A&A 370, 513-523 (2001)
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20010262
Y. Grosdidier1,2,3, - A. Acker1 - A. F. J. Moffat2,3,
1 - Observatoire Astronomique de Strasbourg, UMR 7550,
11 rue de l'Université, 67000 Strasbourg, France
2 -
Université de Montréal, Département de Physique,
CP 6128, Succursale Centre-Ville, Montréal (Québec) H3C 3J7, Canada
3 -
Observatoire du mont Mégantic, Canada
Received 19 October 2000 / Accepted 13 February 2001
Abstract
Using spectroscopic observations taken at the Observatoire
de Haute-Provence (France) and the Observatoire du mont Mégantic
(Canada), we describe wind fluctuations in the [WC 8]-type central star
of the planetary nebula NGC 40, HD 826, which was
observed intensively during 22 nights.
Moving features seen on the top of the
C III5696 and C IV
5801/12
(+C III5826) emission
lines are interpreted as outflowing "blobs'' which are radially accelerated
outwards in the Wolf-Rayet wind.
The amplitudes of the
variations range up to 25-30% of the adjacent
continuum flux, over timescales of hours. The variabilities of both lines
are quite well correlated, although they are somewhat weaker for the
C IV complex. Subpeaks (or gaps) on the
top of the C III line generally move towards the nearest line edge
in a symmetric fashion in the blue and the red.
Kinematic parameters of the blobs were
derived and compared to those observed for massive and other low-mass
Wolf-Rayet stars.
Especially impressive are the significantly larger observed
maximum radial acceleration values of the blobs,
compared to those already reported for massive WC 5-9, or
low-mass [WC 9] stars. This is attributed to the very small stellar radius of
HD 826. In addition the
velocity field is
found to possibly underestimate the true gradient within the stellar
wind flow. On the whole, the wind of HD 826 is highly
stochastically variable on a very short time-scale. This supports a turbulent
origin.
Key words: stars: individual: HD 826 - planetary nebulae:
individual: NGC 40 - stars: mass-loss - stars:
atmospheres -
stars: Wolf-Rayet - turbulence
It is well known that the Wolf-Rayet (WR) phenomenon is not restricted to bright, massive stars, but that it is also found among the central stars of some (50) planetary nebulae (PN), the so-called [WC] stars (Acker et al. 1992; Tylenda et al. 1993; Peña et al. 1998). About twenty percent (van der Hucht 1996; van der Hucht 1999) of the known stars showing the WR phenomenon in our Galaxy are central stars of PN. All the PN nuclei exhibiting a WR spectrum belong to the WC sequence (Tylenda et al. 1993), and appear virtually hydrogen free. No WN-type central star is known now that M 1-67 (= Sh 2-80), surrounding WR 124 (Spectral type: WN 8), has been removed from the list of bona-fide PN (Crawford & Barlow 1991).
The similarities in line profiles suggests that the winds of [WC] central stars are scale models of the winds of the massive WC stars. However, the level of excitation conditions among WR central stars is quite different since it spans a large range, from [WC 2] to [WC 11] (Méndez & Niemela 1982; Hu & Bibo 1990; van der Hucht 1996), compared to WC 4-WC 9 (with extension to WO 1-WO 5 at the hot-end) for massive, Population I WR stars (van der Hucht 1996). Note that such an extended distribution of spectral types (although the [WC 5-7] subtypes are apparently less represented; Acker et al. 1996; van der Hucht 1996) may additionally provide a broad baseline for comparison and detection of overall trends that otherwise might be drowned out in data generally showing large intrinsic dispersions within a given spectral type.
Although the loss of the outer hydrogen-rich envelope appears to be a necessary condition to the onset of the WR phenomenon, it is clearly not a sufficient one: the large majority of PN central stars (50 of 350 central stars for which the spectrum is known) does not have a WR-like spectrum (Acker et al. 1992). We still do not know exactly what determines some PN central stars to become [WC] stars. Moreover, the observational data, despite their incompleteness or low accuracy for many [WC] central stars, suggest that what distinguishes a [WC] star is not its present physical properties (Acker et al. 1996; Pottasch 1996), but rather more likely its initial properties and evolutionary history. This complicates the study of their precise origin. However, the status and evolutionary history of the PN central stars, as well as their ultimate fate as white dwarfs, is somewhat better known than that of their massive counterparts. The latter point combined with the broad range of excitation conditions of the nuclei suggests that [WC] central stars may facilitate understanding the WR phenomenon as a whole.
