A&A 367, 532-548 (2001)
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20000458
Ph. Stee1 - J. Bittar2
1 - Observatoire de la Côte d'Azur, Département Fresnel UMR 6528, Caussols, 06460 St. Vallier de Thiey, France
2 -
Observatoire Midi-Pyrénées, CNRS UMR 5572, 14 Av. Edouard
Belin, 31400 Toulouse, France
Received 5 October 2000 / Accepted 14 November 2000
Abstract
We report theoretical HI visible and near-IR line profiles, i.e. H(6562 Å), H
(4861 Å) and Br
(21656 Å),
and intensity maps for a large set of parameters (density, temperature, envelope geometry,
inclination angle), representative of early to late Be spectral types.
We have computed the size of the emitting
region in the Br
line and its nearby continuum which both originate
from a very extended region, i.e. at least 40 stellar radii which is twice the
size of the H
emitting region. We predict the relative fluxes
from the central star, the envelope contribution in the given lines and in the
continuum for a wide range of parameters characterizing the disk models. For
a density
=
5 10-13 gcm-3
at the base of the stellar photosphere, we obtain the largest probability of
HI IR lines in emission, which is a factor of 100 lower than typical values
found for Be stars. We have also studied the effect of changing the spectral
type on our results and we obtain a clear correlation between the luminosity
in H
and in the infrared. We found that for a density
=
5 10-12 gcm-3, the probability of detecting HI IR lines in
emission must be stronger for late-B spectral type stars. If no IR lines are
detected for late types, it may indicate that the density in the disc is very
high (
10-11 gcm-3). On the other hand, we found
that around
= 5 10-13 g cm-3, it is possible
to have a large envelope contribution in the Br
line and
a similar or even smaller emission in the Balmer lines. Even if Br
is formed in an extended region, it is possible to obtain a FWHM and a V/R that
agree well with observed profiles. Finally, it seems that the contribution in
the Br
line increases when the envelope becomes more and
more "disk-like'', contrary to the H
and H
lines.
Key words: stars: circumstellar matter; emission line; Be - infrared: stars - winds: models - techniques: interferometric
Interferometry in the visible has been used successfully to study the circumstellar
environment of Be stars (Thom et al. 1986; Quirrenbach et al. 1993;
Stee et al. 1995 (hereafter Paper I), Quirrenbach et al. 1997;
see also the recent review given by Stee 2000). It is now clear that
the matter responsible for the visible emission lines and the continuum is not
spherically distributed. Moreover, in the paper by Stee et al. (1998),
we found that the envelope size in the visible increases following the
sequence HeI
(2.3 R*), 0.48
m
continuum (2.8 R*), 0.65
m continuum (3.5 R*),
H
(
8.5 R*) and H
(18 R*) emitting
regions. In fact, the envelope size in the HeI
line was under-estimated due to the subtraction of the nearby continuum in
our computation. Since the line is formed on its continuum, it was not correct
to separate photons from the line and the continuum in the simulation. Adding
the 0.65
m continuum, we obtain a HeI
emitting region with an angular size of
4 R*, in agreement
with the size of 3.7 R* for the 0.65
m continuum obtained
in this paper. In this paper, we extend previous model to near-IR wavelengths,
a timely contribution in the context of recent IR spectroscopic studies
(Marlborough et al. 1997; Clark & Steele 2000; Hony et al. 2000) and planned interferometric observations (Richichi
et al. 2000; Weigelt et al. 2000). We stress in this
work the importance of simultaneous high spectral and angular resolution
studies in the visible and near-IR in providing strong constraints on the
physics of the circumstellar envelopes of Be stars.
The paper is organized as follows. In Sect. 2 we briefly present the SIMECA
code and its main assumptions. Section 3 presents theoretical HI visible H,
H
,
and near-IR Br
line profiles, as well as computed
energy distribution and intensity maps obtained with SIMECA for the particular
case of
Cas. In Sect. 4 we study the possibility of extending these
results to other Be stars with different wind densities. Section 5 discusses the
effect of changing the effective temperature of the central star. In Sect. 6
we present results for different spectral types: B0, B2, B5 and B8. In Sects. 7 and 8 we study respectively the effect of the geometrical thickness
of the disk and the inclination angle between the line of sight and the rotational
axis. Section 9 deals with the rotational and the terminal wind velocity fields
and their influence on the Br
line profile. Finally, in Sect. 10
we summarize and discuss our main results.
The SIMECA code has been already described in previous papers (see Stee & Araùjo 1994 and Paper I). It computes classical observables, i.e. spectroscopic and photometric ones but also intensity maps in Balmer lines and in the continuum in order to obtain theoretical visibility curves which can be directly compared to high angular resolution data. The main hypothesis of this code is that the envelope is axi-symmetric with respect to the rotational axis. No meridian circulation is allowed. We assume that the physics of the polar regions is well represented by a CAK type stellar wind model (Castor et al. 1975) and the solutions for all stellar latitudes are obtained by introducing a parametrized model which is constrained by spectrally resolved interferometric data. The inner equatorial region is dominated by Keplerian rotation.
In order to take into account the 7-4 levels radiative transition to reproduce
the Br
line profile at 2.16
m, we have added one more
level to the hydrogen atoms which have now seven bound levels. The ionization-excitation
equations are solved for an envelope modeled in a 170
90
71 cube. Since
the final population of atomic levels are strongly NLTE distributed we start
with the LTE populations for each level, we then compute the escape probability
of each transition which allows us to obtain up-dated populations, and we iterate
until convergence. The convergence is quite fast (about ten iterations) and
stable within an effective temperature of the central star in the range
.
The basic equations of the SIMECA code are given in
detail in Paper I.
