A&A 374, 443-453 (2001)
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20010739
J. U. Fynbo 1 - P. Møller 1 - B. Thomsen 2
1 -
European Southern Observatory,
Karl-Schwarzschild-Straße 2,
85748 Garching, Germany
2 -
Institute of Physics and Astronomy,
Århus University, 8000 Århus C., Denmark
Received 15 March 2001 / Accepted 21 May 2001
Abstract
We present spectroscopic observations obtained with the ESO
Very Large Telecope (VLT) of seven candidate Ly
emitting
galaxies in the field of the radio quiet Q1205-30 at z=3.04
previously detected with deep narrow
band imaging. Based on equivalent widths and limits on line
ratios we confirm that all seven objects are Ly
emitting
galaxies.
Deep images also obtained with the VLT in the B and I bands
show that five of the seven galaxies have very faint continuum fluxes
(
and
).
The star formation rates of these seven galaxies estimated from the
rest-frame UV continuum around 2000 Å, as probed by the I-band
detections, as well as from the Lyluminosities, are 1-4
yr-1 assuming a
Hubble constant of 65 km s-1 Mpc-1,
,
and
.
This is 1-3 orders of magnitude lower
than for other known populations of star-forming galaxies at similar
redshifts (the Lyman-Break galaxies and the sub-mm selected sources).
The inferred density of the objects is high,
per arcmin2 per unit redshift. This is consistent with
the integrated luminosity function for Lyman-Break galaxies
down to R=27 if the fraction of Ly
emitting galaxies
is 70% at the faint end of the luminosity function. However,
if this fraction is 20% as reported for
the bright end of the luminosity function then the space density
in this field is significantly larger (by a factor of 3.5) than
expected from the luminosity function for Lyman-Break galaxies in
the HDF-North. This would be an indication that at least some
radio quiet QSOs at high redshift reside in overdense environments
or that the faint end slope of the high redshift
luminosity function has been underestimated.
We find evidence that the faint Ly
galaxies
are essentially dust-free.
These observations show that Ly
emission is an efficient
method by which to probe the faint end of the luminosity function
at high redshifts.
Key words: galaxies: formation - quasars: absorption lines - quasars: individual: Q1205-30
Several studies have shown that Ly narrow-band imaging is an alternative technique to identify high redshift galaxies (Møller & Warren 1993; Francis et al. 1995; Pascarelle et al. 1996; Pascarelle et al. 1998; Cowie & Hu 1998; Hu et al. 1998; Fynbo et al. 1999, 2000; Kudritzki et al. 2000; Kurk et al. 2000; Pentericci et al. 2000; Steidel et al. 2000; Roche et al. 2000; Rhoads et al. 2000). So far it has not been considered efficient enough to seriously compete with the LBG technique, but it does have the advantage that spectroscopic confirmation is not limited by the broad band flux. Most recently the current success in identification of Gamma-Ray Bursts at high redshifts, has provided a completely independent selection technique for the host galaxies of Gamma-Ray Bursts (e.g. Odewahn et al. 1998; Bloom et al. 1999; Holland & Hjorth 1999; Vreeswijk et al. 2000; Smette et al. 2001; Jensen et al. 2001; Fynbo et al. 2001).
From the point of view of observations, what is still missing is an understanding of the connection between high redshift galaxies selected in different ways. Fontana et al. (2000) find that photometric redshifts including IR colours select nearly a factor of 2 more high redshift galaxy candidates in the Hubble Deep Fields (HDFs) than pure LBG photometric selection does, to the same flux limits. However, this discrepancy cannot be resolved spectroscopically. While LBGs are selected by continuum flux, DLAs are selected by gas cross-section. Under the assumption of a scaling relation between the gas disc size and the luminosity for high redshift galaxies, and by normalising this relation using the few observed impact parameters for DLAs, DLAs are predicted to be much fainter than the SLBG limit (Fynbo et al. 1999; Haehnelt et al. 2000; see also Ellison et al. 2001). Members of the population of galaxies producing DLAs are obviously not only found close to QSO lines of sight so we expect an abundant population of galaxies below the current spectroscopic limit for LBGs.
