Weak lensing power spectra for precision cosmology - Multiple-deflection, reduced shear, and lensing bias corrections
A&A, 523 (2010) A28
Published online: 2010-11-15
Articles citing this article
The Citing articles tool gives a list of articles citing the current article.
The citing articles come from EDP Sciences database, as well as other publishers participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking Program. You can set up your personal account to receive an email alert each time this article is cited by a new article (see the menu on the right-hand side of the abstract page).
Cited article:
This article has been cited by the following article(s):
Beyond the 3rd moment: a practical study of using lensing convergence CDFs for cosmology with DES Y3
D Anbajagane, C Chang, A Banerjee, T Abel, M Gatti, V Ajani, A Alarcon, A Amon, E J Baxter, K Bechtol, M R Becker, G M Bernstein, A Campos, A Carnero Rosell, M Carrasco Kind, R Chen, A Choi, C Davis, J DeRose, H T Diehl, S Dodelson, C Doux, A Drlica-Wagner, K Eckert, J Elvin-Poole, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 526 (4) 5530 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad3118
Weak lensing of gravitational waves in wave optics: Beyond the Born approximation
Morifumi Mizuno and Teruaki SuyamaPhysical Review D 108 (4) (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.108.043511
How to detect lensing rotation
Mathew Robertson and Antony LewisJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2023 (08) 048 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2023/08/048
Dark energy survey year 3 results: cosmological constraints from the analysis of cosmic shear in harmonic space
C Doux, B Jain, D Zeurcher, J Lee, X Fang, R Rosenfeld, A Amon, H Camacho, A Choi, L F Secco, J Blazek, C Chang, M Gatti, E Gaztanaga, N Jeffrey, M Raveri, S Samuroff, A Alarcon, O Alves, F Andrade-Oliveira, E Baxter, K Bechtol, M R Becker, G M Bernstein, A Campos, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 515 (2) 1942 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac1826
Accurate relativistic observables from postprocessing light cone catalogs
Chi Tian, Matthew F. Carney, James B. Mertens and Glenn StarkmanPhysical Review D 105 (6) (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.105.063511
Weak lensing “post-Born” effects are equivalent to pure lens-lens couplings
Oliver Denton-Turner and Eugene A. LimJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2022 (08) 053 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2022/08/053
Effect of Dust in Circumgalactic Halos on the Cosmic Shear Power Spectrum
Makana Silva and Christopher HirataThe Astrophysical Journal 933 (1) 19 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac6acc
Pure-mode correlation functions for cosmic shear and application to KiDS-1000
Peter Schneider, Marika Asgari, Yasaman Najafi Jozani, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 664 A77 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202142479
Second-order gauge-invariant formalism for the cosmological observables: complete verification of their gauge-invariance
Matteo Magi and Jaiyul YooJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2022 (09) 071 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2022/09/071
The density distributions of cosmic structures: impact of the local environment on weak-lensing convergence
Sonia Akter Ema, Md Rasel Hossen, Krzysztof Bolejko and Geraint F LewisMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 509 (2) 3004 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab3134
Cosmology at high redshift — a probe of fundamental physics
Noah Sailer, Emanuele Castorina, Simone Ferraro and Martin WhiteJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2021 (12) 049 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2021/12/049
KiDS-1000 methodology: Modelling and inference for joint weak gravitational lensing and spectroscopic galaxy clustering analysis
B. Joachimi, C.-A. Lin, M. Asgari, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 646 A129 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202038831
Cosmic shear power spectra in practice
Andrina Nicola, Carlos García-García, David Alonso, et al.Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2021 (03) 067 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2021/03/067
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Curved-sky weak lensing mass map reconstruction
N Jeffrey, M Gatti, C Chang, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 505 (3) 4626 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab1495
Intrinsic and extrinsic correlations of galaxy shapes and sizes in weak lensing data
Basundhara Ghosh, Ruth Durrer and Björn Malte SchäferMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 505 (2) 2594 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab1435
Galaxy shape statistics in the effective field theory
Zvonimir Vlah, Nora Elisa Chisari and Fabian SchmidtJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2021 (05) 061 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2021/05/061
Linear anisotropies in dispersion-measure-based cosmological observables
David AlonsoPhysical Review D 103 (12) (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.123544
Galaxy imaging surveys as spin-sensitive detector for cosmological colliders
Kazuhiro Kogai, Kazuyuki Akitsu, Fabian Schmidt and Yuko UrakawaJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2021 (03) 060 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2021/03/060