In Grosdidier et al. (2000; hereafter Paper I), wind fluctuations were described for four [WC 9-10] stars, including BD +303639 ([WC 9]) observed intensively during 15 nights. In the latter study, the authors show that the wind clumping originating in BD +303639 is remarkably similar to that reported for one of its massive, WC 9 counterparts, WR 103. Therefore, they interpreted this fact as strong evidence for understanding the WR phenomenon as a purely atmospheric phenomenon independent of the differences between massive and low-mass WR stars. The present paper will discuss the case of the hotter subtype [WC 8]. The case of the cooler subtypes, [WC 10-12], will be investigated in detail in future studies.
In order to resolve the narrow subpeaks present on the tops of the emission lines originating in BD +303639 ([WC 9]), Grosdidier et al. (Paper I) and Acker et al. (1997) found it necessary to have a spectral resolution of about one Angström, or better. For NGC 40, the Balick et al. (1996) spectroscopic data and our first observations (January 96; see Sect. 2 for details) demonstrated to us that a 3 Å spectral resolution is sufficient. Since the subpeaks are very weak, securing time resolution along with sufficient S/N ratio imposes the use of large telescopes. As a compromise, one has to concentrate on relatively bright [WC] central stars observed intensively, especially when using 2 m class telescopes, as in the present study.
Some 17 [WC]-late ([WC 8-12]) central stars are known within the Galaxy (Górny & Stasinska 1995; Acker, private communication) and only two belong to the [WC 8] spectral type. The [WC 8] nucleus of M 2-43 (= PN G027.6+04.2) is certainly too faint ( ) for our project. Therefore, the central star of NGC 40, HD 826, which is 4.1 mag brighter in the visible domain ( ), appears obviously to be the best target for studying [WC 8] spectroscopic flickering. We concentrated our intensive spectroscopic program on the C III5696 and C IV 5801/12+C III5826 emission lines originating in HD 826 observed intensively during 22 nights with 2 m class telescopes. Because they are relatively bright and have comparable intensities in [WC 8] stars, they are the best lines to study expanding stellar wind variability in the optical domain. In addition, the blend-free C III5696 emission line constitutes an excellent line to trace the movements of independent subpeaks, which are blurred by mixing in the adjacent blended C IV 5801/12+C III5826 emission line.
The PN NGC 40 is a well known nebula, with a 48
-diameter
barrel-shaped core, surrounded by two haloes; a faint, diffuse, inner halo out
to 90
,
and an outer halo with jet-like structures extending to 4;
see
Meaburn et al. (1996). These authors noted that turbulent
motions exist in the nebula, an observation confirmed by the analysis of
nebular line profiles (Neiner et al. 2000). NGC 40
is unusual, because the low excitation class (p=1) of the nebula suggests a stellar
temperature of about 30000 K, whereas the UV spectrum of the nucleus is
compatible with a temperature three
times higher. This discrepancy can be explained by the existence of a "carbon
curtain'' in the nebula (Bianchi & Grewing 1987).
C II6578 emission was observed to be coincident with the
48
[N II] shell, implying that the expanding central envelope is relatively
rich in carbon (see Meaburn et al. 1996). The PN NGC 40
probably originated from a relatively massive progenitor (6 ;
Bianchi 1992).
