Constraints on the location of a possible 9th planet derived from the Cassini data
A&A, 587 (2016) L8
Published online: 2016-03-08
Articles citing this article
The Citing articles tool gives a list of articles citing the current article.
The citing articles come from EDP Sciences database, as well as other publishers participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking Program. You can set up your personal account to receive an email alert each time this article is cited by a new article (see the menu on the right-hand side of the abstract page).
Cited article:
This article has been cited by the following article(s):
Can the Gravitational Effect of Planet X be Detected in Current-era Tracking of the Known Major and Minor Planets?
Daniel C. H. Gomes, Zachary Murray, Rafael C. H. Gomes, Matthew J. Holman and Gary M. BernsteinThe Planetary Science Journal 4 (4) 66 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.3847/PSJ/acc7a2
On the origin of extreme trans-Neptunian objects within Modified Newtonian Dynamics
Cezary MigaszewskiMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 525 (1) 805 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad2250
What If Planet Nine Has Satellites?
Man Ho ChanThe Astrophysical Journal 944 (2) 172 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/acb5a1
Bayesian test of the mass of the graviton with planetary ephemerides
Vincenzo Mariani, Agnès Fienga, Olivier Minazzoli, Mickaël Gastineau and Jacques LaskarPhysical Review D 108 (2) (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.108.024047
Prospects for localizing Planet 9 with a future Uranus mission
Jozef Bucko, Deniz Soyuer and Lorenz ZwickMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters 524 (1) L32 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnrasl/slad067
A search for Planet 9 in the IRAS data
Michael Rowan-RobinsonMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 510 (3) 3716 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab3212
Machine Learning for Searching the Dark Energy Survey for Trans-Neptunian Objects
B. Henghes, O. Lahav, D. W. Gerdes, et al.Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 133 (1019) 014501 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1538-3873/abcaea
Neptune: From Grand Discovery to a World Revealed
William SheehanHistorical & Cultural Astronomy, Neptune: From Grand Discovery to a World Revealed 361 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54218-4_10
Analysis of Cassini radio tracking data for the construction of INPOP19a: A new estimate of the Kuiper belt mass
A. Di Ruscio, A. Fienga, D. Durante, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 640 A7 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202037920
Exploring Trans-Neptunian Space with TESS: A Targeted Shift-stacking Search for Planet Nine and Distant TNOs in the Galactic Plane
Malena Rice and Gregory LaughlinThe Planetary Science Journal 1 (3) 81 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.3847/PSJ/abc42c
Specifics of the Distribution of Orbits of Long-Period Comets in the Inner Part of the Oort Cloud
O. V. Kalinicheva and Yu. A. ChernetenkoAstrophysical Bulletin 75 (4) 459 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1134/S1990341320040082
The Trans-Neptunian Solar System
Chadwick A. TrujilloThe Trans-Neptunian Solar System 79 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-816490-7.00004-7
New constraints on the location of P9 obtained with the INPOP19a planetary ephemeris
A. Fienga, A. Di Ruscio, L. Bernus, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 640 A6 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202037919
The Case for a Large-scale Occultation Network
Malena Rice and Gregory LaughlinThe Astronomical Journal 158 (1) 19 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/ab21df
Directly testing gravity with Proxima Centauri
Indranil Banik and Pavel KroupaMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 487 (2) 1653 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz1379
Calculation of the Uncertainties in the Planetary Precessions with the Recent EPM2017 Ephemerides and their Use in Fundamental Physics and Beyond
Lorenzo IorioThe Astronomical Journal 157 (6) 220 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/ab19bf
Shepherding in a Self-gravitating Disk of Trans-Neptunian Objects
Antranik A. Sefilian and Jihad R. ToumaThe Astronomical Journal 157 (2) 59 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/aaf0fc
The planet nine hypothesis
Konstantin Batygin, Fred C. Adams, Michael E. Brown and Juliette C. BeckerPhysics Reports 805 1 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2019.01.009
Stellar Flybys Interrupting Planet–Planet Scattering Generates Oort Planets
Nora Bailey and Daniel FabryckyThe Astronomical Journal 158 (2) 94 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/ab2d2a
Chaos in the inert Oort cloud
Melaine Saillenfest, Marc Fouchard, Takashi Ito and Arika HiguchiAstronomy & Astrophysics 629 A95 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201936298
