A&A 369, 57-64 (2001)
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20010103
M. Santos-Lleó1 - J. Clavel1 - B. Schulz2 - B. Altieri1 - P. Barr3 - D. Alloin4 - P. Berlind5 - R. Bertram6,7 - D. M. Crenshaw8 - R. A. Edelson9 - U. Giveon10 - K. Horne11 - J. P. Huchra5 - S. Kaspi10 - G. A. Kriss12 - J. H. Krolik13 - M. A. Malkan14 - Yu. F. Malkov15 - H. Netzer10 - P. T. O'Brien9 - B. M. Peterson6 - R. W. Pogge6 - V. I. Pronik15,16 - B.-C. Qian17 - G. A. Reichert18 - P. M. Rodríguez-Pascual19 - S. G. Sergeev15,16 - J. Tao17 - S. Tokarz5 - R. M. Wagner6,7 - W. Wamsteker20 - B. J. Wilkes5
1 - XMM Science Operations Center, Astrophysics Division, ESA Space
Science Department, PO Box 50727, 28080 Madrid, Spain
2 - ISO Science Operations Center, Astrophysics Division, ESA Space
Science Department, PO Box 50727,
28080 Madrid, Spain
3 - Integral Science Operations Center, Astrophysics Division, ESA
Space Science Department, ESTEC, Postbus 299, 2200 AG Noordwijk, The
Netherlands
4 - European Southern Observatory, Alonso de Cordova 3107,
Vitacura Casilla 19001, Santiago 19, Chile
5 - Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street,
Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
6 - Department of Astronomy, Ohio State University, 140 West 18th Avenue,
Columbus, OH 43210, USA
7 - Mailing address: Steward Observatory, University of Arizona,
Tucson, AZ 85721, USA
8 - Computer Sciences Corporation, Laboratory for Astronomy and Solar
Physics, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Code 681, Greenbelt, MD 20771,
USA
9 - Department of Physics and Astronomy, University
of Leicester, University Road, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK
10 - School of Physics and Astronomy and the Wise Observatory, The Raymond
and Beverly Sackler Faculty of Exact Sciences, Tel-Aviv University,
Tel-Aviv 69978, Israel
11 - School of Physics and Astronomy, University of St. Andrews, North
Haugh, St. Andrews KY16 9SS, Scotland, UK
12 - Space Telescope Science Institute, 3700 San Martin Drive,
Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
13 - Department of Physics and Astronomy, The John Hopkins University,
Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
14 - Department of Astronomy, University of California, Math-Science
Building, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA
15 - Crimean Astrophysical Observatory, P/O Nauchny, 334413 Crimea,
Ukraine
16 - Isaac Newton institute of Chile, Crimean Branch
17 - Shanghai Astronomical Observatory, 80 Nandan Road, 200030 Shanghai,
PR China
18 - Raytheon ITSS, Space Science Data Operations Office,
NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Code 631, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA
19 - Universidad Europea de Madrid, Departamento de Física, C/ Tajo
sn, Urb. El Bosque, Villaviciosa de Odón, 28670 Madrid, Spain
20 - ESA IUE Observatory, PO Box 50727, 28080 Madrid, Spain
Received 3 January 2000 / Accepted 12 January 2001
Abstract
Mid-infrared images of the Seyfert 1 galaxy Mrk 279
obtained with the ISO satellite are presented together with the
results of a one-year monitoring campaign of the 2.5-11.7m spectrum.
Contemporaneous optical photometric and spectrophotometric observations
are also presented.
The galaxy appears as a point-like source at the resolution of the
ISOCAM instrument (4-5
).
The 2.5-11.7
m average spectrum of the nucleus in Mrk 279 shows a
strong power law continuum with
(
)
and weak PAH emission features.
The Mrk 279 spectral energy distribution shows a mid-IR bump,
which extends from 2 to 15-20
m. The mid-IR bump is
consistent with thermal emission from dust grains at a distance of
lt-d.
No significant variations of the mid-IR flux have been detected during our
observing campaign, consistent with the relatively low amplitude (
10%
rms) of the optical variability
during the campaign. The time delay for H
line emission in response to the optical
continuum variations is
days, consistent with
previous measurements.
Key words: galaxies: active - galaxies: individual: Mrk279 - galaxies: nuclei - galaxies: Seyfert - infrared: galaxies
The emerging picture is one where the near to mid-IR emission arises from thermal re-radiation of UV and optical photons absorbed by the circumnuclear dust. Various models for the geometry and location of this dust have been proposed, but the exact configuration of the models remains unconstrained due to a lack of suitable observational data.