Denomination | Central star | Journal | of | observations | ||
PNG | Spectr. type | Telescope (diam.) | Spectr. range | S/N | Date | No. of |
Usual name PN | Va | Spectrograph | Resol. power (RP) | spectra | ||
Star name | ||||||
(1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) |
120.0+09.8 | [WC 8] | OMM (1.6 m) | 5300-5960 Å | 78 | 1996 Jan. 11 | 12 |
NGC 40 | 11.6 | B&C | 2.8 Å (2000) | 48 | 1996 Jan. 15 | 22 |
HD 826 | 44 | 1996 May 26 | 15 | |||
42 | 1996 May 27 | 15 | ||||
40 | 1996 May 30 | 13 | ||||
80 | 1996 Jul. 28 | 18 | ||||
56 | 1996 Sep. 26 | 26 | ||||
65 | 1996 Sep. 30 | 19 | ||||
43 | 1996 Nov. 16 | 34 | ||||
63 | 1996 Nov. 17 | 32 | ||||
OHP (1.52 m) | 5250-6000 Å | 36 | 1997 Jan. 12 | 20 | ||
AURELIE | 1.1 Å (5000) | 39 | 1997 Jan. 13 | 19 | ||
26 | 1997 Mar. 3 | 8 | ||||
21 | 1997 Mar. 5 | 13 | ||||
16 | 1997 Mar. 6 | 12 | ||||
29 | 1997 Mar. 7 | 14 | ||||
7 | 1998 Jan. 20 | 5 | ||||
17 | 1998 Jan. 21 | 18 | ||||
19 | 1998 Jan. 22 | 19 | ||||
17 | 1998 Jan. 23 | 17 | ||||
20 | 1998 Jan. 24 | 12 | ||||
18 | 1998 Jan. 25 | 9 |
a From the Acker et al. (1992) catalogue.
b Characteristic signal-to-noise ratio evaluated in the continuum adjacent to C III5696. |
The effective temperature of HD 826 was estimated at 46000 K by Leuenhagen et al. (1996), although some authors report effective temperatures as low as 30000 K (Köppen & Tarafdar 1978), or as high as 90000 K (Schmutz et al. 1989; Bianchi & Grewing 1987). Using IUE data, Bianchi & Grewing (1987) reported a terminal velocity of 1800 km s-1 and a luminosity of 26200 . From these results they inferred a radius of 0.66 for the continuum-emitting region. Earlier UV spectroscopic data obtained by Benvenuti et al. (1982) led to an even larger terminal velocity, km s-1. However, such a value is not reliable because of the poor spectral resolution of their instrumentation. Recent, reliable modelling of the expanding atmosphere (Leuenhagen et al. 1996) led to about 1000 km s-1 for the terminal velocity and 0.33 for the stellar core radius. PN nucleus spectroscopic flickering similar to that observed for massive WR stars was reported for the first times by Balick et al. (1996) and Grosdidier et al. (1997). They found that the [WC 8] central star of HD 826 shows fast moving subpeaks on the top of its flat-topped C III5696 emission line. Balick et al. (1996) also reported a nearly similar apparent acceleration for all features, the acceleration zone being at least 5 in extension.
We used the 1.52 m telescope at the Observatoire de
Haute-Provence (OHP, France) equipped with the Aurélie spectrograph (see
Gillet et al. 1994). The detector was a double linear array
Thomson TH7832 of 2048 pixels (Gillet et al. 1994). We used a
300 l/mm grating, leading to a 2.8-pixel resolving
power of 5000 (1 Å spectral resolution at 5500 Å). The
spectral range was centered on 5625 Å and covered 5250-6000 Å.
The entrance aperture of Aurélie is circular with a diametre of 3
.
We also
used the 1.6 m Ritchey-Chrétien, Boller & Chivens telescope at the
Observatoire du mont Mégantic (OMM, Canada) combined with the Perkin-Elmer
(model 31523) spectrograph at the f/8 focus. The detector was a THX CCD
with
pixels (before 1996 July 29), or a Loral CCD with
pixels (starting on 1996 September 26). We used a 600
l/mm grating as dispersive element, leading to a 2.2-pixel resolving power
of 2000 (2.8 Å spectral resolution at 5700 Å). The spectral
range, centered on 5630 Å, covered 5300-5960 Å. The width of the slit was
2.5
.
