XMM-Newton observation of the Lockman Hole - I. The X-ray data
A&A, 365 1 (2001) L45-L50
Published online: 2001-01-15
Articles citing this article
The Citing articles tool gives a list of articles citing the current article.
The citing articles come from EDP Sciences database, as well as other publishers participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking Program. You can set up your personal account to receive an email alert each time this article is cited by a new article (see the menu on the right-hand side of the abstract page).
Cited article:
This article has been cited by the following article(s):
A High-resolution Far-infrared Survey to Probe Black Hole–Galaxy Co-evolution
Matteo Bonato, David Leisawitz, Gianfranco De Zotti, Laura Sommovigo, Irene Shivaei, C. Megan Urry, Duncan Farrah, Locke Spencer, Berke V. Ricketti, Hannah Rana, Susanne Aalto, David B. Sanders and Lee G. MundyThe Astrophysical Journal 977 (2) 208 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad8e36
1711 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-6960-7_46
Dark Matter Halos of Luminous Active Galactic Nuclei from Galaxy–Galaxy Lensing with the HSC Subaru Strategic Program
Wentao Luo, John D. Silverman, Surhud More, Andy Goulding, Hironao Miyatake, Takahiro Nishimichi, Chiaki Hikage, Lalitwadee Kawinwanichakij, Junyao Li, Qinxun Li, Xiangchong Li, Elinor Medezinski, Masamune Oguri, Taira Oogi and Cristobal SifonThe Astrophysical Journal 977 (1) 59 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad86b5
Repeating nuclear transients as candidate electromagnetic counterparts of LISA extreme mass ratio inspirals
Shubham Kejriwal, Vojtěch Witzany, Michal Zajaček, Dheeraj R Pasham and Alvin J K ChuaMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 532 (2) 2143 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stae1599
Outskirts of Abell 1795: Probing gas clumping in the intracluster medium
Orsolya Eszter Kovács, Zhenlin Zhu, Norbert Werner, Aurora Simionescu and Ákos BogdánAstronomy & Astrophysics 678 A91 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202347201
The Lockman-SpReSO project
Mauro Gonzalez-Otero, Carmen P. Padilla-Torres, Jordi Cepa, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 669 A85 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202244480
Measuring the cosmic X-ray background accurately
Hancheng Li, Roland Walter, Nicolas Produit and Fiona HubertExperimental Astronomy 56 (1) 141 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10686-023-09896-7
Handbook of X-ray and Gamma-ray Astrophysics
Carolyn Kierans, Tadayuki Takahashi and Gottfried KanbachHandbook of X-ray and Gamma-ray Astrophysics 1 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4544-0_46-1
X-Ray Sources in the SSA22 Chandra Field
Brandon T. Radzom, A. J. Taylor, A. J. Barger and L. L. CowieThe Astrophysical Journal 940 (2) 114 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac9bfe
The LOFAR Two-meter Sky Survey: Deep Fields Data Release 1
R. Kondapally, P. N. Best, M. J. Hardcastle, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 648 A3 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202038813
Spectroscopic Redshift Measurements for Galaxy Clusters from the Lockman Hole Survey with the eROSITA Telescope Onboard the SRG Observatory
I. A. Zaznobin, R. A. Burenin, A. R. Lyapin, et al.Astronomy Letters 47 (3) 141 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063773721030075
Identification of AGN in the XMM-Newton X-ray survey of the SMC
Chandreyee Maitra, Frank Haberl, Valentin D. Ivanov, Maria-Rosa L. Cioni and Jacco Th. van LoonAstronomy & Astrophysics 622 A29 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201833663
The Fundamental Plane of Black Hole Accretion and Its Use as a Black Hole-Mass Estimator
Kayhan Gültekin, Ashley L. King, Edward M. Cackett, Kristina Nyland, Jon M. Miller, Tiziana Di Matteo, Sera Markoff and Michael P. RupenThe Astrophysical Journal 871 (1) 80 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aaf6b9
SIXTE: a generic X-ray instrument simulation toolkit
Thomas Dauser, Sebastian Falkner, Maximilian Lorenz, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 630 A66 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201935978
Nonthermal Emission from the Interaction of Magnetized Exoplanets with the Wind of Their Host Star
Xiawei Wang and Abraham LoebThe Astrophysical Journal Letters 874 (2) L23 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ab108d
A Deep X-ray Survey of the globular cluster Omega Centauri
Simon Henleywillis, Adrienne M Cool, Daryl Haggard, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 479 (2) 2834 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty675
Star formation history of Canis Major OB1
T. Santos-Silva, J. Gregorio-Hetem, T. Montmerle, B. Fernandes and B. StelzerAstronomy & Astrophysics 609 A127 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201730815
The Lockman Hole Project: new constraints on the sub-mJy source counts from a wide-area 1.4 GHz mosaic
I Prandoni, G Guglielmino, R Morganti, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 481 (4) 4548 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty2521
