A&A 373, 796-804 (2001)
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20010531
J. U. Fynbo 1 - J. Gorosabel 2 - T. H. Dall 3,4 - J. Hjorth 5 - H. Pedersen 5 - M. I. Andersen 6 - P. Møller 1 -
S. Holland 11 - I. Smail 7 - N. Kobayashi 8 - E. Rol 9 - P. Vreeswijk 9 - I. Burud 10 - B. L. Jensen 5 - B. Thomsen 4 -
A. Henden 12 - F. Vrba 12 - B. Canzian 12 - J. M. Castro Cerón 13 - A. J. Castro-Tirado 14,15 - T. Cline 19 -
M. Goto 9 - J. Greiner 17 - M. T. Hanski 18 - K. Hurley 16 - N. Lund 2 - T. Pursimo 18 - R. Østensen 20 -
J. Solheim 20 - N. Tanvir 21 - H. Terada 22
1 -
European Southern Observatory
Karl-Schwarzschild-Straße 2, 85748 Garching,
Germany
2 -
Danish Space Research Institute,
Juliane Maries Vej 30, 2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark
3 -
Nordic Optical Telescope,
Apartado Postal 474, 38700 Santa Cruz de La Palma, Spain
4 -
Institute of Physics and Astronomy, University of Århus,
8000 Århus C, Denmark
5 -
Astronomical Observatory,
University of Copenhagen,
Juliane Maries Vej 30, 2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark
6 -
Division of Astronomy,
PO Box 3000, 90014 University of Oulu,
Finland
7 -
Department of Physics, University of Durham, South Road,
Durham DH1 3LE, UK
8 -
SUBARU Telescope, National Astronomical Observatory of Japan,
650 North A'ohoku Place Hilo,
Hawaii 96720, USA
9 -
University of Amsterdam,
Kruislaan 403, 1098 SJ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
10 -
Institut d'Astrophysique et de Géophysique, Université
de Liège, Avenue de Cointe 5, 4000 Liège, Belgium
11 -
Department of Physics, University of Notre Dame,
Notre Dame, IN 46556-5670, USA
12 -
Universities Space Research Association
U.S. Naval Observatory,
Flagstaff Station, Flagstaff, AZ 86002-1149, USA
13 -
Real Instituto y Observatorio de la Armada, Sección de
Astronomía, 11110 San Fernando-Naval, Cádiz, Spain
14 -
Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía (IAA-CSIC),
PO Box 03004, 18080 Granada, Spain
15 -
Laboratorio de Astrofísica Espacial y Física
Fundamental
(LAEFF-INTA), PO Box 50727, 28080, Madrid, Spain
16 -
University of California, Berkeley,
Space Sciences Laboratory,
Berkeley, CA 94720-7450, USA
17 -
Astrophysical Institute Potsdam,
An der Sternwarte 16, 14482 Potsdam, Germany
18 -
Tuorla Observatory, University of Turku, 21500 Piikkiö,
Finland
19 -
NASA Goddard Space Flight Center,
Code 661, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA
20 -
Department of Physics, University of Tromsø, Tromsø,
Norway
21 -
Department of Physical Sciences,
University of Hertfordshire, College Lane, Hatfield,
Herts AL10 9AB, UK
22 -
Department of Physics, Kyoto University, Kitashirakawa
Oiwake-cho, Sakyo, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan
Received 9 February 2001 / Accepted 6 April 2001
Abstract
We present the discovery of the Optical Transient (OT) of the
long-duration gamma-ray burst GRB 000926. The optical
transient was detected independently with the Nordic Optical
Telescope and at Calar Alto 22.2 hours after the burst. At this
time the magnitude of the transient was R = 19.36. The
transient faded with a decay slope of about 1.7 during the first two
days after which the slope increased abruptly (within a few hours)
to about 2.4. The light-curve started to
flatten off after about a week indicating the presence of an
underlying extended object. This object was detected in a deep image
obtained one month after the GRB at
and
consists of several compact knots within about
5 arcsec. One of the knots is spatially coincident with
the position of the OT and hence most likely belongs to the
host galaxy. Higher resolution imaging is needed to
resolve whether all the compact knots belong to the host
galaxy or to several independent objects. In a separate paper we
present a discussion of the optical spectrum of the OT, and its
inferred redshift (Møller et al., in prep.).