One can use variability as a tool
to probe the inner few lightyears of the dusty regions.
Reverberation-mapping techniques (Blandford & McKee 1982)
have been used extensively to map the BLR in several AGN,
on scales of lightdays to lightmonths, notably by
the International AGN Watch
consortium (Alloin et al. 1994).
A similar approach can be used to probe the IR-emitting region,
i.e. the warm dust component within the obscuring material.
Given UV flux variations of sufficient amplitudes, a mid-IR
monitoring campaign of sufficiently long duration and adequate
sampling rate, it may in principle be possible to recover the transfer
function of the dust.
The Infrared Space Observatory (ISO; Kessler et al. 1996) offered a unique opportunity to carry out such a spectrophotometric monitoring program in the mid-IR. The Seyfert 1 galaxy Mrk 279 ( z = 0.0294) was selected because its celestial position allows an uninterrupted 12-month visibility window for ISO and it has a well-documented variability history in the optical (Osterbrock & Shuder 1982; Peterson et al. 1985; Maoz et al. 1990; Stirpe et al. 1994), the UV (Chapman et al. 1985), and X-rays (Reichert et al. 1985). Balmer-line time-delays (Maoz et al. 1990; Stirpe & de Bruyn 1991; Stirpe et al. 1994) suggest a BLR size in the range 6 to 12 lightdays. A search for day-to-day variability across the Balmer-line profile was unsuccessful (Eracleous & Halpern 1993). No far-IR flux variations were detected with IRAS (Edelson & Malkan 1987).
Mrk 279 was observed with two of the instruments on board the
ISO satellite: nine narrow-band filter images were obtained with
ISOCAM (Cesarsky et al. 1996),
while spectra were recorded with the
PHT-S spectrometer, a subsystem of the ISOPHOT
instrument (Lemke et al. 1996).
The PHT-S spectrometer covers the 2.5-12 m spectral range at a mean
resolution of
3150kms-1, with a gap between 4.9 and 5.9
m.
Its entrance aperture projects to
on
the sky.
All PHT-S observations were carried-out in an identical fashion. The
integrating amplifiers were reset every 32s and on-source
measurements were interleaved with background measurements by ``chopping''
on the sky at a frequency of 1/256 Hz. The chopper throw was set to 300''.
For each of the observations, total on-source integration time was 2048 s
and total observing time (including background measurements and instrument
overheads) was 4236 s.
The CAM observations were performed in staring mode at a magnification
of
per pixel and with a gain of 2. Nine different filters were
used. The unit integration time was 2.1s per readout and there were between
72 and 197 readouts per image, depending on the filter used. The particular
sequence of filters was chosen to go from high to low illumination so as to
minimize the detector stabilization time. Good stabilization was also
guaranteed by the relatively large number of readouts per exposure.
The PHT-S observations were made at 16 different epochs, from 1996, February 5 to 1997, February 13 (Table 1). The ISOCAM observations of Mrk 279 were all carried out on 1996 February 5, contemporaneously with the first of the PHT-S spectra.
Standard procedures from the CAM Interactive Analysis (CIA) software package were used for the reduction of the ISOCAM data
(Ott et al. 1997). The full width at half maximum (FWHM) of Mrk 279 varies
with the filter wavelength from
to
(Table 2),
but is always consistent with that of a point source.
Monochromatic intensities were obtained by integration of the source flux
within a circle of radius 6 pixels (18'') and subtraction of a
normalised background measured in a concentric circular ring.
The intensity of Mrk 279 in the different filters is listed in
Table 2. The accuracy of these measurements is
%.
The ISOPHOT-S data were reduced with the PHOT Interactive Analysis
(PIA;
Gabriel 1998) software package. However, because ISOPHOT-S was
operating close to its sensitivity limit, special reduction and
calibration procedures had to be applied. After a change of illumination,
the responsivity of the Si:Ga photoconductors immediately jumps to an
intermediate level. This initial jump is followed by a characteristic slow
transient to the final level. At the faint flux limit, this time constant is
extremely long, and in practice only the initial step is observed in
chopped-mode. The spectral response function for this particular mode and
flux-level was derived directly from observations of a faint
standard star HD 132142 whose flux ranges from 0.15 to 2.54 Jy. The
calibration star observation was performed with the same chopper frequency
and readout-timing as the AGN observations. The S/N of the ISOPHOT-S
spectra was considerably enhanced by two additional measures:
i) the 32-s integration ramps were divided into sub-ramps of 2 s
and no de-glitching (removal of cosmic ray hits) was performed at
ramp-level ii) after slope-fitting and de-glitching at slope-level,
the maximum of the distribution of the slopes was determined by
fitting a gaussian to the histogram. The resulting ISOPHOT-S fluxes are
accurate to within
%.
The 1996 February 5 PHT-S spectrum is shown in Fig. 1, together
with the monochromatic intensities measured with ISOCAM on the same day.
![]() |
Figure 1: The ISOPHOT-S spectrum from 1996 February 5 together with the ISOCAM photometric fluxes from the same date. The x-axis shows the rest frequency at the bottom and the rest wavelength in microns at the top, both on a logarithmic scale |
Open with DEXTER |
For each epoch of observation the continuum flux
was measured over two different intervals, at short wavelengths (SW:
2.5-4.7m) and long wavelengths (LW: 5.8-9.9
m).
Table 1 lists the mean intensities
over these intervals and their uncertainties, while the light curves are
shown in Fig. 2.
![]() |
Figure 2:
IR and optical light curves of Mrk 279. The top two panels
show the IR light curves from the SW and LW detectors
(2.52-4.70 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
An accurate determination of the flux uncertainties is essential when discussing source variability. We have therefore investigated the different source of errors which could potentially affect our PHT-S measurement.
In staring mode, the overall responsivity of PHT-S is known to remain
stable within % (Schulz 1999).
We have assessed the stability of the PHT-S responsivity more
specifically at the time of each of the Mrk 279 observations and verified
that no other systematic effects were present. For this purpose,
two different types of calibration measurements were used as diagnostic:
As a consistency check, errors were also computed by comparing PHT-S fluxes obtained within 30 days from each others. This gives a conservative error estimate since it assumes that there are no flux variations on time scales shorter than 30 days. Taking every pair of fluxes within 30 days and measuring the error on their means, we get mean relative errors of 3.5% and 1.6% for the SW and LW bands, respectively.
UT | MJD | F(2.5-4.7![]() |
F(5.8-9.9![]() |
(-2450000) | (mJy) | (mJy) | |
(1) | (2) | (3) | (4) |
1996 Feb. 5 | 119 | 73.5 ![]() |
132 ![]() |
1996 Mar. 3 | 146 | 75.3 ![]() |
123 ![]() |
1996 Mar. 12 | 155 | 65.2 ![]() |
125 ![]() |
1996 Apr. 2 | 176 | 69.5 ![]() |
129 ![]() |
1996 Apr. 27 | 201 | 72.7 ![]() |
127 ![]() |
1996 May 11 | 215 | 72.8 ![]() |
128 ![]() |
1996 May 29 | 233 | 73.2 ![]() |
131 ![]() |
1996 Jul. 29 | 294 | 63.6 ![]() |
127 ![]() |
1996 Aug. 12 | 308 | 61.8 ![]() |
122 ![]() |
1996 Aug. 27 | 323 | 62.0 ![]() |
123 ![]() |
1996 Sep. 15 | 342 | 60.0 ![]() |
124 ![]() |
1996 Oct. 17 | 374 | 73.8 ![]() |
128 ![]() |
1996 Nov. 1 | 389 | 62.6 ![]() |
120 ![]() |
1996 Nov. 18 | 406 | 73.7 ![]() |
128 ![]() |
1996 Dec. 5 | 423 | 70.1 ![]() |
124 ![]() |
1997 Feb. 13 | 493 | 81.8 ![]() |
128 ![]() |
Filter |
![]() |
Range | Flux | FWHM |
(![]() |
(![]() |
(mJy) | ('') | |
(1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) |
SW1 | 3.57 | 3.05-4.10 | 68 | 3.9 |
SW5 | 4.25 | 3.00-5.5 | 60 | 3.3 |
LW4 | 6.00 | 5.50-6.50 | 106 | 4.1 |
LW2 | 6.75 | 5.00-8.50 | 115 | 4.8 |
LW5 | 6.75 | 6.50-7.00 | 106 | 4.2 |
LW6 | 7.75 | 7.00-8.50 | 120 | 5.0 |
LW7 | 9.62 | 8.50-10.7 | 159 | 3.8 |
LW8 | 11.4 | 10.7-12.0 | 212 | 4.5 |
LW3 | 15.0 | 12.0-18 | 209 | 5.0 |
Spinoglio et al. (1985) measured L-band (3.5
)
fluxes of
mJy,
mJy, and
mJy
through apertures of 12'', 12'', and 17'', respectively, consistent
with our results to within the measurement uncertainties.