XMM–Newton view of X-ray overdensities from nearby galaxy clusters: the environmental dependencies
Turgay Caglar and Murat HudaverdiMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 471 (4) 4990 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx1811
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4968944
New Physical Insights about Tidal Disruption Events from a Comprehensive Observational Inventory at X-Ray Wavelengths
Katie Auchettl, James Guillochon and Enrico Ramirez-RuizThe Astrophysical Journal 838 (2) 149 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aa633b
Quasar UV luminosity function evolution up toz = 8
S. Manti, S. Gallerani, A. Ferrara, B. Greig and C. FeruglioMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 466 (1) 1160 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw3168
Modeling nonthermal emission from stellar bow shocks
V. Pereira, J. López-Santiago, M. Miceli, R. Bonito and E. de CastroAstronomy & Astrophysics 588 A36 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201527985
The faint radio sky: radio astronomy becomes mainstream
Paolo PadovaniThe Astronomy and Astrophysics Review 24 (1) (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00159-016-0098-6
Mildly obscured active galaxies and the cosmic X-ray background
V. Esposito and R. WalterAstronomy & Astrophysics 590 A49 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201527868
Second ROSAT all-sky survey (2RXS) source catalogue
Th. Boller, M. J. Freyberg, J. Trümper, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 588 A103 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201525648
EDDINGTON RATIO DISTRIBUTION OF X-RAY-SELECTED BROAD-LINE AGNs AT 1.0 < z < 2.2
Hyewon Suh, Günther Hasinger, Charles Steinhardt, John D. Silverman and Malte SchrammThe Astrophysical Journal 815 (2) 129 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/815/2/129
Cosmological evolution of supermassive black holes in galactic centers unveiled by hard X-ray observations
Yoshihiro UEDAProceedings of the Japan Academy, Series B 91 (5) 175 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.2183/pjab.91.175
DETAILED SHAPE AND EVOLUTIONARY BEHAVIOR OF THE X-RAY LUMINOSITY FUNCTION OF ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEI
T. Miyaji, G. Hasinger, M. Salvato, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 804 (2) 104 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/804/2/104
Probing the gaseous halo of galaxies through non-thermal emission from AGN-driven outflows
Xiawei Wang and Abraham LoebMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 453 (1) 837 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv1649
Possibility of observable signatures of leptonium from astrophysical sources
S. C. Ellis and Joss Bland-HawthornPhysical Review D 91 (12) (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.91.123004
GHIGLS: H I MAPPING AT INTERMEDIATE GALACTIC LATITUDE USING THE GREEN BANK TELESCOPE
P. G. Martin, K. P. M. Blagrave, Felix J. Lockman, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 809 (2) 153 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/809/2/153
TOWARD THE STANDARD POPULATION SYNTHESIS MODEL OF THE X-RAY BACKGROUND: EVOLUTION OF X-RAY LUMINOSITY AND ABSORPTION FUNCTIONS OF ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEI INCLUDING COMPTON-THICK POPULATIONS
Yoshihiro Ueda, Masayuki Akiyama, Günther Hasinger, Takamitsu Miyaji and Michael G. WatsonThe Astrophysical Journal 786 (2) 104 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/786/2/104
The hunt for red active galactic nuclei: a new infrared diagnostic
Dario Fadda and Giulia RodighieroMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters 444 (1) L95 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnrasl/slu111
Systematic search for high-energy gamma-ray emission from bow shocks of runaway stars
A. Schulz, M. Ackermann, R. Buehler, M. Mayer and S. KlepserAstronomy & Astrophysics 565 A95 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201423468
The largest X-ray-selected sample of $\boldsymbol {z>3}$ AGNs: C-COSMOS and ChaMP
E. Kalfountzou, F. Civano, M. Elvis, M. Trichas and P. GreenMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 445 (2) 1430 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu1745
Direct detection of black holes via electromagnetic radiation
J. L. G. Sobrinho and P. AugustoMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 441 (4) 2878 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu786
TheXMM-NewtonWide Angle Survey (XWAS)
P. Esquej, M. Page, F. J. Carrera, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 557 A123 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201218832
STATISTICAL STUDY OF 2XMMi-DR3/SDSS-DR8 CROSS-CORRELATION SAMPLE
Yan-Xia Zhang, Xin-Lin Zhou, Yong-Heng Zhao and Xue-Bing WuThe Astronomical Journal 145 (2) 42 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-6256/145/2/42
X-RAY GROUPS OF GALAXIES IN THE AEGIS DEEP AND WIDE FIELDS
G. Erfanianfar, A. Finoguenov, M. Tanaka, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 765 (2) 117 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/765/2/117
The evolution of active galactic nuclei across cosmic time: what is downsizing?
