A&A 371, 1035-1047 (2001)
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20010456
K. Uytterhoeven1 - C. Aerts1 - P. De Cat1 - K. De Mey1 -
J. H. Telting2 - C. Schrijvers3 - J. De Ridder1 -
K. Daems1 - G. Meeus1 - C. Waelkens1
1 - Instituut voor Sterrenkunde, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven,
Celestijnenlaan 200 B, 3001 Leuven, Belgium
2 -
Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research, Isaac Newton Group of Telescopes, Apartado 321,
38700 Santa Cruz de La Palma, Spain
3 -
Astronomical Institute Anton Pannekoek, University of Amsterdam, Kruislaan 403, 1098 SJ Amsterdam,
The Netherlands
Received 9 February 2001 / Accepted 22 March 2001
Abstract
We present a total time series of high signal-to-noise,
high-resolution spectra of the SiIII
,
and
Å lines of the fast-rotating, spectroscopic binary and
Cephei star
Scorpii. Among this data set is a sample of 422
spectra of intensive monitoring during eight subsequent nights in July 1997. We
find variability of the line profiles on two time-scales: a variation of several
months as a result of the orbital motion and rapid variations of a few hours,
which are explained in terms of non-radial pulsation modes. From the total
dataset, covering a time span of 9 years, we derive for the first time the
orbital parameters of
Scorpii and find an orbital period of 195 days.
The complex patterns on the grayscale representations of the residual SiIII
Å profiles with respect to the average profile point
towards more than one (non-axisymmetric) pulsation mode. A frequency analysis
of the three normalised velocity moments confirms the main period of 4.80 hours
and the second period of 4.93 hours, which were previously derived from
photometric data. We attempt an identification of the pulsation modes by means
of the moment method and line-profile fitting and find that
Scorpii
pulsates in a main prograde sectoral mode of degree 1 or 2 and in an additional
tesseral mode for which l = 5, m = 1 are the most likely wavenumbers. In
the variations of the line profiles we find indications for the presence of
additional pulsation modes.
Key words: stars: binaries: spectroscopic - stars :
oscillations - line: profiles - stars: individual:
Scorpii
A detailed knowledge of the pulsation of the star may also lead to mapping of
the stellar interior. This branch of astronomy, so called asteroseismology, has
gained a lot of interest the last few years, mainly thanks to the large progress
made in the study of the solar interior (helioseismology) from SOHO data. A
prime step towards asteroseismology is a correct identification of the excited
modes. Therefore, an identification of the pulsation parameters by means of a
detailed study of the line-profile variability is very useful, particularly when
only a limited number of -driven modes are excited.
The multi-periodic variations in line profiles, due to NRP, detected in
fast-rotating spectroscopic binary Cephei stars, seem to be similar to
each other (see e.g.
Vir, Smith 1985;
Sco, De Mey et al. 1997;
Sco, Telting & Schrijvers 1998;
Per, De Cat et al. 2000;
Cen, Schrijvers 1999). They all exhibit bumps moving through
the profiles.
Here, we present a study of a new dataset of LPVs of the rapidly rotating
Cephei star
Scorpii (HD 160578,
mV = 2.41, SpT B1.5III),
which is a spectroscopic binary. On the base of a photometric study, Shobbrook
& Lomb (1972) and Lomb & Shobbrook (1975) classified
Scorpii as a
variable star, - and more specifically as a
Cephei variable -, in a
binary system. The binarity was also confirmed by means of spectroscopic data
by Heasley et al. (1982). From the peculiar shapes of the HeI-profile they
suggested that this star may be a double-lined spectroscopic binary. Aerts et al. (1989), on the other hand, noticed the line-profile variability for the
first time.
The intrinsic variability was interpreted by Shobbrook & Lomb (1972) and Lomb
& Shobbrook (1975). A period-analysis performed on photometric data covering
the time span 1969-1973 led to the detection of one frequency
cd-1. The presence of a second frequency
cd-1 was suspected from a longer (beat)
periodicity of about 7 days in the data.
The aim of our study is to clarify both the binary and the pulsational nature of
Scorpii in full detail. Hereto, we made use of a series of 422
high-resolution (
), high signal-to-noise spectroscopic
observations gathered during 8 subsequent nights in July 1997, in addition to
other spectroscopic data, covering a total time span of 9 years.
The paper is organised as follows. Initially we give a description of the observations. In Sect. 3, we study the orbital motion from the data. Section 4 presents an analysis of the intrinsic pulsation. A study of the grayscale representations, a frequency analysis and a mode identification is given. The latter is based on a confrontation between the moment method and the method of line-profile fitting. In Sect. 5 we give an estimation of the physical parameters of the binary components. We end the paper with a discussion of the results in Sect. 6.
