Articles citing this article

The Citing articles tool gives a list of articles citing the current article.
The citing articles come from EDP Sciences database, as well as other publishers participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking Program. You can set up your personal account to receive an email alert each time this article is cited by a new article (see the menu on the right-hand side of the abstract page).

Cited article:

LATIS: Constraints on the Galaxy–Halo Connection at z ∼ 2.5 from Galaxy–Galaxy and Galaxy–Lyα Clustering

Andrew B. Newman, Mahdi Qezlou, Nima Chartab, Gwen C. Rudie, Guillermo A. Blanc, Simeon Bird, Andrew J. Benson, Daniel D. Kelson and Brian C. Lemaux
The Astrophysical Journal 961 (1) 27 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad0896

The NIRSpec Wide GTO Survey

Michael V. Maseda, Anna de Graaff, Marijn Franx, Hans-Walter Rix, Stefano Carniani, Isaac Laseter, Ugnė Dudzevičiūtė, Tim Rawle, Eleonora Parlanti, Santiago Arribas, Andrew J. Bunker, Alex J. Cameron, Stephane Charlot, Mirko Curti, Francesco D’Eugenio, Gareth C. Jones, Nimisha Kumari, Roberto Maiolino, Hannah Übler, Aayush Saxena, Renske Smit, Chris Willott and Joris Witstok
Astronomy & Astrophysics 689 A73 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202449914

Metal-enriched halo gas across galaxy overdensities over the last 10 billion years

Rajeshwari Dutta, Michele Fumagalli, Matteo Fossati, et al.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 508 (3) 4573 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab2752

The Subaru HSC Galaxy Clustering with Photometric Redshift. I. Dark Halo Masses versus Baryonic Properties of Galaxies at 0.3 ≤ z ≤ 1.4

Shogo Ishikawa, Nobunari Kashikawa, Masayuki Tanaka, Jean Coupon, Alexie Leauthaud, Jun Toshikawa, Kohei Ichikawa, Taira Oogi, Hisakazu Uchiyama, Yuu Niino and Atsushi J. Nishizawa
The Astrophysical Journal 904 (2) 128 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/abbd95

Quasar Sightline and Galaxy Evolution (QSAGE) survey – I. The galaxy environment of O vi absorbers up to z = 1.4 around PKS 0232−04

J X Prochaska, R G Bower, R A Crain, et al.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 486 (1) 21 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz774

The VLT LBG redshift survey – VI. Mapping H i in the proximity of z ∼ 3 LBGs with X-Shooter

R. M. Bielby, T. Shanks, N. H. M. Crighton, et al.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 471 (2) 2174 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx1772

The FMOS-COSMOS Survey of Star-forming Galaxies at Z ∼ 1.6. V: Properties of Dark Matter Halos Containing Hα Emitting Galaxies

Daichi Kashino, Surhud More, John D. Silverman, Emanuele Daddi, Alvio Renzini, David B. Sanders, Giulia Rodighiero, Annagrazia Puglisi, Masaru Kajisawa, Francesco Valentino, Jeyhan S. Kartaltepe, Olivier Le Fèvre, Tohru Nagao, Nobuo Arimoto and Naoshi Sugiyama
The Astrophysical Journal 843 (2) 138 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aa789d

Cosmic evolution of stellar quenching by AGN feedback: clues from the Horizon-AGN simulation

R. S. Beckmann, J. Devriendt, A. Slyz, et al.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 472 (1) 949 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx1831

The VLT LBG redshift survey – V. Characterizing thez = 3.1 Lyman α emitter population

R. M. Bielby, P. Tummuangpak, T. Shanks, et al.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 456 (4) 4061 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv2914

SHELS: COMPLETE REDSHIFT SURVEYS OF TWO WIDELY SEPARATED FIELDS

Margaret J. Geller, Ho Seong Hwang, Ian P. Dell’Antonio, Harus Jabran Zahid, Michael J. Kurtz and Daniel G. Fabricant
The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 224 (1) 11 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.3847/0067-0049/224/1/11

The very wide-fieldgzKGalaxy Survey – II. The relationship between star-forming galaxies atz∼ 2 and their host haloes based upon HOD modelling

Shogo Ishikawa, Nobunari Kashikawa, Takashi Hamana, Jun Toshikawa and Masafusa Onoue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 458 (1) 747 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw271

The galaxy–halo connection in the VIDEO survey at 0.5 P. W. Hatfield, S. N. Lindsay, M. J. Jarvis, et al.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 459 (3) 2618 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw769

Galaxy clustering using photometric redshifts

A. M. Sołtan and M. J. Chodorowski
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 453 (1) 1013 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv1664

Probing the galaxy–halo connection in UltraVISTA to z ∼ 2

H. J. McCracken, M. Wolk, S. Colombi, et al.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 449 (1) 901 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv305

The very wide-fieldgzKgalaxy survey – I. Details of the clustering properties of star-forming galaxies atz∼ 2

Shogo Ishikawa, Nobunari Kashikawa, Jun Toshikawa and Masafusa Onoue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 454 (1) 213 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv1927

LINKING GALAXIES TO DARK MATTER HALOS ATz∼ 1: DEPENDENCE OF GALAXY CLUSTERING ON STELLAR MASS AND SPECIFIC STAR FORMATION RATE

Jae-Woo Kim, Myungshin Im, Seong-Kook Lee, et al.
The Astrophysical Journal 806 (2) 189 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/806/2/189

A new methodology to test galaxy formation models using the dependence of clustering on stellar mass

David J. R. Campbell, Carlton M. Baugh, Peter D. Mitchell, et al.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 452 (1) 852 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv1315

A large narrow-band Hα survey at z∼ 0.2: the bright end of the luminosity function, cosmic variance and clustering across cosmic time

Andra Stroe and David Sobral
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 453 (1) 242 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv1555

The galaxy–halo connection from a joint lensing, clustering and abundance analysis in the CFHTLenS/VIPERS field

J. Coupon, S. Arnouts, L. van Waerbeke, et al.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 449 (2) 1352 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv276