The H
photometry we made was used to find stars showing
H
emission. This was done by means of an
index,
defined as a difference between the magnitudes of a star through a
narrow and a wide filter. Our filters and, consequently, the
index resembles those used by others, namely Abt & Golson
(1966), Tebbe (1969), Feinstein (1974),
Dachs & Schmidt-Kaler (1975), Claría & Escosteguy
(1981), Strauss & Ducati (1981), and Goderya &
Schmidt (1994). We made, however, no attempt to transform
our
to that defined by others; it was left in the
instrumental system. In Fig. 4 we show the
index
for 442 stars with
15.4 mag, the limiting magnitude of
our H
photometry. The same stars are shown in
Fig. 5, where the
index is plotted as a function of
.
Out of the 25 known Be stars in the area shown in Fig. 1, 22 fall within the P field, and 14 within the V field. As can be seen in
Fig. 4, except for doubtful Be star Sanduleak 11, all these 22 known Be stars indeed show emission, that is, have
placing
them above the locus of cluster non-emission stars, shown with a
continuous line. The line was obtained from the spectra given by
Danks & Dennefeld (1994) which were combined with the
transmission curves of the H
filters provided by the
manufacturer. Except for known Be stars, some other stars are found
above this line as well. Because some foreground late-type stars can
also have weak emission, we need to separate them from the Be stars
first. For this reason, we made a rough selection of non-members with
the use of the cluster CM diagram (see Sect. 7). Stars selected as
non-members are plotted with crosses in Figs. 4 and
5. Obviously, with this kind of selection, we cannot
indicate all non-members which contaminate the cluster main sequence.
Many objects with
14 mag in Fig. 4 situated
clearly above the continuous line are certainly such unrecognized
non-members.
Using Fig. 4 we can conclude that four stars, namely W61,
128, 151, and 240 (we precede star numbers taken from Wallenquist
(1929) with "W''), may be classified as new Be stars. A
star was selected as a new Be star if: (i) the difference between
the observed
and the value taken for a star of the same
magnitude showing no emission (continuous line in Fig. 4)
was negative and its absolute value was larger than 4
,
where
is the rms error of
,
and (ii) the star
was not selected as a non-member.
![]() |
Figure 4:
The ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Figure 5:
The ![]() ![]() |
All four new Be stars are among the faintest Be stars in NGC663,
implying that the previous Be star surveys were rather complete for
the brightest cluster stars. It can be also seen in Fig. 4
that Be stars with strong and intermediate H
emission occur in
the whole range of the B spectral type. Most of them, however, occupy
the range between B0 and B3. Maeder et al. (1999) compared
the fractions of Be stars in clusters of an age comparable to that of
NGC663. In the widest interval considered by these authors,
-5 <
MV < -1.4 mag, they found that NGC663 contained 34
11% of Be stars. The above-given interval of MV corresponds
to
mag. There are 59 stars we observed in
this interval of
,
including 18 Be stars. This gives the
revised fraction of Be stars in NGC663 equal to
%, with
the error calculated assuming Poisson statistics.
![]() |
Figure 6:
The ![]() |
Among stars fainter than
mag, we find 7 Be stars,
including all four discovered in our search. Comparing this number
with the number of all B-type stars later than B3 (101), we obtain the
fraction of
%.
For 13 Be stars, simultaneous (in the sense that a narrow Hframe was sandwiched between two wide H
ones) H
photometry was made in one epoch only. For the remaining 13 Be stars,
such observations were made on two different epochs allowing detection
of possible changes in the emission strength. The largest change of
we detected was 0.045 mag for Sanduleak 3 and two epochs
separated by about 550 days. The epochs of H
observations and
corresponding
values are given in Table 3, available in
electronic form only.
The
indices given in Table 1 were calculated using all frames,
including some additional wide H
frames made on epochs other
than those given in Table 3. For this reason the
indices
given in Table 1 (average values) are not exactly the same as those
presented in Table 3 (epoch photometry).
Copyright ESO 2001