During the period 1988-1997 high-resolution and high-S/N spectra of Scorpii were obtained at ESO, La Silla, with the CAT telescope and the CES
spectrograph. The observations made in 1988 were realised by means of a Reticon
detector, contrary to all other observations which were made by a CCD.
In order to allow an in-depth investigation of the line-profile variability of
Scorpii high-spatial and -temporal resolution (
)
spectroscopic observations were made during 8 subsequent nights in July
1997. These spectra were obtained by means of CCD#38, a Loral/Lesser
pixel CCD with a pixel size of
m2 in the
Long Camera mode, and the observed spectral domain was the one centered on the
SiIII triplet at
Å,
Å and
Å. The integration time of the spectra varied from two to six
minutes, which is less than 1.5% of the photometric frequency f1.
Besides these 422 high-signal-to-noise (S/N > 400) spectra, additional observations were gathered with the same instruments and focussed on the same wavelength region by several observers during nights in the period 1988-1997. These were used to study both the orbital motion and the line-profile variability. A logbook of the observations is given in Table 1.
date | observer | ![]() |
N | S/N |
May 1988 | C. Waelkens | 5 | 46 | 400-600 |
June 1995 | C. Aerts | 4 | 187 | 350 |
September 1995 | J. Telting | 2 | 12 | 500-600 |
March 1996 | C. Aerts | 7 | 13 | 350 |
April 1996 | G. Meeus | 6 | 14 | 350 |
April 1996 | C. Schrijvers | 5 | 5 | 400 |
May 1996 | G. Meeus | 1 | 2 | 350 |
June 1996 | K. Daems | 1 | 9 | 150-200 |
July 1996 | C. Aerts | 5 | 12 | 300-450 |
February 1997 | C. Aerts | 6 | 9 | 400-500 |
March 1997 | P. De Cat | 3 | 4 | 450-550 |
May 1997 | J. De Ridder | 6 | 5 | 500 |
July 1997 | P. De Cat | 2 | 8 | 250-500 |
July 1997 | K. De Mey | 8 | 422 | 400-750 |
October 1997 | P. De Cat | 5 | 4 | 200-350 |
The obtained spectra were reduced using the ESO-MIDAS software package. Firstly
the spectra were adjusted for the background radiation by subtracting a mean
bias-value. After flatfielding by means of spectra of a quartz flatfield lamp
to remove the pixel-to-pixel sensitivity variations inherent to the detector, we
used the spectra of a thorium hollow cathode lamp to provide the wavelength
calibration. Then the rebinned spectrum was divided by the response curve for
its continuum, which was obtained by a spline function. The results were
normalised spectra with continuum at unity. Finally a barycentric and
heliocentric correction was carried out. We rebinned all spectra such that
Å.
We ran up against some difficulties in normalising the spectrum. In most cases
the broadening of the line of the secondary component extends into the
continuum. Also the presence of "moving-bumps'' through the line-wings made the tracing of the continuum more complicated than usual. Third, a weak absorption line at
Å
caused confusion with the continuum. The presence of this line
reduced the continuum between the SiIII lines at
Å and
Å to only a few Ångström. All these effects put a limitation on
the accuracy of the spline-approximation of the response curve of the continuum.
![]() |
Figure 1:
Left panel a) A random chosen set of SiIII line profiles from the
eight subsequent nights in July 1997, showing the variation in the
profiles. Right panel b) The average spectra of the observations made in (from
bottom to top) March 1997, July 1997 and October 1997 at
![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
Figure 1a shows a random chosen set of line profiles of the SiIII triplet, taken during the eight subsequent nights of July 1997 (20-28 July). The lines are broadened and we can see wiggles in them. They prograde from blue to red through the profile (see left-hand panel of Fig. 3). In the red wing of each of the spectra the broadened line due to the component can be seen. The component stays almost at the same position in the profile during the eight nights.
Figure 1b shows the average spectra of the observations made in
March 1997, July 1997 and October 1997 at
Å. The broad lines
of the component are clearly visible and appear subsequently in the red and blue
wing of the profile of the primary. From this we estimate an orbital period of
several months.
A preceding study of the binary character of
Scorpii was made by De Mey
(1997) as part of her Ph.D. Thesis. She used all spectra which were obtained
before July 1997 to determine the orbital elements. She found an orbital period
of
.
De Mey also made an analysis of line-profile variations
from the restricted number of data of June 1995. Because of the small frequency
resolution, she only found one frequency f = 4.97 cd-1, which is in
between the two frequencies earlier found in photometry (Lomb & Shobbrook
1975).
