Improved cosmological constraints from a joint analysis of the SDSS-II and SNLS supernova samples
A&A, 568 (2014) A22
Published online: 2014-08-08
Articles citing this article
The Citing articles tool gives a list of articles citing the current article.
The citing articles come from EDP Sciences database, as well as other publishers participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking Program. You can set up your personal account to receive an email alert each time this article is cited by a new article (see the menu on the right-hand side of the abstract page).
Cited article:
This article has been cited by the following article(s):
Constraints on cosmic distance duality relation from cosmological observations
Meng-Zhen Lv and Jun-Qing XiaPhysics of the Dark Universe 13 139 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dark.2016.06.003
Marginal evidence for cosmic acceleration from Type Ia supernovae
J. T. Nielsen, A. Guffanti and S. SarkarScientific Reports 6 (1) (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1038/srep35596
NEUTRONIZATION DURING CARBON SIMMERING IN TYPE IA SUPERNOVA PROGENITORS
Héctor Martínez-Rodríguez, Anthony L. Piro, Josiah Schwab and Carles BadenesThe Astrophysical Journal 825 (1) 57 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.3847/0004-637X/825/1/57
Simple inhomogeneous cosmological (toy) models
Eddy G. Chirinos Isidro, Cristofher Zuñiga Vargas and Winfried ZimdahlJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2016 (05) 003 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2016/05/003
Dark sectors of the Universe: A Euclid survey approach
Isaac Tutusaus, Brahim Lamine, Alain Blanchard, et al.Physical Review D 94 (12) (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.94.123515
1 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20794-0_100-1
Constraining the dark energy equation of state with H ii galaxies
R. Chávez, M. Plionis, S. Basilakos, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 462 (3) 2431 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw1813
Impacts of different SNLS3 light-curve fitters on cosmological consequences of interacting dark energy models
Yazhou Hu, Miao Li, Nan Li and Shuang WangAstronomy & Astrophysics 592 A101 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201526946
Angular distribution of cosmological parameters as a probe of space-time inhomogeneities
C. Sofia Carvalho and Katrine MarquesAstronomy & Astrophysics 592 A102 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201628177
Comparison of dark energy models after Planck 2015
Yue-Yao Xu and Xin ZhangThe European Physical Journal C 76 (11) (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-4446-5
Non-local gravity and comparison with observational datasets. II. Updated results and Bayesian model comparison with ΛCDM
Yves Dirian, Stefano Foffa, Martin Kunz, Michele Maggiore and Valeria PettorinoJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2016 (05) 068 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2016/05/068
SN 2014J at M82 – I. A middle-class Type Ia supernova by all spectroscopic metrics
L. Galbany, M. E. Moreno-Raya, P. Ruiz-Lapuente, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 457 (1) 525 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw026
Revisit of the interacting holographic dark energy model after Planck 2015
Lu Feng and Xin ZhangJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2016 (08) 072 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2016/08/072
Testing models of vacuum energy interacting with cold dark matter
Yun-He Li, Jing-Fei Zhang and Xin ZhangPhysical Review D 93 (2) (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.93.023002
IS THE EXPANSION OF THE UNIVERSE ACCELERATING? ALL SIGNS POINT TO YES
D. Rubin and B. HaydenThe Astrophysical Journal Letters 833 (2) L30 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/833/2/L30
MEASURING TYPE IA SUPERNOVA POPULATIONS OF STRETCH AND COLOR AND PREDICTING DISTANCE BIASES
D. Scolnic and R. KesslerThe Astrophysical Journal Letters 822 (2) L35 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8205/822/2/L35
Are cosmological data sets consistent with each other within theΛcold dark matter model?
