MASSIV: Mass Assembly Survey with SINFONI in VVDS - V. The major merger rate of star-forming galaxies at 0.9 < z < 1.8 from IFS-based close pairs
A&A, 553 (2013) A78
Published online: 2013-05-07
Articles citing this article
The Citing articles tool gives a list of articles citing the current article.
The citing articles come from EDP Sciences database, as well as other publishers participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking Program. You can set up your personal account to receive an email alert each time this article is cited by a new article (see the menu on the right-hand side of the abstract page).
Cited article:
This article has been cited by the following article(s):
Comparing Galaxy Merger Orbits in Hydrodynamical Simulation and in Dark Matter only Simulation
Yahan Pu, Lan Wang, Guangquan Zeng and Lizhi XieResearch in Astronomy and Astrophysics 26 (11) 115009 (2026)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-4527/ae6cbe
The HST-Hyperion Survey: Companion fraction and overdensity in a z ∼ 2.5 proto-supercluster
F. Giddings, B. C. Lemaux, B. Forrest, L. Shen, D. Sikorski, R. Gal, O. Cucciati, E. Golden-Marx, W. Hu, K. Ronayne, E. Shah, R. O. Amorín, S. Bardelli, D. C. Baxter, L. P. Cassarà, G. De Lucia, F. Fontanot, G. Gururajan, N. Hathi, M. Hirschmann, D. Hung, L. Lubin, D. B. Sanders, D. Vergani, L. Xie and E. ZuccaAstronomy & Astrophysics 706 A55 (2026)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202554407
Spatially non-parametric recovery of intrinsic kinematic maps in pre- to post-merger galaxies
Isaac Kanowski, Emily Wisnioski, J Trevor Mendel, Antoine Marchal and Takafumi TsukuiRAS Techniques and Instruments 4 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.1093/rasti/rzaf040
Galaxy mergers in the epoch of reionization – I. A JWST study of pair fractions, merger rates, and stellar mass accretion rates at z = 4.5–11.5
Qiao Duan, Christopher J Conselice, Qiong Li, Duncan Austin, Thomas Harvey, Nathan J Adams, Kenneth J Duncan, James Trussler, Leonardo Ferreira, Lewi Westcott, Honor Harris, Rogier A Windhorst, Benne W Holwerda, Thomas J Broadhurst, Dan Coe, Seth H Cohen, Xiaojing Du, Simon P Driver, Brenda Frye, Norman A Grogin, Nimish P Hathi, Rolf A Jansen, Anton M Koekemoer, Madeline A Marshall, Mario Nonino, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 540 (1) 774 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staf638
A Rest-frame Near-IR Study of Clumps in Galaxies at 1 < z < 2 Using JWST/NIRCam: Connection to Galaxy Bulges
Boris S. Kalita, John D. Silverman, Emanuele Daddi, Connor Bottrell, Luis C. Ho, Xuheng Ding and Lilan YangThe Astrophysical Journal 960 (1) 25 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/acfee4
A Merger-driven Scenario for Clumpy Galaxy Formation in the Epoch of Reionization: Physical Properties of Clumps in the FirstLight Simulation
Yurina Nakazato, Daniel Ceverino and Naoki YoshidaThe Astrophysical Journal 975 (2) 238 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad7d0b
Galaxy Cruise: Deep Insights into Interacting Galaxies in the Local Universe
Masayuki Tanaka, Michitaro Koike, Sei’ichiro Naito, Junko Shibata, Kumiko Usuda-Sato, Hitoshi Yamaoka, Makoto Ando, Kei Ito, Umi Kobayashi, Yutaro Kofuji, Atsuki Kuwata, Suzuka Nakano, Rhythm Shimakawa, Ken-ichi Tadaki, Suguru Takebayashi, Chie Tsuchiya, Tomofumi Umemoto and Connor BottrellPublications of the Astronomical Society of Japan 75 (5) 986 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1093/pasj/psad055
Molecular gas properties of Planck-selected protocluster candidates at z ≃ 1.3–3
M. Polletta, H. Dole, C. Martinache, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 662 A85 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202142255
The VIMOS Ultra Deep Survey: The reversal of the star-formation rate − density relation at 2 < z < 5
B. C. Lemaux, O. Cucciati, O. Le Fèvre, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 662 A33 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202039346
North Ecliptic Pole merging galaxy catalogue
W. J. Pearson, L. E. Suelves, S. C.-C. Ho, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 661 A52 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202141013
The ALPINE-ALMA [CII] survey
M. Romano, P. Cassata, L. Morselli, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 653 A111 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202141306
Spatially resolved star formation and fuelling in galaxy interactions
Jorge Moreno, Paul Torrey, Sara L Ellison, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 503 (3) 3113 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa2952
Interacting galaxies in the IllustrisTNG simulations – III. (The rarity of) quenching in post-merger galaxies
Salvatore Quai, Maan H Hani, Sara L Ellison, David R Patton and Joanna WooMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 504 (2) 1888 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab988
The ALPINE-ALMA [CII] survey
O. Le Fèvre, M. Béthermin, A. Faisst, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 643 A1 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201936965
Clustering with JWST: Constraining galaxy host halo masses, satellite quenching efficiencies, and merger rates at z = 4−10
Ryan Endsley, Peter Behroozi, Daniel P Stark, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 493 (1) 1178 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa324
Interacting galaxies in the IllustrisTNG simulations – II: star formation in the post-merger stage
Paul Torrey, David R Patton, Sara L Ellison, Hayman Gosain and Maan H HaniMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 493 (3) 3716 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa459
Stellar populations of galaxies in the ALHAMBRA survey up toz ∼ 1
L. A. Díaz-García, A. J. Cenarro, C. López-Sanjuan, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 631 A157 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201832882
New criteria for the selection of galaxy close pairs from cosmological simulations: evolution of the major and minor merger fraction in MUSE deep fields
E. Ventou, T. Contini, N. Bouché, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 631 A87 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201935597
Time-average properties of z ∼ 0.6 major mergers: mergers significantly scatter high-z scaling relations
M Puech, H Flores, M Rodrigues, F Hammer and Y B YangMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 488 (1) 876 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz1754
Persistence of the colour–density relation and efficient environmental quenching to z ∼ 1.4
B C Lemaux, A R Tomczak, L M Lubin, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 490 (1) 1231 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz2661
The abundance of massive compact galaxies at 1.0 < z < 3.0 in 3D-HST/CANDELS
Shi-Ying Lu, Yi-Zhou Gu, Guan-Wen Fang and Qi-Rong YuanResearch in Astronomy and Astrophysics 19 (10) 150 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-4527/19/10/150
Stellar populations of galaxies in the ALHAMBRA survey up to z ∼ 1
L. A. Díaz-García, A. J. Cenarro, C. López-Sanjuan, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 631 A158 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201935257
ALMA C ii 158 μm Imaging of an H i-selected Major Merger at z ∼ 4
J. Xavier Prochaska, Marcel Neeleman, Nissim Kanekar and Marc RafelskiThe Astrophysical Journal Letters 886 (2) L35 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ab55eb
The MOSDEF Survey: No Significant Enhancement in Star Formation or Deficit in Metallicity in Merging Galaxy Pairs at 1.5 ≲ z ≲ 3.5∗
Tim J. Wilson, Alice E. Shapley, Ryan L. Sanders, Naveen A. Reddy, William R. Freeman, Mariska Kriek, Irene Shivaei, Alison L. Coil, Brian Siana, Bahram Mobasher, Sedona H. Price, Mojegan Azadi, Guillermo Barro, Laura de Groot, Tara Fetherolf, Francesca M. Fornasini, Gene C. K. Leung and Tom O. ZickThe Astrophysical Journal 874 (1) 18 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab06ee
Probing black hole accretion in quasar pairs at high redshift
C Vignali, E Piconcelli, M Perna, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 477 (1) 780 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty682
The Role of Black Hole Feedback on Size and Structural Evolution in Massive Galaxies
Ena Choi, Rachel S. Somerville, Jeremiah P. Ostriker, Thorsten Naab and Michaela HirschmannThe Astrophysical Journal 866 (2) 91 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aae076