In order to determine the orbital parameters of Scorpii with higher
precision, we derived the radial velocities (RVs) from all the spectra listed in
Table 1. Because of the distortion of the line profiles we
prefered to use the first moment of the lines instead of a determination of RVs
by means of Gaussian fits. The first moment was calculated for both the first
(
Å) and the second (
Å) line of the SiIII
triplet. We note that, as a result of a loss of information of the
Å line due to vignetting, we only could use the
Å
line of the data of 7 June 1995. In order to increase the accuracy of the
RVs, we used the average value of the first moment, obtained from the
Å and the
Å line.
The orbital parameters of
Scorpii we derived from the RVs by means of
the Léhmann-Filhés method (1894), are listed in Table
2. The orbital period associated with the best fit is
195.65 days. The orbit has a large eccentricity of 0.49.
A phase diagram of this solution is presented as the full line in
Fig. 2. We note that the data of 7 June 1995 lie slightly above the
calculated theoretical curve. This is due to the loss of information of the
Å line mentioned above, in combination with the result that
the RVs of the second SiIII line appear always to be larger than those
determined from the first SiIII line. We note that the determination of the RVs
from different SiIII lines also led to different values for the binary
line-profile variable
Per (De Cat et al. 2000).
We also note that the descending branch of the fitted curve contains just a few points.
Consequently, they could have an influence on the determination of the orbital parameters.
We calculated also the orbital parameters based upon the RVs calculated from the first
(
Å) line of the SiIII triplet, and find slightly different values for the estimated eccentricity (
)
and
(
).
Orbital parameter | estimate |
![]() |
195.65 |
![]() |
0.2 ![]() |
K (km s-1) | 48.0 ![]() |
E0 (HJD) | 2449983.9 ![]() |
e | 0.488 ![]() |
![]() |
0.75 |
![]() |
92.7 ![]() |
f(M) (![]() |
1.49 |
![]() |
Figure 2:
The radial velocity curve associated with the velocities which were
calculated from the first moment of the
![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
To perform an analysis of the intrinsic pulsation of Scorpii, we
prewhitened all the data with the orbital solution presented in Fig. 2.
For the analysis we used the 422 observations gathered during eight nights in
July 1997, which were obtained specifically for this aim.
Firstly, we studied the grayscale representation of the residual SiIII
Å profiles with respect to the average profile. The grayscale plots
display the variations in time within the line profiles. For each individual
observation the residual flux is reflected in a shade of gray: light gray to
white indicates a positive and dark gray to black represents a negative flux
with respect to the mean. The grayscale plots are shown in the left-hand panel of
Fig. 3. Each plot shows a different complex pattern, which points
towards a non strict repetitive nature of the line-profile variations from one
night to the other. A possible cause could be the presence of more than one
pulsation mode. We see a continuation of black and white bands, whose shapes
point towards (a) non axisymmetric mode(s).
![]() |
Figure 3:
Left: grayscale representations of the eight subsequent nights 20-28 of July 1997. Top of each figure: grayscale representations of the residual SiIII
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
In order to study more thoroughly the intrinsic variation, we performed a frequency analysis of the three normalised velocity moments ( <v>, <v2> and <v3>). The three velocity moments of the profiles are related to the radial velocity, the line width and the skewness of the profiles. The normalised velocity moments are obtained by normalising the moments by the equivalent width. For a desciption of the velocity moments, we refer to Aerts et al. (1992). We used different analysis-methods: Stellingwerf's (1978) Phase Dispersion Minimisation (hereafter referred to as PDM) and two methods based on Fourier techniques, particularly the Lomb-Scargle (Scargle 1982) method and the CLEAN-algorithm (Roberts et al. 1987). We searched for frequencies in the 0.001-10.000 cycles/day (cd-1) interval, with frequency steps of 10-3 cd-1. In case of the PDM-method, we used the combinations 5 bins and 2 covers and 10 bins and 3 covers. The half width at half maximum of the highest peak of the window function gave us an indication for the frequency resolution; it turned out to be 0.07 cd-1.
A downward trend in the first normalised moment <v> (shown in Fig. 4) caused a deformation of the phase diagrams associated with the first moment. This trend cannot be explained by a periodic phenomenon with a period shorter than 15 days. It could be due to a long beat-period, but our data have insufficient time spread to draw this conclusion. Most probably, the downward trend is simply a consequence of the relatively inaccurate orbit determination (see Fig. 2). We cancelled out the phenomenon by assuming a linear trend and removing it from <v> and subsequently also from <v2> and <v3>.