N. Fanidakis, C. M. Baugh, A. J. Benson, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 419 (4) 2797 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19931.x
Non-thermal processes in bowshocks of runaway stars
M. V. del Valle and G. E. RomeroAstronomy & Astrophysics 543 A56 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201218937
The deepXMM-NewtonSurvey of M 31
H. Stiele, W. Pietsch, F. Haberl, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 534 A55 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201015270
PACS Evolutionary Probe (PEP) – AHerschelkey program
D. Lutz, A. Poglitsch, B. Altieri, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 532 A90 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201117107
Do all QSOs have the same black hole mass?
T. Shanks, S. M. Croom, S. Fine, N. P. Ross and U. SawangwitMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society no (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19076.x
Optical and infrared properties of active galactic nuclei in the Lockman Hole
E. Rovilos, S. Fotopoulou, M. Salvato, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 529 A135 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201015763
A WEAK LENSING STUDY OF X-RAY GROUPS IN THE COSMOS SURVEY: FORM AND EVOLUTION OF THE MASS-LUMINOSITY RELATION
Alexie Leauthaud, Alexis Finoguenov, Jean-Paul Kneib, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 709 (1) 97 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/709/1/97
The AKARI FU-HYU galaxy evolution program: first results from the GOODS-N field
C. P. Pearson, S. Serjeant, M. Negrello, et al.Astronomy and Astrophysics 514 A9 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/200913383
Inverse-Compton X-rays from giant radio galaxies atz∼ 1
T. Laskar, A. C. Fabian, K. M. Blundell and M. C. ErlundMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 401 (3) 1500 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15769.x
The XMM-Newton serendipitous survey
M. G. Watson, A. C. Schröder, D. Fyfe, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 493 (1) 339 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:200810534
An extreme EXO: a type 2 QSO atz = 1.87
A. Del Moro, M. G. Watson, S. Mateos, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 493 (2) 445 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:200809665
Quasar and Supermassive Black Hole Evolution
Scott M. Croom and Stephen FineProceedings of the International Astronomical Union 5 (S267) 223 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743921310006320
BALANCING THE COSMIC ENERGY BUDGET: THE COSMIC X-RAY BACKGROUND, BLAZARS, AND THE COMPTON THICK ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEUS FRACTION
A. R. Draper and D. R. BallantyneThe Astrophysical Journal 707 (1) 778 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/707/1/778
DeepU-B-Vimaging of the Lockman Hole with the LBT
E. Rovilos, V. Burwitz, G. Szokoly, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 507 (1) 195 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/200912626
The 2dF���SDSS LRG and QSO survey: the QSO luminosity function at 0.4
Scott M. Croom, Gordon T. Richards, Tom Shanks, et al.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 399 (4) 1755 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15398.x
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 399 (4) 1755 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15398.x
When appearances are deceptive
Michael ShullNature 458 (7242) 1119 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1038/4581119a
PHOTOMETRIC REDSHIFT AND CLASSIFICATION FOR THEXMM-COSMOS SOURCES
M. Salvato, G. Hasinger, O. Ilbert, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 690 (2) 1250 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/690/2/1250
The 2dF-SDSS LRG and QSO Survey: the spectroscopic QSO catalogue
Scott M. Croom, Gordon T. Richards, Tom Shanks, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 392 (1) 19 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.14052.x
EMISSION AND ABSORPTION PROPERTIES OF LOW-MASS TYPE 2 ACTIVE GALAXIES WITHXMM-NEWTON
Carol E. Thornton, Aaron J. Barth, Luis C. Ho and Jenny E. GreeneThe Astrophysical Journal 705 (2) 1196 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/705/2/1196
Is there an upper limit to black hole masses?