Lensing corrections on galaxy-lensing cross correlations and galaxy-galaxy auto correlations
Vanessa Böhm, Chirag Modi and Emanuele CastorinaJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2020 (03) 045 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2020/03/045
The accuracy of weak lensing simulations
Pierluigi Monaco, Claudio Llinares, Baojiu Li, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 493 (1) 305 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa281
Euclid: The importance of galaxy clustering and weak lensing cross-correlations within the photometric Euclid survey
I. Tutusaus, M. Martinelli, V. F. Cardone, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 643 A70 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202038313
Cosmology with galaxy–galaxy lensing on non-perturbative scales: emulation method and application to BOSS LOWZ
Benjamin D Wibking, David H Weinberg, Andrés N Salcedo, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 492 (2) 2872 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz3423
Cluster–galaxy weak lensing
Keiichi UmetsuThe Astronomy and Astrophysics Review 28 (1) (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00159-020-00129-w
Euclid: The reduced shear approximation and magnification bias for Stage IV cosmic shear experiments
A. C. Deshpande, T. D. Kitching, V. F. Cardone, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 636 A95 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201937323
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: cosmology with moments of weak lensing mass maps – validation on simulations
M Gatti, C Chang, O Friedrich, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 498 (3) 4060 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa2680
Accessing the high- ℓ frontier under the reduced shear approximation with k -cut cosmic shear
Anurag C. Deshpande, Peter L. Taylor and Thomas D. KitchingPhysical Review D 102 (8) (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.102.083535
Disentangling magnification in combined shear-clustering analyses
Leander Thiele, Christopher A J Duncan and David AlonsoMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 491 (2) 1746 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz3103
Post-Limber weak lensing bispectrum, reduced shear correction, and magnification bias correction
Anurag C. Deshpande and Thomas D. KitchingPhysical Review D 101 (10) (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.101.103531
Cosmological gravity on all scales: Simple equations, required conditions, and a framework for modified gravity
Daniel B. ThomasPhysical Review D 101 (12) (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.101.123517
Cross-correlation between Subaru Hyper Suprime-Cam Galaxy Weak Lensing and Planck Cosmic Microwave Background Lensing
Gabriela A. Marques, Jia Liu, Kevin M. Huffenberger and J. Colin HillThe Astrophysical Journal 904 (2) 182 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/abc003
Nuisance hardened data compression for fast likelihood-free inference
Justin Alsing and Benjamin WandeltMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 488 (4) 5093 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz1900
CMB lensing reconstruction biases in cross-correlation with large-scale structure probes
Giulio Fabbian, Antony Lewis and Dominic BeckJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2019 (10) 057 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2019/10/057
Evidence for the Cross-correlation between Cosmic Microwave Background Polarization Lensing from Polarbear and Cosmic Shear from Subaru Hyper Suprime-Cam
T. Namikawa, Y. Chinone, H. Miyatake, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 882 (1) 62 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab3424
Accurately computing weak lensing convergence
Sofie Marie Koksbang and Chris ClarksonMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters 486 (1) L41 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnrasl/slz055
Gauge-invariant formalism of cosmological weak lensing
Jaiyul Yoo, Nastassia Grimm, Ermis Mitsou, Adam Amara and Alexandre RefregierJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2018 (04) 029 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2018/04/029
ICE-COLA: fast simulations for weak lensing observables
Albert Izard, Pablo Fosalba and Martin CrocceMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 473 (3) 3051 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx2544
Lensing reconstruction in post-Born cosmic microwave background weak lensing
Dominic Beck, Giulio Fabbian and Josquin ErrardPhysical Review D 98 (4) (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.98.043512
CMB weak-lensing beyond the Born approximation: a numerical approach
Giulio Fabbian, Matteo Calabrese and Carmelita CarboneJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2018 (02) 050 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2018/02/050
Weak Lensing for Precision Cosmology
Rachel MandelbaumAnnual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics 56 (1) 393 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-051928
Unveiling galaxy bias via the halo model, KiDS, and GAMA
Andrej Dvornik, Henk Hoekstra, Konrad Kuijken, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 479 (1) 1240 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty1502