In order not to exclude the possibility of the downward trend resulting from a beat, we compare the results of our frequency analyses performed on the non-corrected and the corrected moments (referred to as the first and the second analysis).
As well the first analysis as the second yielded the same result with respect to
the determination of the most significant frequency in the different moments. In
all the data we find a frequency compatible with the first frequency f1,
suggested by Lomb & Shobbrook (1975) on the basis of a photometric study.
Using the different methods, for each of <v>, <v2> and <v3> we find
frequencies that differ less than 0.07 cd-1 from f1. Phase plots of
the velocity moments, corrected for the trend, are given in
Fig. 5. According to the definition of the moments (see Aerts et al. 1992), <v> varies with f1, <v2> with f1 and 2f1, and the variation of <v3> depends on f1, 2f1 and 3f1. These three fits, taking respectively f1; f1 and 2f1; f1, 2f1 and 3f1 into account, reduce the variability with ,
and
in respectively <v>, <v2> and <v3>.
The results of a search for a second frequency turned out to be more ambiguous. We prewhitened the original and trend-corrected <v>, <v2> and <v3> with the first (photometric) frequency f1 and performed successively the first and the second analysis.
The first analysis of the different velocity moments identified frequencies which can be related to the second frequency f2, found by means of an analysis of photometric data (Lomb & Shobbrook 1975), in terms of alias frequencies. The second analysis , on the other hand, found, mainly in the <v> data, the second photometric frequency itself.
We used the SAS statistical package to calculate the best fitting values of the amplitudes associated with the sinusoidal variation in the trend-corrected moments. We calculated the amplitudes of the monoperiodic (f1) and the biperiodic (f1 and f2) model. The results are listed in Table 3, which also presents the contributions of f1 and f2 in the variations of the normalised trend-corrected moments <v>, <v2> and <v3>. In the higher-order moments, we also took the beat frequencies, which appear as a result of the interaction of the different pulsation modes, into account (see Mathias et al. 1994). We note from Table 3 that the addition of f2 does not result in a large enhancement of the variance reduction.
normalised moment | frequency | ampl ![]() |
f. v. |
<v> (km s-1) | f1 | 2.250 ![]() |
|
f2 | 0.633 ![]() |
77.9% | |
<v2> (km s-1)2 | f1 | 135.3 ![]() |
|
2f1 | 61.6 ![]() |
||
f2 | 24.3 ![]() |
||
2f2 | 12.1 ![]() |
||
f1 + f2 | 14.7 ![]() |
||
f1 - f2 | 26.9 ![]() |
60.1% | |
<v3> (km s-1)3 | f1 | 11392 ![]() |
|
2f1 | 685 ![]() |
||
3f1 | 596 ![]() |
||
f2 | 3383 ![]() |
||
2f2 | 535 ![]() |
||
3f2 | 461 ![]() |
||
f1 + f2 | 1402 ![]() |
||
f1 - f2 | 4990 ![]() |
||
2f1 + f2 | 516 ![]() |
||
2f1 - f2 | 2143 ![]() |
||
2f2 + f1 | 497 ![]() |
||
2f2 - f1 | 2785 ![]() |
59.6% |
![]() |
Figure 4: The downward trend in the first normalised moment <v> |
Open with DEXTER |
We also performed a two dimensional analysis of the variable signal in the
spectra, for the Fourier and PDM methods. For every wavelength bin (
Å), we computed first of all the Fourier component for the
frequencies between 0 and 16 cd-1, with a frequency spacing of 0.001 cd-1. We used the CLEAN parameters
and a gain of 0.2 and
0.5. The power spectrum across the SiIII Å line profile (gain = 0.2) is
plotted in Fig. 6.
The variational power is mainly found at the first photometric frequency f1. We note that a gap appears in the power at the center of the line profile. The greater part of the gap can be filled by the one-day alias frequencies of f1. The use of a larger gain factor (gain = 0.5) did not result in a better filling of the gap. The second frequency f2 can not be found in the frequency spectrum. Nevertheless, evidence for the presence of f2 can be found in the smaller peaks at some beat frequencies. The power is strong at 2f2 - f1, and its one-day alias frequencies (2f2 - f1) + 1 cd-1 and (2f2 - f1) + 2 cd-1. A weak peak at 2(f1 - f2) cd-1 can also be detected. These four peaks and the frequencies f2 and f2/2 are indicated as dashed lines in Fig. 6. Other non-identified frequencies seem to appear as well (e.g. 3.52 cd-1 and 1.55 cd-1).
