We see that our results are mostly in agreement with those previously
published (where these exist) and by using the full map (global)
values of these in conjunction with those of the distant sample
(Curran et al. 2000, Table 5),
in Paper II we will analyse these results and draw our conclusions.
Galaxy | D |
![]() |
![]() |
Ratio |
![]() |
NGC 0034 | 79 | ![]() |
![]() |
4.1 | 14.3 |
NGC 1667 | 61 |
![]() |
![]() |
2.6 | 4.2 |
Mrk 231 | 170 | ![]() |
![]() |
6.0 | 128 |
Mrk 273 | 150 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
73 |
NGC 5135 | 55 | ![]() |
![]() |
18 | 9.0 |
Arp 220 | 71 | ![]() |
![]() |
6.5 | 84 |
NGC 7130 | 65 | ![]() |
![]() |
16 | 11.9 |
NGC 7469 | 65 |
![]() |
![]() |
8.0 | 18.2 |
Average | 90 | 2.6 | 0.67 | ![]() |
43 |
Acknowledgements
We wish to thank the referee R. Antonucci for his prompt and helpful comments. Also, Lars E. B. Johansson for his advice, Francisco Azagra at SEST for staying up to monitor the impromtu SEST observations of NGC 1068, Aage Sandqvist for his NGC 1365 data as well as Felipe Mac-Auliffe and Saul Vidal at La Silla for getting the Dahlem et al. (1993) data from 9-track tape, and Susanne Hüttemeister for her permission to use it. This research made use of the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED) which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
Copyright ESO 2001