Key words: cosmology: observations - gamma rays: bursts
The discoveries of the first X-ray afterglow (Costa et al. 1997) and
OT (van Paradijs et al. 1997) of a gamma-ray burst
(GRB) have led to a major breakthrough in GRB research. The determination of
a redshift of 0.835 for GRB 970508 (Metzger et al. 1997), and
the subsequent determination of redshifts of more than a dozen bursts
with a median redshift of 1.1, have firmly established their
cosmological origin (e.g. Kulkarni et al. 2000; Castro-Tirado 2001 and
references therein).
One of the current goals is to use the OT properties (brightness, position
within the host galaxy, light-curve shape) as diagnostic tools to study
the environment of GRBs and to possibly shed some light on the nature
of GRB progenitors (e.g. Bloom et al. 2000).
Another very appealing aspect of GRB research is the use of GRBs
as cosmological probes. GRBs have been suggested as probes of the
very high redshift universe (Lamb & Reichart 2000; Andersen et al.
2000). An equally
interesting use of GRBs is as an independent way by which to select
galaxies at cosmological
distances. In some widely accepted scenarios GRBs are related to deaths
of very massive, short-lived stars and furthermore gamma-rays are
not obscured by dust. Hence a sample of GRB host galaxies
may be considered star-formation-selected independent of the
amount of extinction of the rest-frame UV and optical emission.
However, we do not know if GRBs (as a class) evolve with redshift and
furthermore
GRBs are of course gamma-ray flux selected. It is nevertheless
interesting to
compare GRB-selected galaxies with other samples of galaxies
selected e.g. by rest-frame UV flux (Steidel et al. 1996), Damped Ly-
Absorption (DLAs, e.g. Wolfe et al. 1995; Djorgovski et al. 1996; Møller
& Warren 1993, 1998; Ellison et al. 2001), Ly-
emission (Hu et al.
1999; Fynbo et al.
2000a; Kudritzki et al. 2000; Steidel et al. 2000) or sub-mm emission
(e.g. Ivison et al. 2000). There is currently some
controversy as to whether most of the star-formation at high redshift
takes place
in the UV-selected or in the sub-mm selected objects (e.g. Smail et al.
1997; Hughes et al. 1998; Peacock et al. 2000; Adelberger & Steidel 2000;
van der Werf et al. 2000). DLAs trace a very abundant population of
(proto)galaxies at high redshift that could also contribute significantly to
the star-formation density (Fynbo et al. 1999, 2000a). A well understood
sample of GRB host galaxies may resolve where most of the stars are formed
as a function of redshift.
In this paper we present the detection of the OT and host galaxy of GRB 000926 and the results of multi-colour optical and near infrared (IR) photometry. We then compare the properties of GRB 000926 and its host galaxy with those of GRB 000301C, which occurred at nearly the same redshift, with emphasis on the (very different) properties of their host galaxies.
Throughout this paper, we adopt a Hubble constant of H0=65 kms-1 Mpc-1 and assume
and
.
GRB 000926 was detected by three instruments in the Interplanetary
Network (IPN: Ulysses, Konus-WIND, and NEAR), and localized to a
35 arcmin2 error box which was circulated via the GRB Coordinates
Network (GCN)
20.3 hours after the
burst (Hurley 2000). The Earth-crossing time for the burst was
September 26.9927 UT. As observed by Ulysses, it had a duration of
approximately 25 s (placing it in the "long duration'' burst
category), a revised 25-100 keV fluence of
erg cm-2,
and a revised peak flux over 0.25 s of
erg cm-2 s.
