A&A 372, 71-84 (2001)
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20010305
A. K. Durgapal - A. K. Pandey - V. Mohan
State Observatory, Manora Peak, Naini Tal - 263 129, India
Received 11 May 2000 / Accepted 6 February 2001
Abstract
We present multicolour CCD photometry for two poorly
studied open clusters
(King 5 and Be 20). Photometry for a field near King 5 was also
carried out to estimate the contamination by field stars.
The colour magnitude diagrams (CMD) of the clusters show a well
defined main sequence extending to the limit of the photometry,
mag. The reddening for King 5, estimated from the
colour-colour diagram, is
0.82, whereas that for
Be 20 as estimated by comparing theoretical main-sequence (MS) with the
observed MS is 0.10. The morphology of the CMDs indicates that these
clusters are old. The
CMD of Be 20 shows a globular cluster-like horizontal branch.
In case of King 5 the comparison of
observational CMDs with the standard isochrones of VandenBerg
(1985) indicates an apparent discrepancy between the shape of the turnoff
and isochrones.
The CMDs of King 5 seem to be better understood in terms of stellar models with convective overshoot.
The comparison of the CMDs with the stellar models by Bertelli et al. (1994)
with convective overshoot produces a good fit for a metallicity Z = 0.008
and an age = 1 Gyr for King 5 and 5 Gyr for Be 20. An apparent distance modulus
(m-M) = 14.0 and
15.1 has been estimated for King 5 and Be 20 respectively. They
correspond to a distance of
pc and 9026
480 pc,
respectively. The radial density distribution in King 5 indicates
that there is an excess of low mass stars in the outer region of the
cluster, whereas the density distribution in Be 20 shows a good fit with
the empirical King (1962) model. For both clusters, observations have also been carried out to
search for variable stars.
Key words: Hertzsprung-Russel (HR) diagram - open clusters - individual: King 5; Be 20
The system of galactic open
clusters, in particular the oldest members, serve as excellent probes of the
structure and evolution of the Galactic Disk; (Janes & Phelps 1994;
Carraro & Chiosi 1994; Friel & Janes 1993). In addition, the intermediate-age open clusters
are well
suited to study the issue of convective overshooting
(Barbaro & Pigatto 1984; Bertelli et al. 1985; Mazzei & Pigatto
1988). These clusters have turnoff masses near the critical value
separating the domain of core He flash from that
of mild He-ignition. A comparison of the HR diagram of the observed
clusters with the evolutionary models of the same chemical composition
can be used to test overshooting and classical stellar
models. Spatial and age distribution of clusters provide
insight into the processes of cluster formation and destruction that
have allowed a substantial number of old open clusters to survive.
Date | Field | Filter | Exp.(sec) |
King 5: | |||
18 Nov.-93 |
Cluster | U |
![]() |
Region | |||
,, | ,, | B | ![]() |
,, | ,, | V |
![]() |
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
,, | ,, | R |
![]() |
,, | ,, | ![]() |
|
,, | ,, | ![]() |
|
,, | ,, | I |
![]() |
,, | ,, | ![]() |
|
,, | ,, | ![]() |
|
19 Nov.-93 | ,, | U |
![]() |
![]() |
|||
,, | ,, | B |
![]() |
![]() |
|||
,, | ,, | V | ![]() |
,, | ,, | R | ![]() |
![]() |
|||
,, | ,, | I | ![]() |
![]() |
|||
16 Dec.-93 | Nearby | B |
![]() |
(east) | |||
,, | ,, | V |
![]() |
,, | ,, | R |
![]() |
,, | ,, | I |
![]() |
![]() |
|||
Be 20: |
|||
14 Nov.-96 |
Cluster | B |
![]() |
Region | |||
,, | ,, | V |
![]() |
,, | ,, | R |
![]() |
,, | ,, | I |
![]() |
15 Nov.-96 | B |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|||
,, | ,, | V |
![]() |
![]() |
|||
,, | ,, | R |
![]() |
![]() |
|||
,, | ,, | I |
![]() |
![]() |
Recently, much interest has been shown by various groups in determining
accurate ages for intermediate and old open clusters (see e.g. Kaluzny 1990,
1994;
Janes & Phelps
1990; Twarog et al. 1993; Phelps et al. 1994; Carraro & Chiosi 1994)
with the aim of setting a lower
limit to the age of the Galactic Disk. The understanding of their properties
(age, metallicity and kinematics) is mandatory for many studies, such as the
history of star formation in the Galactic Disk, the structure
of the disk etc.
