A robust morphological classification of high-redshift galaxies using support vector machines on seeing limited images - I. Method description
A&A, 478 3 (2008) 971-980
Published online: 2007-11-20
Articles citing this article
The Citing articles tool gives a list of articles citing the current article.
The citing articles come from EDP Sciences database, as well as other publishers participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking Program. You can set up your personal account to receive an email alert each time this article is cited by a new article (see the menu on the right-hand side of the abstract page).
Cited article:
This article has been cited by the following article(s):
AM-GMCNet: An Adaptive Morphology-aware Residual Network for Galaxy Morphology Recognition
Peng Liu, Yangyang Guo, Hao Fu, Lin He, Zhou Yang and Xue MeiResearch in Astronomy and Astrophysics 26 (3) 035006 (2026)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-4527/ae29b9
CLIP-GMC: Contrastive Language-image Pretraining Model for Few-shot Galaxy Morphology Classification
Handa Cai and Weibin ChenThe Astronomical Journal 171 (3) 132 (2026)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/ae37eb
Classification of spiral galaxies by spiral arm number using convolutional neural network
Ming Wei Lee, John Y.H. Soo and Syarawi M.H. SharoniAstronomy and Computing 52 100965 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ascom.2025.100965
The Next Generation Virgo Cluster Survey (NGVS). XL. The Morphological Classification of Virgo Cluster Galaxies
Max M. Kurzner, Patrick Côté, Laura Ferrarese, Kaixiang Wang, Eric W. Peng, Scott Wilkinson, Joel C. Roediger, Chelsea Spengler, Toby Brown, Chengze Liu, Sungsoon Lim, Rubén Sánchez-Janssen, Elisa Toloba, Puragra Guhathakurta, John P. Blakeslee, Patrick R. Durrell, Ariane Lançon, J. Christopher Mihos, Matthew A. Taylor, Tyrone E. Woods, Solveig Thompson and Lauren A. MacArthurThe Astronomical Journal 170 (6) 363 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/ae1616
Galaxy Morphological Classification with Zernike Moments and Machine Learning Approaches
Hamed Ghaderi, Nasibe Alipour and Hossein SafariThe Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 277 (1) 10 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/ada8ab
Galaxy Morphology Classification via Deep Semisupervised Learning with Limited Labeled Data
Zhijian Luo, Jianzhen Chen, Zhu Chen, Shaohua Zhang, Liping Fu, Hubing Xiao and Chenggang ShuThe Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 279 (1) 17 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/addb4c
Contribution of AGN to the Morphological Parameters of Their Host Galaxies up to Intermediate Redshifts of z ∼ 2
Tilahun Getachew-Woreta, Mirjana Pović, Jaime Perea, Isabel Marquez, Josefa Masegosa, Antoine Mahoro and Shimeles Terefe MengistueGalaxies 13 (4) 84 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies13040084
Advanced classification of hot subdwarf binaries using artificial intelligence techniques and Gaia DR3 data
C. Viscasillas Vázquez, E. Solano, A. Ulla, M. Ambrosch, M. A. Álvarez, M. Manteiga, L. Magrini, R. Santoveña-Gómez, C. Dafonte, E. Pérez-Fernández, A. Aller, A. Drazdauskas, Š. Mikolaitis and C. RodrigoAstronomy & Astrophysics 691 A223 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202451247
A post-merger enhancement only in star-forming Type 2 Seyfert galaxies: the deep learning view
M S Avirett-Mackenzie, C Villforth, M Huertas-Company, S Wuyts, D M Alexander, S Bonoli, A Lapi, I E Lopez, C Ramos Almeida and F ShankarMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 528 (4) 6915 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stae183
Fast emulation of cosmological density fields based on dimensionality reduction and supervised machine learning
Miguel Conceição, Alberto Krone-Martins, Antonio da Silva and Ángeles MolinéAstronomy & Astrophysics 681 A123 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202346734
Similar Image Retrieval using Autoencoder. I. Automatic Morphology Classification of Galaxies
Eunsuk Seo, Suk Kim, Youngdae Lee, Sang-Il Han, Hak-Sub Kim, Soo-Chang Rey and Hyunmi SongPublications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 135 (1050) 084101 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1538-3873/ace851
Machine Learning Detects Multiplicity of the First Stars in Stellar Archaeology Data
Tilman Hartwig, Miho N. Ishigaki, Chiaki Kobayashi, Nozomu Tominaga and Ken’ichi NomotoThe Astrophysical Journal 946 (1) 20 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/acbcc6
Searching for Barium Stars from the LAMOST Spectra Using the Machine-learning Method: I
Fengyue Guo, Zhongding Cheng, Xiaoming Kong, Yatao Zhang, Yude Bu, Zhenping Yi, Bing Du and Jingchang PanThe Astronomical Journal 165 (2) 40 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/aca323
Euclid preparation
H. Bretonnière, U. Kuchner, M. Huertas-Company, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 671 A102 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202245042
The Dawes Review 10: The impact of deep learning for the analysis of galaxy surveys
M. Huertas-Company and F. LanussePublications of the Astronomical Society of Australia 40 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1017/pasa.2022.55
Galaxy Zoo DESI: Detailed morphology measurements for 8.7M galaxies in the DESI Legacy Imaging Surveys
Mike Walmsley, Tobias Géron, Sandor Kruk, Anna M M Scaife, Chris Lintott, Karen L Masters, James M Dawson, Hugh Dickinson, Lucy Fortson, Izzy L Garland, Kameswara Mantha, David O’Ryan, Jürgen Popp, Brooke Simmons, Elisabeth M Baeten and Christine MacmillanMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 526 (3) 4768 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad2919
Automatic Classification of Galaxy Morphology: A Rotationally-invariant Supervised Machine-learning Method Based on the Unsupervised Machine-learning Data Set
GuanWen Fang, Shuo Ba, Yizhou Gu, Zesen Lin, Yuejie Hou, Chenxin Qin, Chichun Zhou, Jun Xu, Yao Dai, Jie Song and Xu KongThe Astronomical Journal 165 (2) 35 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/aca1a6
A quantum-enhanced support vector machine for galaxy classification
Mohammad Hassan Hassanshahi, Marcin Jastrzebski, Sarah Malik and Ofer LahavRAS Techniques and Instruments 2 (1) 752 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1093/rasti/rzad052
Inclination angles for Be stars determined using machine learning
B D Lailey and T A A SigutMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 527 (2) 2585 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad3321
Pattern Recognition Using SVM for the Classification of the Size and Distance of Trans-Neptunian Objects Detected by Serendipitous Stellar Occultations
B. Hernández-Valencia, J. H. Castro-Chacón, M. Reyes-Ruiz, et al.Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 134 (1038) 084501 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1538-3873/ac7f5c
Lessons learned from the two largest Galaxy morphological classification catalogues built by convolutional neural networks
T-Y Cheng, H Domínguez Sánchez, J Vega-Ferrero, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 518 (2) 2794 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac3228
Effect of AGN on the morphological properties of their host galaxies in the local Universe
Tilahun Getachew-Woreta, Mirjana Pović, Josefa Masegosa, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 514 (1) 607 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac851
Automatic Morphological Classification of Galaxies: Convolutional Autoencoder and Bagging-based Multiclustering Model
ChiChun Zhou, Yizhou Gu, Guanwen Fang and Zesen LinThe Astronomical Journal 163 (2) 86 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/ac4245
The OTELO survey as a morphological probe. Last ten Gyr of galaxy evolution
Jakub Nadolny, Ángel Bongiovanni, Jordi Cepa, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 647 A89 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202037861
Deep Learning assessment of galaxy morphology in S-PLUS Data Release 1
C R Bom, A Cortesi, G Lucatelli, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 507 (2) 1937 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab1981
GalaxyNet: connecting galaxies and dark matter haloes with deep neural networks and reinforcement learning in large volumes
Benjamin P Moster, Thorsten Naab, Magnus Lindström and Joseph A O’LearyMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 507 (2) 2115 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab1449
1 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1109/CBMI50038.2021.9461889
The Tully-Fisher relation in dense groups at z ∼ 0.7 in the MAGIC survey
Valentina Abril-Melgarejo, Benoît Epinat, Wilfried Mercier, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 647 A152 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202038818
Nonsequential neural network for simultaneous, consistent classification, and photometric redshifts of OTELO galaxies
J. A. de Diego, J. Nadolny, Á. Bongiovanni, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 655 A56 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202141360
Quantifying Non-parametric Structure of High-redshift Galaxies with Deep Learning