To account for the photospheric absorption line, we assumed the underlying star
to be a normal B star with a given
and log g . For each
and log g we have computed H
,
H
and Br
synthetic line profiles using the SYNSPEC code
developed by Hubeny (Hubeny 1988;
Hubeny & Lanz 1995). These photospheric line profiles are then broadened
by solid rotation and can be further absorbed by the envelope volume projected
on the stellar disk. The SIMECA code is also able to produce theoretical intensity
maps of the circumstellar envelope in these lines and in the continuum at different
wavelengths (see for instance Fig. 1). These maps can be directly
compared to milli-arcsecond interferometric measurements such as those obtained
from the GI2T (Paper I) and Mark III (Quirrenbach et al. 1993)
interferometers or with the forthcoming VLT interferometer.
![]() |
Figure 1:
Intensity maps with parameters representative of the Be Star ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
Among Be stars,
Cas (B0.5 IVe, HD 5394, HR 264) is certainly the
most studied Be star. Its geometry has been already studied in detail by long
baseline interferometry at visible wavelengths (Thom et al. 1986; Quirrenbach
et al. 1993; Paper I; Quirrenbach et al. 1997).
In the near IR, many studies have used spectroscopic data to constrain the physics
of
Cas (Hamman & Simmon 1987; Hony et al. 2000)
but no observations aimed at a direct study of its circumstellar environment
have been carried out yet. Using SIMECA, we have computed intensity maps in
the Br
line profile
and in the continuum at 2.16
m (see Fig. 1) with stellar
and wind parameters given in Table 1. Since we have added one more
level to the hydrogen atoms in order to reproduce the Br
line
and since it changed the ionization-exitation equations, we have computed
H
and H
line profiles and intensity maps in order
to check if it affected our previous results. From Fig. 5
it is clear that we obtain similar profiles and maps for H
and
H
compared to those obtained in Stee & Araùjo (1994)
and in Paper I. From the maps in Fig. 1 (plotted with the same
iso-contour dynamic) it is clear that the extension of
Cas is very large in the near-IR. The maximal extention in the North-South direction
is 41 stellar radii at 2.16
m. This is mainly due to the fact that
at IR wavelengths, the contribution from the star is less important compared to
contribution from the envelope. Thus, the contrast between the star and the envelope
is less pronounced and the objet (star+envelope) appears more extended. In other
words, in the near-IR, the central star does not overwhelm the emission and it thus
becomes possible to "see'' the emission from the surrounding matter located
at larger distances. To measure an angular extension, we compute the region
where more than 50% of the total flux originates, then follow the gradient
of the computed image intensity as a function of the stellar radius. If the
gradient becomes smaller, implying that we are in the "halo'' of the emitting
region and not in the core, we return, stopping where the gradient is steeper in
order to obtain a "clean'' edge. This point corresponds to the angular extension
given in Table 2. Since the modulus of the complex degree of
coherence of an astrophysical source is equal to the modulus of the normalized
spatial Fourier transform of the source's brightness, we have computed the modulus
of the Fourier transform of these maps. Finally, in order to obtain theoretical
visibilities, we have cut these 2D maps in the direction which corresponds to
the GI2T baseline orientation (North-South). It can be seen in Fig. 2
that with baselines on the order of 50 meters the envelope is well resolved, even
in the near-IR where the spatial resolution is lower by a factor of 4, due
to the longer wavelengths, compared to the
visible (if B is the baseline and
is the wavelength the spatial resolution
changes as
/B). In the continuum (Fig. 3) the differences
are even larger:
Cas appears as a point source at 0.48
m and
is poorly resolved at 0.65
m, whereas at 2.16
m the extended
free-free and free-bound envelope emission are expected to be very well resolved.
Spectral type | B0.5 IVe |
![]() |
25000 K |
Mass | 16
![]() |
Radius | 10
![]() |
Luminosity | 3.5 104
![]() |
![]() |
230 kms-1 |
Inclination angle i | 45![]() |
Photospheric density | 5.0 10-12 gcm-3 |
Photospheric expansion velocity | 0.11 kms-1 |
Equatorial rotation velocity | 326 km s-1 |
Equatorial terminal velocity | 200 kms-1 |
Polar terminal velocity | 2000 kms-1 |
Polar mass flux | 1.7 10-9
![]() |
m1 | 6.0 |
Mass of the disk | 4.43 10-9
![]() |
Mass loss | 3.16 10-7
![]() |
The difference between the calculated visibilities in the Br
and the 2.16
m continuum is not very large since the Br
line originates
from the same region as its nearby continuum and the line emission
is only 9% of the total (star+envelope) flux (see Col. 3 in Table 3
for
=
5 10-12 g cm-3). In Fig. 4
we have plotted the ratio of the calculated visibilities in the lines and in the corresponding
continuum (i.e. referenced visibilities). The crosses are data in the H
line obtained from the GI2T during the 1993 campain. The agreement with our model
is better for larger baselines, except for the last data point and, as already mentioned
in Paper I, it seems that our model envelope is larger than the observed envelope.
Since the visibilities
in the Br
and the 2.16
m continuum were similar,
the referenced visibility at this wavelength is close to one. Thus the result
from the cross-correlation data reduction method, where we cross-correlate a
wide spectral channel taken in the continuum with a channel centered on the
line, must show a nearly unresolved object whereas with the autocorrelation
method,
Cas will be well resolved both in the line and in the
continuum. Of course, both methods finally give the same referenced visibility
but from a S/N point of view it may be easier to use the cross-correlation method
(with well contrasted fringes) while the autocorrelation method deals with
well resolved visibilities (and poorly contrasted fringes). This was not the case
in previous studies since
Cas H
and H
continua were poorly resolved and thus the theoritical visibilities referenced
or unreferenced were similar. Nevertheless, we must point out that for "real''
data it is crucial to use referenced visibilities since they are in principle
independent of seeing and instrumental noise.
