A&A 375, 909-921 (2001)
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20010863
P. Cseresnjes 1,2
1 - DASGAL, Observatoire de Paris, 61 avenue de l'Observatoire, 75014 Paris, France
2 - Centre d'Analyse des Images - INSU, France
Received 19 April 2001 / Accepted 1 June 2001
Abstract
We carried out a period analysis on 3700 RR Lyrae stars on two Schmidt fields centred on
,
-7.1
)
and (6.6
,
-10.8
)
respectively, covering an area of
50 deg2. These stars are distributed almost evenly between
the Sagittarius dwarf galaxy (Sgr) and the Milky Way. For Sgr members, the average periods are
and
for RRab and RRc stars respectively. This places Sgr in the long-period tail of the
Oosterhoff I group. We report the detection of 53 double-mode RR Lyrae stars (RRd) within
our sample. The magnitude of 40 of these stars
is consistent with membership in Sgr whereas 13 RRds are located within our Galaxy.
We also found 13 RR Lyraes (5 in Sgr and 8 in the Galaxy) exhibiting two closely spaced frequencies, most probably related to
non-radial pulsations.
The period distribution of the RR Lyrae
variables in Sgr is compared to those of other Milky Way satellites. We find a remarkable similarity between the RR Lyrae
populations in Sgr and the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC), suggesting that these galaxies have similar horizontal branch morphologies.
This may indicate that Sgr
and the LMC started their formation under similar conditions.
Using various photometric indicators, we estimate the metallicity of the RR Lyrae stars in Sgr and find
dex with a dispersion of
0.5 dex around this value and a minor but significant population at
-2.0 dex.
We do not find evidence for a spatial metallicity
gradient in the RR Lyrae population of Sgr. From the spatial distribution of RR Lyraes, we find that the main body of Sgr contains
4200 RRab stars. Assuming that population gradients are negligible in Sgr, we find
13.9
+0.4-0.6
mag for the main body. If Sgr has been stripped of 50
of its mass through Galactic tides, as assumed by some models, it would imply
a total absolute magnitude of
-14.7 mag for this galaxy. Such a luminosity would be consistent with the empirical
metallicity/luminosity relation for dwarf spheroidal galaxies
.
Key words: stars: horizontal-branch - stars: population II - stars: variables: RR Lyr - galaxies: dwarf - galaxies: individual: Sagittarius dwarf - local group
Of particular interest among RR Lyrae stars are those pulsating simultaneously in the
fundamental and first overtone mode (RRd).
These stars offer the opportunity to constrain their mass and luminosity independent of stellar evolution theory
(e.g. Bono et al. 1996; Kovács & Walker 1999).
The exact status of these variables is still under debate. The intermediate position of
RRd stars in the instability strip between RRc (pulsating in the first overtone mode) and RRab stars (pulsating in the fundamental mode)
suggests that these stars are in the process of mode switching. This scenario seems however excluded by theoretical calculations
(Cox et al. 1980) which yield a much too short duration for this transition state (103-4 years)
to account for the high fraction of RRd
variables observed in some systems (e.g. IC4499, M68). It seems however that these stars are evolving rapidly (i.e. the changes
are observable during a human life-time), and some period and amplitude changes have already been observed (Purdue et al. 1995;
Clement et al. 1997; Paparó et al. 1998; Benkö & Jurcsik 2000).
The first RRd star discovered was AQ Leo (Jerzykiewicz & Wenzel 1977), a field RR Lyrae. After this discovery, searches were
focused on old stellar systems harboring RR Lyrae stars and, surprisingly, RRd variables were searched successfully in some systems
but vainly in others. RRd stars have been found in globular clusters (M 15: Nemec 1985; M 3: Nemec & Clement 1989;
NGC 2419 and NGC 2466: Clement & Nemec 1990; M 68: Clement et al. 1993; IC 4499: Walker & Nemec 1996), in Dsph
galaxies (Draco: Nemec 1985; Sculptor: Kauzny et al. 1995) and in the Galactic Halo (Clement et al. 1991;
Garcia-Melendo & Clement 1997; Clementini et al. 2000). On the other hand, searches for RRd variables were unsuccessful
in
Cen
(Nemec et al. 1986), M 80, M 9 and NGC 2298 (Clement & Walker 1991), Ursa Minor (Nemec et al. 1988) and 20 other
globular clusters (Clement & Nemec 1990). The parameter(s) driving the occurrence of RRd pulsators in stellar systems is still not
clear and more observations are needed before any firm conclusion can be drawn. What is clear, however, is that the two Oosterhoff
groups are well separated in a Petersen diagram (a plot of the period ratio versus the fundamental period - Petersen 1973),
the OoI RRd pulsators having lower periods and period ratios than their OoII counterparts.