Producing Distant Planets by Mutual Scattering of Planetary Embryos
Kedron Silsbee and Scott TremaineThe Astronomical Journal 155 (2) 75 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/aaa19b
Mass of the Kuiper belt
E. V. Pitjeva and N. P. PitjevCelestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy 130 (9) (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-018-9853-5
The Influence of Planet Nine on the Orbits of Distant TNOs: The Case for a Low-perihelion Planet
Jessica Cáceres and Rodney GomesThe Astronomical Journal 156 (4) 157 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/aad77a
A new approach to distant solar system object detection in large survey data sets
V. Perdelwitz, M. Völschow and H. M. MüllerAstronomy & Astrophysics 615 A159 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201732254
Comprehensive wide-band magnitudes and albedos for the planets, with applications to exo-planets and Planet Nine
Anthony Mallama, Bruce Krobusek and Hristo PavlovIcarus 282 19 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2016.09.023
BLACKBODY RADIATION FROM ISOLATED NEPTUNES
Sivan Ginzburg, Re’em Sari and Abraham LoebThe Astrophysical Journal 822 (1) L11 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8205/822/1/L11
Is the Recently Proposed Mars-Sized Perturber at 65–80 AU Ruled Out by the Cassini Ranging Data?
Lorenzo IorioFrontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences 4 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.3389/fspas.2017.00028
Non-resonant secular dynamics of trans-Neptunian objects perturbed by a distant super-Earth
Melaine Saillenfest, Marc Fouchard, Giacomo Tommei and Giovanni B. ValsecchiCelestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy 129 (3) 329 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-017-9775-7
Numerical Solutions for the Orbital Motion of the Solar System over the Past 100 Myr: Limits and New Results
Richard E. ZeebeThe Astronomical Journal 154 (5) 193 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/aa8cce
CONSEQUENCES OF A DISTANT MASSIVE PLANET ON THE LARGE SEMIMAJOR AXIS TRANS-NEPTUNIAN OBJECTS
C. Shankman, J. J. Kavelaars, S. M. Lawler, B. J. Gladman and M. T. BannisterThe Astronomical Journal 153 (2) 63 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/153/2/63
Constraints on Planet Nine’s Orbit and Sky Position within a Framework of Mean-motion Resonances
Sarah Millholland and Gregory LaughlinThe Astronomical Journal 153 (3) 91 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/153/3/91
Evaluating the Dynamical Stability of Outer Solar System Objects in the Presence of Planet Nine
Juliette C. Becker, Fred C. Adams, Tali Khain, Stephanie J. Hamilton and David GerdesThe Astronomical Journal 154 (2) 61 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/aa7aa2
SEARCHING FOR PLANET NINE WITH COADDEDWISEANDNEOWISE-REACTIVATION IMAGES
Aaron M. Meisner, Benjamin C. Bromley, Peter E. Nugent, et al.The Astronomical Journal 153 (2) 65 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/153/2/65
Towards an explanation of orbits in the extreme trans-Neptunian region: The effect of Milgromian dynamics
R. PaučoAstronomy & Astrophysics 603 A11 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201630335
Improvement of the position of planet X based on the motion of nearly parabolic comets
Yu. D. Medvedev, D. E. Vavilov, Yu. S. Bondarenko, D. A. Bulekbaev and N. B. KunturovaAstronomy Letters 43 (2) 120 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063773717020037
Measuring the Radius and Mass of Planet Nine
J. SchneiderPublications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 129 (980) 104401 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1538-3873/aa79fd
Binary stripping as a plausible origin of correlated pairs of extreme trans-Neptunian objects
C. de la Fuente Marcos, R. de la Fuente Marcos and S. J. AarsethAstrophysics and Space Science 362 (11) (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-017-3181-1
X Makes Nine: A Distant Ice Giant in the Solar System
Hugo A. Van Den BergScience Progress 99 (2) 220 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.3184/003685016X14593318781056
CORRALLING A DISTANT PLANET WITH EXTREME RESONANT KUIPER BELT OBJECTS
Renu Malhotra, Kathryn Volk and Xianyu WangThe Astrophysical Journal 824 (2) L22 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8205/824/2/L22
THE HUNT FOR PLANET NINE: ATMOSPHERE, SPECTRA, EVOLUTION, AND DETECTABILITY
Jonathan J. Fortney, Mark S. Marley, Gregory Laughlin, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 824 (2) L25 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8205/824/2/L25
OBSERVATIONAL CONSTRAINTS ON PLANET NINE: ASTROMETRY OF PLUTO AND OTHER TRANS-NEPTUNIAN OBJECTS
Matthew J. Holman and Matthew J. PayneThe Astronomical Journal 152 (4) 80 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.3847/0004-6256/152/4/80
Orbital clustering of distant Kuiper belt objects by hypothetical Planet 9. Secular or resonant?