Non-linear general relativistic effects in the observed redshift
Giuseppe Fanizza, Jaiyul Yoo and Sang Gyu BiernJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2018 (09) 037 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2018/09/037
Gravitational corrections to light propagation in a perturbed FLRW universe and corresponding weak-lensing spectra
Carolina Cuesta-Lazaro, Arnau Quera-Bofarull, Robert Reischke and Björn Malte SchäferMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 477 (1) 741 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty672
DES Y1 Results: validating cosmological parameter estimation using simulated Dark Energy Surveys
N MacCrann, J DeRose, R H Wechsler, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 480 (4) 4614 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty1899
Complete super-sample lensing covariance in the response approach
Alexandre Barreira, Elisabeth Krause and Fabian SchmidtJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2018 (06) 015 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2018/06/015
Bayesian weak lensing tomography: Reconstructing the 3D large-scale distribution of matter with a lognormal prior
Vanessa Böhm, Stefan Hilbert, Maksim Greiner and Torsten A. EnßlinPhysical Review D 96 (12) (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.96.123510
Geometry and growth contributions to cosmic shear observables
José Manuel Zorrilla Matilla, Zoltán Haiman, Andrea Petri and Toshiya NamikawaPhysical Review D 96 (2) (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.96.023513
CFHTLenS revisited: assessing concordance with Planck including astrophysical systematics
Shahab Joudaki, Chris Blake, Catherine Heymans, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 465 (2) 2033 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw2665
Full-sky Gravitational Lensing Simulation for Large-area Galaxy Surveys and Cosmic Microwave Background Experiments
Ryuichi Takahashi, Takashi Hamana, Masato Shirasaki, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 850 (1) 24 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aa943d
Inference from the small scales of cosmic shear with current and future Dark Energy Survey data
N. MacCrann, J. Aleksić, A. Amara, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 465 (3) 2567 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw2849
Lensing smoothing of BAO wiggles
Enea Di DioJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2017 (03) 016 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2017/03/016
Validity of the Born approximation for beyond Gaussian weak lensing observables
Andrea Petri, Zoltán Haiman and Morgan MayPhysical Review D 95 (12) (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.95.123503
The limits of cosmic shear
Thomas D. Kitching, Justin Alsing, Alan F. Heavens, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 469 (3) 2737 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx1039
Estimating the weak-lensing rotation signal in radio cosmic shear surveys
Daniel B. Thomas, Lee Whittaker, Stefano Camera and Michael L. BrownMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 470 (3) 3131 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx1468
Angular spectra of the intrinsic galaxy ellipticity field, their observability and their impact on lensing in tomographic surveys
Björn Malte Schäfer and Philipp M. MerkelMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 470 (3) 3453 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx1446
Cosmic shear measurements with Dark Energy Survey Science Verification data
M. R. Becker, M. A. Troxel, N. MacCrann, et al.Physical Review D 94 (2) (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.94.022002
Fourier band-power E/B-mode estimators for cosmic shear
Matthew R. Becker and Eduardo RozoMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 457 (1) 304 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv3018
Impact of post-Born lensing on the CMB
Geraint Pratten and Antony LewisJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2016 (08) 047 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2016/08/047
Bias to CMB lensing measurements from the bispectrum of large-scale structure
Vanessa Böhm, Marcel Schmittfull and Blake D. SherwinPhysical Review D 94 (4) (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.94.043519
Cosmic shear as a probe of galaxy formation physics
Simon Foreman, Matthew R. Becker and Risa H. WechslerMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 463 (3) 3326 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw2189
CMB-lensing beyond the Born approximation
Giovanni Marozzi, Giuseppe Fanizza, Enea Di Dio and Ruth DurrerJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2016 (09) 028 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2016/09/028
The DES Science Verification weak lensing shear catalogues
M. Jarvis, E. Sheldon, J. Zuntz, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 460 (2) 2245 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw990
Relativistic weak lensing from a fully non-linear cosmological density field
D.B. Thomas, M. Bruni and D. WandsJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2015 (09) 021 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2015/9/021
Relativistic weak lensing from a fully non-linear cosmological density field
D.B. Thomas, M. Bruni and D. WandsJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2015 (09) 021 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2015/09/021