Given the spectrograph aperture (
),
the host galaxy of Mrk 279 could, in principle, contribute to
the PHT-S flux. Indeed, a faint extended nebulosity is
apparent in the K-band (
2.2
)
image of
McLeod & Rieke (1995). This extended flux arises from
the integrated emission of giants and supergiants in the galactic
disk whose energy distribution is maximum at
2
and
falls-off abruptly at longer wavelengths. In practice, stellar emission
will therefore make a negligible contribution to the PHT-S
flux. Nevertheless, this was positively verified by comparison with
ground-based data as follows:
The galaxy contributes
mJy,
mJy and
mJy to the
photometric measurements in the J, H, and K bands respectively
(Granato et al. 1993). These values are used in Sect. 6 to infer
the intrinsic spectral energy distribution of the active nucleus in Mrk 279.
Ground-based optical observations were made in support of the ISO observations. Spectroscopic monitoring was carried out with the 1.8-m Perkins Telescope of the Ohio State and Ohio Wesleyan University at the Lowell Observatory, the 1.0-m telescope of the Wise Observatory, the 2.6-m Shajn Telescope of the Crimean Observatory, and the 1.5-m Mt. Hopkins Telescope of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics (CfA). A detailed log of the spectroscopic observations can be found at the International AGN Watch website.
In addition, CCD photometry was made on the 1.0-m telescope of the Wise Observatory. The flux was measured using a fixed aperture of radius 7'', under seeing conditions of 2-3''. The B, V, R, and I instrumental magnitudes are listed in Cols. (3)-(6) of Table 4. They have not been scaled to any standard system.
The spectroscopic data were processed by the individual observers
in standard fashion for CCD frames. However, the standard astronomical flux
calibration techniques
based on determining the instrument response function
from observations of standard stars are only accurate
for AGN spectrophotometry at
about the 10% level even under ideal observing conditions.
We used the standard stars only for relative
calibration, and employed different calibration
techniques for absolute calibration:
the data from Wise Observatory were calibrated following the
method described by Maoz et al. (1994). The data
from Ohio, Crimea, and CFA were
calibrated through
scaling through [O III]
flux that was measured
on five photometric nights, at F([O III]
)
=
10
ergs s-1cm-2.
On these calibrated spectra we measured the continuum flux
by averaging the flux in a 10Å wide band centered at 5105Å in the
rest frame of Mrk 279 (
). The H
line flux
has been measured by linear interpolation between rest-frame wavelengths
4765Å and
5105Å, and line integration between 4770Å and
4935Å. The long-wavelength
cutoff of this integration band misses some of the H
flux
underneath [O III]
,
but avoids the need to
estimate the Fe II contribution to this feature and still gives
a good representation of the H
variability. We did not
correct for the narrow-line, which is expected to be constant.
As the measurements made from the spectra are subject to systematic
differences between the four data sets used, we applied the prescriptions of
Peterson et al. (1999) to intercalibrate the data sets, and correct
for aperture effects. The final continuum
(5100Å) and
H
emission-line fluxes are given in Table 5.
The spectrophotometric and photometric light curves are
shown in Fig. 2. Using the results of Granato et al. (1993),
we estimate that stars contribute for
mJy or
% to
the mean reddening corrected 5100Å flux.
Figure 3 shows the weighted mean 2.5-11.7m spectrum
of Mrk 279 obtained by averaging all 16 PHT-S spectra.
The spectrum of Mrk 279 is quite similar to the mean Seyfert 1
spectrum obtained by Clavel et al. (2000) from their sample of 28
type 1 AGNs. It shows a strong continuum,
with a flux density per frequency unit that drops sharply
with increasing frequency and only weak broad emission features.
The continuum is well approximated by a power law
(
)
of spectral index
(Fig. 3), close to the average
Seyfert 1 mid-IR
index
(Clavel et al. 2000).
![]() |
Figure 3:
The weighted averaged mid-IR spectrum of Mrk 279 (dark line),
the rms deviations about the mean (light line) and the error
(dotted line). The best-fit power law with index
![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 4:
The spectral energy distribution (SED) of Mrk 279, from
the far-IR to the X-rays. The IRAS data are represented as
open squares whereas near-IR ground-based data are shown as stars.