From a theoretical point of view, the properties of this faint end of the high redshift LF is important in order to constrain the importance of stellar feedback processes (e.g. Efstathiou 2000; Thacker & Couchman 2000; Poli et al. 2001) and the fraction of the background of hydrogen ionising photons produced by high mass stars at high redshift (Steidel et al. 2001; Haehnelt et al. 2001).
To probe the faint end of the LF at high redshifts we need methods to search for emission from high redshift galaxies fainter than . Here several methods are possible: i) Using the Lyman break technique and photometric redshifts, LFs for z=3 galaxies has been presented by Adelberger & Steidel (2000) and by Poli et al. (2001) down to R=27. The faint end (R>25.5) of these LFs are uncertain due to the lack of spectroscopic confirmation, ii) Ly narrow-band imaging. iii) Imaging of DLAs at very faint continuum levels with the Hubble Space Telescope (Møller & Warren 1998; Kulkarni et al. 2000, 2001; Ellison et al. 2001; Warren et al. 2001; Møller et al. 2001 in prep.), and iv) deep searches for the host galaxies of well-localized (to within a fraction of an arcsec using the positions of optical transients) Gamma-Ray Bursts. In this paper we focus on Ly emission as a method by which to study the faint end of the LF at z=3.
In Fynbo et al. (2000, Paper I) we reported on six faint candidate Ly Emitting Galaxies detected in a very deep narrow band image of the z=3.036 radio quiet QSO Q1205-30 obtained with the NTT. Here we present photometric and spectroscopic follow-up observations of these 6 candidates (called S7-S12, detected at better than 5) plus 2 marginal candidates (S13 and S14, detected at the 4 level). This paper is concerned mostly with the details of the observations, data reduction and the results concerning the physical properties of the Ly galaxies. In a separate Letter we discussed the spatial distribution of the confirmed Ly galaxies and how it related to current models of structure formation in the early universe (Møller & Fynbo 2001). In that paper we concluded that the Ly emitting objects are proto-galatic sub-units in the process of assembly, and for that reason chose to refer to them as "Ly Emitting Galaxy-building Objects'' (LEGOs). Here, for consistency, we shall adopt the same acronym. The rest of the paper is organized as follows: In Sect. 2 we describe the observations and the data reduction, in Sect. 3 we present our results, in Sect. 4 we discuss our results in terms of star-formation rates and luminosity function compared to that of the LBGs and in Sect. 5 we summarise our conclusions. Throughout this paper we adopt a Hubble constant of 65 km s-1Mpc-1 and assume and .
We chose grism G600B to cover the region of Ly at z=3.036and grism G600R to look for other emission lines at longer wavelengths. Even though we did not expect to see any lines in the red spectra, it is imperative that they are deep enough that we can rule out the alternative interpretation that our objects are O II emitters rather than Ly emitters. G600B has a wavelength coverage from 3600 Å to 6000 Å (depending somewhat on the position on the CCD) and a spectral resolution of 815 whereas G600R covers the range 5200 Å-7400 Å at a spectral resolution of 1230.
We constructed three independent masks. In addition to covering all eight candidate LEGOs, several of them in more than one mask, this also allowed us to obtain spectra of objects close to the quasar line of sight. For the mask construction we used the FORS Instrumental Mask Simulator (FIMS). We hereafter refer to the three G600B masks as maskB1, maskB2 and maskB3, and to the three G600R masks as maskR1, maskR2 and maskR3.
