Tension with the flat ΛCDM model from a high-redshift Hubble diagram of supernovae, quasars, and gamma-ray bursts
A&A, 628 (2019) L4
Published online: 2019-08-06
Articles citing this article
The Citing articles tool gives a list of articles citing the current article.
The citing articles come from EDP Sciences database, as well as other publishers participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking Program. You can set up your personal account to receive an email alert each time this article is cited by a new article (see the menu on the right-hand side of the abstract page).
Cited article:
This article has been cited by the following article(s):
Using quasar X-ray and UV flux measurements to test the cosmic opacity with cosmography
Bing Xu, Kaituo Zhang, Qihong Huang, Bing Chen and Yong LiPhysics of the Dark Universe 33 100875 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dark.2021.100875
Testing the quasar Hubble diagram with LISA standard sirens
Lorenzo Speri, Nicola Tamanini, Robert R. Caldwell, Jonathan R. Gair and Benjamin WangPhysical Review D 103 (8) (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.083526
Viewing Angle Effects in Quasar Application to Cosmology
Raj Prince, Bożena Czerny and Agnieszka PolloThe Astrophysical Journal 909 (1) 58 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/abd775
X-Ray Plateaus in Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglows and Their Application in Cosmology
Fan Xu, Chen-Han Tang, Jin-Jun Geng, Fa-Yin Wang, Yu-Yang Wang, Abudushataer Kuerban and Yong-Feng HuangThe Astrophysical Journal 920 (2) 135 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac158a
High-redshift long gamma-ray bursts Hubble diagram as a test of basic cosmological relations
V L Gorokhov, V V Sokolov, Yu V Baryshev, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 496 (2) 1530 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa1548
Quasars as standard candles
E. Lusso, G. Risaliti, E. Nardini, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 642 A150 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202038899
High-redshift cosmography: auxiliary variables versus Padé polynomials
O Luongo, R D’Agostino and S CapozzielloMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 494 (2) 2576 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa871
Preferred-frame effects, the $$H_0$$ tension, and probes of Hořava–Lifshitz gravity
Nils A. NilssonThe European Physical Journal Plus 135 (4) (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-020-00369-w
Cosmography and flat ΛCDM tensions at high redshift
Tao Yang, Aritra Banerjee and Eoin Ó ColgáinPhysical Review D 102 (12) (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.102.123532
Do stellar-mass and super-massive black holes have similar dining habits?
R. Arcodia, G. Ponti, A. Merloni and K. NandraAstronomy & Astrophysics 638 A100 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202037969
Probing phenomenological emergent dark energy model in a Bianchi type-I spacetime with the recent observational data
Shivani SharmaPhysics of the Dark Universe 30 100717 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dark.2020.100717
Testing cosmic anisotropy with Pantheon sample and quasars at high redshifts
J. P. Hu, Y. Y. Wang and F. Y. WangAstronomy & Astrophysics 643 A93 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202038541
Evidence for cosmic acceleration with next-generation surveys: a model-independent approach
Carlos A P BengalyMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters 499 (1) L6 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnrasl/slaa040
Time-delay cosmographic forecasts with strong lensing and JWST stellar kinematics
Aleksi Halkola, Sherry H Suyu and Akın YıldırımMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 493 (4) 4783 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa498
Model-independent Distance Calibration and Curvature Measurement Using Quasars and Cosmic Chronometers
Jun-Jie Wei and Fulvio MeliaThe Astrophysical Journal 888 (2) 99 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab5e7d
Testing the Cosmic Opacity at Higher Redshifts: Implication from Quasars with Available UV and X-Ray Observations
Tonghua Liu, Shuo Cao, Marek Biesiada, Yuting Liu, Shuaibo Geng and Yujie LianThe Astrophysical Journal 899 (1) 71 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aba0b6
A Cosmography Approach to Dark Energy Cosmologies: New Constraints Using the Hubble Diagrams of Supernovae, Quasars, and Gamma-Ray Bursts
Mehdi Rezaei, Saeed Pour-Ojaghi and Mohammad MalekjaniThe Astrophysical Journal 900 (1) 70 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aba517
Quasar X-ray and UV flux, baryon acoustic oscillation, and Hubble parameter measurement constraints on cosmological model parameters
Narayan Khadka and Bharat RatraMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 492 (3) 4456 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa101
Using quasar X-ray and UV flux measurements to constrain cosmological model parameters
Narayan Khadka and Bharat RatraMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 497 (1) 263 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa1855
Is the Hubble diagram of quasars in tension with concordance cosmology?
Hermano Velten and Syrios GomesPhysical Review D 101 (4) (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.101.043502
Einstein’s Geometrical versus Feynman’s Quantum-Field Approaches to Gravity Physics: Testing by Modern Multimessenger Astronomy
Yurij BaryshevUniverse 6 (11) 212 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.3390/universe6110212
A crucial test of the phantom closed cosmological model
S I Shirokov and Yu V BaryshevMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters 499 (1) L101 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnrasl/slaa167
Cosmology With Quasars: Predictions for eROSITA From a Quasar Hubble Diagram
Elisabeta LussoFrontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences 7 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.3389/fspas.2020.00008
The Scale-Invariant Vacuum (SIV) Theory: A Possible Origin of Dark Matter and Dark Energy
Andre Maeder and Vesselin G. GueorguievUniverse 6 (3) 46 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.3390/universe6030046
The failure of testing for cosmic opacity via the distance-duality relation
Václav Vavryčuk and Pavel KroupaMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 497 (1) 378 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa1936
What can machine learning tell us about the background expansion of the Universe?
Rubén Arjona and Savvas NesserisPhysical Review D 101 (12) (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.101.123525
Investigating Dark Energy Equation of State With High Redshift Hubble Diagram
Marek Demianski, Elisabeta Lusso, Maurizio Paolillo, Ester Piedipalumbo and Guido RisalitiFrontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences 7 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.3389/fspas.2020.521056
A Bayesian comparison between $$\Lambda $$CDM and phenomenologically emergent dark energy models
M. Rezaei, T. Naderi, M. Malekjani and A. MehrabiThe European Physical Journal C 80 (5) (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-7942-6
Does $$\varLambda $$CDM really be in tension with the Hubble diagram data?
Ahmad Mehrabi and Spyros BasilakosThe European Physical Journal C 80 (7) (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-8221-2
Hubble parameter in f(R)-gravity
V. Zhdanov and O. StashkoBulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Astronomy (61) 22 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.17721/BTSNUA.2020.61.22-25
Kinematic constraints beyond z ≃ 0 using calibrated GRB correlations
Orlando Luongo and Marco MuccinoAstronomy & Astrophysics 641 A174 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202038264
Quasars as standard candles II
F. Salvestrini, G. Risaliti, S. Bisogni, E. Lusso and C. VignaliAstronomy & Astrophysics 631 A120 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201935491
Universe opacity and Type Ia supernova dimming
Václav VavryčukMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters 489 (1) L63 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnrasl/slz128