A two dimensional PDM analysis resulted in the power spectrum, which is plotted in Fig. 7. We used several combinations of PDM bins and covers, wich led to comparable results. The mean peak is also situated at f1, but we are not able to find any evidence for the presence of the second photometric frequency. The strongest peaks are situated at frequencies which are connected with f1: f1 + i, f1/i (full lines). We note that the gap in the f1power also is visible in the PDM power spectrum.
The fragmentation of the power peak at f1 into peaks at
one-day alias frequencies of f1 and the strong power at some beat frequencies in the two dimensional plots can
be attributed to the complexity of the line-profile variations of
Scorpii.
![]() |
Figure 5:
The first three normalised moments of the SiIII
![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 6:
Power spectrum across the line profile of the SiIII line at
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 7:
Power spectrum across the line profile of the SiIII line at
![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
We conclude that the observed line-profile variations in
Scorpii are
due to a dominant pulsation mode with pulsation frequency f1 and a second
mode with pulsation frequency f2. Both frequencies were suggested from the
photometric study and it is the first time that a frequency analysis of the
(three normalised velocity moments of the) line profiles confirms the presence
of both frequencies in the spectroscopic variability of the star. The power
spectrum shown in Fig. 6 indicates the presence of other modes, but
the candidate frequencies occur with an amplitude at the level of the detection
treshold. Therefore we can only suggest the existence of other modes from our
data set.
Various methods to retrieve the pulsation parameters are developed during the past years. We will use the method of line-profile fitting (Smith 1977, 1986) based on the results obtained with the moment method (Balona 1986; Aerts et al. 1992; Aerts 1996).
The moment method, suggested by Balona (1986) and refined by Aerts et al. (1992) and by Aerts (1996), is based on the variations of the first three velocity moments of the line profile. This method enables an identification of the
wavenumbers (l, m) by the so called discriminant (
), which is a
function of the observed and theoretically calculated amplitudes of the
moments. The smaller
,
the better the agreement between observed
and theoretical amplitudes of the moments. Also an estimation of the amplitude
of the pulsation, the rotational velocity and inclination of the star and the
width of the intrinsic profile is derived. For a full description of the
discriminant, we refer to Aerts (1996).
We transferred the code presented by Aerts (1996) that determines the
discriminant into a user-friendly FORTRAN code, which is available upon
request. Given the limb-darkening coefficient, the frequency(ies), the
associated K-value(s) (i.e. the ratio of horizontal to vertical pulsation
amplitude), and the observed amplitudes of the moments, the algorithm
calculates for a given range of modes and a given grid of velocity parameters
the discriminant values and selects the pulsation parameters of the lowest
values of the discriminant. In case of a multiperiodic pulsation model, the
program calculates the discriminant for each mode separately.
l | |m| |
![]() |
![]() |
i | ![]() |
![]() |
2 | 1 | 1.02 | 6 |
![]() |
100 | 13 |
1 | 1 | 1.36 | 4 |
![]() |
110 | 15 |
2 | 2 | 1.37 | 8 |
![]() |
110 | 15 |
4 | 2 | 1.38 | 12 |
![]() |
105 | 10 |
3 | 3 | 1.45 | 4 |
![]() |
120 | 10 |
l | |m| |
![]() |
![]() |
i | ![]() |
![]() |
4 | 1 | 0.48 | 6 |
![]() |
100 | 11 |
5 | 1 | 0.58 | 10 |
![]() |
105 | 14 |
6 | 5 | 0.78 | 16 |
![]() |
120 | 15 |
6 | 4 | 0.81 | 26 |
![]() |
105 | 11 |
5 | 3 | 0.88 | 18 |
![]() |
100 | 10 |
We ran the FORTRAN program with the following grid of parameters: inclination
(i): from 0-90
,
with step 10
;
amplitude of
the pulsation (
): from 4-26 kms-1, with step = 2 km s-1;
projected rotation velocity (
): from 100-130 km·s-1, with step
= 5 kms-1; intrinsic width of the profile (
): from 10-15km s-1, with step = 1 kms-1. We searched for the minimum value of the
discriminant for all candidate modes in the range of l-values 0-6 for
f1. In the case of the pulsation parameters, associated with the second
frequency f2, we tested all (
)
combinations with
.
The
observed amplitudes of the moments we used, are listed in Table 3.
The results of the discriminant for the biperiodic model are listed in Table 4 for the five best solutions in the parameter space. The
identification results in the presence of a low degree ()
tesseral or
sectoral mode and a tesseral mode of higher degree (
). The
best solutions derived from Table 4 are of such a nature
that they lead to complex velocity structures at the stellar surface. Due to
this complexity, it is very likely that several combinations from Table 4 lead to almost the same line-profile variability, such
that one unique identification based on the discriminant alone is difficult. We
investigate this in the following part.