The error-box of GRB 000926 (Hurley 2000)
was observed in the R-band with the 2.56-m Nordic Optical Telescope
(NOT) and the Calar Alto (CA) 2.2-m telescope on 2000 September 27.85 UT (20.64 hours after the burst). Comparing with red
Palomar Optical Sky Survey II exposures an OT was found in the
error box (Gorosabel et al.
2000; Dall et al. 2000). Spectra were obtained at the NOT on
both September 27 and September 28; these spectra revealed a strong
metal absorption system at a redshift of
,
which in
all likelihood is due to gas in the GRB host
galaxy (Møller et al., in prep). The OT was observed during
the following weeks at the NOT, CA and also with the Isaac Newton
Telescope (INT), the 1.0 m telescope at the US Naval Observatory at
Flagstaff Station (USNOFS), and in the IR with the 8.2-m Subaru telescope
and the 3.8-m United Kingdom Infrared Telescope (UKIRT).
The logs of optical and IR observations are given
in Tables 2 and 5. A finding-chart and
R-band images of the
OT at three different epochs are shown in Fig. 1.
![]() |
Figure 1: Left panel: An R-band finding-chart for GRB 000926 centred on the position of the OT (marked with an arrow). Also marked are the four secondary calibration stars A-D used to transform the relative PSF-photometry onto the standard system. The photometric properties of the stars are given in Table 1. Right panels: Three smaller R-band images centred on the OT at three different epochs showing the decline of the OT. |
Open with DEXTER |
star/filter | U | B | V | R | I |
A |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
B |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
C |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
D | - |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
UT | Obs. | mag | Seeing | Exposure time |
(arcsec) | (sec) | |||
U-banda | ||||
Sep. 27.9484 | NOT |
![]() |
1.35 | 1000 |
Sep. 28.8291 | NOT |
![]() |
1.29 | 450 |
Sep. 29.8493 | NOT |
![]() |
1.16 | 900 |
B-banda | ||||
Sep. 27.8881 | NOT |
![]() |
1.00 | 100 |
Sep. 27.9673 | CA |
![]() |
2.42 | 1200 |
Sep. 27.9894 | CA |
![]() |
2.41 | 1200 |
Sep. 28.0057 | CA |
![]() |
2.59 | 1200 |
Sep. 29.8346 | NOT |
![]() |
1.19 | 500 |
Sep. 29.8688 | NOT |
![]() |
1.20 | 600 |
Sep. 30.8688 | NOT |
![]() |
1.20 | 1200 |
V-banda,b | ||||
Sep. 27.906 | INT |
![]() |
1.0 | 300 |
Sep. 27.910 | INT |
![]() |
1.0 | 300 |
Sep. 27.915 | INT |
![]() |
1.0 | 300 |
Sep. 27.9237 | CA |
![]() |
2.22 | 900 |
Sep. 29.9557 | NOT |
![]() |
1.29 | 600 |
Sep. 30.839 | INT |
![]() |
1.0 | 600 |
R-banda,b | ||||
Sep. 27.8547 | NOT |
![]() |
0.83 | 300 |
Sep. 27.8594 | NOT |
![]() |
0.84 | 300 |
Sep. 27.8639 | NOT |
![]() |
0.86 | 300 |
Sep. 27.8651 | CA |
![]() |
1.44 | 900 |
Sep. 27.8684 | NOT |
![]() |
0.82 | 300 |
Sep. 27.8729 | NOT |
![]() |
0.87 | 300 |
Sep. 27.8774 | NOT |
![]() |
0.90 | 300 |
Sep. 27.8820 | NOT |
![]() |
0.91 | 300 |
Sep. 27.892 | INT |
![]() |
1.0 | 300 |
Sep. 27.896 | INT |
![]() |
1.0 | 300 |
Sep. 27.901 | INT |
![]() |
1.0 | 300 |
Sep. 27.9109 | CA |
![]() |
2.01 | 900 |
Sep. 27.9658 | NOT |
![]() |
1.06 | 300 |
Sep. 27.9705 | NOT |
![]() |
1.09 | 300 |
Sep. 27.9750 | NOT |
![]() |
1.01 | 300 |
Sep. 27.9795 | NOT |
![]() |
1.02 | 300 |
Sep. 27.9840 | NOT |
![]() |
1.00 | 300 |
Sep. 28.097 | USNOFS |
![]() |
2.0 | 3![]() |
Sep. 28.8356 | NOT |
![]() |
1.06 | 300 |
Sep. 28.8911 | NOT |
![]() |
1.05 | 500 |
Sep. 28.9595 | NOT |
![]() |
1.19 | 600 |