Continuing the series of papers on the photometric study of intermediate/old-age open
clusters, we present here photometric data for two old open clusters,
namely King 5
(C0311+525,
,
)
and Be 20
(C0530+001,
,
). The aim of the
present work is to study the structure of the clusters and to compare the
observed CMD with the theoretical one.
The paper is divided into eleven sections: in Sect. 2 we deal with previous studies performed for these clusters; in Sect. 3 we describe the observations and discuss the data reduction procedure; Sect. 4 deals with the photometric errors and the comparison of the present photometry with previous photometries. The determination of the cluster age with the help of a morphological age parameter method is given in Sect. 5. Section 6 contains comments on the spatial distribution of the stars in the clusters and on the possible existence of a corona in the cluster King 5. In Sect. 7 morphological features of CMD are discussed. Section 8 deals with determination of interstellar extinction in the clusters. In Sect. 9, the comparison of the CMDs with theoretical isochrones and distance of the clusters are given. Section 10 deals with the binary content and variable stars in the clusters; finally, Sect. 11 summarizes the main results and conclusions of our work.
![]() |
Figure 1: The internal error of the stars in King 5 and Be 20 given by DAOPHOT as a function of V magnitude. |
Open with DEXTER |
Macminn et al. (1994) reported CCD VI photometric data and
derived an age of 6 Gyr, metallicity
,
E(V-I)= 0.16 and a
distance of 8.4 kpc. They mention that its great distance below the
galactic plane
poses difficult questions for any picture of disk formation and
structure. In their study several good candidates for blue straggler
stars have also been predicted. Using medium resolution spectroscopy
of five stars, Friel et al. (1995) obtained
.
The observations of the cluster King 5 in UBVRI and Be 20 in
BVRI passbands were carried out using the photometric CCD system at f/13
Cassegrain focus of the 104-cm
reflector of the State Observatory, Naini Tal.
In this set-up, each pixel
of 24
of
size CCD corresponds to
0.37'' and
the entire chip covers a
field of
6.0
arcmin. In order to improve the
S/N ratio, the observations
were taken in the binning mode of
pixels.
Multiple exposures were
taken with exposure time ranging from 5 s to 1800 s, depending
upon the presence of bright stars and filter in use. The frames were
co-added in order to achieve a total integration time of 90 min in U,
45 min in B, 20 min in V and 10 min in R and I passbands for King 5
and 90 min in B, 45 min in V and 15 min in R and I passbands for
Be 20. One field
region located at
towards east of the King 5
cluster
region was also observed to estimate the field star
contamination in King 5.
A number of bias and twilight flat-field frames were also
taken during the observing runs. The frames
were cleaned employing the standard procedures using ESO- MIDAS
software running on the computer systems of the Observatory.
The photometry of co-added frames was carried out using
DAOPHOT package by Stetson (1987). The PSF was obtained for each
frame using several uncontaminated stars and the PSF magnitudes
were suitably tied to aperture photometry magnitudes. One star of the
cluster field was taken as the comparison star and differential magnitude and
colours of each star were obtained. The differential magnitudes were then
standardized
using Landolt (1983) stars.
The transformation equations used for the CCD system are:
![]() |
Figure 2: Comparison of present photometry for King 5 and Be 20 with the previous photometries. |
Open with DEXTER |
The errors affecting photometric data of stars in a crowded field have been discussed by many authors (see, e.g., Mateo & Hodge 1986; Stetson 1987; Chiosi et al. 1989; Aparicio et al. 1990). To a first approximation, the photometric errors should be related to the signal-to-noise ratio. The errors given by ALLSTAR are calculated as the mean square root of the residuals of the fitting of the PSF to the profile of the central part of each star.