Recently, the collection of known RRd stars has been substantially increased with the discovery of 181 new RRd variables in the Large Magellanic Cloud (Alcock et al. 1997; Alcock et al. 2000b). These stars revealed a new picture because they were spread across the Petersen diagram, filling the gap between the two Oosterhoff groups. Pulsation models show that this distribution may be caused by a mass and/or metallicity spread within the population of RRd stars (Kovács 2000). Spectroscopic measurements on a sample of these stars seems to confirm the metallicity spread (Clementini et al. 2000; Bragaglia et al. 2001).
The search for multi-periodic RR Lyraes in the MACHO data set revealed other surprises. For instance, many RR Lyrae periodograms exhibited two closely spaced frequencies. This frequency pattern, first discovered by Olech et al. (1999a, 1999b) in RR Lyrae stars, cannot be explained by the superposition of radial pulsations and is therefore believed to be related to non-radial modes. Although these kind of stars have been detected in only four different places to date (M 55, M 5, LMC and Galactic Bulge), they seem to be relatively common in their host system. Theoretical modelling of these stars have been proposed by Van Hoolst et al. (1998) and by Dziembowski & Cassisi (1999).
We carried out a period analysis on a sample of 3700 RR Lyrae stars in Sgr and the Galactic Centre.
The paper is structured as follows. Section 2 presents the data and their reduction. In Sect. 3, we describe the selection processes and
present the sample of detected multi-periodic RR Lyraes. In Sect. 4, we present the period distributions of the RR Lyrae catalogs and
compare them with those observed in other stellar systems. Section 5 is devoted to a presentation of the period-amplitude diagram of the RR Lyrae
population in Sgr. In Sect. 6, we use photometric indicators to estimate the metallicity of the RR Lyrae population. Section 7 is devoted
to a discussion about the spatial homogeneity of the RR Lyrae population and in Sect. 8 we estimate the RRab content of Sgr.
Finally, we summarize our results and conclude in Sect. 9.
![]() |
Figure 1: Typical spectral windows for SAG (Upper panel) and DUO (lower panel). |
Open with DEXTER |
The data discussed in this paper are based on two sets of photographic plates taken with the
ESO 1 m Schmidt telescope at La Silla (Chile) between 1994 and 1996.
The first set of observations consists of a series of 82
photographic plates
centred on (l,b)=(3.1
,
-7.1
)
and taken between June 11th 1994
and October 7th 1994. The limiting magnitude of these plates reaches
.
A first analysis of these data allowed the detection of microlensing
events toward the Galactic bulge as part of the DUO project (Alard & Guibert 1997).
The second set of data results from a series of 68 Kodak Tech-Pan 4415 films combined with a BG12 filter
centred on (l,b)=(6.6
,
-10.8
). These observations spanned 83 days between
May 17th and August 9th 1996. The exposure times resulted in a limiting magnitude of
.
Together with the first set of plates, this series allowed us to reveal
the shape of the Sagittarius dwarf galaxy near the Galactic Plane (Alard 1996; Cseresnjes et al. 2000, hereafter
Paper I). For convenience we will refer to the first field as the DUO field whereas the second field
will be called SAG field. Typical spectral windows for SAG and DUO are shown in Fig. 1.
The plates were scanned at CAI/Paris Observatory with the high-speed
microdensitometer MAMA. The extraction of the sources
were performed with the software Extractor written by Alard (Alard & Guibert 1997). The final
database contains the light curve for
stars.
The selection process for RR Lyrae stars is similar to the one used in Paper I, except that we adapted the
parameters to allow detection of RRc stars. In short, we extracted from the data-base the variables with
an amplitude 0.2 mag. (
)
and a minimum of 30 points in their light curve.
These stars were then period searched between 0.2
and 10.0
using the multi-harmonic
periodogram method of
Schwarzenberg-Czerny (1996) and we fitted a Fourier series with up to five harmonics to the folded
light curve. The variables with a well-defined light curve (
)
were
then plotted in the R21/
plane where the RR Lyrae stars could easily be spotted. The final
sample contains
3700 RR Lyrae variables almost evenly distributed between Sgr and the Galaxy.
To search for multi-periodic RR Lyraes, we use the following procedure. For each lightcurve we search for the dominant period and
fit a third order Fourier series to the folded lightcurve. The resulting Fourier series is then subtracted from the time series and the
procedure is iterated. To characterize the strength of the peak value in the periodogram, we follow Alcock et al. (2000b) and calculate
the statistics:
![]() |
(1) |
For all the lightcurves passing at least 2 iterations, we calculated the value
/
,
where
is the reduced
of the fit of the Fourier series with the primary period and
refers
to the fit of the double Fourier series with the primary and secondary periods. All lightcurves for which Proba(
according to a Fisher-Snedecor distribution were selected for visual inspection. For all these candidates, we simultaneously checked
the lightcurves and the periodograms in order to select the multi-mode pulsating stars.
![]() |
Figure 2: Example of RRd star where the primary period is trapped in an alias period. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
It is very likely that we miss many multi-mode variables with the above-described procedure. This is due to three
reasons: (1) the photometric accuracy is limited with our photographic material,
(2) the superposition of two (or more) periods introduces noise in the periodograms, (3) the strong aliasing at
(see Fig. 1). There is not much that can be done about these problems, except for problem (3) in the search for RRd stars
where we have more
control because the period ratios are relatively well constrained. Figure 2 shows a typical example of a RRd star missed by the
preceding method. Although the maximum amplitude occurs at
,
it is clear that the true frequency
is rather
,
a value that yields a more "classical'' period ratio
.
We thus re-processed the whole variable star data-base in order to search for double-mode RR Lyrae stars, but this time
we forced the period search between 0.33
and
0.44
.
This interval encompasses the range of primary periods of all known RRds. A Fourier series
with the periodicity P1 was fitted to the light curve and the residual relative to this fit was
period searched in the range 0.45
.
The fit to the residuals was then
subtracted from the initial light curve and the procedure was repeated. We then calculated the reduced
about the resulting double Fourier series.
![]() |
Figure 3: Left panels: a typical RRd star. The panels represent from top to bottom: spectral window, periodogram after successive subtraction of the main pulsation, and decomposition of the lightcurve. Right panels: same as before for a RR Lyrae star with two closely spaced frequencies. |
Open with DEXTER |
In the following, we kept only those stars for which
,
corresponding to a range that is considered physically plausible by stellar pulsation models (Cox et al. 1980;
Kovács et al. 1991; Bono et al. 1996).
To select the double mode pulsating RR Lyraes we define the variable
/
,
where
and
are the reduced
referring
to the single-mode
and double-mode fit respectively. All the variables for
which the double-mode fit yields a better representation of the light curve (i.e. those with Proba (
)
where inspected
visually. We simultaneously checked the single period and the double-mode fit in order not to spuriously select
a variable with a true period outside the range searched as an RRd star.
![]() |
Figure 4:
Finding charts for multiperiodic RR Lyrae stars in Sgr and the Galactic Centre. Each finding chart is 36
![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
For completeness, we repeated the above-described procedure by inverting the order of the period searches (P0 before P1) in order to detect any eventual RRd with a higher amplitude in the fundamental mode relative to the first overtone mode. No additionnal RRd star was found this way, confirming that the first overtone mode is almost always the primary pulsation. This method allowed detection of 16 additional RRd stars.
The final sample contains two kinds of multiperiodic stars: RRd stars and RR Lyrae stars with two closely spaced frequencies.