C. Tohill, L. Ferreira, C. J. Conselice, S. P. Bamford and F. FerrariThe Astrophysical Journal 916 (1) 4 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac033c
GLACE survey: Galaxy activity in ZwCl0024+1652 cluster from strong optical emission lines
Zeleke Beyoro-Amado, Miguel Sánchez-Portal, Ángel Bongiovanni, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 501 (2) 2430 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa3812
Galaxy morphological classification catalogue of the Dark Energy Survey Year 3 data with convolutional neural networks
Ting-Yun Cheng, Christopher J Conselice, Alfonso Aragón-Salamanca, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 507 (3) 4425 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab2142
Galaxy Image Classification Based on Citizen Science Data: A Comparative Study
Manuel Jimenez, Mercedes Torres Torres, Robert John and Isaac TrigueroIEEE Access 8 47232 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2978804
Large-scale structures in the ΛCDM Universe: network analysis and machine learning
Noam I Libeskind, Yurij Holovatch, Bohdan Novosyadlyj and Maksym TsizhMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 495 (1) 1311 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa1030
Reliable photometric membership (RPM) of galaxies in clusters – I. A machine learning method and its performance in the local universe
Paulo A A Lopes and André L B RibeiroMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 493 (3) 3429 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa486
Galaxy classification: deep learning on the OTELO and COSMOS databases
José A. de Diego, Jakub Nadolny, Ángel Bongiovanni, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 638 A134 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202037697
Predicting star formation properties of galaxies using deep learning
Shraddha Surana, Yogesh Wadadekar, Omkar Bait and Hrushikesh BhosaleMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 493 (4) 4808 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa537
Optimizing automatic morphological classification of galaxies with machine learning and deep learning using Dark Energy Survey imaging
Ting-Yun Cheng, Christopher J Conselice, Alfonso Aragón-Salamanca, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 493 (3) 4209 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa501
Reproducible k-means clustering in galaxy feature data from the GAMA survey
Sebastian Turner, Lee S Kelvin, Ivan K Baldry, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 482 (1) 126 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty2690
A machine-learning approach for identifying the counterparts of submillimetre galaxies and applications to the GOODS-North field
Ruihan Henry Liu, Ryley Hill, Douglas Scott, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 489 (2) 1770 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz2228
What shapes a galaxy? – unraveling the role of mass, environment, and star formation in forming galactic structure
Asa F L Bluck, Connor Bottrell, Hossen Teimoorinia, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 485 (1) 666 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz363
Machine Learning Applied to Star–Galaxy–QSO Classification and Stellar Effective Temperature Regression
Yu Bai, JiFeng Liu, Song Wang and Fan YangThe Astronomical Journal 157 (1) 9 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/aaf009
Star formation in far-IR AGN and non-AGN galaxies in the green valley – II. Morphological analysis
Antoine Mahoro, Mirjana Pović, Pheneas Nkundabakura, Beatrice Nyiransengiyumva and Petri VäisänenMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 485 (1) 452 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz434
Searching for Hot Subdwarf Stars from the LAMOST Spectra. III. Classification of Hot Subdwarf Stars in the Fourth Data Release of LAMOST Using a Deep Learning Method
Yude Bu, Jingjing Zeng, Zhenxin Lei and Zhenping YiThe Astrophysical Journal 886 (2) 128 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab4c47
Galaxies image classification using artificial bee colony based on orthogonal Gegenbauer moments
Mohamed Abd Elaziz, Khalid M. Hosny and I. M. SelimSoft Computing 23 (19) 9573 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-018-3521-2
Multiband Galaxy Morphologies for CLASH: A Convolutional Neural Network Transferred from CANDELS
M. Pérez-Carrasco, G. Cabrera-Vives, M. Martinez-Marin, et al.Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 131 (1004) 108002 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1538-3873/aaeeb4