Figure 1: HD 826 typical normalized spectrum indicating the most obvious emission or absorption features (1998 January 23) | |
Open with DEXTER |
Tests at higher resolutions (0.5 Å and less) were conducted at the OHP (23 spectra taken in January and March 96). At high spectral resolutions, we were forced to significantly increase the exposure times in order to reveal the subpeaks (hence losing time resolution). However, despite longer exposures times (about one hour and more), we only achieved poor S/N ratios precluding any detailed statement concerning the appearance of subpeaks observed at different resolutions. The spectra were reduced in the way described in Paper I with the MIDAS package (OHP data) and the IRAF package (OMM data).
Figure 2: Residuals from the mean of C III5696 in HD 826 for 1996 November, 16 and 17. The mean was calculated based on all 22 nights of data. The segment in the lower right corner of the upper panel indicates the amplitude for 1.0 continuum unit in the residuals. Velocities are given relative to Å. The mean profile in the bottom panels is based on all thespectra in 22 nights | |
Open with DEXTER |
The characteristic time scale for significant variations is confirmed to be a few hours. Ejection times and starting wavelengths of individual blobs appear at random (this will be clearer by inspecting Fig. 6 in a subsequent section). The strongest, most obvious features appear to last longer and move throughout the C III line with apparently constant acceleration (see Sect. 3.3).
In order to emphasize the trajectories of subpeaks on the top of the C III5696 line, Fig. 3 shows grayscale plots of nightly differences from the global mean profile for the 22 nights, which is presented in the lower panels. These plots were obtained in a manner similar to that presented in Paper I. Gaps within the time series appear as a black horizontal bar. In these plots, we also show the trajectories of subpeaks on the top of the nearby C IV 5801/12 emission line. In this complex carbon line, moving subpeaks appear with ghost images on their side. This is likely due to the line blending within this emission line. Unfortunately, the blending of the C IV 5801/12 (+C III5826) emission feature prevents us from clearly identifying moving features. On the other (weak) lines, the situation is even worse; most of the subpeaks arising from noise can be erroneously associated with true manifestations of local overdensities because of the low S/N ratios in the lines.
The precise characterization
of the variations showed in Figs. 2 and 3 could be greatly influenced by photon statistics and
other sources of error. In order to rigorously estimate the significance
level of the line profile variations, we have applied the "temporal
variance
spectrum'' analysis (TVS) of Fullerton et al. (1996). For
details, we refer the reader to Fullerton et al.'s
original paper and to Grosdidier et al. (2000; Paper I).
Roughly speaking, the values of the TVS give a statistical assessment of the
variability level at a given wavelength. Another outcome of this technique is the possibility
of comparing time series of spectroscopic data obtained with different
instrumentation and/or inhomogeneous quality.
Figure 3: Grayscale plots for HD 826 of C III5696 & C IV 5801/12 residuals for 22 nights. Bottom panels show the 22-night mean. The range of the grayscale plots is -1.0 (black, lack of emission) to 1.0 (white, excess of emission) continuum units | |
Open with DEXTER |
The temporal variance spectra have been calculated for each of the 21 nights made up of at least 8 individual spectra, in order to secure statistical significance. Figures 4 and 5 have been obtained in the way described in Paper I: they show the related TVS1/2(i.e. reflecting the amplitude of variability rather than the variance) along with contour levels for significant variability at the 1% and 5% levels. To facilitate the identification of the variable zones, the nightly mean spectra are superposed. The main results are the following:
Figure 4: HD 826 nightly mean spectra (solid lines) and the computed square root of the TVSs (dashed curves), for 6 nights (see text). Contours of statistical significance for 1% and 5% levels are indicated by horizontal dotted lines (see arrows). Our calculations account for pixel-to-pixel and spectrum-to-spectrum differences in the noise distribution | |
Open with DEXTER |
The distribution does not appear symmetric in each of the two occupied quadrants, a few blobs with significant higher acceleration being observed in the wind receding region. We suspect that, if more blobs had been secured for a larger sample of spectra, the distribution would have been more symmetric. Therefore, we interpret this fact as a statistical effect. As already noticed for BD +303639 (Paper I), the large majority of the blobs in Fig. 6 satisfies . Therefore, the assumption of outwardly radially accelerating features is quite reasonable. However, 4 structures (only two at more than 2) move towards line centre. These features are likely spurious, being the tail end of a statistical distribution.