Wavelength | Angular diameter | Angular diameter |
(stellar radii) | (mas) | |
H![]() |
15.6 | 3.51 |
H![]() |
8.1 | 1.82 |
Br![]() |
43.1 | 9.69 |
He I ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
0.65 ![]() |
3.7 | 0.83 |
0.48 ![]() |
2.8 | 0.63 |
2.16 ![]() |
41.2 | 9.27 |
We obtain for
Cas the extensions summarized in Table 2. In Fig. 2 it is also important to note that
with 10 m class telescopes working in the diffraction limited mode (adaptive optics
reference, aperture masking reference) it may be possible to resolve the envelope around
Cas in H
,
H
and Br
lines
(see Tuthill et al. 2000 for an example using the Keck telescope in the
aperture masking mode).
Moreover, these telescopes may be complementary to long baseline interferometers
such as GI2T where it is not possible to use baselines less than 16 meters, beyond
which the models predict the extended component to be completely resolved.
In Fig. 5 we present normalized line profiles
and the spectral energy distribution curve obtained with SIMECA. The line profiles
are asymmetric with V/R < 1, and the maximum intensity decreasing following H
,
H
and Br
.
We notice that the Br
line profile presents a large FWHM of 390 kms-1 which strongly depends
on the wind terminal velocity (see Sect. 9). The spectral energy distribution
curve shows a large IR excess after 2
m due to the envelope free-free
and free-bound emission.
![]() |
Figure 2:
Visibilities as a function of baseline (in meters) in the North-South direction
for the Be Star ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 3:
Visibilities as a function of baseline (in meters) in the North-South direction
for the Be Star ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 4:
Referenced visibilities as a function of baseline (in meters) in the North-South
direction for the Be Star ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 5:
Line profiles with parameters representative of the Be Star ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
We may wonder if these results for Cas may be extended to other
Be stars with different wind densities. The wind density range at the base of
the photosphere, usually allowed for Be stars, lies between 10-14and 10-11 gcm-3 (Gehrz et al. 1974; Dachs et al.
1988; Kastner & Mazzali 1989; Hony et al. 2000)
thus we have performed simulations within this range, keeping the other parameters
constant and equal to those used for
Cas and defined in Table 1.
![]() |
Figure 6:
Line profiles with different wind density at the base of the photosphere. Respectively:
![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
From Fig. 6 it is clear that for very low densities (less than
5 10-14 gcm-3), the lines are not in emission and we only have a photospheric
absorption line profile. For
gcm-3, the H
line shows the strongest emission. The H
line profile also appears
and shows very extended line wings, whereas the Br
profile
is just above the continuum level. This is due to the fact that for
gcm-3 there is a very large contribution from the envelope continuum
(see Fig. 7 upper left) which can reach 50% and 98% of the total
flux, respectively, for H
and Br
,
lowering the emission
in the line (see Table 3). It is more obvious on the lower left
of Fig. 7, where the envelope line emission increases in strength
with increasing densities: up to
5 10-13 gcm-3 for Br
and up to
5 10-12 gcm-3 for H
.
For larger
densities, the percentage of the line emission decreases except for H
which increases from
5 10-14 to
5 10-10 g cm-3.
There is a difference of 6 magnitudes between the
5 10-15 and
5 10-11 gcm-3 densities in the Br
absolute fluxes (upper right
in Fig. 7). This difference is only of 1.3 magnitudes for H
,
whereas it remains nearly constant for H
.
The stellar emission
(lower right in Fig. 7) is essentially the mirror of the envelope
continuum emission, i.e. it decreases when the envelope continuum increases
and vice versa.
In a paper by Hony et al. (2000), they used, as a model for the IR continuum
energy distribution of Cas, a stellar contribution to the total
flux of about 20% at 2.4
m, based on extrapolation of a Kurucz
model atmosphere fitted to the UV continuum. We found for the same density,
i.e.
5 10-11 g cm-3 that only 1% of the total flux originates
from the central star. From our simulation, we obtain that the envelope density
should be as low as
5 10-13 gcm-3 in order to obtain a
similar (24%) stellar contribution.
In the study by Zaal et al. (1995), they found that IR emission lines
may be detectable for densities up to about 10-14 gcm-3.
They also found that around this density, HI IR lines are in emission while Balmer
lines do not show any emission because of the strong underlying continuum.
For
=
5 10-13 gcm-3 we obtain the strongest
IR line emission in Br
(34.2% of the total flux) whereas for
lower densities the emission is too faint to be detectable. For higher densities,
due to an increase of the envelope underlying continuum (up to 98.4% for
=
5 10-11 g cm-3),
the emission in the Br
line will also decrease. Thus in order
to have the largest probability of HI IR lines in emission, the density
must be close to
5 10-13 gcm-3 which is a factor of 100 lower
than typical values for Be stars. We were not able to obtain HI IR lines
in emission with Balmer lines in absorption with the same stellar parameters.
The results of our simulations are summarized in Table 3.