The PHT-S spectrum is shown as a dotted line, while ISOCAM fluxes are
plotted as crosses where the horizontal bars indicate the filter
range. The two open circles in the optical are the nuclear
R- and B- band fluxes. The filled circle is the mean 5100Å
flux. Optical and near IR data have been corrected for stellar light
while UV and optical data have been corrected for galactic reddening.
The best fit power laws mid-IR and UV (
![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
This Work (H![]() |
Wise Obs. (H![]() |
Wise Obs. (H![]() |
LAG (H![]() |
|
Parameter | (1996) | (1988) | (1988) | (1990) |
(1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) |
Cross-correlation centroid
![]() |
16.7+5.3-5.6 | 2.5+25.5-5.4 | 11.6+8.5-11.7 | 6.8+19.8-6.9 |
Cross-correlation peak
![]() |
21+2-9 | 3+28-5 | 11+11-11 | 2+29-3 |
Peak correlation coefficient
![]() |
0.769 | 0.799 | 0.793 | 0.795 |
Continuum rms fractional variability
![]() |
0.093 | 0.071 | 0.071 | 0.126 |
Mean time between observations (days) | 2.3 | 4.1 | 4.1 | 6.0 |
Duration of campaign (days) | 195 | 156 | 156 | 152 |
Figure 4 shows the continuum spectral energy distribution (SED)
of Mrk 279 from the far-IR to the X-rays.
The IRAS data points are the average of 6 pointed observations reported
by Edelson & Malkan (1987). The near-IR data are from Spinoglio et al.
(1985) after subtraction of the stellar light (Sect. 3.2). The
R and B band fluxes (Granato et al. 1993)
and the mean 5100Å-flux (this paper) have also been corrected for
the underlying galaxy contribution and de-reddened. The 1500 Å data point
represents the average of 26 observations made with IUE (Rodriguez et al.
1998) between 1978 and 1991. It has been corrected for foreground reddening
using
cm-2 (Elvis et al. 1989). The
large error bar reflects the strong variability of Mrk 279 at UV wavelengths.
The EXOSAT X-ray data are from 1983 and 1984 and are best described
in terms of a broken power-law (Ghosh & Soundararajaperumal 1992),
while the 1994 data from ASCA are modeled with a unique power law
in the Tartarus Database (http://tartarus.gsfc.nasa.gov/).
Since this SED is constructed from data collected over 19
years, we caution that it may be distorted by variability.
Variability is important in shaping the X-ray, ultraviolet, and optical
spectrum, but is much less significant at longer wavelengths
(see Sect. 7).
Bearing these limitations in mind, it is still possible
to draw some general conclusions which are not affected by flux variations
at short wavelengths.
The Mrk 279 SED displays three broad maxima or
``bumps''.
The first maximum occurs in the far-IR at wavelengths 25
m.
Given the large IRAS (
1') apertures and
the cold color temperature of the far-IR bump,
the 100
m and 60
m fluxes are probably dominated
by cold dust from the host galaxy's ISM.
Hence, the far-IR ``bump'' is most likely not related to the AGN itself.
The second maximum is the usual ``big blue bump'' which dominates
the SED of type 1 AGNs from the optical to the soft X-rays.
It is usually identified as thermal emission from an accretion disk.
In between these two maxima lies a third and smaller bump
which extends from
1
m to
15-20
m.
We tentatively identify this mid-IR bump as
thermal emission from dust in
the putative molecular torus and/or from dust in the NLR,
as discussed below.
The total duration of our ISO campaign was 374 days,
with a mean sampling interval of 24.9 days.
In addition to the weighted-mean spectrum,
,
Fig. 3 displays the
rms spectrum
,
and the mean error spectrum
.
The latter was evaluated as
![]() |
(1) |
The relatively dense sampling of the optical light curves between
January and July 1996 allows us to
measure the time-delayed response, or ``lag'', of
the H
emission line to continuum variations by
cross-correlation of the light curves shown in Fig. 2.
We used both the interpolation method of Gaskell & Sparke (1986)
and the discrete-correlation function (DCF) method
of Edelson & Krolik (1988), in both cases
employing the specific implementation described by
White & Peterson (1994).
The centroid of the cross-correlation is at
16.7+5.3-5.6days.