For comparison, the theoretical
-relation derived from the velocity field,
,
is also plotted in
Fig. 6 for different angles
between the line of sight
and blob directions of movement (
,
).
Adopting
1000 km s-1and the value
0.33
for HD 826
(Leuenhagen et al. 1996), the
kinematics are consistent with a
velocity law with
,
in contrast to the value
adopted in the atmosphere model
(Leuenhagen et al. 1996). A
value as small as 1 is
ruled out because it would imply accelerations ranging up to about
0.65 km s-2, which are not observed (see also Sect. 3.2.4 of Paper I).
The line formation region is evaluated
to span radial distances 10-100
from the nucleus,
judging from the distribution of the data in Fig. 6.
Therefore, the line
formation region appears much more extended than previously reported
by Balick et al. (1996).
Since the lifetime of the subpeaks is a few hours,
they would cross, at speed
1000 km s-1, a zone
limited to about a few tenths of the line formation region in radial extension.
Thus the wind of HD 826 is highly variable on a very short
time-scale, which supports a turbulent origin. Note that Lépine et al.
(2000) find lifetimes for C III5696 blobs
in the wind of the pop. I WC 8 star WR 135 to be of the order of
the crossing time in the C III5696 formation zone, thus
implying relatively long lasting blobs, that still could be turbulent.
Figure 5: HD 826 nightly mean spectra (solid lines) and the computed square root of the TVSs (dashed curves), for 6 other nights (see text and Fig. 4) | |
Open with DEXTER |
Figure 6: Kinematics in the form of projected mean acceleration vs projected mean velocity for each subpeak/gap on top of the C III5696 emission line (120 points). Filled (open) symbols correspond to an excess (deficit) of emission. The projected -velocity law is shown for = 0 (towards the observer, lower left corner) to 180 (away from the observer, upper right corner), in steps of 10 ( : solid curves; and : dotted lines). We use the stellar parameters given by Leuenhagen et al. (1996); see text | |
Open with DEXTER |
Judging from the distribution of the data in
Fig. 6, we estimate
for HD 826 to be around 3.3 .
For nine massive WR stars,
Lépine & Moffat (1999) found
.
Our lower
is likely mainly related to the very small
radius of HD 826, as expected for PN nuclei.
Recall that the expected maximum acceleration within a -velocity field is proportional to , with the function k (see Paper I) being only slightly dependent on for above 2-3. Thus, fitting the observed maximum acceleration with the theoretical -relation gives a constraint on the ratio . Therefore, we expect that reliable values on and should follow the relation: -5 km s-2.
Absolute values of the acceleration in Fig. 6 range from nearly 0 to 70 m s-2. The mean radial acceleration in the line formation zone (calculated from the 120 observed points) is m s-2 (compared to only m s-2 for BD +303639; Paper I). Within the line formation region, the spread in acceleration values appears quite large. Overall, these values in HD 826 are very similar to those observed in the massive WC 8 star WR 135 (Robert 1992; Lépine & Moffat 1999). However, especially impressive are the 3-4 times larger observed maximum values (HD 826: 66 m s-2) compared to those already reported for massive WC 5-9 stars or low-mass [WC 9] stars (4-20 m s-2: see Paper I; Lépine & Moffat 1999; Robert 1992). Note that in massive WR stars the amplitudes of the accelerations do not show correlations with either the stellar effective temperature, or the stellar luminosity (see Table 4 in Lépine & Moffat 1999). Thus, conjecturing that this property still holds for low-mass WR stars, and although HD 826's massive counterparts have larger terminal velocities, large maximum values are mainly a consequence of its very small core radius.
Figure 7: Relative error on , , as a function of for the blobs in Fig. 6, satisfying . The horizontal axis is in s-1 | |
Open with DEXTER |
Figure 8: Frequency distribution of the values (solid histogram). For comparison, the distribution expected from a true -velocity field is also plotted (dotted histogram). The line formation region in the second histogram is assumed to span radial distances 10-100 from the central star, with (see text). The horizontal axis is in s-1 | |
Open with DEXTER |
As was already noticed for massive WR stars, the blue-shifted absorption component of the lines exhibiting P-Cygni profiles in HD 826 is significantly more variable than the emission component. This is likely mainly due to the small volume of matter in front of the stellar "disk'', a large fraction of which is subject to a higher level of coherent variability. This suggests linear sizes for the blobs of 1 .