Line-profile fitting is the numerical fitting of observed line-profile variations with the simulated line-profile variations from numerical models describing the surface-velocity fields related to NRP (Smith 1977, 1986).
We used a FORTRAN code to generate theoretical profiles, given the
limb-darkening coefficient, the pulsation frequenties and the associated K-value
and the parameters of pulsation. For a given set of observed profiles, covering
the whole phase of pulsation, we then compare the theoretical profiles with the
observed ones, after adapting the phase of the generated profiles to the one of
the observed profiles. We devided the phase interval [0,1], associated with
the frequency f1, into 20 phase bins of 0.05 and chose at random from the 422 profiles
obtained in July 1997 a representative profile for each bin. We focus
on the SiIII profile at
Å. We based the pulsation parameters,
required for the input of the FORTRAN code, on the results of the moment method.
On the basis of the lowest pixel-to-pixel deviation between the observed and
the theoretically calculated profile, measured by the value of
,
with
,
with n the number of wavelength pixels in the profile and N the
number of spectra, between the generated and the observed profiles, the best
sets of pulsation parameters is chosen (i.e. the ones with the smallest values
of
). Thus,
denotes the average standard deviation
between the flux of the observed and the generated profiles.
The final choice of the overal best set still requires visual
inspection of the comparison between observed and theoretically calculated
profiles for the lowest
values.
Mode identification from direct line-profile fitting can be done on the basis of
nowadays, if one is dealing with a monoperiodic pulsation. As soon as
more than one mode is present, the number of free parameters is too large to
calculate theoretical profiles for a sufficiently fine grid. For this reason, we
do not perform "fitting'' in the strict sense, but calculate
for all
possible combinations of modes, given in Table 4.
The best fitting pulsation mode, associated with the dominant frequency, turned
out to be a low degree prograde sectoral mode. The lowest value of the deviation
was obtained by the combination (1,-1) and (5,1). Table 5
gives the five best solutions from the tested set of
parameters. The result of the line-profile fitting with pulsation modes (1, -1)
and (5, 1) is shown in Fig. 8. We note that the theoretical profiles
do not explain sufficiently the bumps, moving through the individual
profiles. The l-value of the prime mode is in any case too low to account for
the shape of the bumps.
To investigate the character of the bumps, we determined from the July 1997 data for each phase bin of width 0.05 a mean profile. This mean is based on typically 20 profiles. As suspected, the irregular bumps, which are visible in the individual profiles, are wiped out in the mean profiles. In the latter, only a weak global bump is visible. In order to avoid coming up with a solution dependent on the randomly chosen profiles (with randomly appearing bumps), we performed the same profile-fitting on the new set of mean profiles. This analysis resulted in a even stronger preference for the combination (1, -1) and (5, 1).
We next tried to find the best fitting combination of pulsation parameters
associated with this combination of modes, by rerunning the profile-fitting
FORTRAN program with the following much more detailed grid of parameters other
than the degrees and azimuthal orders: inclination (i): from 0-90
,
with step 10
;
amplitude of the pulsation (
): from 4-26 kms-1, with step = 2: kms-1; projected rotation velocity (
): from 100-130 kms-1, with step = 5 kms-1; intrinsic
width of the profile (
): from 10-25 kms-1, with step = 1 kms-1. The lowest value of the testparameter
(
)
was obtained for an inclination of
,
km s-1,
an intrinsic width of the profile of 23 km s-1 and pulsation amplitudes of
resp. 9 and 18 km s-1 (shown in Fig. 9). A list of the five
best combinations is given in Table 6.
We note that the selected value of the intrinsic width
km s-1is higher than the value
kms-1 we obtained from the moment
method, which was also the highest tested value in that case. So, we ran the
program of the moment method with the same grid as mentioned in the previous
section, but with values of the intrinsic width from 15-25 kms-1, with
step = 1 kms-1. This test resulted again in a preference for
km s-1, although line-profile fitting signs up for a higher value. An
explanation could be the following: the parameter
appears only in the
terms varying with frequencies f1 and f2 in <v3>. Estimating
through the discriminant is therefore mainly based on <v3>, for which our
biperiodic fit explains only 60% of the observed variability. As already
mentioned, we found indications for the presence of additional low-amplitude
modes, which are not taken into account in deriving the amplitudes listed in
Table 3. The broadening parameters
and
derived from the moments do not take the broadening due to the low amplitude
features into account, while they are "forced'' to have a higher value in
fitting since the total broadening of the profile needs to meet the observed
broadening with that method.