A morphological study of galaxies in ZwCl0024+1652, a galaxy cluster at redshift z ∼ 0.4
Zeleke Beyoro Amado, Mirjana Pović, Miguel Sánchez-Portal, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 485 (2) 1528 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz427
Effect of richness on AGN and star formation activities in SDSS galaxy groups
Feng Li, Yi-Zhou Gu, Qi-Rong Yuan, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 484 (3) 3806 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz267
Integrating human and machine intelligence in galaxy morphology classification tasks
Melanie R Beck, Claudia Scarlata, Lucy F Fortson, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 476 (4) 5516 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty503
The impact of redshift on galaxy morphometric classification: case studies for SDSS, DES, LSST and HST with morfometryka
Leonardo de Albernaz Ferreira and Fabricio FerrariMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 473 (2) 2701 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx2266
An automatic taxonomy of galaxy morphology using unsupervised machine learning
Alex Hocking, James E. Geach, Yi Sun and Neil DaveyMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 473 (1) 1108 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx2351
Bayesian bulge–disc decomposition of galaxy images
J J Argyle, J Méndez-Abreu, V Wild and D J MortlockMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 479 (3) 3076 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty1691
Machine learning classification ofGaiaData Release 2
Yu Bai, Ji-Feng Liu and Song WangResearch in Astronomy and Astrophysics 18 (10) 118 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-4527/18/10/118
A catalogue of structural and morphological measurements for DES Y1
F Tarsitano, W G Hartley, A Amara, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 481 (2) 2018 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty1970
1168 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1109/RTEICT.2017.8256782
The morphological transformation of red sequence galaxies in clusters since z ∼ 1
P. Cerulo, W. J. Couch, C. Lidman, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 472 (1) 254 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx1687
Star formation of far-IR AGN and non-AGN galaxies in the green valley: possible implication of AGN positive feedback
Antoine Mahoro, Mirjana Pović and Pheneas NkundabakuraMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 471 (3) 3226 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx1762
Support vector machine classification of strong gravitational lenses
P. Hartley, R. Flamary, N. Jackson, A. S. Tagore and R. B. MetcalfMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 471 (3) 3378 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx1733
Galaxy Zoo: quantitative visual morphological classifications for 48 000 galaxies from CANDELS
B. D. Simmons, Chris Lintott, Kyle W. Willett, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 464 (4) 4420 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw2587
The Extremely Luminous Quasar Survey in the SDSS Footprint. I. Infrared-based Candidate Selection
Jan-Torge Schindler, Xiaohui Fan, Ian D. McGreer, Qian Yang, Jin Wu, Linhua Jiang and Richard GreenThe Astrophysical Journal 851 (1) 13 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aa9929
Classification of large-scale stellar spectra based on the non-linearly assembling learning machine
Zhongbao Liu, Lipeng Song and Wenjuan ZhaoMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 455 (4) 4289 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv2600
Multi-wavelength landscape of the young galaxy cluster RXJ 1257.2+4738 atz= 0.866
I. Pintos-Castro, M. Pović, M. Sánchez-Portal, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 592 A108 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201526744
Machine-learning identification of galaxies in the WISE × SuperCOSMOS all-sky catalogue
T. Krakowski, K. Małek, M. Bilicki, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 596 A39 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201629165
ASTErIsM: application of topometric clustering algorithms in automatic galaxy detection and classification
A. Tramacere, D. Paraficz, P. Dubath, J.-P. Kneib and F. CourbinMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 463 (3) 2939 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw2103
Galaxy morphologies in the era of big-data surveys
M. Huertas-CompanyProceedings of the International Astronomical Union 11 (S319) 118 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743921315010911
