EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
Home All issues A&A, 582 (2015) A100 Article references

Articles citing this article

The Citing articles tool gives a list of articles citing the current article.
The citing articles come from EDP Sciences database, as well as other publishers participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking Program. You can set up your personal account to receive an email alert each time this article is cited by a new article (see the menu on the right-hand side of the abstract page).

Cited article:

The uncommon intracluster medium features of the first massive clusters selected independently of their baryon content

S Andreon, M Radovich, A Moretti, F -X Desert, T Hamana, M Pizzardo, C Romero, H Roussel and G Trinchieri
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 536 (4) 3466 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stae2780

Galaxy cluster optical mass proxies from probabilistic memberships

Lia Doubrawa, Eduardo S Cypriano, Alexis Finoguenov, Paulo A A Lopes, Matteo Maturi, Anthony H Gonzalez and Renato Dupke
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 526 (3) 4285 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad3024

Do gas-poor galaxy clusters have different galaxy populations? The positive covariance of hot and cold baryons

Emanuella Puddu and Stefano Andreon
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 511 (2) 2968 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab3632

Atacama Cosmology Telescope measurements of a large sample of candidates from the Massive and Distant Clusters of WISE Survey

John Orlowski-Scherer, Luca Di Mascolo, Tanay Bhandarkar, et al.
Astronomy & Astrophysics 653 A135 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202141200

Stellar mass as a galaxy cluster mass proxy: application to the Dark Energy Survey redMaPPer clusters

A Palmese, J Annis, J Burgad, et al.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 493 (4) 4591 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa526

The Massive and Distant Clusters of WISE Survey. X. Initial Results from a Sunyaev–Zeldovich Effect Study of Massive Galaxy Clusters at z > 1 Using MUSTANG2 on the GBT

Simon R. Dicker, Charles E. Romero, Luca Di Mascolo, Tony Mroczkowski, Jonathan Sievers, Emily Moravec, Tanay Bhandarkar, Mark Brodwin, Thomas Connor, Bandon Decker, Mark Devlin, Anthony H. Gonzalez, Ian Lowe, Brian S. Mason, Craig Sarazin, Spencer A. Stanford, Daniel Stern, Khunanon Thongkham, Dominika Wylezalek and Fernando Zago
The Astrophysical Journal 902 (2) 144 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/abb673

An analysis of galaxy cluster mis-centring using cosmological hydrodynamic simulations

G Hinshaw, T Tröster, I G McCarthy, et al.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 493 (1) 1120 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa295

Disruption of satellite galaxies in simulated groups and clusters: the roles of accretion time, baryons, and pre-processing

Yannick M Bahé, Joop Schaye, David J Barnes, et al.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 485 (2) 2287 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz361

The Impact of Environment on Late-time Evolution of the Stellar Mass–Halo Mass Relation

Jesse B. Golden-Marx and Christopher J. Miller
The Astrophysical Journal 878 (1) 14 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab1d55

The Massive and Distant Clusters of WISE Survey. I. Survey Overview and a Catalog of >2000 Galaxy Clusters at z ≃ 1

Anthony H. Gonzalez, Daniel P. Gettings, Mark Brodwin, Peter R. M. Eisenhardt, S. A. Stanford, Dominika Wylezalek, Bandon Decker, Daniel P. Marrone, Emily Moravec, Christine O’Donnell, Brian Stalder, Daniel Stern, Zubair Abdulla, Gillen Brown, John Carlstrom, Kenneth C. Chambers, Brian Hayden, Yen-ting Lin, Eugene Magnier, Frank J. Masci, Adam B. Mantz, Michael McDonald, Wenli Mo, Saul Perlmutter, Edward L. Wright and Gregory R. Zeimann
The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 240 (2) 33 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/aafad2

Mass–Richness Relations for X-Ray and SZE-selected Clusters at 0.4 < z < 2.0 as Seen by Spitzer at 4.5 μm

A. Rettura, R. Chary, J. Krick and S. Ettori
The Astrophysical Journal 867 (1) 12 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aad818

An optically-selected cluster catalog at redshift 0.1 < z < 1.1 from the Hyper Suprime-Cam Subaru Strategic Program S16A data

Masamune Oguri, Yen-Ting Lin, Sheng-Chieh Lin, Atsushi J Nishizawa, Anupreeta More, Surhud More, Bau-Ching Hsieh, Elinor Medezinski, Hironao Miyatake, Hung-Yu Jian, Lihwai Lin, Masahiro Takada, Nobuhiro Okabe, Joshua S Speagle, Jean Coupon, Alexie Leauthaud, Robert H Lupton, Satoshi Miyazaki, Paul A Price, Masayuki Tanaka, I-Non Chiu, Yutaka Komiyama, Yuki Okura, Manobu M Tanaka and Tomonori Usuda
Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan 70 (SP1) (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1093/pasj/psx042

KiDS-450: cosmological constraints from weak lensing peak statistics – I. Inference from analytical prediction of high signal-to-noise ratio convergence peaks

HuanYuan Shan, Xiangkun Liu, Hendrik Hildebrandt, et al.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 474 (1) 1116 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx2837

The amazing diversity in the hot gas content of an X-ray unbiased massive galaxy clusters sample

S. Andreon, Ana Laura Serra, A. Moretti and G. Trinchieri
Astronomy & Astrophysics 585 A147 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201527408

Next generation cosmology: constraints from theEuclidgalaxy cluster survey

B. Sartoris, A. Biviano, C. Fedeli, et al.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 459 (2) 1764 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw630