Issue |
A&A
Volume 518, July-August 2010
Herschel: the first science highlights
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | L149 | |
Number of page(s) | 6 | |
Section | Letters | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201014655 | |
Published online | 16 July 2010 |
Herschel: the first science highlights
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
A study of the distant activity of comet C/2006 W3 (Christensen)
with Herschel and ground-based radio telescopes
,![[*]](/icons/foot_motif.png)
D. Bockelée-Morvan1 - P. Hartogh2 - J. Crovisier1 - B. Vandenbussche3 - B. M. Swinyard4 - N. Biver1 - D. C. Lis5 - C. Jarchow2 - R. Moreno1 - D. Hutsemékers6 - E. Jehin6 - M. Küppers11 - L. M. Lara12 - E. Lellouch1 - J. Manfroid6 - M. de Val-Borro2 - S. Szutowicz7 - M. Banaszkiewicz7 - F. Bensch8 - M. I. Blecka7 - M. Emprechtinger5 - T. Encrenaz1 - T. Fulton9 - M. Kidger10 - M. Rengel2 - C. Waelkens3 - E. Bergin13 - G. A. Blake5 - J. A. D. L. Blommaert3 - J. Cernicharo14 - L. Decin3 - P. Encrenaz15 - T. de Graauw16,17,18 - S. Leeks4 - A. S. Medvedev2 - D. Naylor19 - R. Schieder20 - N. Thomas21
1 - LESIA, Observatoire de Paris, 5 place Jules Janssen, 92195 Meudon, France
2 - Max-Planck-Institut für Sonnensystemforschung, Katlenburg-Lindau, Germany
3 - Instituut voor Sterrenkunde, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium
4 - Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Oxfordshire, UK
5 - California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, USA
6 - F.R.S.-FNRS, Institut d'Astrophysique et de Géophysique, Liège, Belgium
7 - Space Research Centre, Polish Academy of Science, Warszawa, Poland
8 - Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR), Bonn, Germany
9 - Blue Sky Spectroscopy Inc., Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada
10 - Herschel Science Centre, ESAC, Madrid, Spain
11 - European Space Astronomy Centre, Madrid, Spain
12 - Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía (CSIC), Granada, Spain
13 - University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA
14 - CAB. INTA-CSIC Crta Torrejon a Ajalvir km 4. 28850 Torrejon
de Ardoz, Madrid, Spain
15 - LERMA, Observatoire de Paris, and Univ. Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France
16 - SRON Netherlands Institute for Space Research, PO Box 800, Groningen,
The Netherlands
17 - Leiden Observatory, University of Leiden, The Netherlands
18 - Joint ALMA Observatory, Santiago, Chile
19 - University of Lethbridge, Canada
20 - University of Cologne, Germany
21 - University of Bern, Switzerland
Received 31 March 2010 / Accepted 7 May 2010
Abstract
Comet C/2006 W3 (Christensen) was observed in November
2009 at 3.3 AU from the Sun with Herschel.The PACS
instrument acquired images of the dust coma in 70-m and
160-
m filters and spectra covering several H2O rotational
lines. Spectra in the range 450-1550 GHz were acquired with
SPIRE. The comet emission continuum from 70 to 672
m was
measured, but no lines were detected. The spectral energy
distribution indicates thermal emission from large particles and
provides a measure of the size distribution index and dust
production rate. The upper limit to the water production rate is
compared to the production rates of other species (CO, CH3OH,
HCN, H2S, OH) measured with the IRAM 30-m and Nançay
telescopes. The coma is found to be strongly enriched in species
more volatile than water, in comparison to comets observed closer
to the Sun. The CO to H2O production rate ratio exceeds 220%.
The dust-to-gas production rate ratio is on the order of 1.