Stellar contribution | Envelope contribution | Envelope contribution | Total | |
![]() |
(in %) | in the line (in %) | in the continuum (in %) | (in 1032 ergs-1) |
![]() |
||||
H![]() |
11.2 | 37.4 | 62.5 | 30 |
H![]() |
32.8 | 51.0 | 48.9 | 28 |
Br![]() |
0.1 | 1.5 | 98.4 | 27 |
0.65 | 17.9 | - | 82 | 19 |
0.48 | 67.1 | - | 32.9 | 14 |
2.16 | 0.09 | - | 99.91 | 27 |
![]() |
||||
H![]() |
40.7 | 47.9 | 11.4 | 20 |
H![]() |
63.4 | 34.5 | 2.1 | 34 |
Br![]() |
2.2 | 9.2 | 88.6 | 4.3 |
0.65 | 78.2 | - | 21.8 | 10 |
0.48 | 96.8 | - | 3.2 | 23 |
2.16 | 2.4 | - | 97.6 | 3.9 |
![]() |
||||
H![]() |
64.0 | 34.6 | 1.4 | 9.3 |
H![]() |
80.2 | 19.6 | 0.2 | 25 |
Br![]() |
15.5 | 34.2 | 50.3 | 0.45 |
0.65 | 97.9 | - | 2.1 | 9.3 |
0.48 | 99.7 | - | 0.3 | 25 |
2.16 | 23.6 | - | 76.4 | 0.45 |
![]() |
||||
H![]() |
99.6 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 9.2 |
H![]() |
99.9 | 0 | 0.1 | 25 |
Br![]() |
75.3 | 0.1 | 50.3 | 0.14 |
0.65 | 99.8 | - | 0.2 | 9.2 |
0.48 | 99.9 | - | 0.1 | 25 |
2.16 | 75.3 | - | 24.7 | 0.14 |
![]() |
||||
H![]() |
100 | 0 | 0 | 8.9 |
H![]() |
100 | 0 | 0 | 25 |
Br![]() |
96.8 | 0 | 3.2 | 0.11 |
0.65 | 99.9 | - | 0.02 | 9.2 |
0.48 | 100 | - | 0 | 25 |
2.16 | 96.8 | - | 3.2 | 0.11 |
![]() |
Figure 7:
Different flux contributions (in %) as a function of the wind density at the
base of the photosphere (Log scale). For all plots we have the following convention:
H![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
We have also studied the effect of changing the density on the visibility curves.
From Fig. 8 we can see that the visibilites are very sensitive
to a density change. As for Cas, the Br
line and
its nearby continuum are the most extended emitting regions. For very dense
envelopes, the Br
visibility falls down to 0.2 for a baseline
of 100 meters as does the H
visibility. For
=
5 10-14and
5 10-15 gcm-3 the emitting regions are too faint to
be resolved in the H
and H
lines or in their nearby
continua. In the H
continuum the density must be on the order of
5 10-11 gcm-3 in order to be barely resolved with baseline
of a few meters whereas in the H
continuum a density of
5 10-12 gcm-3is sufficient. Measuring the visibilities in these 3 lines and their continua
may be a simple way to deduce the density of the envelope of Be stars.
![]() |
Figure 8:
Density effect on the visibility curves as a function of baseline (in meters)
for different lines: H![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
We have investigated the effect of changing the effective temperature
of the central star. We recall that in SIMECA the envelope temperature follows:
From Fig. 9 we see that with decreasing temperature the equivalent
width of all the lines, or the line-to-continuum ratio, increases. This result has
already been found by Marlborough et al. (1997) for the H
and
Br
line profiles, although the temperature range for their study
was between 2000 and 10000 K whereas we investigate a temperature range between
16000 and 40000 K. They also found that the line width increases with increasing
temperature, which is not the case in Fig. 9. The main reason
is due to the fact that in Marlborough et al. (1997) they used a Planck
function as the line source function which decreases with decreasing temperature.
Since the disc is optically thick, the line strength in the line wings is lower
for lower temperature and thus the line width decreases with decreasing temperature.
In SIMECA we solved the coupled ionization-excitation equations and our final
atomic levels are strongly NLTE-distributed, as found by Hony et al. (2000)
from the study of the infrared spectrum of
Cas. For 35000 and
40000 K the H
line presents a P-Cygni profile which can be due to
the fact that the envelope continuum emission is strongly increasing with increasing
temperature in the blue part of the spectrum. Thus the emission in the H
line is reduced (see lower right in Fig. 9). The Br
line presents very extended wings up to 30 Å.
![]() |
Figure 9:
Line profiles with different effective temperatures. Respectively:
![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
As for the study on the density effect, we have computed visibilities as a function
of baseline for the same temperature range, keeping the other parameters constant.
From Fig. 10 it is clear that the visibility curves are not very
sensitive to a temperature change, compared to a density change especially for
the continuum and the Br
curves. Nevertheless, within the given
temperature range the Br
-emitting region remains the most extended
region. For all the lines, the visibility curves in the continuum are not strongly
affected by temperature. Since the continuum originates mainly from free-free
and free-bound transitions and since the envelope is completely ionized between
16000 and 40000 K, it is not surprising that the continuum emitting regions are
not very sensitive to the temperature. For the emitting regions in the lines,
we found that the extensions decrease, i.e. the visibilities are closer to one,
for increasing temperatures. This last result follows the decrease of the
line-to-continuum ratio with increasing temperature, already outlined in the previous
subsection.
![]() |
Figure 10:
Temperature effect on the visibility curves as a function of baseline (in meters)
for different lines: H![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 11:
Correlation
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
Following the study by Neto & de Freitas Pacheco (1982) and Kastner
& Mazzali (1989) who found an empirical relationship
between the luminosity in H
and in the near-IR
which allowed them to derive the central densities of Be discs, i.e. from 2 1011 cm-3 for late sub-type to 3 1012 cm-3 for early
sub-type, as well as the mass of the discs. We have studied whether such a correlation could
exist for a given density in the disc (3 1012 cm-3) but
for different effective temperatures.
Figure 11 indicates that there is such a correlation,
approximately given by:
![]() |
Figure 12:
Different flux contributions (in %) as a function of the effective temperature
(in unit of 1000 K). For all plots we have the following convention: H![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
We have investigated how the fraction of envelope contribution to the total radiation in the lines and in the continuum is affected by temperature change. In Fig. 12 (upper left), we can see that the envelope continuum contribution, for the whole temperature range, is:
In the previous section, we studied the effect of changing the effective
temperature of the central star. In order to study the effect of changing the
spectral type on our results we have computed models for different B spectral
types: B0, B2, B5 and B8. We have adopted the same stellar parameters (see Table
5) given in Zaal et al. (1995) and have assumed
for all the models that the density at the base of the photosphere is constant
and equal to 5 10-12 gcm-3. From early to late spectral
type the temperature and the radius both decrease. Thus, the relative
fluxes in the lines and in the continuum are very different from those in Fig. 12 where temperature was the only free parameter. From Fig. 13 (upper right) we can see that the absolute fluxes (in erg s-1)
decrease from early to late spectral type with a loss of 5 magnitudes
for Br
and 3 magnitudes for H
and H
.
The stellar emission in Fig. 13 (lower right) does not increase
for hotter stars as in Fig. 12 but is more or less constant as
a function of the spectral type. The behaviour of the envelope line emission
(lower left in Fig. 13) is also nearly constant for H
and H
and increases from early to late spectral type for Br
.
The envelope continuum emission is about 1.5% at 0.46
m, about
10% at 0.65
m and 95% at 2.16
m and seems to be more
or less independent of the spectral type (see Fig. 13, upper
left).
Stellar contribution | Envelope contribution | Envelope contribution | Total | |
![]() |
(in %) | in the line (in %) | in the continuum (in %) | (in 1032 ergs-1) |
![]() |
||||
H![]() |
37.6 | 53.5 | 8.9 | 10 |
H![]() |
57.6 | 41.1 | 1.3 | 16 |
Br![]() |
2.2 | 13.7 | 84.1 | 2.6 |
0.65 ![]() |
80.9 | - | 19.1 | 4.8 |
0.48 ![]() |
97.9 | - | 2.1 | 9.4 |
2.16 ![]() |
2.5 | - | 97.5 | 2.2 |
![]() |
||||
H![]() |
38.8 | 51.2 | 10.0 | 15 |
H![]() |
60.0 | 38.3 | 1.7 | 24 |
Br![]() |
2.2 | 8.4 | 88.6 | 3.4 |
0.65 ![]() |
79.5 | - | 16.8 | 7.1 |
0.48 ![]() |
97.4 | - | 2.6 | 15 |
2.16 ![]() |
2.5 | - | 96.7 | 3 |
![]() |
||||
H![]() |
40.7 | 47.9 | 11.4 | 20 |
H![]() |
63.4 | 34.5 | 2.1 | 34 |
Br![]() |
2.2 | 9.2 | 88.6 | 4.3 |
0.65 ![]() |
78.2 | - | 21.8 | 10 |
0.48 ![]() |
96.8 | - | 3.2 | 23 |
2.16 ![]() |
2.4 | - | 97.6 | 3.9 |
![]() |
||||
H![]() |
51.1 | 38.5 | 10.4 | 21 |
H![]() |
74.6 | 23.5 | 1.9 | 41 |
Br![]() |
3 | 8.4 | 88.6 | 3.8 |
0.65 ![]() |
83.2 | - | 16.8 | 13 |
0.48 ![]() |
97.6 | - | 2.4 | 31 |
2.16 ![]() |
3.3 | - | 96.7 | 3.5 |
![]() |
||||
H![]() |
64.2 | 24 | 11.8 | 20 |
H![]() |
88.4 | 9.5 | 2.1 | 44 |
Br![]() |
3.5 | 7.3 | 89.2 | 4.1 |
0.65 ![]() |
84.4 | - | 15.6 | 16 |
0.48 ![]() |
97.6 | - | 2.4 | 39 |
2.16 ![]() |
3.7 | - | 96.3 | 3.8 |
![]() |
||||
H![]() |
69.4 | 19.1 | 11.5 | 23 |
H![]() |
92.0 | 5.9 | 2.1 | 51 |
Br![]() |
4.0 | 4.5 | 91.5 | 4.1 |
0.65 ![]() |
85.9 | - | 14.1 | 18 |
0.48 ![]() |
97.8 | - | 2.2 | 48 |
2.16 ![]() |
4.1 | - | 95.9 | 3.9 |
In the paper by Zaal et al. (1995), they found that normal early B type
stars have the strongest probability of being surrounded by a low-density disk
which can be detected thanks to the HI IR lines in emission. Our results for
a density of 5 10-12 gcm-3, illustrated in Table 6,
show the reverse: the envelope contribution in the Br
line
increases for later B-type stars, mainly due to a decrease of the envelope
continuum contribution. Thus, for a given density, the probability of detecting
HI IR lines in emission should be stronger for normal late B-type stars. This
may explain why 70% of the 66 isolated Be stars within spectral types 09-B9
obtained by Clark & Steele (2000) show Br
in emission.
Within these 70%, 60% are between spectral types B0-B4 and thus 40% between
B5-B9. Nevertheless, this result strongly depends on the assumed wind density.
Since surveys in the Paschen lines seem to indicate that no IR lines are detected for late B spectral types (Hubert, private communication) it may be an indication that:
![]() |
Figure 13:
Different flux contributions (in %) as a function of the spectral type. For
all plots we have the following convention: H![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
As for the temperature, we have studied if it is possible to determine an empirical
relationship
between the luminosity in
H
and in the infrared as a function of the spectral type. From
Fig. 14 we can see that the correlation is very good.
We obtain the relation:
Spectral type | Radius (in
![]() |
![]() |
B0 | 6.0 | 30000 |
B2 | 4.3 | 23000 |
B5 | 3.0 | 15000 |
B8 | 2.5 | 12000 |
In a paper by Briot et al. (1997), they present a study from Hipparcos
data of the mean absolute magnitude as a function of spectral type for the
B and Be stars. As was well known before, they found that the general trend for
Be stars is an over luminosity compared to B stars of the same spectral
type. A more interesting feature is that this over-luminosity is higher for
later Be spectral types. In Fig. 16 we have plotted the ratio between
the total flux from a B star and that of a Be star as a function of the
spectral type. It is clear that for early-type stars this ratio is close to
1, whereas it increases for later-type stars, i.e. the overluminosity increases
with later Be spectral type, as found by Briot et al. (1997). This
may be due to the fact that recombination in the envelope is less efficient
for early-type stars but increases for later type stars which increases
the overluminosity of late Be stars compared to "normal'' B stars of
the same spectral type.
Stellar contribution | Envelope contribution | Envelope contribution | Total | |
(in %) | in the line (in %) | in the continuum (in %) | (in 1032 ergs-1) | |
B0 | ||||
H![]() |
65.23 | 27.17 | 7.6 | 6.1 |
H![]() |
83.92 | 14.84 | 1.23 | 14 |
Br![]() |
5.2 | 7.95 | 86.85 | 0.85 |
0.65 ![]() |
89.57 | - | 10.43 | 4.5 |
0.48 ![]() |
98.55 | - | 1.45 | 12 |
2.16 ![]() |
5.61 | - | 94.39 | 0.78 |
B2 | ||||
H![]() |
63.34 | 30.51 | 6.15 | 2.2 |
H![]() |
80.85 | 18.27 | 0.88 | 4.7 |
Br![]() |
5.76 | 10.52 | 83.72 | 0.3 |
0.65 ![]() |
91.16 | - | 8.84 | 1.6 |
0.48 ![]() |
98.92 | - | 1.08 | 3.9 |
2.16 ![]() |
6.42 | - | 93.58 | 0.27 |
B5 | ||||
H![]() |
69.07 | 26.52 | 4.42 | 0.56 |
H![]() |
83.70 | 15.82 | 0.48 | 1.1 |
Br![]() |
7.53 | 12.90 | 79.57 | 0.074 |
0.65 ![]() |
93.99 | - | 6.01 | 0.41 |
0.48 ![]() |
99.43 | - | 0.57 | 0.94 |
2.16 ![]() |
8.63 | - | 91.37 | 0.065 |
B8 | ||||
H![]() |
72.71 | 24.44 | 2.84 | 0.21 |
H![]() |
85.02 | 14.55 | 0.43 | 0.39 |
Br![]() |
14.11 | 24.02 | 61.87 | 0.02 |
0.65 ![]() |
96.24 | - | 3.76 | 0.16 |
0.48 ![]() |
99.50 | - | 0.5 | 0.33 |
2.16 ![]() |
18.57 | - | 81.43 | 0.015 |
![]() |
Figure 14:
Correlation
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 15:
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 16: Be/B total flux ratio as a function of the B spectral type |
Open with DEXTER |
Following the study by Stee (1998) who investigate the shape of the
envelope around B[e] supergiant stars, we have studied the effect of changing
the geometrical thickness of the disk on the different flux contributions. Thus,
we have computed different models with different m1 parameters which describe
the variation of the mass flux from the pole to the equator according to:
From Table 7, we can see that the envelope contribution in the line
increases as the envelope becomes more and more ellipsoidal (lower m1). At the
same time, the stellar contribution decreases from a very flat envelope to a more
ellipsoidal one due to an increase in the absorption of the stellar continuum
from the circumstellar envelope. Both effects tend to decrease the ratio of stellar/envelope
continuum for more ellipsoidal geometries. Another interesting effect is that
the envelope contribution in the Br
line increases when the
envelope becomes more "disk-like'' contrary to the envelope
contribution in the H
and H
lines, which decreases.
This is due to the increasing envelope continuum contribution for larger m1values which increases the ratio line/continuum for the Br
line.
The total flux decreases for flatter envelopes, i.e. for large m1 values.
Stellar contribution | Envelope contribution | Envelope contribution | Total | |
(in %) | in the line (in %) | in the continuum (in %) | (in 1032 ergs-1) | |
m1=0.1 | ||||
H![]() |
34.25 | 52.55 | 13.20 | 21 |
H![]() |
56.97 | 40.62 | 2.41 | 35 |
Br![]() |
1.52 | 7.59 | 90.89 | 5.6 |
0.65 ![]() |
72.17 | - | 27.83 | 10 |
0.48 ![]() |
95.94 | - | 4.06 | 21 |
2.16 ![]() |
1.62 | - | 98.38 | 5.2 |
m1=6 | ||||
H![]() |
40.72 | 47.94 | 11.34 | 20 |
H![]() |
63.43 | 34.52 | 2.05 | 34 |
Br![]() |
2.15 | 9.26 | 88.59 | 4.3 |
0.65 ![]() |
78.22 | - | 21.78 | 10 |
0.48 ![]() |
96.86 | - | 3.14 | 23 |
2.16 ![]() |
2.35 | - | 97.65 | 3.9 |
m1=100 | ||||
H![]() |
63.45 | 30.81 | 5.74 | 14 |
H![]() |
81.19 | 17.82 | 0.99 | 31 |
Br![]() |
6.78 | 13.37 | 79.84 | 1.6 |
0.65 ![]() |
91.70 | - | 8.30 | 10 |
0.48 ![]() |
98.79 | - | 1.21 | 25 |
2.16 ![]() |
7.83 | - | 92.17 | 1.4 |
m1=1000 | ||||
H![]() |
68.53 | 27.64 | 3.83 | 13 |
H![]() |
84.04 | 15.23 | 0.72 | 30 |
Br![]() |
11.31 | 18.36 | 70.33 | 0.95 |
0.65 ![]() |
94.71 | - | 5.29 | 9.6 |
0.48 ![]() |
99.15 | - | 0.85 | 25 |
2.16 ![]() |
13.85 | - | 86.15 | 0.77 |
Since the disk is optically thick in the lines, the line strength depends on
the inclination angle. There are two main effects. (1) Since we solve the radiative
transfer within the Sobolev approximation, the escape probability and thus
the population of atomic levels strongly depends on the stellar latitude. The
atomic populations rapidly decrease from the equator to the pole. (2) At the same
time, the length of lines of sight crossing the disk increases and the optical
depths become larger (which can be understood as a kind of "envelope-darkening''
effect). From Table 8 we can directly measure these effects: (1) from
the pole to the equator the stellar contribution decreases from 80.6%
to 38.1% for H,
i.e. it is more difficult to
see the central star through the envelope, and (2) the envelope contribution
in the lines increases with increasing inclination angle. Both effects tend
to increase the strength of the lines with inclination angle.