Uncertainties were estimated using the model-independent
FR/RSS Monte-Carlo method described by Peterson et al. (1998).
The cross-correlation results are shown in
Table 3 and Fig. 5. For comparison,
Table 3 also lists the results of previous Mrk 279 monitoring
campaigns by Maoz et al. (1990) and Stirpe et al. (1994).
![]() |
Figure 5:
Cross-correlation function of the H![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
The mid-IR spectrum of Mrk 279
shows a strong power-law continuum
of spectral index
,
with weak PAH emission
bands and no detectable silicate
9.7
m feature.
The mid-IR bump of Mrk 279 extends
from roughly 1.25
m to 15-20
m and is
wider than a single blackbody. It peaks near
3
m.
In Fairall 9, the mid-IR bump most likely originates from the
re-processing of UV and optical photons by nuclear dust (Sect. 1).
We can estimate the distance to the central source
of the innermost and hottest dust grains in Mrk 279,
,
by scaling directly from Fairall 9
(Clavel et al. 1989). Mrk 279 is
approximately eight times less luminous than Fairall 9.
Since the inner radius of the dust distribution is presumably
controlled by sublimation,
should scale approximately as L1/2, so
should be a factor of
smaller in Mrk 279
than in Fairall 9, i.e.
light-days.
During the ISO campaign, the mid-IR flux did not experience
variations of amplitude larger than 10%, the detection limit of
the PHT-S instrument.
Optical data contemporaneous to the IR observations revealed
significant fluctuations of the 5100Å flux with a relative
rms amplitude of 9% and a ratio of the maximum
to the minimum fluxes,
.
Any upper limit to the mid-IR variability in Mrk 279 has to
be examined in the light of the UV and optical continuum variations
over the same period of time. As noted earlier, in the dust reprocessing
scenario the amplitude of the MIR flux variations will be reduced compared
to that of the primary UV-optical source because of the finite propagation
time of the photons. Imagine a short (duration
1 day) pulse
of the UV-optical source illuminating a thin dust annulus,
inclined by
with respect to the line of sight.
The annulus IR response will be delayed by
and will last for
.
For numerical values appropriate to Mrk 279,
the duration of the IR reverberated pulse will be 38 days
and its peak amplitude thereby reduced by a factor of order 38.
Given the relatively low amplitude of the optical flux variations
(Fig. 2), the absence of measurable variations of
the MIR flux is consistent with the above scenario.
Though a detailed quantitative fit with a particular model is
beyond the scope of this paper, it is nevertheless illustrative
to perform a qualitative comparison of our data
with the theoretical predictions from the torus model
by Pier & Krolik (1992). This model predicts a mid-IR ``bump''
that is approximately 0.7 to 1 decade wide in wavelengths, in
agreement with the Mrk 279 observations. In the Pier & Krolik (1992) model,
the torus emission is expected to peak at a wavelength
that depends primarily on the flux illuminating the torus inner surface
and its inclination angle i with respect to the line of sight.
The relatively high color temperature implied by
constrains the inclination
to be small (
). The absence of silicate absorption
also rules out very optically thick models and constrains
the vertical column density at the torus inner edge,
.
Comparison of Fig. 4 with Fig. 5 of Pier & Krolik (1992)
also suggests a moderately thick torus, with
.
The delay
of H
w.r.t. the optical continuum
was
16.7+5.3-5.6 days during this campaign.
Comparison with the results from previous monitoring campaigns
(see Table 3) does not reveal any significant change
of
over a time span of
8 years. In other words,
we find no evidence for a secular change in the structure of the
BLR in Mrk 279. Equating
with the
emissivity weighted radius
of the H
emitting
region, one sees that
is about 8 times larger than
.
In other words, the BLR lies well within the
dust evaporation radius.
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to all the observatories involved for the generous allocation of observing time and José Acosta-Pulido for helpful discussions on the PHT-S instrument calibration. MS acknowledges partial support by Spanish CICYT grant PB-ESP95-0389-C02-02 and all the staff at the Laboratorio de Astrofísica Espacial y Física Fundamental, Spain where most of this work was done. Support for the ground-based observations was provided by the National Science Foundation through grant AST-9420080 to Ohio State University. Observations at the Wise Observatory are supported by grants from the Israel Science Foundation. This research has made use of the TARTARUS database, which is supported by Jane Turner and Kirpal Nandra under NASA grants NAG5-7385 and NAG5-7067.