Articles citing this article

The Citing articles tool gives a list of articles citing the current article.
The citing articles come from EDP Sciences database, as well as other publishers participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking Program. You can set up your personal account to receive an email alert each time this article is cited by a new article (see the menu on the right-hand side of the abstract page).

Cited article:

FBQ 0951+2635: Time delay and structure of the main lensing galaxy

Vyacheslav N. Shalyapin, Luis J. Goicoechea and Eleana Ruiz-Hinojosa
Astronomy & Astrophysics 694 A31 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202452234

Revisiting the Hubble Constant, Sound Horizon, and Cosmography from Late-time Universe Observations

Zhiwei Yang, Tonghua Liu and Xiaolei Li
The Astrophysical Journal 982 (2) 71 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/adb7e5

Testing f(T) cosmologies with HII Hubble diagram and CMB distance priors

Rodrigo Sandoval-Orozco, Celia Escamilla-Rivera, Rebecca Briffa and Jackson Levi Said
Physics of the Dark Universe 46 101641 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dark.2024.101641

Foreground biases in strong gravitational lensing

Daniel Johnson, Pierre Fleury, Julien Larena and Lucia Marchetti
Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2024 (10) 055 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2024/10/055

Inverse distance ladder method for determining $$H_0$$ from angular diameter distances of time-delay lenses and supernova observations

Xiaolong Gong, Tonghua Liu and Jieci Wang
The European Physical Journal C 84 (8) (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13259-7

Breaking the mass-sheet degeneracy in strong lensing mass modelling with weak lensing observations

Narayan Khadka, Simon Birrer, Alexie Leauthaud and Holden Nix
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 533 (1) 795 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stae1832

Determining cosmological-model-independent H0 and post-Newtonian parameter with time-delay lenses and supernovae

Tonghua Liu and Kai Liao
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 528 (2) 1354 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stae119

Finding Multiply Lensed and Binary Quasars in the DESI Legacy Imaging Surveys

C. Dawes, C. Storfer, X. Huang, G. Aldering, Aleksandar Cikota, Arjun Dey and D. J. Schlegel
The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 269 (2) 61 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/ad015a

TD-CARMA: Painless, Accurate, and Scalable Estimates of Gravitational Lens Time Delays with Flexible CARMA Processes

Antoine D. Meyer, David A. van Dyk, Hyungsuk Tak and Aneta Siemiginowska
The Astrophysical Journal 950 (1) 37 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/acbea1

Data science methodology for time-delay estimation and data preprocessing of the time-delay challenge

Luis Leon-Anaya, Juan C Cuevas-Tello, Octavio Valenzuela, César A Puente and Carlos Soubervielle-Montalvo
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 522 (1) 1323 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad817

COOL–LAMPS. III. Discovery of a 25.″9 Separation Quasar Lensed by a Merging Galaxy Cluster*  

Michael N. Martinez, Kate A. Napier, Aidan P. Cloonan, Ezra Sukay, Katya Gozman, Kaiya Merz, Gourav Khullar, Jason J. Lin, Owen S. Matthews Acuña, Elisabeth Medina, Jorge A. Sanchez, Emily E. Sisco, Daniel J. Kavin Stein, Kiyan Tavangar, Juan Remolina González, Guillaume Mahler, Keren Sharon, Håkon Dahle and Michael D. Gladders
The Astrophysical Journal 946 (2) 63 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/acbe39

Revisiting the Hubble Constant, Spatial Curvature, and Cosmography with Strongly Lensed Quasar and Hubble Parameter Observations

Tonghua Liu, Shuo Cao, Marek Biesiada and Shuaibo Geng
The Astrophysical Journal 939 (1) 37 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac93f3

Revising the Hubble constant, spatial curvature and dark energy dynamics with the latest observations of quasars

Tonghua Liu, Shuo Cao, Xiaolei Li, et al.
Astronomy & Astrophysics 668 A51 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202243375

Model selection using time-delay lenses

Fulvio Melia, Jun-Jie Wei and Xue-Feng Wu
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 519 (2) 2528 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac3682

SDSS-IV MaNGA: a catalogue of spectroscopically detected strong galaxy–galaxy lens candidates

Michael S Talbot, Joel R Brownstein, Justus Neumann, Daniel Thomas, Claudia Maraston and Niv Drory
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 515 (4) 4953 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac1736

Measurements of H0 in modified gravity theories: The role of lensed quasars in the late-time Universe

Rocco D’Agostino and Rafael C. Nunes
Physical Review D 101 (10) (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.101.103505

Quasar catalogue for the astrometric calibration of the forthcoming ILMT survey

Amit Kumar Mandal, Bikram Pradhan, Jean Surdej, et al.
Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy 41 (1) (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12036-020-09642-x

H0LiCOW – XIII. A 2.4 per cent measurement of H0 from lensed quasars: 5.3σ tension between early- and late-Universe probes

Kenneth C Wong, Sherry H Suyu, Geoff C-F Chen, et al.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 498 (1) 1420 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz3094

New database for a sample of optically bright lensed quasars in the northern hemisphere

R. Gil-Merino, L. J. Goicoechea, V. N. Shalyapin and A. Oscoz
Astronomy & Astrophysics 616 A118 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201832737

Astronomical Distance Determination in the Space Age

Sherry H. Suyu, Tzu-Ching Chang, Frédéric Courbin and Teppei Okumura
Space Sciences Series of ISSI, Astronomical Distance Determination in the Space Age 66 353 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1631-2_8

Crash testing difference-smoothing algorithm on a large sample of simulated light curves from TDC1

S. Rathna Kumar
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 470 (3) 2918 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx1364

H0LiCOW – IV. Lens mass model of HE 0435−1223 and blind measurement of its time-delay distance for cosmology

Kenneth C. Wong, Sherry H. Suyu, Matthew W. Auger, et al.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 465 (4) 4895 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw3077

A Spectroscopic Survey of the Fields of 28 Strong Gravitational Lenses: Implications for H0

Michelle L. Wilson, Ann I. Zabludoff, Charles R. Keeton, Kenneth C. Wong, Kurtis A. Williams, K. Decker French and Ivelina G. Momcheva
The Astrophysical Journal 850 (1) 94 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aa9653

Bayesian estimates of astronomical time delays between gravitationally lensed stochastic light curves

Hyungsuk Tak, Kaisey Mandel, David A. van Dyk, et al.
The Annals of Applied Statistics 11 (3) (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1214/17-AOAS1027

Discovery of the optically bright, wide separation double quasar SDSS J1442+4055

A. V. Sergeyev, A. P. Zheleznyak, V. N. Shalyapin and L. J. Goicoechea
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 456 (2) 1948 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv2763

Magnification relations of quad lenses and applications on Einstein crosses

Zhe Chu, G. L. Li, W. P. Lin and H. X. Pan
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 461 (4) 4466 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw1614

The influence of weak lensing on measurements of the Hubble constant with quad-image gravitational lenses

M. Jaroszyński and J. Skowron
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 462 (2) 1405 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw1739

Evidence for two spatially separated UV continuum emitting regions in the Cloverleaf broad absorption line quasar

D. Sluse, D. Hutsemékers, T. Anguita, L. Braibant and P. Riaud
Astronomy & Astrophysics 582 A109 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201526832