Nevertheless, at the pole, the population of the levels decreases with distance much more rapidly, which produces a less important contribution at larger Doppler displacement and the polar profiles appear single peaked with a larger line strength. At the equator, it is the opposite: in our radiative wind model, the flow reaches its terminal velocity within a few stellar radii, a larger part of the envelope contributes a larger Doppler effect and the profiles appear double-peaked with a decreasing line strength. This is discussed in detail in Stee & Araùjo (1994). Finally, we obtain the same trend for the effect of the inclination angle on the line profiles as those obtained by Marlborough et al. (1997) but from a completely different physical effect.
We have also studied the effect of the inclination angle on the visibilities.
From Fig. 17 it is clear that the inclination angle has a large effect:
for instance in H,
for the pole-on case (full line), the visibility
is close to 0.8 for large baselines, whereas it falls down to 0.4 for the equator-on
case (dashed line). Moreover, as it has been well shown using the MkIII interferometer
(Quirrenbach et al. 1997), the envelope geometry of Be stars
is not only dependent on the inclination angle but also on the orientation of
the disk elongation into the sky plane, which is another important free parameter
that can be constrained only by spectropolarimetry or interferometry. For instance,
thanks to simultaneous optical interferometry and spectropolarimetry measurements,
Quirrenbach et al. (1997) have found that the polarization angles
were perpendicular to the interferometric major axii for seven Be stars and
favors disk geometry over mildly ellipsoidal models.
Thus, we require
simultaneously high spectral resolution as well as high angular resolution observations
in order to fully constrain the free parameters of Be star models.
Stellar contribution | Envelope contribution | Envelope contribution | Total | |
(in %) | in the line (in %) | in the continuum (in %) | (in 1032 ergs-1) | |
i=0![]() |
||||
H![]() |
80.63 | 15.61 | 3.76 | 60 |
H![]() |
91.33 | 8.17 | 0.50 | 150 |
Br![]() |
11.76 | 8.08 | 80.16 | 4.8 |
0.65 ![]() |
95.54 | - | 4.46 | 51 |
0.48 ![]() |
99.45 | - | 0.55 | 130 |
2.16 ![]() |
12.80 | - | 87.20 | 4.4 |
i=45![]() |
||||
H![]() |
56.94 | 35.94 | 7.12 | 26 |
H![]() |
76.80 | 22.06 | 1.12 | 52 |
Br![]() |
4.59 | 10.54 | 84.87 | 3.7 |
0.65 ![]() |
88.89 | - | 11.11 | 16 |
0.48 ![]() |
98.56 | - | 1.44 | 41 |
2.16 ![]() |
5.07 | - | 94.93 | 3.3 |
i=90![]() |
||||
H![]() |
38.10 | 53.32 | 9.57 | 17 |
H![]() |
60.18 | 38.16 | 1.66 | 30 |
Br![]() |
2.21 | 12.32 | 85.47 | 3.5 |
0.65 ![]() |
79.92 | - | 20.08 | 8.3 |
0.48 ![]() |
97.31 | - | 2.69 | 19 |
2.16 ![]() |
2.46 | - | 97.54 | 3.0 |
![]() |
Figure 17:
Visibilities as a function of the inclination angle. Full line: pole-on, dotted
line: i=45![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 18:
Br![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
Since the Br
line originates from very extended regions it may
be sensitive to the rotational velocity field which takes place in the inner
region but also to the slowly expanding equatorial velocity which reaches its
terminal velocity in a few stellar radii. In order to check this effect, we have
computed Br
lines for 3 different rotational velocities, i.e.
325, 300 and 250 kms-1. From Fig. 18 we can see that
the FWHM of the Br
line profile is independent of the equatorial
rotational velocity. The only difference appears in the intensity of the red
(R) and violet (V) peaks of the profile, which are smaller for lower velocities.
On the contrary Fig. 19 shows clearly that Br
is very sensitive to an equatorial terminal velocity change. Both intensity
and FWHM of the profiles decrease with decreasing terminal velocity.
If we compare our FWHM for the Br
line with the value of 280 kms-1obtained by Chalabaev & Maillard (1985) for
Cas
in 1982, we find that a terminal velocity of
100 kms-1is needed to fit their data. This is in agreement with the value of 90 kms-1they obtained for the velocity of the outflow. Nevertheless, they also interpret
the quasi-symmetric Br
profile (with
)
as
direct evidence of an inner (
R < 3 R *) region where rotation
dominates. In our model, we have the same geometry, i.e. an inner region dominated
by the rotation of the envelope and outer layers dominated by expansion.
Nevertheless, in our case, Br
originates from extended regions
(
1 R * < R < 20 R*) and the profile presents a V/R ratio
0.90 for a terminal velocity of 100 kms-1, which is very close to
the
they obtained. Thus,
even if Br
is formed
in an extended region, it is also possible to obtain a FWHM and a V/R ratio that
fits their observational data.
![]() |
Figure 19:
Br![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
Using the SIMECA code developed by Stee et al. (1994), (1995)
we have carried out a study of theoretical HI visible, H,
H
,
and near-IR Br
line profiles for a large set of parameters (density,
temperature, envelope oblateness, inclination angle). We have also computed
energy distribution, intensity maps and corresponding visibility curves which
allow us to draw the following conclusions:
- The near-IR emission both in the Br
line and the nearby continuum
originates from a very extended region with a typical size of 40 stellar radii
which is twice the size of the H
-emitting region. This prediction
may be compared to previous estimates of the disk extension at various wavelengths,
compiled in Table 9.