No attempt was made to
detect RR Lyrae variables implying long time effects (e.g. Blazkho variables or period changes), because of our too short time span for
these kinds of detections. Nor did we search for more than two periods because of the limited accuracy of our photometry.
System | [Fe/H] |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() | r | ![]() |
M 3 | -1.7 | 0.558 | 0.008 | 0.344 | 0.019 | 0.87 | -24.0 |
M 15 | -2.2 | 0.641 | 0.013 | 0.359 | 0.008 | 0.15 | -1068.5 |
Draco | -2.0 | 0.614 | 0.004 | 0.351 | 0.012 | 0.67 | -48.9 |
Ursa Minor | -2.2 | 0.638 | 0.009 | 0.375 | 0.011 | 0.16 | -63.0 |
Carina | -2.0 | 0.620 | 0.006 | 0.366 | 0.015 | 0.51 | -60.8 |
Leo II | -1.9 | 0.619 | 0.006 | 0.363 | 0.008 | 0.62 | -42.9 |
Sculptor | -1.8 | 0.587 | 0.007 | 0.337 | 0.005 | 0.67 | -46.7 |
Sextans | -1.7 | 0.606 | 0.010 | 0.355 | 0.024 | 0.78 | -44.6 |
SMC (RRLyr) | -1.7 | 0.588 | 0.006 | 0.380 | 0.008 | 0.81 | -34.5 |
LMC (RRLyr) | -1.6 | 0.582 | 0.001 | 0.325 | 0.001 | 0.96 | -19.0 |
Sgr | -1.6 | 0.574 | 0.002 | 0.322 | 0.002 | 1.00 | ... |
Galactic Centre | ... | 0.548 | 0.002 | 0.305 | 0.002 | 0.86 | -28.3 |
![]() |
Figure 5: Period distribution of the RR Lyraes detected in various systems. The dark regions indicate the location of the RRd variables (1 st overtone period). |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 6: Cumulative distributions of RR Lyrae periods in the OoI globular cluster M 3 and all satellites of the Milky Way with a well studied RR Lyrae population. The solid line refers to Sgr whereas the dotted line corresponds to the system indicated in each panel. Left (resp. right) curves correspond to RRc stars (resp. RRab stars). |
Open with DEXTER |
We found 53 RRd stars (40 in Sgr and 13 in the Galaxy), which are presented in
Tables 1 and 2. The first
column is the star identifier, Cols. 2 and 3 are the equatorial coordinates. The apparent magnitude of each star is shown in
Col. 4 (DUO) or 5 (SAG). Columns 6 and 7 are the amplitude (in
band for DUO and
B4415 for SAG) of the fundamental mode pulsation, and amplitude ratio respectively.
Columns 8 and 9 are the periods and period ratios. Column 10 represents the probability that the
occured by chance if it were following a Fisher-Snedecor distribution. Although this is not true because
of the non-Gaussianity of the errors, it is still indicative of the strength of the detection. In the last column, we indicate whether
the RRd star has been detected through the first
method or not, and in the latter case, why it was missed (A0: fundamental period aliased, A1: first overtone period aliased, N:
periodogram too noisy - i.e. Si<8). A typical RRd star is presented in Fig. 3
(left panels).
In addition to the RRd stars, we found 13 RR Lyrae stars with two closely spaced frequencies (5 in Sgr and 8 in the Galaxy). These stars are presented in Table 3 (Sgr) and 4 (Galaxy). A typical detection is presented in Fig. 3 (right panels). Similar detections have been performed in M 55 (Olech et al. 1999a), M 5 (Olech et al. 1999b), the LMC (Alcock et al. 2000b) and the Galactic Bulge (Moskalik 2000).
Finding charts of all the detected multiperiodic RR Lyraes are presented in Fig. 4 only available in electronic form at http://www.edpsciences.org. North is up, East is left, and each box is 36
on a side. Light curves are available at the CDS via anonymous ftp to cdsarc.u-strasbg.fr (130.79.128.5) or via http://cdsweb.u-strasbg.fr/cgi-bin/qcat?J/A+A/375/909.