Key words: comets: individual: C/2006 W3 (Christensen) - techniques: photometric - radio lines: planetary systems - radio continuum: planetary systems - comets: general
1 Introduction
Direct imaging shows that distant activity is a general property
of cometary nuclei (e.g., Mazzotta Epifani et al. 2009). It is attributed to
the sublimation of hypervolatile ices, such as CO or
CO2, or to the release of volatile species trapped in amorphous
water ice during the amorphous-to-crystalline phase transition
(Prialnik et al. 2004). Indeed, at heliocentric distances
larger
than 3-4 AU, the sublimation of water, the major volatile in
cometary nuclei, is inefficient. Characterizing the processes
responsible for distant activity is important for understanding
the structure and composition of cometary nuclei, their thermal
properties and their evolution upon solar heating. However,
detailed investigations of distant nuclei are sparse. The
best studied objects are the distant comet
29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 1, where CO, CO+, and CN were detected
at 6 AU from the Sun, and C/1995 O1 (Hale-Bopp),
whose exceptional activity allowed us to detect several
molecules and radicals farther than 3 AU - including CO up to 14
AU (Rauer et al. 2003; Biver et al. 2002).
Comet C/2006 W3 (Christensen) was discovered in November 2006 at
AU from the Sun with a total visual magnitude
.
This long-period comet passed perihelion on July 6, 2009
at
AU. Because of its significant brightness (
at perihelion), it was an interesting target for the
study of distant cometary activity. We report here on observations
undertaken at
AU post-perihelion with the PACS
(Poglitsch et al. 2010) and SPIRE (Griffin et al. 2010) instruments on
Herschel (Pilbratt et al. 2010), in the framework of the Herschel guaranteed time key project called ``Water and related
chemistry in the Solar System'' (Hartogh et al. 2009). These observations
are complemented by production rate measurements of several
species with the Nançay radio telescope and the 30-m telescope
of the Institut de Radioastronomie millimétrique (IRAM) at
3.2-3.3 AU pre- and post-perihelion.
Table 1: Molecular observations in comet C/2006 W3 (Christensen).
2 Observations with Herschel
Comet C/2006 W3 (Christensen) was observed with Herschel on
November 1-8, 2009 at
AU and a distance from
Herschel
-3.7 AU.
There were two PACS observations acquired during the Herschel science demonstration phase: on November 1.83 UT,
simultaneous acquisition of
coma images
(Fig. 1) in blue (60-85
m) and red (130-210
m) bands with the scan map photometry mode with a scan speed
of 10
/sec (Obsid
1342186621 and 1342186622 with
orthogonal scanning, duration
s each), and on
November 8.74-8.82 UT, pointed source dedicated line spectroscopy
over a
field of view (
pixels
of 9.4
)
with a large (6
)
chopper throw and a number
(so-called line repetition
)
of ABBA nodding cycles
(Obsid
1342186633,
= 6837 s). The water lines
221-110 (108.07
m,
),
313-202 (138.53
m,
),
303-212 (174.63
m,
),
212-101 (179.53
m,
)
and
221-212 (180.49
m,
)
were targeted at a
spectral resolution
-0.12
m. The
PACS data were processed with the HIPE software version 2.3.1,
which uses ground calibration for the signal-to-flux conversion. A
high-pass filter with a width of 297 was used to remove the 1/fnoise. According to sky calibration sources, PACS spectroscopy
fluxes in the 100-220
m range are too high by a factor of
1.1 on average, with a 30% accuracy. For the blue and red maps,
the overestimation factors are 1.05 and 1.29, and the flux
accuracies are 10 and 20%, respectively. We applied these
corrections. No hint of lines is present in the PACS spectra
(online Fig. 2, Table 1 for
upper limits). However, thermal emission from the dust coma is
detected in the 25 pixels.
![]() |
Figure 1:
Blue (70 |
Open with DEXTER |
On November 6.59-6.68 UT the comet was observed using the central pixels on the SPIRE spectrometer for a total duration of 6926 s. The spectral range (450-1550 GHz) encompasses the fundamental ortho 110-101 and para 111-000 water lines. This source was extremely faint for the SPIRE spectrometer. Standard pipeline reduction showed significant problems with the overall flux level in both the high- (SSW) and low- (SLW) frequency channels. A different approach has been taken therefore, which does not rely on the standard pipeline processing. It uses the variation in bolometer temperature to transform the source and dark interferograms into spectra, which are then subtracted and divided by a calibration spectrum obtained on a bright source (Uranus).