date | setup | seeing | Exposure time |
arcsec | (sec) | ||
Imaging: | |||
2000 Jan. 12, 17 | Bessel B | 0.68-1.02 | 5200 |
2000 Mar. 5 | Bessel I | 0.55-0.75 | 3750 |
Spectroscopy: | |||
2000 Mar. 5 | MOS, maskB1 | 0.78-0.96 | 7200 |
2000 Mar. 4 | MOS, maskB2 | 0.78-1.18 | 7200 |
2000 Mar. 4 | MOS, maskB3 | 0.61-0.66 | 7200 |
2000 Mar. 4 | MOS, maskR1 | 0.77-0.93 | 5400 |
2000 Mar. 5 | MOS, maskR2 | 0.57, 0.78 | 3600 |
2000 Mar. 5 | MOS, maskR3 | 0.59-0.95 | 5400 |
Source | wavelength | redshift | fwhm | velocity width | B mag | I mag | flux(slit) | flux(aper) | |
(Å) | (Å) | km s-1 | erg s-1 cm-2 | erg s-1 cm-2 | (Å) | ||||
S7 | 4911.6 | 3.0402 | 7.4 | <350 | >61 | ||||
S8 | 4911.1 | 3.0398 | 6.5 | <240 | 27.3b | 26.8b | 456b | ||
S9 | 4905.2 | 3.0350 | 7.2 | <340 | >164 | ||||
S10 | 4905.6 | 3.0353 | 7.2 | <240 | 27.3b | 26.8b | 456b | ||
S11 | 4900.6 | 3.0312 | 7.2 | <440 | 27.3b | 26.8b | 456b | ||
S12 | 4903.2 | 3.0333 | 8.2 | <520 | 27.3b | 26.8b | 456b | ||
S13 | 4890.4 | 3.0228 | 7.3 | <450 | 27.3b | 26.8b | 456b |
The spectroscopic frames were first BIAS subtracted. The flat-fielding was thereafter done in the following way. First we median filtered the flat-fields along the dispersion direction (x-axis) using a 301 boxcar filter for the G600B flat-frames and a 601 boxcar filter for the G600R flat-frames. Then we normalised the flat-frames by dividing the unfiltered flat-frames with the filtered flat-frames. Finally, we divided the science frames with these normalised flat-frames. The individual BIAS subtracted and flat-fielded science spectra were subsequently sky-subtracted in the following way. First we removed cosmic ray hits from the sky-region of the 2-dimensional spectrum by -clipping along each spatial direction column. We determined a 2-dimensional sky-frame using the background task in the kpnoslit package in IRAF. This sky-frame was then subtracted from the original BIAS subtracted and flat-fielded 2-dimensional science spectrum. The individual reduced and sky-subtracted science spectra were then combined using -clipping for rejection of cosmic ray hits.
1-dimensional spectra were extracted using the apall task. For objects without or with very faint continuum we used bright objects from neighbour slitlets to determine the trace of the spectra.
The 1-dimensional spectra were wavelength calibrated
using the dispcor task. The rms of the deviations
from the fits to 3. order chebychev polynomia were 0.3-0.5 Å
for the G600B spectra and 0.05-0.1 Å for the G600R
spectra. The high rms values for the wavelength calibration
of the G600B spectra is due to the binning of CCD for the
G600B spectra which imply fewer pixels per resolution element.
Figure 1: The spectral regions around the Ly emission lines for the LEGOs S7-S13. For S8, S9, and S13 we show the spectra from several masks. As seen, the presence of emission lines is confirmed for all 7 candidates. For S14 (not shown) we did not detect an emission-line within the range of the narrow filter. | |
Open with DEXTER |
In Fig. 1 we show extractions of the blue grism spectra of all the candidates for which we confirm the presence of an emission line within the transmission curve of the narrow filter. Only for S7 and S9 did we detect a faint continuum in the spectra.
With variable seeing and 1.2 arcsec slits it was not possible to obtain a spectrophotometric calibration. Nevertheless we obtained a rough calibration as follows. For each mask we had placed several slits on stars for which we had accurate B and I magnitudes. For the G600B masks we selected a star with a flat spectrum in B, and used that as a local standard for the flux calibration of emission lines. The calibration was done for each mask individually, and the results were combined afterwards for those objects that were observed more than once. The scatter for the objects observed more than once was about two-three times larger than the observational errors, confirming that this calibration is dominated by slit-losses as we expected. The resulting line fluxes are given in Table 2 (flux(slit)).