Sep. 29.110 | USNOFS |
![]() |
1.8 | 3![]() |
Sep. 29.138 | USNOFS |
![]() |
1.9 | 4![]() |
Sep. 29.170 | USNOFS |
![]() |
2.0 | 4![]() |
Sep. 29.8414 | NOT |
![]() |
0.86 | 600 |
Sep. 29.9478 | NOT |
![]() |
1.17 | 600 |
Sep. 30.83 | NOT |
![]() |
0.90 | 2400 |
Oct. 2.84 | NOT |
![]() |
1.14 | 1500 |
Oct. 6.85 | NOT | - | 1.29 | 2700 |
Oct. 27.84 | NOT | - | 1.10 | 4700 |
Nov. 3.84 | NOT | - | 1.26 | 2400 |
Nov. 4.84 | NOT | - | 1.12 | 3600 |
I-banda,b | ||||
Sep. 27.919 | INT |
![]() |
1.0 | 300 |
Sep. 27.924 | INT |
![]() |
1.0 | 300 |
Sep. 27.929 | INT |
![]() |
1.0 | 300 |
Sep. 27.9370 | CA |
![]() |
2.22 | 900 |
Sep. 27.9433 | NOT |
![]() |
0.72 | 600 |
Sep. 27.9510 | CA |
![]() |
2.16 | 900 |
Sep. 29.8608 | NOT |
![]() |
0.79 | 600 |
Sep. 30.839 | INT |
![]() |
1.0 | 600 |
Radio and X-ray afterglow measurements have been reported by Frail et al. (2000) and by Piro et al. (2000). Optical afterglow measurements have also been reported by Price et al. (2001). This paper includes preliminary reduced NOT and CA observations from Hjorth et al. (2000), Fynbo et al. (2000b) and Gorosabel et al. (2000) for which the finally reduced data appear in this paper.
We first fitted a broken power-law
The
per degree of freedom is smallest for the broken power-law fit.
The data favor a very large value of n as the
is monotonically
decreasing as n is increased even for n > 100. The 2
lower limit
on n is 7 in the sense that the difference between
for a fit with
n = 7 and the broken power-law is 2. This indicates that the break in the
light-curve is very abrupt (within a few hours).
In conclusion, the data
are best fit by a sharp break around
days after the burst.
In Fig. 2 we show the R-band
light-curve of the OT together with the three fits and the residuals
around the fits.
![]() |
Figure 2: The R-band light-curve of the OT. The upper panel show the R-band measurements together with the three light-curve fits. The three lower panels shows the deviations around the fits for, from top to bottom, the broken power-law, the n fixed and the n free fits. |
Open with DEXTER |
Fit | ![]() |
![]() |
other | ![]() |
b. p.-l. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
1.000 |
n=1 |
![]() |
![]() |
n=1 (fixed) | 1.263 |
n free |
![]() |
![]() |
n>7 (2![]() |
1.084 |
To precisely determine the broad band colours of the OT we used the
UBV and I band observations obtained at NOT and INT. The CA points were excluded
since Johnson R and I filters are significantly different from Bessel,
Cousins and
Harris. We determined the colours as the offset of the broken power-law fit
to the R-band light-curve that minimized the
of the fit.
Due to the lower error bars the magnitudes obtained on Sep. 27 have
the largest weight in the fits. Therefore we do not expect a
large systematic uncertainty due to emission from the underlying
host galaxy. In order to minimize the effect of the host galaxy
only points obtained earlier than and including September 29 were used
in the fits. The 1
errors on the
colours were determined as the colours that increased the value
of
by 1, but the true uncertainty including calibration and
systematic errors is most likely somewhat
larger (
5%). For all filters U,B,V and I the fits were
consistent with the (offset) broken power-law fit, which shows that
the data within the errors (few percent) are consistent with an
achromatic optical afterglow. The results are given in
Table 4.