Another aspect that is not currently accurately calibrated in standard processing is the effect of variations in the instrument temperature between the observation of the dark sky and the source: this can cause large relative variations in the recorded spectrum in the low frequency SLW portion. For the data presented here we determined the overall net flux of the source with no subtraction or addition of flux from the variation in instrument temperature. We then inspected the low frequency spectrum and compared it to the spectrum expected from the subtraction of two black bodies at temperatures given by the average instrument temperatures recorded in the housekeeping data. In general, as with the standard pipeline, this gives either too much or too little flux and a non-physical spectrum compared to the spectrum seen in the (unaffected) high-frequency band. The difference in model instrument temperatures in the dark sky and the source observation were therefore varied until a match between the overall flux level in SSW was achieved and the flux at the lowest frequencies is zero within the noise. The degree of variation in the temperature difference required to achieve this is less than 1% of the recorded temperatures.
The comet is
somewhat extended in the beam of the SPIRE spectrometer, so a
correction is required to the shape of the spectrum to account for
the varying beam size of the instrument with frequency
(Swinyard et al. 2010). We normalised this correction here to give the
flux in an effective beam size of 18.7
for both the SSW and
SLW channels. Inspection of the data shows that no line is
detected within a 3-
upper limit of
0.7-
W m-2. Continuum emission from the
coma is detected (Fig. 3).
![]() |
Figure 3:
Spectral energy distribution of C/2006 W3 (Christensen)
combining SPIRE (SLW: red dots; SSW: green dots), PACS photometry
(blue dots), and spectroscopy (cyan dots) data, scaled to a half
power beam width of 18.7
|
Open with DEXTER |
3 Observations with ground-based telescopes
![]() |
Figure 4: Sample of ground-based spectra of comet C/2006 W3 (Christensen) acquired in 2009: OH spectrum (average of 1665 and 1667 MHz lines) observed at Nançay on Feb. 2 to Apr. 19, and HCN (Sept. 13-14), CO (Oct. 29), and CH3OH (Oct. 14) spectra observed at the IRAM-30m. |
Open with DEXTER |
The OH lines at 18 cm were observed in comet C/2006 W3
(Christensen) with the Nançay radio telescope
(Fig. 4, Table 1). The methods of
observation and analysis are described in Crovisier et al. (2002). The
observations were done pre-perihelion from February 10 to April
19, 2009 when the comet was at an average heliocentric distance
similar to that of the Herschel post-perihelion
observations. An average OH production rate
=
s-1 was derived, which corresponds
to a water production rate
s-1, assuming that water is
the main source of OH radicals.
Observations with the IRAM 30-m were made on September 12-14,
2009 with the recently installed EMIR receiver, completed by a
short observation on October 29 just before the Herschel
observations (Fig. 4 and online
Fig. 5, Table 1). CO, HCN (two rotational
transitions), CH3OH (six lines around 157 GHz) and H2S
were detected. Beam sizes are between 10 and 27
,
similar to
PACS and SPIRE fields of view.
4 Analysis and discussion
The observed water rotational lines are optically thick
(e.g., Biver et al. 2007; Hartogh et al. 2010). To derive upper limits for the
water production rate, we used an excitation model which considers
radiation trapping, excitation by collisions with neutrals (here
CO) and electrons, and solar IR pumping (Biver et al. 1999; Biver 1997). An
H2O-CO total cross-section for de-excitation of
cm2 is assumed (Biver et al. 1999). The same excitation
processes are considered in the models used to analyze the
molecular lines observed at the IRAM 30-m. We used a gas kinetic
temperature of 18 K, derived from the relative intensities of the
CH3OH lines, and a gas expansion velocity of 0.47
km s-1, consistent with the widths of lines detected at IRAM.
The largest model uncertainty is in the electron density profile.
We used the profile derived from the 1P/Halley in-situ
measurements and scaled it to the heliocentric distance and
activity of comet Christensen, as detailed in e.g. Bensch & Bergin (2004).
The electron density was then multiplied by a factor
,
constrained from observations of the 557 GHz water line in
other comets (Biver et al. 2007; Hartogh et al. 2010). Upper limits on the water
production rate obtained from the 212-101 line observed
with PACS, and from the 111-000 line observed with
SPIRE, are given in
Table 1. Other observed H2O lines,
either with PACS or with SPIRE do not improve these limits. The
higher water production rate measured pre-perihelion at Nan¸cay
may suggest a seasonal effect. As the field of view of the
Nan¸cay telescope is large (
),
another interpretation is the detection of water sublimating from
icy grains. The
measured at Nan¸cay corresponds
to a sublimation cross-section of 400 km2, or a sublimating
sphere of pure ice of 8 km radius.