The VIMOS Ultra Deep Survey
A. Durkalec, O. Le Fèvre, A. Pollo, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 612 A42 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201730734
Testing the hierarchical assembly of massive galaxies using accurate merger rates out to z ∼ 1.5
Myriam Rodrigues, M Puech, H Flores, F Hammer and N PirzkalMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 475 (4) 5133 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty098
The VIMOS Ultra-Deep Survey: Emerging from the dark, a massive proto-cluster at z ~ 4.57
B. C. Lemaux, O. Le Fèvre, O. Cucciati, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 615 A77 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201730870
SDSS-IV MaNGA: Galaxy Pair Fraction and Correlated Active Galactic Nuclei
Hai Fu, Joshua L. Steffen, Arran C. Gross, Y. Sophia Dai, Jacob W. Isbell, Lihwai Lin, David Wake, Rui Xue, Dmitry Bizyaev and Kaike PanThe Astrophysical Journal 856 (2) 93 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aab364
The MUSE Hubble Ultra Deep Field Survey
Adrien Guérou, Davor Krajnović, Benoit Epinat, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 608 A5 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201730905
Morpho-kinematics ofz∼ 1 galaxies probe the hierarchical scenario
M. Rodrigues, F. Hammer, H. Flores, M. Puech and E. AthanassoulaMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 465 (1) 1157 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw2711
A consistent measure of the merger histories of massive galaxies using close-pair statistics – I. Major mergers at z < 3.5
Carl J. Mundy, Christopher J. Conselice, Kenneth J. Duncan, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 470 (3) 3507 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx1238
Glimpsing the imprint of local environment on the galaxy stellar mass function
Adam R. Tomczak, Brian C. Lemaux, Lori M. Lubin, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 472 (3) 3512 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx2245
The VIMOS Ultra-Deep Survey: A major merger origin for the high fraction of galaxies at 2 < z < 6 with two bright clumps
B. Ribeiro, O. Le Fèvre, P. Cassata, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 608 A16 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201630057
The rise and fall of stellar across the peak of cosmic star formation history: effects of mergers versus diffuse stellar mass acquisition
C. Welker, Y. Dubois, J. Devriendt, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 465 (1) 1241 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw2778
The MUSEHubbleUltra Deep Field Survey
E. Ventou, T. Contini, N. Bouché, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 608 A9 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201731586
Galactic Bulges
Françoise CombesAstrophysics and Space Science Library, Galactic Bulges 418 413 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19378-6_15
Deep MUSE observations in the HDFS
T. Contini, B. Epinat, N. Bouché, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 591 A49 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201527866
RESOLVING THE DISCREPANCY OF GALAXY MERGER FRACTION MEASUREMENTS AT z ∼ 0–3
Allison W. S. Man, Andrew W. Zirm and Sune ToftThe Astrophysical Journal 830 (2) 89 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.3847/0004-637X/830/2/89
MORPHOLOGIES OF ∼190,000 GALAXIES AT z = 0–10 REVEALED WITH HST LEGACY DATA. II. EVOLUTION OF CLUMPY GALAXIES
Takatoshi Shibuya, Masami Ouchi, Mariko Kubo and Yuichi HarikaneThe Astrophysical Journal 821 (2) 72 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.3847/0004-637X/821/2/72
MERGER SIGNATURES IN THE DYNAMICS OF STAR-FORMING GAS
Chao-Ling Hung (洪肇伶), Christopher C. Hayward, Howard A. Smith, Matthew L. N. Ashby, Lauranne Lanz, Juan R. Martínez-Galarza, D. B. Sanders and Andreas ZezasThe Astrophysical Journal 816 (2) 99 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.3847/0004-637X/816/2/99
CLUMPY GALAXIES IN CANDELS. I. THE DEFINITION OF UV CLUMPS AND THE FRACTION OF CLUMPY GALAXIES AT 0.5
Yicheng Guo, Henry C. Ferguson, Eric F. Bell, et al.