Colour | GRB 000926 | ![]() |
GRB 000301C | |
U-R |
![]() |
0.59 |
![]() |
|
B-R |
![]() |
0.53 |
![]() |
|
V-R |
![]() |
0.34 |
![]() |
|
R-I |
![]() |
0.48 |
![]() |
|
R-K |
![]() |
1.87 |
![]() |
The afterglow was also observed in the J, H and K bands with the UFTI imager on UKIRT on September 30. The final frames were accumulated in 26, 24 and 9 dithered exposures of 60s duration for J, H and K respectively resulting in a total on-source integration time of 1.56 ks, 1.44 ks and 540s, all in photometric conditions. Employing standard procedures these frames were reduced, combined and calibrated using observations of UKIRT faint standards bracketing the science exposures. The final frames have only a (for this instrument) modest seeing of 0.55-0.60'' FWHM due to the relatively high airmass of the observations, 1.5-2, but clearly detect the OT in all three passbands. The magnitude of the OT was again measured using aperture photometry. The results of the IR photometry is presented in Table 5.
Using the standard star calibrated UKIRT K-band observations we confirmed from faint objects visible in both the UKIRT and SUBARU images that the calibration of the SUBARU images is consistent with that of the UKIRT K-band observations.
UT (Sep) | filter/Obs. | mag | Seeing | Exp. time |
(arcsec) | (sec) | |||
30.276 | J/UKIRT |
![]() |
0.6 | 1560 |
30.250 | H/UKIRT |
![]() |
0.6 | 1440 |
29.24 | K'/SUBARU |
![]() |
0.7 | 1800 |
30.301 | K/UKIRT |
![]() |
0.6 | 540 |
Also shown in Table 4 are the colours (in the same bands) of the OT of GRB 000301C, which was also discovered at the NOT and had a very similar redshift as GRB 000926 (Jensen et al. 2001; Møller et al., in prep). As seen, the OTs of GRB 000926 and GRB 000301C had very similar colours in the optical red bands, whereas in the blue bands and in R-K the OT of GRB 000926 was significantly redder than that of GRB 000301C. In order to test whether this difference is intrinsic to the bursts or caused by a larger extinction along the line of sight to GRB 000926 we follow Jensen et al. (2001) and constrain the extinction by fitting different extinction laws to the SED.
To construct the SED we first used the colours given in Table 4
for the observed U to I bands (normalised to Sep. 27.9 UT).
The J, H and K-observations were obtained on Sep. 30.3 where
the host galaxy possibly contributed significantly to the flux.
In order to estimate the effect of the host galaxy
we used the SEDs for galaxies at redshifts z=2-3 given by
Dickinson (2000, their Fig. 2). By normalising these galaxy SEDs
to the observed
for the host galaxy (see
Sect. 6 below) we derived magnitudes for the host galaxy
which translate into estimated corrections at Sep. 30.3 UT of
,
and
.
The JHK magnitudes were then shifted to
Sep. 27.9 UT using the broken power-law fit to the light-curve given
in Table 3 (assuming that the burst evolved achromatically).
After this the UBVRIJHK magnitudes
were corrected for foreground extinction, using a value of
E(B-V)=0.023 from Schlegel et al. (1998), and transformed to
the AB system. For the optical bands we used the transformations
given by Fukugita et al. (1995):
I(AB) = I+0.43,
R(AB) = R+0.17,
V(AB) = V-0.02,
B(AB) = B-0.14, and
U(AB) = U+0.69. We assigned
uncertainties of 0.05 mag to the BVR and I AB magnitudes
as an estimate of the uncertainty in the transformation. For
U band we assigned an uncertainty of 0.10 mag to the AB magnitude
since this band is more difficult to calibrate (Bessel 1990; Fynbo
et al. 1999, 2000c). For the IR bands we used the
transformations given in Allen (2000):
K(AB) = K+1.86,
H(AB) = H+1.35,
and
J(AB) = J+0.87. We then calculated the
specific flux using
.