With a CO production rate of
s-1, comet Christensen
is only four times less productive than comet Hale-Bopp at
AU
(Biver et al. 2002).
The post-perihelion measurements show that the CO to H2O production rate
ratio in comet Christensen exceeds 220%, indicating a CO-driven activity
(Table 1). For comparison, CO/H2O was
120%
in comet Hale-Bopp at 3.3 AU from the Sun. When normalized to HCN,
abundance ratios HCN:CO:CH3OH:H2S:CS are 1:240:9:6:0.3 and
1:150:10:9:0.3 for comets Christensen and Hale-Bopp, respectively
(online Fig. 6, Biver et al. 2002). Therefore, besides being
depleted in H2O, comet Christensen is enriched in CO relative to HCN,
while other molecules have similar abundances.
The dust coma is highly condensed but clearly resolved in both
blue (B) and red (R) PACS images (Fig. 1). The
width at half maximum of the radial profiles
is 9.0
and 18.1
in B and R,
respectively, a factor 1.64 larger than the PSF
(
5.5
in B, 11
in R). The B image is extended
westward towards the Sun direction at PA = 257.5
(phase
angle = 16
). This asymmetry is also seen in the R image.
HCN and CO spectral lines are similarly blue-shifted
(Table 1), which indicates preferentially dayside
emission of these molecules from the nucleus, and is consistent
with the dust coma morphology. Because CO is likely the main
escaping gas (CO2 has been observed to be less abundant
than CO in comets, Bockelée-Morvan et al. 2004), dust-loading by CO gas is suggested.
The enhanced CO production towards the Sun implies sub-surface
production at depths not exceeding the thermal skin depth (
1 cm). The distant CO production in comet Christensen may result
from the crystallization of amorphous water ice immediately below
the surface (Prialnik et al. 2004).
Radial profiles in the B and R bands are presented in
Fig. 7 for both the comet and the PSF (from Vesta
data). Although highly structured, the background was estimated as
best as possible and subtracted. The PSF has a complex shape,
which was fitted radially with two Gaussian profiles centered at
and
(resp. 12
)
for the B
(resp. R) bands. A symmetric 2D PSF was then constructed and
convolved with theoretical cometary surface brightness profiles
.
One finds that the full range of radial
profiles can be reproduced with 0.8<x<1.2. Most of the
dispersion is likely due to the PSF structure and more
specifically to its extended tri-lobe pattern (Lutz 2010). The
average surface brightness profiles can be fitted with
in the B band and
in the R band.
The radial dependence of the surface brightness is then compatible
with the steady-state
law in the full 60-210
m
spectral range.
![]() |
Figure 7:
Comet surface brightness and re-scaled PSF (Vesta) in B
( left box) and R ( right box) bands. Blue dots: surface brightness
for each pixel. Red dots: mean values in 0.5
|
Open with DEXTER |
There is then no evidence for a significant contribution of
nucleus thermal emission in the central pixels. Assuming that the
CO production rate scales proportionally to the nucleus surface
area, the size of Christensen's nucleus is estimated to be a
factor of two smaller than Hale-Bopp's nucleus size, i.e.
km for comet Christensen (see Altenhoff et al. 1999, for Hale-Bopp's nucleus
size). From
the Standard Thermal Model (Lebofsky & Spencer 1989) with the nucleus albedo set to 4%
and the emissivity and beaming factor taken as unity, a
20 km diameter body would contribute to 4.5% of the flux
measured in the central 1
pixel of the B image (
mJy/pixel), and still less (2%) in the R image where the
measured peak intensity is
mJy/pixel
(2
-pixel). From the B image we estimated that D < 26 km.
The spectral energy distribution (SED) of the dust thermal
emission can constrain important properties of cometary dust, in
particular the dust size distribution and production rate
(Jewitt & Luu 1990). The flux density in the SPIRE spectrum
(Fig. 3) varies as
.
The
spectral index, close to
,
indicates the presence of
large grains, consistent with the maximum ejectable dust size
loaded by the CO gas (
mm for a D = 20 km body of density
kg m-3, with the dust
density
;
;
Crifo et al. 2005).