Galaxy Alignments: Theory, Modelling & Simulations
Alina Kiessling, Marcello Cacciato, Benjamin Joachimi, et al.Space Science Reviews 193 (1-4) 67 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-015-0203-6
Born-corrections to weak lensing of the cosmic microwave background temperature and polarization anisotropies
Steffen Hagstotz, Björn Malte Schäfer and Philipp M. MerkelMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 454 (1) 831 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv1977
Cosmology with cosmic shear observations: a review
Martin KilbingerReports on Progress in Physics 78 (8) 086901 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/78/8/086901
Do we care about the distance to the CMB? Clarifying the impact of second-order lensing
Camille Bonvin, Chris Clarkson, Ruth Durrer, Roy Maartens and Obinna UmehJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2015 (06) 050 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2015/06/050
Detecting baryon acoustic oscillations by 3d weak lensing
Alessandra Grassi and Björn Malte SchäferMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 437 (3) 2632 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stt2075
Weak lensing corrections to tSZ-lensing cross correlation
Tilman Tröster and Ludovic Van WaerbekeJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2014 (11) 008 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2014/11/008
A test of the Suyama-Yamaguchi inequality from weak lensing
A. Grassi, L. Heisenberg, C. T. Byrnes and B. M. SchaferMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 442 (2) 1068 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu900
Weak gravitational lensing of intrinsically aligned galaxies
Aram Giahi-Saravani and Björn Malte SchäferMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 437 (2) 1847 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stt2016
Seeing in the dark – II. Cosmic shear in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey
Eric M. Huff, Tim Eifler, Christopher M. Hirata, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 440 (2) 1322 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu145
Observational probes of cosmic acceleration
David H. Weinberg, Michael J. Mortonson, Daniel J. Eisenstein, et al.Physics Reports 530 (2) 87 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2013.05.001
Intrinsic alignments and 3d weak gravitational lensing
Philipp M. Merkel and Björn Malte SchäferMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 434 (2) 1808 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stt1151
Cosmic shear E/B-mode estimation with binned correlation function data
Matthew R. BeckerMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 435 (2) 1547 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stt1396
calclens: weak lensing simulations for large-area sky surveys and second-order effects in cosmic shear power spectra
Matthew R. BeckerMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 435 (1) 115 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stt1352
CFHTLenS: combined probe cosmological model comparison using 2D weak gravitational lensing
Martin Kilbinger, Liping Fu, Catherine Heymans, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 430 (3) 2200 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stt041
Gravitational lensing simulations - I. Covariance matrices and halo catalogues
Joachim Harnois-Déraps, Sanaz Vafaei and Ludovic Van WaerbekeMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 426 (2) 1262 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21624.x
A weak lensing view on primordial non-Gaussianities
Björn Malte Schäfer, Alessandra Grassi, Mischa Gerstenlauer and Christian T. ByrnesMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society no (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.20357.x
Cosmic shear bispectrum from second-order perturbations in general relativity
Francis Bernardeau, Camille Bonvin, Nicolas Van de Rijt and Filippo VernizziPhysical Review D 86 (2) (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.86.023001
Measuring primordial non-Gaussianity with weak lensing surveys
Stefan Hilbert, Laura Marian, Robert E. Smith and Vincent DesjacquesMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 426 (4) 2870 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21841.x
On the validity of the Born approximation for weak cosmic flexions
Björn Malte Schäfer, Lavinia Heisenberg, Angelos F. Kalovidouris and David J. BaconMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 420 (1) 455 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.20051.x
Second-order weak lensing from modified gravity
R. Ali Vanderveld, Robert R. Caldwell and Jason RhodesPhysical Review D 84 (12) (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.84.123510
Cosmic shear covariance: the log-normal approximation
S. Hilbert, J. Hartlap and P. SchneiderAstronomy & Astrophysics 536 A85 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201117294
A bias in cosmic shear from galaxy selection: results from ray-tracing simulations
J. Hartlap, S. Hilbert, P. Schneider and H. HildebrandtAstronomy & Astrophysics 528 A51 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201015850
Weak-lensing statistics from the Coyote Universe
Tim EiflerMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 418 (1) 536 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19502.x