(l,m) | ![]() |
i | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
(1, -1) | 1.928E-3 | 40![]() |
110 | 15 | 6 |
(5, 1) | 10 | ||||
(1, -1) | 1.984E-3 | 40![]() |
110 | 15 | 4 |
(4, 1) | 6 | ||||
(2, -2) | 1.989E-3 | 20![]() |
110 | 15 | 8 |
(5, 1) | 6 | ||||
(1, -1) | 2.015E-3 | 40![]() |
110 | 15 | 4 |
(3, 1) | 6 | ||||
(2, -2) | 2.018E-3 | 20![]() |
110 | 15 | 8 |
(4, 1) | 4 |
![]() |
i | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
1.2651E-3 | 30![]() |
115 | 23 | 9 | 18 |
1.2653E-3 | 40![]() |
115 | 23 | 9 | 18 |
1.2657E-3 | 30![]() |
115 | 22 | 9 | 17 |
1.2659E-3 | 30![]() |
115 | 23 | 10 | 17 |
1.2663E-3 | 30![]() |
115 | 24 | 10 | 18 |
![]() |
Figure 8:
For each phase bin of length 0.05, associated with the frequency f1,
a SiIII ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 9:
The mean profile at SiIII ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
As can be seen in Fig. 9, our pulsation model is still not
sufficient enough to explain all the variability in the profiles. The
insufficiency also becomes clear when we compare the grayscale representations
of the theoretical simulated SiIII
Å profiles, with the
corresponding grayscale representations of the observed profiles, given in
the left-hand panel of Fig. 3. The grayscale representations of the third and fourth
night of the calculated theoretical profiles are shown in
Fig. 10.
In order to explain the grayscale plots in more detail, we reconsidered the
combinations listed in Table 4. Though pulsation models with
modes (2, -2) and (5, 1) result in higher values of the testparameter (e.g.
), the grayscale figures seem to match the observed
grayscales in a better way than the profiles calculated with (1, -1) and (5, 1)
modes. A comparative study between observed and theoretical calculated grayscale
representations, led to a preference for the following pulsation model:
,
kms-1,
kms-1, and modes
(2, -2) and (5, 1), with pulsation amplitude, resp. 8 and 12 kms-1. The
results are shown in the right-hand panel of Fig. 3.
We come to the following conclusion regarding the mode identification. Using the
moment method and line-profile fitting we tried to find a pulsation model which
accounts for both the LPVs visible in the grayscale representations of the
observed profiles and their moment variations. The relative small velocity
changes of about 1 kms-1 in the LPVs made it not easy to determine the
pulsation parameters. The pulsation model, shown in the right panel of
Fig. 3, seems to reconstruct the variations in the observed profiles approximately and
occurred among the best solutions from the discriminant. Part of the variations
cannot be explained by our model, though.
![]() |
Figure 10:
Grayscale representations of the calculated theoretical profiles,
corresponding with the observed profiles of the third and fourth night of July
1997. The pulsation parameters of the computed profiles are:
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
In order to find a periodicity in the appearance of the bands in the grayscale plots, we focus on the black bands pendulating through the grayscale figures of the observations, which display the line-profile variations in time (see the left panel of Fig. 3). Additionally we investigate two alternative biperiodic models.
We tried to understand the brightest bands by determing the time on which the
bump (dis)appears (expressed by ), the wavelength range the bump has
travelled before disappearing (
)
and the slope of the band. The
results of the investigation are given in Table 7. The frequencies we
found in the fifth and the sixth night (resp. 6.51 cd-1 and 6.73 cd-1) can be linked with the frequency
(2f2 - f1) + 2 cd-1=
6.7314 cd-1, which also has a strong power in the plot of the two
dimensional CLEAN analysis (Fig. 6).
Night | ![]() |
frequency |
![]() |
slope |
3 | 0.107 | 9.36 | 46 | 0.147 |
5 | 0.154 | 6.51 | 26 | 0.348 |
6 | 0.149 | 6.73 | 18 | 0.378 |
7 | 0.106 | 9.47 | 36 | 0.182 |
Based on the strong presence of the frequency 2f2 - f1 and its one-day aliases in the results of the two dimensional CLEAN analysis (Fig. 6) and the appearance of (2f2 -f1) + 2 in the periodicity of the black bands in the grayscale representations of the line-profile variability in time, we investigated if two alternative biperiodic models could better explain the moment and line-profile variability: f1 and f2' = 2f2 - f1, and the model f1 and f2'' = 4.68 cd-1, which is the frequency selected by the two dimensional CLEAN analysis. We did not find evidence to prefer the alternative models to the "classical'' model with f1 and f2.