Priyamvada Natarajan and Ezequiel TreisterMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 393 (3) 838 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13864.x
THE X-RAY POINT-SOURCE POPULATION OF NGC 1365: THE PUZZLE OF TWO HIGHLY-VARIABLE ULTRALUMINOUS X-RAY SOURCES
Iskra V. Strateva and S. KomossaThe Astrophysical Journal 692 (1) 443 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/692/1/443
A multi-coloured survey of NGC 253 with XMM–Newton: testing the methods used for creating luminosity functions from low-count data
R. Barnard, L. Shaw Greening and U. KolbMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 388 (2) 849 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13447.x
Absorption properties and evolution of active galactic nuclei
G. HasingerAstronomy & Astrophysics 490 (3) 905 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:200809839
Nonthermal Phenomena in Clusters of Galaxies
Y. Rephaeli, J. Nevalainen, T. Ohashi and A. M. BykovSpace Science Reviews 134 (1-4) 71 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-008-9314-7
Combined Chandra, XMM-Newton, and Hubble Space Telescope observations of the Galactic globular cluster NGC 2808
M. Servillat, A. Dieball, N. A. Webb, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 490 (2) 641 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:200810188
Reproducibility of Non-X-Ray Background for the X-Ray Imaging Spectrometer aboard Suzaku
Noriaki Tawa, Kiyoshi Hayashida, Masaaki Nagai, Hajime Nakamoto, Hiroshi Tsunemi, Hiroya Yamaguchi, Yoshitaka Ishisaki, Eric D. Miller, Tsunefumi Mizuno, Tadayasu Dotani, Masanobu Ozaki and Haruyoshi KatayamaPublications of the Astronomical Society of Japan 60 (sp1) S11 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1093/pasj/60.sp1.S11
The Luminosity Function of X‐Ray–selected Active Galactic Nuclei: Evolution of Supermassive Black Holes at High Redshift
J. D. Silverman, P. J. Green, W. A. Barkhouse, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 679 (1) 118 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1086/529572
The Stellar Mass Assembly of Galaxies fromz= 0 toz= 4: Analysis of a Sample Selected in the Rest‐Frame Near‐Infrared withSpitzer
Pablo G. Pérez‐González, George H. Rieke, Victor Villar, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 675 (1) 234 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1086/523690
The first XMM-Newton slew survey catalogue: XMMSL1
R. D. Saxton, A. M. Read, P. Esquej, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 480 (2) 611 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20079193
High-resolution radio observations of submillimetre galaxies
A. D. Biggs and R. J. IvisonMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 385 (2) 893 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.12869.x
XMM-Newtonobservations of the Lockman Hole: X-ray source catalogue and number counts
H. Brunner, N. Cappelluti, G. Hasinger, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 479 (1) 283 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20077687
Planned and serendipitous surveys with XMM‐Newton
M.G. WatsonAstronomische Nachrichten 329 (2) 131 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1002/asna.200710896
Clusters of Galaxies
Y. Rephaeli, J. Nevalainen, T. Ohashi and A. M. BykovClusters of Galaxies 71 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-78875-3_5
Relativistic Astrophysics Legacy and Cosmology – Einstein’s
M. Brusa, V. Mainieri and G. HasingerESO Astrophysics Symposia, Relativistic Astrophysics Legacy and Cosmology – Einstein’s 197 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74713-0_44
High precision X-ray log N – log S distributions: implications for the obscured AGN population
S. Mateos, R. S. Warwick, F. J. Carrera, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 492 (1) 51 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:200810004
A 610-MHz survey of the Lockman Hole with the Giant Metrewave Radio Telescope - I. Observations, data reduction and source catalogue for the central 5 deg2
Timothy Garn, David A. Green, Julia M. Riley and Paul AlexanderMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 387 (3) 1037 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13335.x
New pre-main sequence candidates in the Taurus-Auriga star forming region
L. Scelsi, A. Maggio, G. Micela, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 468 (2) 405 (2007)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20065544
Extragalactic MeV γ-ray emission from cocoons of young radio galaxies
M. Kino, N. Kawakatu and H. ItoMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 376 (4) 1630 (2007)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11354.x
The XMM-Newton serendipitous survey
F. J. Carrera, J. Ebrero, S. Mateos, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 469 (1) 27 (2007)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20066271