The mean periods of RR Lyrae stars in Sgr are 0.574
0.002 and 0.322
0.002 for RRab and RRc stars respectively.
This can be compared to the mean periods found in OoI (0.55
and 0.32
)
and OoII (0.65
and
0.37
)
groups. Sgr is thus to be classified in the OoI group. This is not common for Dsph galaxies, which are usually
located in the intermediate region of the Oosterhoff dichotomy.
Table 6 presents the mean periods of RR Lyrae stars in an OoI type globular cluster (M 3), an OoII type cluster (M 15),
in the Galactic Centre and in
all the Milky Way satellites with a well-studied RR Lyrae population. The LMC RR Lyrae stars have been extracted from photographic plate
time series of the first EROS season whereas sources for all the other systems are listed in the caption of Table 6.
The RR Lyrae stars in Sgr present the shortest average periods among all the
dwarf galaxies, but slightly longer than the OoI globular cluster M 3 and the Galactic Centre.
Indeed, these values are rather close to those found in the Large Magellanic Cloud (
0.001
and
0.001).
The similarity between Sgr and the LMC is even more striking when one considers the period distributions of the RR Lyraes.
The period distributions of RR Lyrae stars in the Galactic Centre and in different dwarf galaxies are shown in Fig. 5
and are compared to that of Sgr in Fig. 6.
The coefficients of correlation between all these histograms and the period distribution in Sgr
are shown in Col. 7 of Table 6. As expected, the highest correlation is reached
for the LMC where r=0.96.
Since the correlation coefficient r measures the linearity between two distributions, it is sensitive to the shape of
the distributions, but not to shifts (i.e. two identical distributions shifted one with respect to the other would have r=1.00).
We thus performed another test, adapted from maximum likelihood statistics, and which is more sensitive to shifts.
First, each period histogram is normalized to that of Sgr. We then calculate
the values
where pi corresponds to the probability of finding the number of stars observed in the
ith bin if the parent distribution was identical to the period histogram of Sgr. The results are shown in Col. 8 of
Table 6. The highest
value is reached by the LMC, confirming that the period distributions in Sgr and the LMC are
the most similar.
The RR Lyrae samples in Sgr and the LMC are large (1700 in Sgr and
6500 in the LMC), making the resemblance between these two systems significant. This resemblance is even more striking when one considers that no two other
dwarf galaxies have similar period distributions. Note however that the two distributions are not identical, this
being excluded at the 99
level by a KS test.
![]() |
Figure 7:
Petersen diagram for all the published RRd. In the upper left panel,
the dotted lines correspond to the metallicity for a specific model of RRd star (see text). From top to bottom
![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
System | [Fe/H] | N(RRd) |
![]() |
![]() | r |
IC 4499 | -1.5 | 17 | 0.481 | 0.358 | 0.44 |
M 3 | -1.7 | 5 | 0.481 | 0.359 | 0.22 |
NGC 2419 | -2.1 | 1 | 0.546 | 0.407 | ... |
M 68 | -2.1 | 8 | 0.531 | 0.396 | -0.02 |
M 15 | -2.2 | 12 | 0.541 | 0.404 | 0.13 |
NGC 6426 | -2.2 | 1 | 0.542 | 0.404 | ... |
Draco Dsph | -2.0 | 10 | 0.540 | 0.403 | 0.15 |
Sculptor | -1.8 | 1 | ? | 0.404 | ... |
LMC | -1.7 | 181 | 0.485 | 0.361 | 0.77 |
Sgr | -1.1 | 40 | 0.487 | 0.362 | 1.00 |
MW | ... | 18 | 0.504 | 0.376 | 0.54 |
Table 7 summarizes the average periods of RRd stars in all the systems known to harbor this kind of variable. Again, the LMC and Sgr show a remarkable similarity in the mean periods of their RRd star population. In Fig. 7 we present the distributions of all the published RRd stars in the Petersen diagram. The cluster RRd variables and those of the Draco Dsph galaxy occupy two distinct regions, reproducing the Oosterhoff dichotomy. This is no more the case for RRd stars in Sgr, in the LMC and in the Galactic Centre. These latter stars are distributed on a strip across the diagram. These distributions can be explained either by a metallicity spread, a mass spread or a combination of both (Kovács 2000). A metallicity spread in the RRd population of the LMC has already been confirmed by spectroscopic measurements (Clementini et al. 2000; Bragaglia et al. 2001) and it is likely that the same applies to Sgr.