We modeled the thermal emission of the dust coma following
Jewitt & Luu (1990). Absorption cross-sections calculated with the Mie
theory were used to compute both the temperature of the grains,
solving the equation of radiative equilibrium, and their thermal
emission. Complex refractive indices of amorphous carbon and
olivine (Mg:Fe = 50:50) (Edoh 1983; Dorschner et al. 1995) were taken as broadly
representative of cometary dust. We considered a differential dust
production
(a) as a function of size, with sizes between 0.1
m and 0.9 mm. The size-dependent grain velocities
(a)
were computed following Crifo & Rodionov (1997) assuming D = 20 km, and
vary from 6 to 224 m s-1 (
a-0.5 at large
sizes). We assumed a local dust density
,
where
r is the distance to the nucleus, consistent with the maps. The
best fit to the flux ratio
FB/FR in R and B bands
is obtained for
a-(3.6+0.25-0.8),
which yields a dust opacity (the ratio between the effective
emitting dust cross-section and dust mass), of 6.8
+1.2-2.8and 5.7
+0.3-1.3 m2 kg-1 at 450 GHz, and dust
production rates of850
+1100-200 and 920
+730-110 kg s-1, for carbon and olivine grains, respectively. The
whole SED between 450 and 4300 GHz is consistently explained
(Fig. 3). Assuming that CO is the main gas
escaping from the nucleus, the inferred dust-to-gas mass
production ratio is then 0.5 to 1.4.
5 Conclusions
Comet Christensen was a distant comet. Nevertheless, the continuum was clearly detected by PACS and SPIRE, providing useful constraints on the properties of the cometary dust. Although water emission was not detected in this object, the limits obtained are significant. The prospects for future cometary studies with Herschel are thus very good.
AcknowledgementsPACS has been developed by a consortium of institutes led by MPE (Germany) and including UVIE (Austria); KU Leuven, CSL, IMEC (Belgium); CEA, LAM (France); MPIA (Germany); INAF-IFSI/OAA/OAP/OAT, LENS, SISSA (Italy); IAC (Spain). This development has been supported by the funding agencies BMVIT (Austria), ESA-PRODEX (Belgium), CEA/CNES (France), DLR (Germany), ASI/INAF (Italy), and CICYT/MCYT (Spain). SPIRE has been developed by a consortium of institutes led by Cardiff University (UK) and including Univ. Lethbridge (Canada); NAOC (China); CEA, LAM (France); IFSI, Univ. Padua (Italy); IAC (Spain); Stockholm Observatory (Sweden); Imperial College London, RAL, UCL-MSSL, UKATC, Univ. Sussex (UK); and Caltech, JPL, NHSC, Univ. Colorado (USA). This development has been supported by national funding agencies: CSA (Canada); NAOC (China); CEA, CNES, CNRS (France); ASI (Italy); MCINN (Spain); Stockholm Observatory (Sweden); STFC (UK); and NASA (USA). Additional funding support for some instrument activities has been provided by ESA. HCSS/HSpot/HIPE are joint developments by the Herschel Science Ground Segment Consortium, consisting of ESA, the NASA Herschel Science Center, and the HIFI, PACS and SPIRE consortia. IRAM is an international institute co-funded by CNRS, France, MPG, Germany, and IGN, Spain. The Nançay radio observatory is cofunded by CNRS, Observatoire de Paris, and the Région Centre (France). D.B.-M. thanks M.A.T. Groenewegen and D. Ladjal for support in PACS data analysis, and V. Zakharov for useful discussions on gas and dust dynamics.