The synthesis of the cosmic X-ray background in the Chandra and XMM-Newton era
R. Gilli, A. Comastri and G. HasingerAstronomy & Astrophysics 463 (1) 79 (2007)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20066334
Black Hole Masses and Eddington Ratios of AGNs atz< 1: Evidence of Retriggering for a Representative Sample of X‐Ray‐selected AGNs
L. Ballo, S. Cristiani, G. Fasano, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 667 (1) 97 (2007)
https://doi.org/10.1086/519479
Unveiling the oldest and most massive galaxies at very high redshift
G. Rodighiero, A. Cimatti, A. Franceschini, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 470 (1) 21 (2007)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20066497
The XMM-SSC survey of hard-spectrum XMM–Newton sources – I. Optically bright sources
M. J. Page, I. Lehmann, Th. Boller, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 378 (4) 1335 (2007)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11857.x
The XMM ‐ Newton Wide‐Field Survey in the COSMOS Field. III. Optical Identification and Multiwavelength Properties of a Large Sample of X‐Ray–Selected Sources
M. Brusa, G. Zamorani, A. Comastri, et al.The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 172 (1) 353 (2007)
https://doi.org/10.1086/516575
The XMM‐Newton Wide‐Field Survey in the COSMOS Field. II. X‐Ray Data and the log N ‐log S Relations
N. Cappelluti, G. Hasinger, M. Brusa, et al.The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 172 (1) 341 (2007)
https://doi.org/10.1086/516586
An X-ray look at the Seyfert 1 Galaxy Mrk 590:XMM-Newtonand Chandrareveal complexity in circumnuclear gas
A. L. Longinotti, S. Bianchi, M. Santos-Lleo, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 470 (1) 73 (2007)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20066248
The XMM-Newton survey in the Marano field
M. Krumpe, G. Lamer, A. D. Schwope, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 466 (1) 41 (2007)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20065849
The XMM-Newton serendipitous survey
X. Barcons, F. J. Carrera, M. T. Ceballos, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 476 (3) 1191 (2007)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20077606
The XMM‐Newton Wide‐Field Survey in the COSMOS Field. I. Survey Description
G. Hasinger, N. Cappelluti, H. Brunner, et al.The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 172 (1) 29 (2007)
https://doi.org/10.1086/516576
The evolution of massive black hole seeds
Marta Volonteri, Giuseppe Lodato and Priyamvada NatarajanMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 383 (3) 1079 (2007)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12589.x
The XMM‐Newton Wide‐Field Survey in the COSMOS Field. IV. X‐Ray Spectral Properties of Active Galactic Nuclei
V. Mainieri, G. Hasinger, N. Cappelluti, et al.The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 172 (1) 368 (2007)
https://doi.org/10.1086/516573
The XMM-Newton survey of the ELAIS-S1 field
S. Puccetti, F. Fiore, V. D'Elia, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 457 (2) 501 (2006)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20064904
The cosmic infrared background resolved by Spitzer
H. Dole, G. Lagache, J.-L. Puget, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 451 (2) 417 (2006)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20054446
X-ray spectra of sources in the 13HXMM–Newton/Chandra deep field
M. J. Page, N. S. Loaring, T. Dwelly, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 369 (1) 156 (2006)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10278.x
X-ray nature of the LINER nuclear sources
O. González-Martín, J. Masegosa, I. Márquez, M. A. Guerrero and D. Dultzin-HacyanAstronomy & Astrophysics 460 (1) 45 (2006)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20054756
TheChandraXBootes Survey. III. Optical and Near‐Infrared Counterparts
Kate Brand, Michael J. I. Brown, Arjun Dey, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 641 (1) 140 (2006)
https://doi.org/10.1086/500312
The Many Scales in the Universe
X. BarconsThe Many Scales in the Universe 87 (2006)
https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4526-3_7
Overdensity of X-Ray Sources in the Field of Two Nearby Clusters of Galaxies: XMM-Newton View of A 194 and A 1060
Murat Hudaverdi, Hideyo Kunieda, Takeshi Tanaka, Yoshito Haba, Akihiro Furuzawa, Yuzuru Tawara and E. Nihal ErcanPublications of the Astronomical Society of Japan 58 (6) 931 (2006)
https://doi.org/10.1093/pasj/58.6.931
Active galactic nuclei in the mid-IR
I. Matute, F. La Franca, F. Pozzi, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 451 (2) 443 (2006)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20053710
The HELLAS2XMM survey
R. Maiolino, M. Mignoli, L. Pozzetti, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 445 (2) 457 (2006)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20053486