H. BeustAstronomy & Astrophysics 590 L2 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201628638
THE INCLINATION OF THE PLANETARY SYSTEM RELATIVE TO THE SOLAR EQUATOR MAY BE EXPLAINED BY THE PRESENCE OF PLANET 9
Rodney Gomes, Rogerio Deienno and Alessandro MorbidelliThe Astronomical Journal 153 (1) 27 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/153/1/27
NEW EXTREME TRANS-NEPTUNIAN OBJECTS: TOWARD A SUPER-EARTH IN THE OUTER SOLAR SYSTEM
Scott S. Sheppard and Chadwick TrujilloThe Astronomical Journal 152 (6) 221 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/152/6/221
OBSERVATIONAL CONSTRAINTS ON THE ORBIT AND LOCATION OF PLANET NINE IN THE OUTER SOLAR SYSTEM
Michael E. Brown and Konstantin BatyginThe Astrophysical Journal 824 (2) L23 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8205/824/2/L23
Is there an exoplanet in the Solar system?
Alexander J. Mustill, Sean N. Raymond and Melvyn B. DaviesMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters 460 (1) L109 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnrasl/slw075
OBSERVATIONAL CONSTRAINTS ON PLANET NINE:CASSINIRANGE OBSERVATIONS
Matthew J. Holman and Matthew J. PayneThe Astronomical Journal 152 (4) 94 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.3847/0004-6256/152/4/94
COSMOLOGISTS IN SEARCH OF PLANET NINE: THE CASE FOR CMB EXPERIMENTS
Nicolas B. Cowan, Gil Holder and Nathan A. KaibThe Astrophysical Journal 822 (1) L2 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8205/822/1/L2
Dynamical impact of the Planet Nine scenario:N-body experiments
Carlos de la Fuente Marcos, Raúl de la Fuente Marcos and Sverre J. AarsethMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters 460 (1) L123 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnrasl/slw078
Some physical properties predicted for the putative Planet Nine of the solar system
I. TothAstronomy & Astrophysics 592 A86 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201628444
Finding Planet Nine: a Monte Carlo approach
C. de la Fuente Marcos and R. de la Fuente MarcosMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters 459 (1) L66 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnrasl/slw049
Finding Planet Nine: apsidal anti-alignment Monte Carlo results
C. de la Fuente Marcos and R. de la Fuente MarcosMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 462 (2) 1972 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw1778
Cassini aids hunt for Planet Nine
Nature 531 (7595) 417 (2016)https://doi.org/10.1038/531417e
Nemesis, Tyche, Planet Nine Hypotheses. I. Can We Detect the Bodies Using Gravitational Lensing?
J. P. Philippov and M. I. ChobanuPublications of the Astronomical Society of Australia 33 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1017/pasa.2016.28
The fates of Solar system analogues with one additional distant planet
Dimitri VerasMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 463 (3) 2958 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw2170