaxy. X-ray images from Chandra are now resolving the spatial structure along quasar jets, producing remarkable images. In Table 1 we have put together properties of these jets collected mainly from the new Chandra observations to compare with the NGC 6217 jet properties. To allow easier comparison, we have converted all numbers assuming q0 =0.5 and H0 = 70 kms-1Mpc-1. We give distance, apparent projected X-ray dimension in arcsec and kpc, respectively, the X-ray luminosity and we comment on the energy band used for the luminosity determination, and on radio and optical identification of the jets and give references. These X-ray jets are all strongly one-sided, as would be the proposed jet in NGC 6217 and are all also observed as radio jets or as colinear radio lobes. They also show hard X-ray spectra as proposed from the hardness ratios for the NGC 6217 jet.
According to Table 1 the NGC 6217 jet would be one of the longest in apparent dimensions and would seem to merit higher resolution from Chandra or greater wavelength coverage investigations from XMM-Newton in order to learn more about the characteristics of energetic ejections. Its measured luminosity is only moderate. However, jet emission may in part be hidden within the flux attributed to NGC 6217 itself becaused of the limited resolution of the ROSAT PSPC, as already is indicated by the slightly better resolution of the HRI which detects jet emission closer to the galaxy nucleus (cf. Fig. 3). The missing optical evidence for a jet in NGC 6217 is no strong argument. Also in Cen A there is no particular optical object associated with the X-ray jet although there are some outer gaseous filaments which lie along the projected track and in Pictor A there is no optical jet visible even in large telescope images. While this, together with the faintness in X-ray and radio, may explain that we do not see hints for jet emission in the optical, deeper, large telescope imaging and radio observations would strongly be needed in addition to better X-ray data to give more strength to the proposed jet interpretation.
Acknowledgements
The X-ray data used in this work were all obtained from the ROSAT Data Archive at the Max-Planck-Institut für extraterrestrische Physik (MPE) at Garching. This research has made use of the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED) which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. To overlay the X-ray data we used a blue digitized sky survey II image. The compressed files of the "Palomar Observatory-Space Telescope Science Institute Digital Sky Survey'' of the northern sky, based on scans of the Second Palomar Sky Survey are copyright (c) 1993-1997 by the California Institute of Technology. All material not subject to the above copyright provision is copyright (c) 1997 by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc. Produced under Contract No. NAS5-2555 with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. The ROSAT project is supported by the German Bundesministerium für Bildung, Wissenschaft, Forschung und Technologie (BMBF/DLR) and by the Max-Planck-Gesellschaft (MPG).
Ninety-one sources are detected in the
field
centered on RE J1629+780 in the deep PSPC exposure. Table 2 shows
their characteristics. Sources 5, 22, 34, 41, 44, 57, 68, 78, and 80 have been
flagged as extended by the detection algorithm. While for most of them
this might indicate overlapping PSF of nearby point sources, extended emission
in 22 further confirms the galaxy cluster identification of the RIXOS program.
Extended emission in 80 reflects overlapping emission components from the
hot interstellar medium and bright point sources in the NGC 6217. The cases
of source 5 and 41/44 will be discussed separately.
To guide optical identifications we produced overlay plots
of PSPC 0.5-2.0 keV band contours on the DSS2 red and blue plates and inspected
APM (Irwin et al. 1994) finding charts and the USNO-A2 Catalogue
(Monet et al. 1998) from which we get positional accuracies for the
optical candidates of better than 1
for USNO-A2 (2
for APM),
optical magnitudes of the blue (O) and red (E) plates, and the color index O-E.
Optical counterparts were searched for in the
r90 X-ray error
circle. Usually only one optical source correlates if at all.
For 33 sources we give the higher accuracy USNO-A2 identification
candidate information in Col. 10
of Table 2 (source number with magnitude from blue plate,
the color index, and separation in arcsec between optical and X-ray position
following in parenthesis). For source 42 only APM information is available.
For sources 54, 56, and 62 two USNO-A2 sources are candidates for the
identification.
![]() |
Figure A.1:
Contour plot superimposed on exposure corrected and smoothed
gray-scale image of the ROSAT PSPC hard band (0.5-2 keV, 117 ks low
background integration time) of the
![]() |
Some of the brighter X-ray sources in Fig. A.1 (sources 22,
39, 48, 68, 76, 80, and 88) have already been investigated in the RIXOS program
(Nicholson et al. 1997; Puchnarewicz et al. 1997; Mason et al. 2000, see Col. 10 of Table 2).
They were identified with the help of optical spectroscopy as a cluster of
galaxies, AGN, star, AGN, AGN, star, emission line galaxy, and AGN,
respectively. The AGN and stars nicely confirm the
log(/
)
classification scheme.
One of the AGN (source 60 with a redshift of 0.358) is very red and could be
absorbed by some outlying dust from NGC 6217. This would be a further incentive
to spectroscopically identify the fainter candidates near the galaxy.
While in the soft band the emission of RE J1629+780 dominates the
central ares of the field, in the 0.5-2.0 keV band there is a smooth transition
from source 41 (i.e. RE J1629+780) to 44 indicating the contribution
from even another source at intermediate position which from the optical
overlays can be identified with a blue stellar object cataloged in APM
with a blue magnitude of 20.1, color 0.1, at position (epoch J2000.0)
RA =
18
9, Dec = +78
05
14
.
We find five correlations of the X-ray source list with the
1.4 GHz NRAO/VLA Sky Survey
(NVSS, Condon et al. 1998) radio source catalogs, one of which is also
contained in the 325 MHz
Westerbork Northern Sky Survey (WENSS, Rengelink et al. 1997)
catalog. The brightest source is NGC 6217. The second brightest source is also
identified with a optical source and most likely is, based on the optical
color and log(/
), a radio galaxy.
The other three sources have no optical counterparts and are most likely
radio-loud AGN.