References
- Altenhoff, W. J., Bieging, J. H., Butler, B., et al. 1999, A&A, 348, 1020 Bensch, F., & Bergin, E. A. 2004, ApJ, 615, 531 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Biver, N. 1997, PhD Thesis, Université Denis Diderot, Paris [Google Scholar]
- Biver, N., Bockelée-Morvan, D., Colom, P., et al. 2002, Earth Moon and Planets, 90, 5 [Google Scholar]
- Biver, N., Bockelée-Morvan, D., Crovisier, J., et al. 1999, AJ, 118, 1850 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Biver, N., Bockelée-Morvan, D., Crovisier, J., et al. 2007, P&SS, 55, 1058 [Google Scholar]
- Bockelée-Morvan, D., Crovisier, J., Mumma, M. J., & Weaver, H. A. 2004, in Comets II, ed. M. C. Festou, H. U. Keller, & H. A. Weaver (Tucson: The University of Arizona Press), 391 [Google Scholar]
- Crifo, J. F., & Rodionov, A. V. 1997, Icarus, 127, 319 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Crifo, J.-F., Loukianov, G. A., Rodionov, A. V., & Zakharov, V. V. 2005, Icarus, 176, 192 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Crovisier, J., Colom, P., Gérard, E., Bockelée-Morvan, D., & Bourgois, G. 2002, A&A, 393, 1053 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Dorschner, J., Begemann, B., Henning, T., Jaeger, C., & Mutschke, H. 1995, A&A, 300, 503 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
- Edoh, J. H. 1983, PhD Thesis, University of Arizona [Google Scholar]
- Griffin, M. J. et al., 2010, A&A, 518, L3 [Google Scholar]
- Hartogh, P., Lellouch, E., Crovisier, J., et al. 2009, P&SS, 57, 1596 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Hartogh, P., et al. 2010, A&A, 518, L150 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Jewitt, D., & Luu, J. 1990, ApJ, 365, 738 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Lebofsky, L. A., & Spencer, J. R. 1989, In Asteroids II, ed. R. P. Binzel, T. Gehrels, & M. S. Matthews (Tucson: The University of Arizona Press), 128 [Google Scholar]
- Lutz, D. 2010, PACS photometer point spread function, PICC-ME-TN-033 [Google Scholar]
- Mazzotta Epifani, E., Palumbo, P., & Colangeli, L. 2009, A&A, 508, 1031 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Pilbratt, G. L. et al. 2010, A&A, 518, L1 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Poglitsch, A. et al., 2010, A&A, 518, L2 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Rauer, H., Helbert, J., Arpigny, C., et al. 2003, A&A, 397, 1109 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Swinyard, B. M., et al. 2010, A&A, 518, L4 [Google Scholar]
- Prialnik, D., Benkhoff, J., & Podolak, M. 2004, in Comets II, ed. M. C. Festou, H. U. Keller, & H. A. Weaver (Tucson: The University of Arizona Press), 359 [Google Scholar]
Online Material
![]() |
Figure 2:
Spectra of C/2006 W3 (Christensen) obtained with PACS on
November 8, 2009 (central pixel pointed on the comet nucleus). The
pixel size is
|
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 5: Spectra of C/2006 W3 (Christensen) observed with the IRAM 30-m telescope. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 6: Comparison of measured abundances relative to HCN in comets C/2006 W3 (Christensen) and C/1995 O1 (Hale-Bopp) at 3.3 AU from the Sun. |
Open with DEXTER |
Footnotes
- ... telescopes
- Herschel is an ESA space observatory with science instruments provided by European-led Principal Investigator consortia and with important participation from NASA.
- ...
- Figures 2, 5, 6 are only available in electronic form at http://www.aanda.org
All Tables
Table 1: Molecular observations in comet C/2006 W3 (Christensen).
All Figures
![]() |
Figure 1:
Blue (70 |
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 3:
Spectral energy distribution of C/2006 W3 (Christensen)
combining SPIRE (SLW: red dots; SSW: green dots), PACS photometry
(blue dots), and spectroscopy (cyan dots) data, scaled to a half
power beam width of 18.7
|
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 4: Sample of ground-based spectra of comet C/2006 W3 (Christensen) acquired in 2009: OH spectrum (average of 1665 and 1667 MHz lines) observed at Nançay on Feb. 2 to Apr. 19, and HCN (Sept. 13-14), CO (Oct. 29), and CH3OH (Oct. 14) spectra observed at the IRAM-30m. |
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 7:
Comet surface brightness and re-scaled PSF (Vesta) in B
( left box) and R ( right box) bands. Blue dots: surface brightness
for each pixel. Red dots: mean values in 0.5
|
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 2:
Spectra of C/2006 W3 (Christensen) obtained with PACS on
November 8, 2009 (central pixel pointed on the comet nucleus). The
pixel size is
|
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 5: Spectra of C/2006 W3 (Christensen) observed with the IRAM 30-m telescope. |
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 6: Comparison of measured abundances relative to HCN in comets C/2006 W3 (Christensen) and C/1995 O1 (Hale-Bopp) at 3.3 AU from the Sun. |
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
Copyright ESO 2010
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.