Wavelength | Diameter (in stellar radii) | Reference |
2.3 and 19.5 ![]() |
8 R * | Gehrz et al. (1974) |
12, 25 and 60 ![]() |
16 R* | Waters (1986) |
IRAS Far-IR | ![]() ![]() |
Waters et al. (1987) |
Millimeter |
![]() ![]() |
Waters et al. (1991) |
near-IR | ![]() ![]() |
Dougherty et al. (1994) |
2 cm | ![]() ![]() |
Taylor et al. (1990) |
We must mention that all these measurements are model-dependent and sometimes solutions with an "infinite'' disk size can be found (see for instance Waters et al. 1987). In fact, our large near-IR extension is mainly due to the lower brightness contrast between the central star and the envelope. In the visible the star appears very bright and thus it is more difficult to "see'' the circumstellar matter. In the near-IR, the central star is very faint and the surrounding matter can be seen at very large distances. It is clear that first interferometric measurements of Be stars at near-IR wavelengths will definitely favor one of the given extensions even if details of the disk structure itself will require more refined models.
- We have computed the envelope size of the Be star Cas in the
H
H
,
Br
lines and at 0.65, 0.48 and
2.16
m in the continuum. In the He I
6678 line our
previous study predicted a size of 2.3 R *, due to the fact that
we had substracted the nearby continuum in the corresponding intensity map.
Taking into account the continuum emitted from the envelope, we obtain a size
of
4 R * in better agreement with the 3.7 R * obtained
at 0.65
m.
- We have predicted the relative fluxes from the central star, the envelope
contribution in the H
H
,
Br
lines
and in the continuum as well as the total fluxes in erg s-1, for a
wide range of parameters characterizing the disk models. For the same parameters,
we have also predicted the sensitivity of the lines, the energy distribution
and the visibilites in the lines and in the continuum. The density at the base
of the photosphere and the inclination angles are the most sensitive parameters
and a factor of 2 or 3 may be found between the different fluxes from the extreme
cases. We found that for densities
5 10-11 gcm-3,
the stellar flux at 2.16
m is only about 1% which is much smaller
than the 20% obtained from Hony et al. (2000) with the same density
but from a Kurucz model atmosphere extrapolation fitted to the UV continuum. In
SIMECA our final atomic levels are strongly NLTE-distributed, as found by Hony
et al. (2000) from the study of the infrared spectrum of
Cas. For
=
5 10-13 gcm-3 we have obtained
the largest probability of having HI IR lines in emission, which is a factor of 100
lower than the typical values for Be stars and close to the value
10-14 gcm-3 found by Zaal et al. (1995).
- We have studied the effect of spectral type on our results and we obtain
a good correlation between the luminosity in H
and in the infrared,
as found by Neto & de Freitas Pacheco (1982) and Kastner & Mazzali
(1989). We have also found that, for
=
5 10-12 gcm-3, the probability of detecting HI IR lines in emission is stronger
for normal late B type stars contrary to Zaal et al. (1995) who obtain
the reverse, i.e. a stronger probability for early type stars with low density
disks. If no IR lines are detected for late B spectral types it may be an indication
that:
a) the density in the disc is very low (10-14 gcm-3)
and near-IR emission lines are not detected but in this case the density is
also too low to produce Balmer lines in emission;
b) the density in the disc is very high (10-11 g cm-3)
and due to the strong underlying continuum from the envelope, the line to continuum
ratio is smaller in the near-IR lines, whereas Balmer lines are still visible.
- On the otherhand, we also found that around a density of 5 10-13 gcm-3 it is possible to have an important envelope contribution in
the Br
line and a similar or even smaller emission in the Balmer
lines. This density is close to that needed to model the B0.2V star
Sco
spectrum in order to obtain strong IR HI emission lines without noticeable emission
in the photospheric H
absorption line (Zaal et al. 1995).
- As found by Briot et al. (1997) we obtain that the overluminosity of Be stars as compared with "normal'' B stars of the same spectral type increases with later Be spectral types, which may be due to the fact that recombination in the envelope is less efficient for early-type stars whereas it increases for later-type stars.
- The equatorial rotational velocity can slightly modify the intensity of the
Br
profile, which is smaller for lower velocities.
Br
itself is very sensitive to an equatorial terminal velocity change.
Both intensity and FWHM of the profiles decrease with decreasing terminal
velocity.
- Finally, it seems that the contribution in the Br
line increases
when the envelope becomes more "disk-like'', in contrast to the
H
and H
lines.
In conclusion, it is clear that the forthcoming VLT interferometer and its near-IR focal instrument AMBER (Richichi et al. 2000) and the GI2T/REGAIN interferometer working in dispersed fringe mode at near-IR wavelengths (Weigelt et al. 2000) will settle the question of whether the IR-emiting region is extended, which will provide strong constraints on the physics of Be stars. We also hope to present in the near future new results from a modified version of the SIMECA code without the Sobolev approximation but with a fully 3D radiative transfer and which will integrate the "one-armed'' oscillations phenomenon (Okazaki 1991) in order to reproduce the observed long term variability.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank C. Thomas and T. Girard for their help in the preparation of the figures presented in this paper. We thank A.-M. Hubert, J. Zorec, D. Briot and J. Pacheco for many helpful suggestions and careful reading of the manuscript. The useful remarks of the referee R. Millan-Gabet are also greatly acknowledged by the authors. Ph. Stee acknowledges the Ministère de la Recherche and the operation "Coup de Pouce Jeunes Chercheurs'' for his financial support.