To compare further, we transformed the Petersen diagrams into density maps and calculated the correlation between all these distributions. The results are shown in Col. 6 of Table 7. The correlation between the LMC and Sgr is r=0.77, which is not as good as the correlation between the single-mode RR Lyrae period distributions, but differences in the completeness between samples may affect the comparison.
![]() |
Figure 8: Panel a) period/amplitude diagram of the RR Lyrae stars in Sgr. Dots represent stars detected in SAG and triangle are double-mode RR Lyraes. Also shown are the fiducial lines of M 3 (OoI group) and M 9 (OoII group). Panel b) Metallicity estimate from the period-amplitude-metallicity relation. The dotted line represents the best Gaussian fit, whose relation is given in the upper right corner of the panel. |
Open with DEXTER |
The distribution of RRab stars in Fig. 8a presents a high dispersion but is preferentially clumped
around the ridge line of the globular cluster M 3, confirming that this population is related to the OoI group. However, the
distribution is skewed toward the ridge line of the OoII cluster member M 9, suggesting the presence of a metal-poor sub-population
within the RR Lyrae population. The RRab population is dominated by low-amplitude stars with a ratio
.
The RR Lyrae population is thus dominated by RRb stars, indicative of a red horizontal branch morphology.
Remarkably, the same features are apparent in the period-amplitude diagram of the LMC (Alcock et al. 1996; Alcock et al. 2000a), providing new evidence of the similarity of the RR Lyrae populations between these two galaxies.
Some indication on the metallicity of the RR Lyrae population in Sgr can be inferred from its period distribution.
In a study of cluster and field RR Lyrae stars spanning a wide range of metallicities, Sandage (1993)
related the average periods of RR Lyrae stars to their metallicities:
The location of the blue and red fundamental edge of the instability strip are functions of metallicity. The shortest and longest
period RR Lyraes are thus indicative of the metallicity boundaries of the RR Lyrae population which are given as (Sandage 1993):
The best Gaussian fit to the metallicity distribution is given by
.
As
can be seen in Fig. 8b, this function fits the distribution relatively well, except for
2.0 dex where the presence
of a significant metal-poor subpopulation is apparent.
A clump of RRd stars is apparent in Fig. 7 at
1.8 dex, suggesting the presence of a minor but significant
population of low metallicity and/or high mass RR Lyraes. The loci of the long period RRd stars in the
Petersen diagram is similar to those found in OoII systems. Table 7 summarizes all the systems with known RRd pulsators.
One sees that qs
all these OoII systems have a metallicity within -2.0 and -2.2 dex, supporting the assumption that a fraction of RR Lyrae stars in Sgr has
this abundance.
The existence of a very low metallicity population in Sgr has been
suggested by Bellazzini et al.
(1999a, 1999b) who detected a star count excess in a region of the CMD that could represent a very blue horizontal branch.
Furthermore, in a period-amplitude diagram of RR Lyrae stars towards the globular cluster M 54, Layden & Sarajedini (2000) noted
that a fraction of RR Lyrae stars could be consistent with
a contamination by Sgr field stars of metallicity
dex.
Several authors claim having detected a metallicity gradient in the stellar population of Sgr, the centre being more
metal-rich than the outer regions. This finding is
based on the redder morphology of the Red Giant Branch and the Horizontal Branch at the centre of Sgr relative to the outer regions
(Marconi et al. 1998; Bellazzini et al. 1999b; Alard 2001). If confirmed, this feature would
be in concordance with observations of other dwarf galaxies (e.g. Saviane et al. 2001 and references therein).We now question whether such a gradient is apparent in the RR Lyrae population.