Plots of the photometric errors in different passbands, for both the clusters
as given by the DAOPHOT package, are shown in Fig. 1 as a function of V magnitude.
The average value of
for stars having
mag in the King 5 region is 0.03 in U and
0.01 in B,V,R and I bands, whereas the average value of
for stars having
mag in the region of Be 20 is 0.02,
0.01, 0.01 and 0.02 in B,V,R and I respectively, where
is
the estimated standard error of the star's magnitude given by ALLSTAR.
The X and Y coordinates as well as the photometric data of the
stars measured in the cluster King 5, the surrounding region of
King 5 and in Be 20 are given in Tables 2-4 respectively. They are available
only in electronic form at the CDS.
We compared our data on King 5 in V and I passbands with those by Phelps et al. (1994). The difference Delta (present data - Phelps et al. data) as a function of V magnitude is shown in Fig. 2. In general the two sets of observations are in good agreement.
A comparison of present photometry in V and I passbands for Be 20 with the previously published photometry by Macminn et al. (1994) indicates that both the photometries are in good agreement. The difference Delta (present data - Macminn et al. data) as a function of V magnitude is also shown in Fig. 2. The results of the comparison for both the clusters are given in Table 5.
Magnitude |
![]() |
![]() |
||
Range |
![]() |
N |
![]() |
N |
King 5: | ||||
|
![]() |
20 |
![]() |
19 |
![]() |
![]() |
34 |
![]() |
20 |
![]() |
![]() |
21 |
![]() |
20 |
![]() |
![]() |
28 |
![]() |
28 |
![]() |
![]() |
31 |
![]() |
31 |
![]() |
![]() |
33 |
![]() |
33 |
Be 20: | ||||
|
![]() |
16 |
![]() |
16 |
![]() |
![]() |
14 |
![]() |
14 |
![]() |
![]() |
42 |
![]() |
42 |
![]() |
![]() |
40 |
![]() |
40 |
![]() |
![]() |
18 |
![]() |
18 |
![]() |
Figure 3: Projected stellar density distributions in the region of King 5. Solid curves represent King profiles (for details see text). |
Open with DEXTER |
The morphology of the CMDs of star
clusters of different ages has been used to estimate the age of
the two clusters in question. This method does not require information
on cluster metallicity and reddening. Morphological ages
for various clusters have been obtained by Carraro & Chiosi (1994)
and Phelps et al. (1994).
We have derived morphological ages of the cluster using
the
parameter which is a difference in (B-V) colour index of the
base of red giant branch (BRGB) and the blue turnoff point (BTO)
![]() |
(1) |
For the cluster King 5,
is
0.57,
which corresponds to an age range of
1.2-1.6 Gyr for different values
of the metallicity. For the cluster Be 20,
is estimated to
be
0.35, which corresponds to an age
5 Gyr for models with convective overshoot and
3.4 Gyr for
a classical model. However, we have to keep in mind that estimation of age
from the morphology of the CMDs of the cluster is just a first
approximation.
Since it is difficult to estimate the cluster center from
our observations because of the small area coverage, we
determined the cluster center with the help of data
by Phelps et al. (1994). The image coordinates of the center
were estimated by convolving a Gaussian kernel with the star
distribution and taking the center to be the point of maximum
density. This is performed for both the axes. In this way, we get
the center coordinates for the data by Phelps et al. (1994),
at (450, 670) pixels. We used
this center to determine the center in our observations:
it corresponds to (227, 205) pixels.
In order to study the stellar distribution we computed
the radial density profile by counting all stars lying in concentric
rings at increasing distances from the cluster
center. The star counts have been normalized to the area of each ring.
![]() |
Figure 4: Projected stellar density distribution in the region of Be 20. The solid line represents the King profile (see text). |
Open with DEXTER |
We used all the stars to determine the stellar density
without applying any correction for
photometric incompleteness. Figure 3 shows
the stellar surface density in stars/arcmin2 as a function of
distance from the cluster center, where the error bars were
calculated assuming that the number of stars in a bin was governed
by Poisson statistics. We tried to fit the empirical model of
King (1962) to the projected stellar density distribution of King 5.