The subpeaks show large measurable velocity shifts in HD 826 during their lifetime. Subpeaks (or gaps) on the top of the C III line generally move from about the line center towards line edges in a symmetric fashion. This is consistent with wind features accelerated outward along radial trajectories. Since the lifetime of the subpeaks is a few hours, they cross, at speed 1000 km s-1, a zone limited to about a few tenths or less of the line formation region in radial extension. Thus the wind of HD 826 is highly variable on a very short time-scale, which supports a turbulent origin.
The kinematics of 120 structures on top of the C III5696 line of HD 826 have been measured. Adopting km s-1 and the kinematics are well reproduced by a -velocity law with , in contrast with the value adopted in the atmosphere model. The line formation region is evaluated to span radial distances 10-100 from the central star. Within the accuracy of our acceleration measurements, and (hence ) seem to be good estimates of the stellar radius and of the parameter. Keeping and fitting the observed maximum acceleration with the theoretical -relation would require a downward revision of the ratio by a factor 10. Because of the quite good reliability of the terminal velocity estimate (1000 km s-1), keeping would therefore imply rather high, unrealistic values of the stellar radius (3.3-3.6 ). Therefore we reject a value of 1 in favor of , which is consistent with previous estimates of for massive WR stars given in Moffat (1996).
The line variability in HD 826 is somewhat similar to that
observed in the massive WC 8 star WR 135 (see Robert 1992;
Lépine & Moffat 1999; Lépine et al. 2000). Thus, on
the whole, the wind fragmentation process appears to be a purely atmospheric
phenomenon, despite the strong differences between both types of underlying
hot star. However, some differences exist: i) in the complex
C IV
5801/12+C III5826 emission line
originating in HD 826, moving subpeaks appear with adjacent ghost
images. This is likely due to line blending. Unfortunately, this blending
prevented us from clearly identifying moving features. This was not
the case for WR 135 (see Lépine et al.
2000); ii) in addition, Lépine et al.
(2000) find lifetimes for C III5696 blobs
in the wind of WR 135 to be of the order of
the crossing time in the C III5696 formation zone, thus
implying relatively long-lasting blobs, compared to those observed
in HD 826.
Combining the results of Paper I with those of the present paper we find that [WC 9] and [WC 8] central stars exhibit similar changes in their C III5696 and C IV 5801/12+C III5826 emissions. We therefore suspect that, if more data had been secured for a larger sample of late subtype [WC] stars, the phenomenon of emission line variability in central stars might have revealed itself to be more common and universal. However, the details differ. For example, accelerations exhibited by the clumps originating in HD 826 are often significantly larger than those in BD +303639 or massive WR stars. This difference could be understood by the smaller hydrostatic radius of HD 826. However, it will be important in the near future to test whether the data indicate any true correlation of the observed variations of the emission lines with radius or any other fundamental stellar parameters, for a larger sample of stars. In the case of pop. I WR stars, no such correlation is seen (Lépine & Moffat 1999).
Finally, high resolution (0.5 Å), high S/N ratio, temporally resolved, optical spectra of HD 826 are needed in order to investigate the appearance and dynamics of subpeaks observed so far at inferior resolutions. In particular, the possible hierarchy of subpeaks within each individual subpeak (such a fractal-like structure is expected in the context of supersonic, compressible turbulence) could be tested in this way. For that purpose, the need for large, 10 m-class telescopes is critical.
Acknowledgements
YG acknowledges financial aid from the French Ministry of Foreign Affairs. AFJM is grateful to NSERC (Canada) and FCAR (Québec) for financial support. AFJM acknowledges the award of a Killam Fellowship from the Canada Council for the Arts. We thank Thomas Eversberg for his help in the data acquisition (OMM data).