Finally, the wavelengths corresponding to our
UBVRIJHK measurements were blueshifted to the GRB rest frame. As it can be
seen in Fig. 3 the spectral energy distribution is clearly
bending from the U to the K-band. This bend can be naturally explained by
the presence of intrinsic extinction at z=2.037. The J-point is falling
significantly below the trend of all the other points. The reason for
this is not understood, but we have decided not to include this point in
the analysis. Including the point does not change any of the conclusions,
but it increases the
of the fits.
![]() |
![]() |
AV | |
No extinction | 3.20 |
![]() |
0 |
Pei (1992), MW | <0 | ||
Pei (1992), LMC | 2.61 |
![]() |
![]() |
Pei (1992), SMC | 1.71 |
![]() |
![]() |
The parameters of the fits are shown in Table 6.
For the no-extinction case we find a value of
consistent
with that of Price et al. (2001).
As for GRB 000301C the best fit was achieved for a
SMC extinction law. We derive a modest extinction of
(restframe V) and a spectral index
.
For
GRB 000301C Jensen et al. (2001) found
.
Therefore,
GRB000926 was indeed intrinsically redder than GRB 000301C.
In the upper panel of Fig. 3 we show the fits using the LMC and SMC
extinction laws and the no-extinction case.
For the redshift of GRB 000926 (as for that of GRB 000301C) the interstellar
extinction bump at 2175 Å is shifted into the R-band. This absorption
bump is very prominent for the MW, moderate for the LMC and
almost nonexistent for the SMC extinction curve. Thus, for a chemically
rich environment, like the MW, we should expect a prominent extinction
bump at 2175 Å (near the observed R-band).
The data points in Fig. 3 show that there is no strong
absorption bump near the
R-band, which makes the fit for the MW (see Table 6)
inconsistent with the data. In fact, the best MW fit implies
a (unphysical) negative extinction. To illustrate the problem with
the MW extinction curve we have in the lower panel of Fig. 3
plotted a
power-law SED extincted by a AV=0.2 MW
extinction curve. As seen, the shape of this extinction curve is
incompatible with the data. In the Milky Way the extinction curve
can be different mainly for stars located in star-forming regions
(Baade & Minkowski 1937; Whittet 1992) in the sense that the shape
of the bump at 2175 Å is different and more importantly the
curve is almost flat in the rest-frame UV at
> 15.1.
This is where the curvature is most pronounced in Fig. 3
and therefore such an extinction curve is also not compatible with
the data (see also Price et al. 2001)
In conclusion, as in the case of GRB000301C, the SED supports a scenario of a host in an early stage of chemical enrichment.
![]() |
Figure 3:
The observed specific flux ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
The total magnitude of the extended emission in a circular aperture with
diameter
4.7 arcsec is
.
Assuming that all this emission comes from
the host galaxy we can get an estimate of the star-formation-rate (SFR) of
the galaxy. The restframe UV continuum in the range 1500 Å-2800 Å can be used as a SFR estimator if one assume that the star-formation is
continuous over a time scale of more than 108 years. Kennicutt (1998)
provides the relation
![]() |
(2) |
![]() |
= | ![]() |
|
= | ![]() |
![]() |
Figure 4:
A contour plot of a 9.5![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
The increase
from the early to the late time decay slope is different for
different physical models for GRB afterglows. For
GRB 000926 we find
from the broken
power-law fit.
This measurement we compare with different models predicting
broken light-curves: i) If the frequency separating fast
cooling and slow cooling electrons moves through the optical part of
the electromagnetic spectrum at
,
the resulting light curve would steepen by
(Sari et al. 1998); ii) If a spherical fireball slows
down to a non-relativistic expansion (Dai & Lu 1999) then
for our value of
;
iii) If the outflow is collimated with a fixed opening angle,
the break in the light curve occurs when the relativistic beaming of
the synchrotron radiation becomes wider than the jet opening angle
with a predicted steepening of
(Mészáros & Rees 1999); iv) finally, if the afterglow
arises in a sideways expanding jet, the steepening will be
(Rhoads 1999) for our value of
.