The flux calibration described above is only valid if all the emission line objects are point sources. For extended objects the slit-losses will be larger than for the standard star, and an additional aperture correction must be applied. Comparing to the imaging line fluxes found with a circular aperture of diameter 3.5 arcsec (Paper I), we find a mean aperture correction of 0.46 mag. Line fluxes including this mean aperture correction are also given in Table 2 (flux(aper)).
Figure 2: Shown here are parts of the G600R spectra were H and O III lines would have been if the emission line detected with the narrow-band imaging (Paper I) were due to O II at z=0.31. S7 is at the bottom and S13 at the top. The spectra have been smoothed with a seven pixel (7.4 Å) box car filter. For S8, S9 and S13 the spectra are the average of 2, 3, and 2 spectra respectively. | |
Open with DEXTER |
For none of the confirmed emission-line objects S7-S13 did we detect any other emission line, neither in the G600B nor in the G600R spectra. In Fig. 2 we show the regions of the G600R spectra where the Hand O III lines would have fallen if the emission lines seen in Fig. 1 had been O II at z=0.313 (S7 at the bottom and S13 at the top). The spectra have been smoothed by a 7 pixel (7.4 Å) boxcar filter and regions with large errors due to strong sky-lines were set to zero. As seen, H and O III lines are not present in any of the spectra. The question of possible alternatives to the Lyidentification is an important one, and we shall return to a complete discussion in Sect. 4.1. For now we shall assume that the lines are indeed due to Ly.
The wavelengths and widths of the emission lines were determined by fitting them with Gaussian profiles. The uncertainty in the determination of the wavelength centroid is about 0.3 Å. The results are given in Table 2 where we also list the resulting redshifts under the assumption that the lines are due to Ly.
In order to constrain the intrinsic width of the lines we must know the spectroscopic resolution. An upper limit to the fwhm of the resolution profile along the dispersion direction can be obtained from the width of the slitlets and the dispersion. With a slit width of 1.2 arcsec (3 pixels) and dispersion of 2.4 Å per pixel the resolution would have been about 7.2 Å if the seeing had been worse than 1.2 arcsec. However, as the seeing was in all cases significantly better than 1.2 arcsec the spectroscopic resolution is smaller than 7.2 Å fwhm. An upper limit to the spectroscopic resolution can be derived from the spatial profile of the spectra of point sources at wavelengths near 4900 Å. Converted to Å the spatial widths are 5.9 Å, 5.7 Å and 4.8 Å for maskB1, maskB2 and maskB3 respectively. As the instrumental resolution for FORS is slightly lower along the dispersion direction than along the spatial direction (T. Szeifert, private communication) these values can be used as lower limits on the spectroscopic resolution. From this lower limit we can obtain upper limits to the intrinsic widths of the lines by deriving the intrinsic widths that convolved with a Gaussian with a width corresponding to the lower limit on the spectroscopic resolution reproduces the observed line widths. These upper limits are also given in Table 2. The line widths are smaller than 6 Å or 370 km s-1 for Ly at z=3.04.
Figure 3: Contour plots of the combined NTT narrow-band (top), VLT B-band (middle) and VLT I-band (bottom) images for each of the six candidate emission line galaxies S7-S12 detected with S/N>5 in the NTT narrow-band image (Paper I). The size of the individual fields is arcsec2 and the fields are orientated with east to the left and north up. The contour levels are logarithmic. | |
Open with DEXTER |
Figure 3 and the two left panels in Fig. 4 show regions of size 1212 arcsec2 centred on each of the objects S7-S12 and S13-S14 from the combined NTT narrow-band image (top row), VLT B-band image (middle row) and VLT I-band image (bottom row). Only two of the objects, S7 and S9, are detected above our 2 detection limits of and (detection limits for 1 arcsec2 circular apertures). Those two galaxies were already detected in the deep NTT images presented in Paper I. For S9 both the B-band and I-band emission is centred arcsec south of the narrow-band position. In the broad band images of S7 we see two nearby objects. The center of the Ly emission is found arcsec east of the easternmost of the two, which we identify as the likely host of the Ly emission. We cannot be certain that the nearby western object is unrelated, hence the aperture magnitudes for S7 given in Table 2 includes both of the objects. The not-confirmed () candidate S14 is clearly detected in both the B and I bands. The B magnitude is bright enough to confirm that the apparent narrow-band excess in the old data set was not significant.