In this section we give an estimation of the masses and radii of the two components of the binary system.
From an estimation (upper limit) of the equivalent width of the SiIII 4552.6 Å line profile of the first and the secondary binary component
(respectively 196 mÅ and 92 mÅ, the latter value is obtained by
extrapolating the line of the component, shown in the middle panel of the right
Fig. 1, assuming a Gaussian profile), we determined the effective
temperature associated with a fixed value of
,
the logarithm of the
number density of silicon
and the velocity of
turbulence
(Becker & Butler 1990). Using for both components
the same values:
(the solar abundance of
SiIII),
kms-1 and
(a mean value
from Strömgren and Geneva photometry, Heynderickx et al. 1994), we find for
respectively the secondary and the first component
K
and
K. The latter is consistent with the mean value of
K found in the literature (Gulati et al. 1989;
Heynderickx et al. 1994; Sokolov 1995; Berghöfer et al. 1996). Using the relation between the mass and luminosity given by Balona (1984),
,
the equation
(Heynderickx 1991),
,
and the relation between
luminosity and
,
we
find the following estimation of masses and radii:
and
;
and
.
We checked the
consistency of the assumption that
,
and find
and
.
Using these new values of
and
,
instead of
,
we find from Becker & Butler (1990) for
respectively the first and the secondary component
K
and
K, which we adopt as the final estimates of the
effective temperature of both components.
In order to check the validity of the masses of both components of Scorpii we re-consider the mass function
(see Table 2). From it, and from the masses of both components, we
derive an orbital inclination of
,
which is not too
different from our estimate
of the inclination angle of the
rotation axis of the primary from the mode identification. Our mass estimates
from the EW of the Si III lines are therefore compatible with the mass function.
From the estimate of
kms-1 for the primary, we derive a
rotational period of 1.90 days. If we accept our mode identification, then this
leads to frequencies of 3.96 and 5.48 cd-1 in the co-rotating frame for
respectively the first and the second mode. Such frequencies are compatible with
the excitation models based on the
mechanism. From these values we
also derive that the period of the first and second mode are respectively 13%
and 10% of the rotation period of the star, which is considerable for
Cep stars but still sufficiently low to allow a neglect of the toroidal
correction terms in the pulsational velocity field.
The rotation period of the secondary cannot be derived very accurately. If we
assume that this star does not pulsate, then half the width of the
Å line profile at the continuum can be regarded as an upper limit for
its
.
Using the orbital inclination as a good approximation of the
inclination angle of the component thus leads to a rotational period of about
1.14 days.
In this paper, we have presented an extensive study of the orbital motion and of
the line-profile variability of the double-lined spectroscopic binary Scorpii. The system consists of two rapidly-rotating B-type stars in an
eccentric orbit with an orbital period of some 196 days.
The primary is clearly a line-profile variable with at least two pulsation
modes. The model we obtained from the fitting of the profiles has led to the
following parameters:
,
kms-1,
kms-1, and modes (2, -2) and (5, 1), with pulsation amplitudes of
respectively 8 and 12 kms-1. Of all the considered combinations, this set
of parameters globally fits the profile variations best. However, this pulsation
model is not able to explain all the complex variations in the line
profiles. The same situation occurs for all the
Cep stars with a
rotational velocity above 100 kms-1 for which line-profile studies were
performed very recently (see the introduction of our paper for the references).
Since the number of targets with such behaviour is increasing steadily, this
systematic detection of complex patterns of wiggles in the line profiles
definitely seems to suggest that rotation affects significantly the pulsational
behaviour of the stars.
For
Scorpii we clearly find indications that many more frequencies
occur in the line-profile variations, besides the two modes that we tried to
model in this work. Their amplitude, however, is too low to accept them, since
their occurrence is usually limited to one specific part of the line
profile. Data with a much higher quality, i.e. with a much larger resolving
power and better signal-to-noise during a long time-base, are needed to confirm
the presence of these frequency peaks and to derive their origin. In view of
this additional variability it is no surprise that our best guess for a
biperiodic pulsation model is not able to explain the variations in full
detail. There is no sign whatsoever of these additional frequencies in the
ground-based photometry of the star. We regard our study as an indication that
many modes are probably excited in
Scorpii, as probably in most of the
other rapid rotators as well.
A confirmation of the presence of a large number of pulsation modes in Cep stars is quite important for the evaluation of massive pulsators as good
potential asteroseismic targets. The previous photometric studies of
Scorpii clearly point out that only data from space will have sufficient quality
to discuss this issue. We therefore suggest that these stars be included in the
programmes of the future seismological space missions such as MOST, MONS and
COROT.