Cosmic rays arrive at Earth with energies from several hundred MeV/particle
to 3 1020 eV; their spectrum for protons is at GeV energies close
to E-2.75, and for He and higher elements close to E-2.65 below
a knee at
eV, where the spectrum turns
down to about E-3.1, to flatten out again near 3 1018 eV,
called the ankle (e.g. Lawrence et al.
1991; Nagano et al.
1992; Zatsepin 1995). The chemical composition is roughly similar to that of the interstellar medium, with reduced hydrogen and
helium relative to silicon.
A proposal (see, e.g., Biermann 1993a, 1997a) is that three sites of origin account for the cosmic rays observed, i) supernova explosions into the interstellar medium, ISM-SN, ii) supernova explosions into the stellar wind of the predecessor star, wind-SN, and iii) radio galaxy hot spots. Here, in this concept, the cosmic rays attributed to supernova-shocks in stellar winds, wind-SN, produce an important contribution at all energies up to 3 109 GeV.
We note that the nucleosynthesis in Wolf-Rayet stars (e.g., Prantzos et al. 1987), and their contribution to cosmic rays has been discussed previously (Yanagita et al. 1990). It appears that they do make a substantial contribution, even as seen in the context of the standard leaky box model approach.
Particle energies go up to 100 Z TeV for ISM-SN, and to 100 Z PeV
with a bend at 600 Z TeV for wind-SN, the knee (Stanev et al.
1993),
where Z is the charge of the nucleus considered. Radiogalaxy hot spots contribute
up to about 100 EeV at the source, with some sources up to 4 1021 eV
(Biermann 1997b). These numerical values are estimates with
uncertainties of surely larger than a factor of 2, since they derive from an estimated
strength of the magnetic field, and estimated values of the effective shock
velocity.
The spectra are predicted to be
for ISM-SN, and
E-2.67+0.00-0.04 for wind-SN below the knee, and
E-3.07+0.00-0.14 for wind-SM above the knee, and about
E-2.0 at injection for radiogalaxy hot spots.
These predictions can be compared at some detail with data, and we have
given comparisons in previous work (e.g.
Biermann 1993a; Biermann 1993b; Wiebel-Sooth et al.1998; Biermann 1996; Biermann 1997a, 1997b). Newer data confirm some of
the general trends near the knee
(Glasmacher et al.
1999a; Glasmacher et al.
1999b).
Copyright ESO 2001