For the five remaining objects we detect no broad band flux above 2. In order to constrain the limit on the broad band emission further we registered the sub-images of the objects S8, S10-S13 to the centroids of their Ly emission and coadded them. In the right panel of Fig. 4 we show the median of the coadded images. We now detect a faint object in both the I-band and the B-band. To be able to compare the fluxes we apply aperture corrections determined from a bright point source and arrive at and for the 3.5 arcsec diameter circular aperture.
If this flux was due mainly to one or two of the objects, they would have been visible on the individual images. Hence, we conclude that the flux must be fairly evenly distributed on most or all of the five objects, and that they each must have roughly the magnitudes measured in the combined images. It is interesting to note that unlike S7 and S9, the continuum emission in the coadded frames is centered on the same position as the Ly emission. This suggests that the relatively bright continuum object identified as S9 and the two-component object identified as S7 are, at least partly, due to a chance alignment of unrelated objects. Hence, the broad-band magnitudes given for S7 and S9 should probably be regarded as upper limits on their brightness.
Møller & Warren (1998) reported that on HST images of three Ly emitting objects related to the DLA at z=2.81 in front of PKS0528-250, there was evidence that the Ly emission was significantly more extended than the continuum sources. We measured the FWHM of the Ly emission of S9 and of the stacked Lyobject, and found an intrinsic size (after correcting for the seeing) of 0.98 and 0.65 arcsec (FWHM). This supports the result reported by Møller & Warren (1998).
Figure 4: Two left panels: Contour plots of the combined NTT narrow-band (top), VLT B-band (middle) and VLT I-band (bottom) images for the two candidate emission line galaxies S13 and S14 detected with S/N<5 in the NTT narrow-band image. The size of the individual fields is 1212 arcsec2 (as in Fig. 3) Right panel: Same as Fig. 3 and the two left panels, but for the median image of S8, S10-S13 and with different contour levels. Broad band emission is detected in the median images at the exact position of the stacked narrow-band object. | |
Open with DEXTER |
We now return in more detail to the identification of the detected emission lines. For a discussion of ways to discriminate between Ly and lower redshift objects for single emission lines around 8000-9000 Å, corresponding to very high redshifts ( ) for Ly, see Stern et al. (2000). Here we discuss possible contaminants for z=3 Ly emitters.
Mg II and Ne III can both be excluded easily since in this case we would have detected the stronger O II line. In the following we will discuss how to reject the possibility that the observed line is due to O II. There are two independent ways to check the likelyhood of the identification as Ly rather than O II. One is by its equivalent width, the other by upper limits on line flux ratios. We shall here apply both tests, and as reference point for the low redshift identification we have chosen the large sample of emission line galaxies from the survey of Terlevich et al. (1991).
The continuum of low redshift O II galaxies is, in contrast to that of the Ly selected galaxies at high redshift, for the most part easily detected. In the sample of Terlevich et al. (1991) we find a median O II rest equivalent width of 59 Å, and the 95% quantile is 163 Å. In Table 2 we list the observed equivalent widths ( ) of our lines. As discussed above, the broad-band aperture magnitudes of the two objects S7 and S9 probably include flux unrelated to the emission line objects, and hence the calculated equivalent widths are lower limits. For the remaining objects it was necessary to coadd the images before we were able to measure their broad-band flux. For consistency we list the equivalent width measured on the stacked images.