The Astrophysical Journal 800 (1) 39 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/800/1/39
The Astrophysical Journal 800 (1) 39 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/800/1/39
The ALHAMBRA survey: accurate merger fractions derived by PDF analysis of photometrically close pairs
C. López-Sanjuan, A. J. Cenarro, J. Varela, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 576 A53 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201424913
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF A PILOT SAMPLE OF SPECTROSCOPIC CLOSE PAIR GALAXIES ATz∼ 2
David R. Law, Alice E. Shapley, Jade Checlair and Charles C. SteidelThe Astrophysical Journal 808 (2) 160 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/808/2/160
A WFC3 GRISM EMISSION LINE REDSHIFT CATALOG IN THE GOODS-SOUTH FIELD
Aaron M. Morris, Dale D. Kocevski, Jonathan R. Trump, et al.The Astronomical Journal 149 (6) 178 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-6256/149/6/178
EVOLUTION OF THE FRACTION OF CLUMPY GALAXIES AT 0.2
K. L. Murata, M. Kajisawa, Y. Taniguchi, et al.
The Astrophysical Journal 786 (1) 15 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/786/1/15
The Astrophysical Journal 786 (1) 15 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/786/1/15
A SCALING RELATION BETWEEN MERGER RATE OF GALAXIES AND THEIR CLOSE PAIR COUNT
C. Y. Jiang, Y. P. Jing and Jiaxin HanThe Astrophysical Journal 790 (1) 7 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/790/1/7
MASSIV: Mass Assembly Survey with SINFONI in VVDS
C. Divoy, T. Contini, E. Pérez-Montero, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 569 A64 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201423911
The ALHAMBRA survey: An empirical estimation of the cosmic variance for merger fraction studies based on close pairs
C. López-Sanjuan, A. J. Cenarro, C. Hernández-Monteagudo, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 564 A127 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201322474
The Hα kinematics of interacting galaxies in 12 compact groups★
S. Torres-Flores, P. Amram, C. Mendes de Oliveira, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 442 (3) 2188 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu1002
SINFONI/VLT 3D spectroscopy of massive galaxies: evidence of rotational support at z ∼ 1.4
Fernando Buitrago, Christopher J. Conselice, Benoît Epinat, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 439 (2) 1494 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu034
EVOLUTION OF THE MAJOR MERGER GALAXY PAIR FRACTION ATz< 1
R. C. Keenan, S. Foucaud, R. De Propris, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 795 (2) 157 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/795/2/157
Galaxy mergers on a moving mesh: a comparison with smoothed particle hydrodynamics
Christopher C. Hayward, Paul Torrey, Volker Springel, Lars Hernquist and Mark VogelsbergerMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 442 (3) 1992 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu957
Evidence for major mergers of galaxies at 2 ≲z< 4 in the VVDS and VUDS surveys
L. A. M. Tasca, O. Le Fèvre, C. López-Sanjuan, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 565 A10 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201321507
Evolution of the mass, size, and star formation rate in high redshift merging galaxies
V. Perret, F. Renaud, B. Epinat, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 562 A1 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201322395
LATE-STAGE GALAXY MERGERS IN COSMOS TO z ∼ 1
C. N. Lackner, J. D. Silverman, M. Salvato, et al.The Astronomical Journal 148 (6) 137 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-6256/148/6/137
A census of Hαemitters in the intergalactic medium of the NGC 2865 system
F. Urrutia-Viscarra, M. Arnaboldi, C. Mendes de Oliveira, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 569 A97 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201323025
Rings of star formation:Imprints of a close galaxy encounter
Jorge MorenoProceedings of the International Astronomical Union 10 (S309) 149 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743921314009508
Discovery of a rich proto-cluster atz= 2.9 and associated diffuse cold gas in the VIMOS Ultra-Deep Survey (VUDS)
O. Cucciati, G. Zamorani, B. C. Lemaux, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 570 A16 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201423811
The Dawes Review 1: Kinematic Studies of Star-Forming Galaxies Across Cosmic Time
Karl GlazebrookPublications of the Astronomical Society of Australia 30 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1017/pasa.2013.34
The dynamics of galaxy pairs in a cosmological setting
Jorge Moreno, Asa F. L. Bluck, Sara L. Ellison, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 436 (2) 1765 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stt1694
Morphology with light profile fitting of confirmed cluster galaxies atz= 0.84
J. B. Nantais, H. Flores, R. Demarco, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 555 A5 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201321268
The VIMOS VLT Deep Survey
C. López-Sanjuan, O. Cucciati, O. Le Fèvre, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 558 A135 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201321411