![]() |
(2) |
![]() |
(3) |
![]() |
Figure 5: The CMDs for the stellar content of King 5 and its surrounding region. Field star corrected CMDs for the cluster King 5 (lower panel). The location of BTO (shown by dotted line) and BRGB are marked in the (V,B-V) CMD (lower panel). |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 6:
CMDs of the cluster King 5 for three subfields having
![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 7: The CMDs for the stellar content of Be 20. The location of BTO (shown by dotted line) and BRGB are also marked in the (V,B-V) CMD. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 8:
CMDs of the cluster Be 20 for three subfields having
![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
To constrain the various parameters, the tidal
radius in particular,
we need a high S/N ratio in the star counts. Kaluzny (1992) has
already shown that it is not possible to get conclusive
estimates of tidal radius of the clusters using the whole set of
parameters and imposed a fit, f(r),
using only two free parameters. The model is
![]() |
(4) |
In order to estimate the contamination due to field stars, we
have counted the MS stars in the uncleaned (V, V-I) CMDs
of cluster and nearby regions. The width of the MS is taken to be
0.25 mag. The counts are given in Table 6.
(V, B-V), (V, V-R) and (V, V-I) CMDs for three subfields having
,
and r >170'' are shown in Fig. 6.
The CMDs of the central region
(
)
and in the ring
are rather similar, whereas the CMDs in the region
having
are most
similar to the CMDs of the field region. The stellar
density in this outermost region is 8.71 stars/(arcmin)2 which
is close to
the field star density as seen from the stellar density profile
(Fig. 3a). This indicates that this region contains
mainly field stars.
CMDs for three subfields having
,
and r >150'' are shown in Fig. 8. CMDs for the innermost cluster
region (
)
show a horizontal branch which
resembles the horizontal branch of
globular clusters. A similar feature has also been found in other old open
clusters (e.g. M 67, NGC 6791, Be 18 and AM-2).
CMDs for the region
are shown in the middle
panel of Fig. 8. Here we can see that the MS is contaminated by field stars.
The lower panel of Fig. 8 shows CMDs for the
stars lying outside radius r =150''. From the density
profile of the cluster,
we can conclude that the cluster extends up to
(see Fig. 4). Therefore, the stars appearing in this diagram are mostly
field stars. The counts of the MS stars obtained from (V,V-I) CMD for the cluster and
field region (r >150'')
are given in Table 6. The area of the outer region is normalized to the area of
the cluster.
To estimate the interstellar extinction in the cluster, we use
the
(U-B, B-V) diagram. Since the cluster field has
a significant amount of contamination due to field stars, the
distribution of stars in colour-colour diagram will be a combination
of field stars and cluster stars. Using the Zero-age MS given by
Cameron (1985) for Z =0.006 and a slope
E(U-B)/E(B-V)= 0.72 (Johnson &
Morgan 1953) we find a good fit for
E(B-V) =0.82,
whereas with the ZAMS by Schmidt-Kaler (1982) for Z =0.02 we get
E(B-V) =0.78.
We prefer
E(B-V) = 0.82, as Friel et al. (1995) estimated
for this cluster, which corresponds to
.
The colour-colour diagram
(U-B, B-V) is shown in
Fig. 9.
V | No. of stars | No. of stars |
Magnitude interval | Cluster region | Nearby region |
King 5: | ||
15.0 - 16.0 |
37 | 2 |
16.0 - 17.0 | 27 | 2 |
17.0 - 18.0 | 36 | 12 |
18.0 - 19.0 | 68 | 13 |
19.0 - 20.0 | 54 | 35 |
Be 20: | ||
18.5 - 19.0 |
32 | 6 |
19.0 - 19.5 | 27 | 6 |
19.5 - 20.0 | 33 | 6 |
20.0 - 20.5 | 33 | 8 |
20.5 - 21.0 | 15 | 2 |
In this section our aim is to compare the observed CMDs with theoretical isochrones computed with and without considering convective core overshooting during the phases of nuclear burning. The quality of fit to the observed CMDs will provide clues to decide whether the overshooting approach should be preferred or not.