For an O II galaxy at z=0.31 we would expect a median
equivalent width of 77 Å and none of seven objects should be above the
95% quantile of 214 Å. This is incompatible with the observed
distribution.
Figure 5: a) Middle panel shows the stacked G600B (left) and G600R (right) spectrum of S7-S13. Lower panel shows, for comparison, the spectrum of a z=0.224 emission line galaxy redshifted to z=0.313 so that the O II line falls at the wavelength of the observed emission line of S7-S13. The stacked spectrum of S7-S13 has none of the lines expected if S7-S13 had been foreground emission line galaxies. Upper panel shows the spectrum of Q1205-30 to indicate the position of the C IV emission expected for AGNs. A C IV emission line is not detected. b) The box to the lower left of each of the figures (b1,2,3,4) marks the 2 limits for the flux ratios , , and under the assumption that S7-S13 are z=0.313 galaxies with O II in the narrow filter. The observed flux ratios from the sample of Terlevich et al. (1991) are plotted ('s) under two assumptions used for the conversion of equivalent widths to fluxes ("mean'' for b1 and b2, and "worst case'' for b3 and b4 respectively, see text for details). Under both assumptions the 2 limits firmly exclude the z=0.313 hypothetis. | |
Open with DEXTER |
In order to compare the intensity ratios, we first had to determine the upper limit for the non-detection of lines in the predicted region for O III and H. For the flux calibration of the G600R spectra we used the exact same method as described in Sect. 3.1.1 for G600B. To maximixe the S/N for the non-detection of H and O III emission lines, we stacked all the spectra. In Fig. 5a we show the stacked spectrum (middle panel), and we have marked the expected positions of various emission lines. We find 2 upper limits to the log of flux ratios as follows: log( , log( , and log( . Above the stacked spectrum we plot the spectrum of the quasar in order to show the positions of the Ly and C IV emission lines. No C IV line is detected in the stacked spectrum. The flux ratio (log( ) excludes a significant AGN contribution to the Ly emission. Below the stacked spectrum we show for comparison the spectrum of an O II galaxy observed by chance during the same run in one of the slits we placed on random objects in order to fill the masks. This galaxy was observed at a redshift of z(O II)=0.224, but we have shifted it to z=0.313 for easy comparison.
In Terlevich et al. (1991) we only found data for the equivalent widths of their emission line sample. In order to convert those to intensity ratios of two lines, we need first to determine the ratio of the local continuum flux under those two lines. In all the published spectra of the Terlevich sample we therefore measured the ratio of the continuum flux at 3727-3870 Å (OII and NeIII) and at 5007 Å (OIII). We then determined the mean of this ratio and the maximum of the ratio (which is the worst case), and used both of them to convert the equivalent width ratios to flux ratios. The results are plotted in Fig. 5b. In Figs. 5b1, b2 we plot line flux ratios calculated from the mean continuum slope. The box and arrows in the lower left corner marks the 2 upper limits of our non-detections. In Figs. 5b3, b4 we repeat the same plots, but here we have used the "worst case'' continuum for the conversion to flux ratios. Even in this case our 2 upper limits have no overlap with the O II galaxy distribution.
In summary of this section we have applied two independent methods (equivalent widths and line flux ratios) to test how well our sample of emission line objects would fit if interpreted as low redshift O II galaxies. Both tests reject the interpretation, and we conclude that all seven objects presented here are Ly emitters at .
In Paper I we calculated star-formation rates (SFR) based on the Ly fluxes. Here, for comparison, we calculate the SFRs from the continuum fluxes. As detailed in Sect. 3.2 we have reasons to believe that the continuum of S7 and S9 may be boosted by neighbour objects, therefore we perform the calculation for the remaining five objects only.
The restframe UV continuum in the range 1500 Å-2800 Å can be used as a SFR estimator if one assumes that the star-formation is
continuous over a time scale of more than 108 years. Kennicutt (1998)
provides the relation
= = |
Survey | z,z | Area | 5 limit | N | field | Confirmed | Ref. | |
' | 10-17 erg s-1 cm-2 | #/ ' | ||||||
PKS0528-250 | 2.81, 0.019 | 27 | 3.7 | 3 | QSO, DLA | all | (1,2) | |
HDF N | 3.43, 0.063 | 29 | 3.0 | 5 | blank | all, 2 AGN | (3,4) | |
SSA 22 | 3.43, 0.063 | 30 | 1.5 | 7 | blank | all | (3,4) | |
BR0019-152 | 3.43, 0.063 | 16 | - | 7 | blank | 3/7 | (3,4) | |
Virgo | 3.15, 0.043 | 50 | 2.0 | 9 | blank | all | (5) | |
SSA 22a | 3.09, 0.066 | 78 | 3.0a | 72 | LBG spike | 12/72 | (6) | |
Q1205-30 | 3.04, 0.016 | 28 | 1.1 | 7 | QSO | all | (7) |
From the Ly fluxes we found SFRs for the same objects in the range 0.3-0.5 h-2 yr-1 for a cosmology. Converting to the cosmology used in this paper this corresponds to 1.6-2.6 yr-1, which is identical to what we now find from the I-band flux. This result is inconsistent with the presence of large amounts of dust in those objects, which is not too surprising as one would expect that a targeted search for Ly emitters would preferentially find objects with very little or no dust. This does however imply that a large number of small star-forming objects at high redshift have essentially no dust in them.
The density of Ly emitters derived from the seven confirmed objects is per arcmin2 per unit redshift (seven objects within the 27.6 arcmin2 field of view of the EMMI instrument of NTT and within the range of the narrow filter). In Table 3 we compare this to the results from other recent searches for LEGOs at . It is seen from Table 3 that our survey found a larger space density than any other survey, but also that we reach the faintest detection limit of them all. The known LBG overdensity studied by Steidel et al. (2000) has a similar space density, but to a three times brighter flux limit. Down to their flux limit we would only have detected two of our seven sources. It is hence not clear from this if the volume around Q1205-30 is overdense in LEGOs, or if we simply see the effect of observing to a lower limiting flux. To be able to address this question, we need to compare our results to the extrapolation of the LBG LF.
Adelberger & Steidel (2000) present a LF for LBG selected galaxies which is based on the HDF-North for the faint (25<R<27) and ground based LBG surveys for the bright (R<25.5) end. Integrating this LF down to R=27 leads to a predicted density of objects of 0.017 Mpc-3h3. The comoving volume probed by our survey is Mpc3h-3. Based on the LF of LBGs we therefore expect ten galaxies in the volume and we find seven. However, only 20% of the Lyman-Break galaxies show Ly in emission (Steidel et al. 2000). This may be an underestimate if Ly and continuum emission in general have different spatial distributions due to different slit-losses.
With the Lyman-Break technique the only way to probe the part of the LF is to use the Hubble Deep Fields. This makes it impossible at present to study the faint end LF of any significant volume with this technique, and it is therefore very uncertain. Indeed, significant differences in the numbers of high redshift objects in the HDF North and South fields based on photometric redshifts have been reported (Fontana et al. 2000). The faint end of the LF is, however, important to study because a significant fraction of the star-formation, and therefore also the background ionising photons, may originate there. Based on the LF of Adelberger & Steidel (2000) there are roughly equal amounts of total luminosity from galaxies with R<25.5, 25.5<R<27 and 27<R<30. Hence, even if this LF is correct, only about one third of the total star formation at z=3 is traced by the LBGs studied in the ground based samples. In case the faint end LF needs to be revised upwards it will be even less.
Assuming for now that the 20% Ly fraction can be extrapolated to the faint end of the LF, we find that the volume we have surveyed has a comoving density of faint LBGs which is 3.5 times that predicted by the HDF-North LF. This could indicate that at least some radio quiet QSOs reside in overdense environments. Another likely interpretation is, however, that the faint end of the LF has a larger fraction of Lyemitters, in our case it must be of order 70% to fit the HDF-North LBG LF. A physical explanation could be that the objects in the faint end of the LBG LF are less dusty that the bright LBGs.
The Ly emitters were selected in a deep narrow-band search. It now remains to be tested if the objects span the entire width of the narrow-band filter, or if they cluster within a wavelength range smaller than the filter width. The width of the filter response was 23 Å, and the full width spanned by the seven objects is 21.2 Å. Monte Carlo simulations, where we randomly distributed seven objects weighted by the filter transmission curve and measured the resulting mean and std.dev., show that the seven redshifts of S7-S13 are consistent (to within 1) with being drawn from a random distribution. Therefore, the structure we have found is most likely larger than the redshift span we have covered with our filter.
We have reported on spectroscopic observations of eight candidate Ly emitting objects at . All six "certain'' () candidates were confirmed, and of the two "possible'' () candidates one was confirmed. To assess the most likely identification of the lines we performed two independent detailed tests based on a large sample of low redshift O II galaxies. Both tests indicate that the only likely identification is Ly. This conclusion is strengthened by the fact that the original narrow-band imaging was centered on a quasar at the same redshift. The seven Ly objects are hence likely associated with the same structure as the quasar.
The narrow-band images of the objects, as well as the large slit-losses of Ly emission we need to correct for when calibrating the line fluxes, indicate that the Ly emission originates in extended objects. This is similar to the results reported by Møller & Warren (1998) on Ly emission related to a DLA at z=2.81, where it was found that the Ly emission was significantly more extended than the continuum sources. As these authors point out, this could cause a severe underestimate of the Ly equivalent widths measured on spectra of high redshift galaxies obtained through a slit.
An analysis of the redshift distribution of the seven confirmed Ly objects shows that it is consistent with a random distribution in the redshift interval selected via the narrow-band filter.
Despite deep detection limits only S7 and S9 were detected directly in the combined B and I band images. For S8 and S10-S13 we registered the broad band images using the positions of the Ly sources and determined the median image of the five. This procedure allowed the detection of broad band emission at the level of and respectively. This means that S8 and S10-S13 belong to the faint end of the LF at z=3. The derived space density of LEGOs is consistent with the integrated LF of LBGs down to R=27. However, only about 20% of R<25.5 LBGs are Ly emitters (Steidel et al. 2000). Hence, either the fraction of Ly emitters at the faint end of the LF is significantly higher than 20% or the space density of galaxies in the field of Q1205-30 is higher than predicted by the LBG LF. The latter would indicate that at least some radio quiet QSOs at high redshift reside in overdense environments.
It has long been argued that Ly based searches for high redshift galaxies were doomed to failure, because even a small amount of dust would quench the Ly emission due to the resonant scattering of the Ly photons. For this reason it has been virtually impossible to obtain telescope time for Ly survey work. We note here in passing that the recent very successful Lysurvey by Kudritzki et al. (2000) was aimed at low redshift planetary nebulae, and the work that supplied our candidate list was aimed at the imaging of a quasar absorber. It is virtually certain that neither of those programmes had been granted telescope time if the aim had been to search for a sample of Ly emitters at z=3.
In this paper we find two strong arguments against the presence of significant amounts of dust in the objects in the faint end of the high redshift galaxy LF. Firstly we find very large equivalent widths, in the upper range of theoretical predictions. Secondly we find that when we calculate the star-formation rate from the continuum flux and from the Ly flux independently, we obtain identical results. Both of those observations are inconsistent with a dust-rich environment.
The faint continuum magnitudes detected for S8 and S10-S13 prove that Ly emission is a powerful method by which to probe the faint end of the galaxy LF at . The next step is now to obtain statisitically significant samples, containing several hundred Ly selected galaxies, in order to further constrain the properties of the faint end of the luminosity function.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful for excellent support during our service observations in January and during the observing run on Paranal in March. We thank the referee A. Fontana for several comments that clarified our manuscript on important points.