![]() |
Figure 9:
Panel a) average period of RRab stars as a function of position. Filled circles correspond to RRab variables in Sgr and a distance (X) from M 54 projected onto the main axis (upper labels). Open circles are average periods of Galactic RRab and are plotted as a function of Galactic latitude (lower labels). Panel b) Normalized period histograms of RRab stars. The solid line correspond to RRab stars with
![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
Any metallicity gradient would translate into a gradient in the mean period of RRab stars.
Figure 9a presents the mean period of RRab stars in Sgr (solid line) as a function of distance from M54 projected onto the
main axis. Each bin size has been adapted in order to contain the
same number of RRab stars. A linear least square fit through
these points yields a slope of
.
From Eq. (2),
it results in a metallicity difference <0.1 dex between
the two extremities of the field. Clearly, there is no significant metallicity gradient in the RR Lyrae
population of Sgr. For comparison, we present in Fig. 9a the average period of Galactic RRab as a function of
latitude (dotted line), where the period dependence as a function of position is evident.
To test the homogeneity further, we divided the RRab catalogue into two subsamples around the median distance from M 54
and compared the period distributions (Fig. 9b). A KS test shows that the two histograms are drawn from the same
parent distribution with a probability of 82,
suggesting a similar horizontal branch morphology in the two subsamples.
Finally, in Fig. 9c we compare the spatial distributions of the 250
longest and shortest period RRab variables. The KS test yields a probability of 88
for the two histograms to be issued from the
same parent distribution. This definitely excludes any modification of the period distribution with position. Thus, unless a metallicity gradient
and the second parameter effect conspire to keep the
horizontal branch morphology constant over the field, the RR Lyrae population should be homogeneous in the main body of Sgr. Furthermore, if
the metallicity gradient was confirmed, this
may indicate that the RR Lyrae population is not associated to the prominent red horizontal branch which is apparent in the CMDs of Sgr.
![]() |
Figure 10:
Luminosity-metallicity relation for Dsph of the Local group. Data have been taken from Mateo (1998). The dashed line corresponds to the best fit to the data points. The filled circle corresponds to the estimated luminosity of Sgr if this galaxy had lost 50![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
Provided RRab stars are good
tracers of light in Sgr, we can estimate a lower limit to the total luminosity of this galaxy using the luminosity
function (LF) published by Mateo et al. (1995). Their LF is complete down to
mag. For fainter
magnitudes we extend the LF with the Bulge LF (Holtzman et al. 1998). This should not significantly alter the result since most
of the light is emitted by brighter stars. The field of Mateo et al. contains five RRab stars. Rescaling the RRab number density to the
integrated luminosity and assuming a distance modulus of
(m-M)0=17.0 to Sgr yields -4.9 mag per RRab. It results that
13.9
+0.4-0.6 mag, where the uncertainties represent the poissonian uncertainty in the RRab counts. Again,
if we assume 50
mass loss, the total magnitude of Sgr before stripping would be
-14.7 mag.
Previous estimates have continuously increased the luminosity of Sgr as new extensions of this galaxy were discovered, with estimations
ranging from 13.0 (Ibata et al. 1995) to
14.6 mag (Mateo et al. 1998). Our estimation seems
to favor the higher luminosity of Sgr. The metallicity of the dominant population in Sgr is estimated to be [Fe/H]
1.1 dex (Mateo et al. 1995). An absolute luminosity of
14.7 mag for Sgr would be consistent with the empirical magnitude-metallicity
relationship for Dsph galaxies, as shown in Fig. 10.
We summarize our results below:
The similarity of RR Lyrae populations between Sgr and the LMC is indicative of similar horizontal branch morphologies. This similarity implies that the parameter(s) driving the HB morphology are similar in both systems. Furthermore, since RR Lyraes represent the old metal-weak population of these systems, this result suggests that the LMC and Sgr formed at the same epoch and in a similar environment with respect to the metal abundance. It is thus tempting to speculate that Sgr and the LMC had a common progenitor. In this picture, Sgr could correspond to a piece of the LMC pulled out during a collision with the Galaxy. Such a scenario could help to explain how a galaxy with an old stellar population can be observed on such a low orbit without being completely disrupted through Galactic tides.
Acknowledgements
I am pleased to thank Christophe Alard for constant support and many useful suggestions during the elaboration of this paper.