Clustering of the AKARI NEP deep field 24μm selected galaxies
A. Solarz, A. Pollo, T. T. Takeuchi, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 582 A58 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201423370
A CATALOG OF VISUALLY CLASSIFIED GALAXIES IN THE LOCAL ( z ∼ 0.01) UNIVERSE
H. B. Ann, Mira Seo and D. K. HaThe Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 217 (2) 27 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0067-0049/217/2/27
A CLASSICAL MORPHOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF GALAXIES IN THE SPITZER SURVEY OF STELLAR STRUCTURE IN GALAXIES (S 4 G)
Ronald J. Buta, Kartik Sheth, E. Athanassoula, et al.The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 217 (2) 32 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0067-0049/217/2/32
Multivariate approaches to classification in extragalactic astronomy
Didier Fraix-Burnet, Marc Thuillard and Asis K. ChattopadhyayFrontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences 2 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.3389/fspas.2015.00003
Stellar populations of galaxies in the ALHAMBRA survey up toz ~ 1
L. A. Díaz-García, A. J. Cenarro, C. López-Sanjuan, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 582 A14 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201425582
A CATALOG OF VISUAL-LIKE MORPHOLOGIES IN THE 5 CANDELS FIELDS USING DEEP LEARNING
M. Huertas-Company, R. Gravet, G. Cabrera-Vives, et al.The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 221 (1) 8 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0067-0049/221/1/8
Extreme emission-line galaxies out toz~ 1 in zCOSMOS
R. Amorín, E. Pérez-Montero, T. Contini, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 578 A105 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201322786
Photometric classification of quasars from RCS-2 using Random Forest
D. Carrasco, L. F. Barrientos, K. Pichara, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 584 A44 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201525752
A support vector machine for spectral classification of emission-line galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey
Fei Shi, Yu-Yan Liu, Guang-Lan Sun, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 453 (1) 122 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv1617
The impact from survey depth and resolution on the morphological classification of galaxies
M. Pović, I. Márquez, J. Masegosa, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 453 (2) 1644 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv1663
Galaxy size trends as a consequence of cosmology
M. J. Stringer, F. Shankar, G. S. Novak, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 441 (2) 1570 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu645
Larger sizes of massive quiescent early-type galaxies in clusters than in the field at 0.8 < z < 1.5
L. Delaye, M. Huertas-Company, S. Mei, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 441 (1) 203 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu496
Gemini multiconjugate adaptive optics system review – II. Commissioning, operation and overall performance
Benoit Neichel, François Rigaut, Fabrice Vidal, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 440 (2) 1002 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu403
The morphological transformation of red sequence galaxies in the distant cluster XMMU J1229+0151
P. Cerulo, W. J. Couch, C. Lidman, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 439 (3) 2790 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu135
A Virtual Observatory Census to Address Dwarfs Origins (AVOCADO)
R. Sánchez-Janssen, R. Amorín, M. García-Vargas, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 554 A20 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201219842
The evolution of the mass–size relation for early-type galaxies from z ∼ 1 to the present: dependence on environment, mass range and detailed morphology
M. Huertas-Company, S. Mei, F. Shankar, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 428 (2) 1715 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sts150
Galaxy Zoo 2: detailed morphological classifications for 304 122 galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey
Kyle W. Willett, Chris J. Lintott, Steven P. Bamford, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 435 (4) 2835 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stt1458
Pushing the limits of theGaiaspace mission by analyzing galaxy morphology
A. Krone-Martins, C. Ducourant, R. Teixeira, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 556 A102 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201219697