The above estimates all assume a constant mean density
distribution of the ambient medium. Only model iii), i.e. a
jet with fixed opening angle, is consistent with the observed value
of
.
This model predicts a spectral
slope of the afterglow of
,
which is consistent with the
from the multi-band photometry.
If the density of the surrounding medium was that of stellar wind
(
with
)
we expect
(Mészáros & Rees
1999; Jaunsen et al. 2001), which is excluded by the data at the
2.2
level.
GRB 000301C and GRB 000926 have very different host galaxies.
The host galaxy of GRB 000301C remains undetected despite a very
deep detection limit of R=28.5 (Fruchter et al. 2000a; Smette et al.
2001), whereas the
host galaxy of GRB 000926 is relatively bright at
(Sect. 6). Hence, the
host galaxy of GRB 000926 is more than 70 times brighter than that
of GRB 000301C. In the same way GRB 990123 and GRB 990510
occured
at nearly identical redshifts
and the host galaxy
of the former is
more than 30 times brighter than the latter (Holland & Hjorth 1999;
Fruchter et al.
1999, 2000b). If GRBs indeed trace star-formation these observations
indicate that at these redshifts galaxies covering a broad range
of luminosities contribute significantly to the over-all density of
star formation. Furthermore, as the observed R-band flux is
proportional to the star formation rate, there must be
1-2 orders of magnitude more galaxies at the R=28 level than at the
R=24 level at
.
Otherwise it would be unlikely to detect
R=28 galaxies as GRB hosts (under the assumption that GRBs trace
star-formation). An alternative explanation is that the
faint host galaxies of GRB 000301C and GRB 990510 are faint at
rest-frame UV wavelengths due to massive extinction similar to some
sources selected in the sub-mm range (e.g. Ivison et al. 2000).
However, the low extinction derived from the optical properties of the
GRB 000301C afterglow argues against this explanation at least for this
particular burst.
Acknowledgements
Most of the optical data presented here have been taken using ALFOSC, which is owned by the Instituto de Astrofisica de Andalucia (IAA) and operated at the Nordic Optical Telescope under agreement between IAA and the NBIfAFG of the Astronomical Observatory of Copenhagen. UKIRT is operated by the Joint Astronomy Centre on behalf of the Particle Physics and Astronomy Research Council of the United Kingdom. JUF and THD acknowledges enthusiastic help and support from C. Møller and I. Svärdh during the hectic moments of finding the OT by comparison with DSS-plates. JUF acknowledges H. O. Fynbo for introducing him to CERNs MINUIT fitting programme. JG acknowledges the receipt of a Marie Curie Research Grant from the European Commission. MIA acknowledges the Astrophysics group of the Physics dept. of University of Oulu for support of his work. IRS acknowledges support from a Royal Society URF. IB was supported by Pôle d'Attraction Interuniversitaire, P4/05 (SSTC, Belgium). JMCC acknowledges the receipt of a FPI doctoral fellowship from Spain's Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología. KH is grateful for Ulysses support under JPL Contract 958056, and for NEAR support under NASA grants NAG5-9503 and NAG5-3500. Additionally, the availability of the GRB Coordinates Network (GCN) and BACODINE services, maintained by Scott Barthelmy, is greatly acknowledged. We acknowledge the availability of POSS-II exposures, used in this work; the Second Palomar Observatory Sky Survey (POSS-II) was made by the California Institute of Technology with funds from the National Science Foundation, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, the National Geographic Society, the Sloan Foundation, the Samuel Oschin Foundation, and the Eastman Kodak Corporation. We acknowledge the availability of the 2MASS catalogs. This work was supported by the Danish Natural Science Research Council (SNF).