The clean CMDs of King 5 after removing the contribution of probable foreground/background stars have been used to perform such a comparison. The best comparison with the classical evolutionary models by VandenBerg (1985) for Z = 0.01, age = 1 Gyr is shown in Fig. 10 (upper panel). There seems to be an apparent discrepancy between the shape of turnoff and the isochrones. This discrepancy has already been noted by several authors (Anthony-Twarog et al. 1991; Alfaro et al. 1992; Pandey et al. 1997) and can be explained as a failure of the standard isochrones. However, to discriminate between different evolutionary scenerios, photometry with membership determination is required.
Theoretical isochrones with convective
overshoot by Bertelli et al. (1994) have also been compared with
the CMDs of King 5 (Fig. 10, lower panel). From the figure, it seems that
these isochrones are better fitted to the data. The best fit is obtained
for Z = 0.008, age = 1 Gyr and apparent distance
modulus
(m-M) = 14.0 which indicates that the cluster is
situated at
Kpc from Sun. The errors in distance
estimates result from errors in the interstellar extinction
and by uncertainty in the eye fit of isochrones with the data.
![]() |
Figure 9: The colour-colour diagram for the stars in the cluster King 5. The ZAMS given by Cameron (1985) for Z = 0.006 has been adjusted for E(B-V) = 0.82 mag. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 10: The comparison of evolutionary model by VandenBerg (1985) (upper panel) and convective core overshooting model by Bertelli et al. (1994) (lower panel) with the observed CMDs of King 5. The dotted curve shows the isochrone brightened by 0.75 mag. Probable variable stars and blue stragglers are shown by filled triangles. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 11: Same as Fig. 10 but for Be 20. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 12:
Frequency distribution
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
One night of monitoring in both clusters reveals a few variable stars. The nature of their variability will be discussed in a forthcoming paper. The variable stars are shown by filled triangles in CMDs (Figs. 10b and 11b).
Stars numbered [99, 414] of King 5 and [161, 222] of Be 20, which are found on the prolongation of the main sequence, can be good candidates for blue stragglers (Ahumada & Lapasset 1995). These stars are also shown by filled triangles in the CMDs (Figs. 10b and 11b). Light curves for probable variable stars in King 5 and Be 20 are shown in Figs. 14 and 15 respectively. Data for these stars are given in Table 7.
![]() |
Figure 13: Same as Fig. 12 but for Be 20. |
Open with DEXTER |
Star No. | V | (V-I) | Distance |
(In arcsec) | |||
King 5: | |||
394 |
15.573 | 1.346 | 121 |
259 | 14.319 | 1.078 | 128 |
13 | 14.852 | 1.194 | 160 |
192 | 15.023 | 1.307 | 150 |
71 | 15.167 | 1.287 | 106 |
185 | 14.841 | 1.253 | 79 |
42 | 16.074 | 0.982 | 131 |
Be 20: | |||
247 |
18.380 | 0.765 | 41 |
215 | 18.845 | 0.716 | 23 |
51 | 18.674 | 0.806 | 92 |
222 | 18.001 | 0.588 | 84 |
210 | 18.408 | 0.812 | 176 |
161 | 17.365 | 0.613 | 7 |
41 | 18.617 | 0.753 | 216 |
![]() |
Figure 14:
Light curves of the probable variable stars in the
field of King 5. Difference of two comparisons (s2-s1), where s1 and s2
are star Nos. 201 and 217, is also shown in the figure by cross (![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 15: Same as Fig. 14 but for Be 20. Here s1 and s2 are star Nos. 257 and 263. |
Open with DEXTER |
Acknowledgements
Thanks are due to Prof. K. A. Janes for providing CCD data of the clusters King 5 and Be 20. The authors are grateful to Prof. Ram Sagar for useful discussions. We gratefully acknowledge the valuable suggestions given by the anonymous referee, which improved the contents of the paper.