X‐ray luminosity functions of different morphological and X‐ray type AGN populations
M. Pović, A.M. Pérez García, M. Sánchez‐Portal, A. Bongiovanni, J. Cepa, M. Fernández Lorenzo, M.A. Lara‐López, J. Gallego, A. Ederoclite, I. Márquez, J. Masegosa, E. Alfaro, H. Castañeda, J.I. González‐Serrano and J.J. GonzálezAstronomische Nachrichten 334 (3) 288 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1002/asna.201211840
The VIMOS Public Extragalactic Redshift Survey (VIPERS)
K. Małek, A. Solarz, A. Pollo, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 557 A16 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201321447
The ALHAMBRA survey: reliable morphological catalogue of 22 051 early- and late-type galaxies
M. Pović, M. Huertas-Company, J. A. L. Aguerri, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 435 (4) 3444 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stt1538
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF SPECTROSCOPICALLY CONFIRMED GALAXIES ATz⩾ 6. II. MORPHOLOGY OF THE REST-FRAME UV CONTINUUM AND Lyα EMISSION
Linhua Jiang, Eiichi Egami, Xiaohui Fan, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 773 (2) 153 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/773/2/153
Early-type galaxies have been the predominant morphological class for massive galaxies since only z ∼ 1
Fernando Buitrago, Ignacio Trujillo, Christopher J. Conselice and Boris HäußlerMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 428 (2) 1460 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sts124
Non-parametric cell-based photometric proxies for galaxy morphology: methodology and application to the morphologically defined star formation–stellar mass relation of spiral galaxies in the local universe
M. W. Grootes, R. J. Tuffs, C. C. Popescu, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 437 (4) 3883 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stt2184
The merger rates and sizes of galaxies across the peak epoch of star formation from the HiZELS survey
John P. Stott, David Sobral, Ian Smail, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 430 (2) 1158 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sts684
EARLY-TYPE GALAXIES ATz= 1.3. I. THE LYNX SUPERCLUSTER: CLUSTER AND GROUPS ATz= 1.3. MORPHOLOGY AND COLOR-MAGNITUDE RELATION
Simona Mei, S. Adam Stanford, Brad P. Holden, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 754 (2) 141 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/754/2/141
Star-galaxy separation in the AKARI NEP deep field
A. Solarz, A. Pollo, T. T. Takeuchi, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 541 A50 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201118108
Morphology of galaxies in the WINGS clusters
G. Fasano, E. Vanzella, A. Dressler, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 420 (2) 926 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19798.x
Dissecting the morphological and spectroscopic properties of galaxies in the local Universe
J. A. L. Aguerri, M. Huertas-Company, J. Sánchez Almeida and C. Muñoz-TuñónAstronomy & Astrophysics 540 A136 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201117632
ACTIVE LEARNING TO OVERCOME SAMPLE SELECTION BIAS: APPLICATION TO PHOTOMETRIC VARIABLE STAR CLASSIFICATION
Joseph W. Richards, Dan L. Starr, Henrik Brink, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 744 (2) 192 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/744/2/192
THE NATURE AND NURTURE OF BARS AND DISKS
J. Méndez-Abreu, R. Sánchez-Janssen, J. A. L. Aguerri, E. M. Corsini and S. ZarattiniThe Astrophysical Journal 761 (1) L6 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/761/1/L6
Properties of the Photometric Components of Lenticular Galaxies
J. Alfonso L. AguerriAdvances in Astronomy 2012 1 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/382674
Morphology and color indices of galaxies in Pairs: Criteria for the classification of galaxies
O. V. Melnyk, D. V. Dobrycheva and I. B. VavilovaAstrophysics 55 (3) 293 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10511-012-9236-7
AGN-host galaxy connection: multiwavelength study
M. Pović, M. Sánchez-Portal, A. M. Pérez García, A. Bongiovanni and J. CepaProceedings of the International Astronomical Union 8 (S290) 295 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1017/S174392131202008X
ALHAMBRA survey: morphological classification
M. Pović, M. Huertas-Company, I. Márquez, et al.Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union 10 (H16) 378 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743921314011508