Marco RaveriPhysical Review D 93 (4) (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.93.043522
The trouble withH0
José Luis Bernal, Licia Verde and Adam G. RiessJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2016 (10) 019 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2016/10/019
SDSS-II SUPERNOVA SURVEY: AN ANALYSIS OF THE LARGEST SAMPLE OF TYPE IA SUPERNOVAE AND CORRELATIONS WITH HOST-GALAXY SPECTRAL PROPERTIES
Rachel C. Wolf, Chris B. D’Andrea, Ravi R. Gupta, Masao Sako, John A. Fischer, Rick Kessler, Saurabh W. Jha, Marisa C. March, Daniel M. Scolnic, Johanna-Laina Fischer, Heather Campbell, Robert C. Nichol, Matthew D. Olmstead, Michael Richmond, Donald P. Schneider and Mathew SmithThe Astrophysical Journal 821 (2) 115 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.3847/0004-637X/821/2/115
How SN Ia host-galaxy properties affect cosmological parameters
H. Campbell, M. Fraser and G. GilmoreMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 457 (4) 3470 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw115
Cosmological constraints on coupled dark energy
Weiqiang Yang, Hang Li, Yabo Wu and Jianbo LuJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2016 (10) 007 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2016/10/007
The significance of anisotropic signals hiding in the Type Ia supernovae
Hai-Nan Lin, Xin Li and Zhe ChangMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 460 (1) 617 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw995
An Analytical Solution in the Complex Plane for the Luminosity Distance in Flat Cosmology
Lorenzo ZaninettiJournal of High Energy Physics, Gravitation and Cosmology 02 (04) 581 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.4236/jhepgc.2016.24050
Ultraviolet diversity of Type Ia Supernovae
Ryan J. Foley, Yen-Chen Pan, P. Brown, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 461 (2) 1308 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw1440
Planck 2015constraints on neutrino physics
Massimiliano LattanziJournal of Physics: Conference Series 718 032008 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/718/3/032008
Neutrino mass limits: Robust information from the power spectrum of galaxy surveys
Antonio J. Cuesta, Viviana Niro and Licia VerdePhysics of the Dark Universe 13 77 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dark.2016.04.005
Testing the mapping between redshift and cosmic scale factor
Radosław Wojtak and Francisco PradaMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 458 (3) 3331 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw547
Model-independent distance calibration of high-redshift gamma-ray bursts and constrain on the ΛCDM model
Hai-Nan Lin, Xin Li and Zhe ChangMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 455 (2) 2131 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv2471
Application of Bayesian graphs to SN Ia data analysis and compression
Cong Ma, Pier-Stefano Corasaniti and Bruce A. BassettMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 463 (2) 1651 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw2069
Spherically symmetricN-body simulations with general relativistic dynamics
Julian Adamek, Mateja Gosenca and Shaun HotchkissPhysical Review D 93 (2) (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.93.023526
9910 99100V (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2231677
Model-independent constraints on modified gravity from current data and from the Euclid and SKA future surveys
Laura Taddei, Matteo Martinelli and Luca AmendolaJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2016 (12) 032 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2016/12/032
The 2-degree Field Lensing Survey: design and clustering measurements
Chris Blake, Alexandra Amon, Michael Childress, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 462 (4) 4240 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw1990
Hořava Gravity in the Effective Field Theory formalism: From cosmology to observational constraints
Noemi Frusciante, Marco Raveri, Daniele Vernieri, Bin Hu and Alessandra SilvestriPhysics of the Dark Universe 13 7 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dark.2016.03.002
Reconstruction of interaction rate in holographic dark energy
Ankan MukherjeeJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2016 (11) 055 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2016/11/055
Prospects of probing quintessence with H i 21-cm intensity mapping survey
Azam Hussain, Shruti Thakur, Tapomoy Guha Sarkar and Anjan A. SenMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 463 (4) 3492 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw2246
Constraints on decaying early modified gravity from cosmological observations
Nelson A. Lima, Vanessa Smer-Barreto and Lucas LombriserPhysical Review D 94 (8) (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.94.083507
Cosmology from cosmic shear with Dark Energy Survey Science Verification data
T. Abbott, F. B. Abdalla, S. Allam, et al.Physical Review D 94 (2) (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.94.022001
Is there a concordance value forH0?
Vladimir V. Luković, Rocco D’Agostino and Nicola VittorioAstronomy & Astrophysics 595 A109 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201628217
Scalar-tensor quintessence with a linear potential: Avoiding the big crunch cosmic doomsday
A. Lykkas and L. PerivolaropoulosPhysical Review D 93 (4) (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.93.043513
Reconciling Planck with the local value of H 0 in extended parameter space
Eleonora Di Valentino, Alessandro Melchiorri and Joseph SilkPhysics Letters B 761 242 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2016.08.043
Turning noise into signal: Learning from the scatter in the Hubble diagram
Tiago Castro, Miguel Quartin and Sandra Benitez-HerreraPhysics of the Dark Universe 13 66 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dark.2016.04.006
Acceleration of the universe: a reconstruction of the effective equation of state
Ankan MukherjeeMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 460 (1) 273 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw964
Power law cosmology model comparison with CMB scale information
Isaac Tutusaus, Brahim Lamine, Alain Blanchard, et al.Physical Review D 94 (10) (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.94.103511
Constraints on modified gravity from Planck 2015: when the health of your theory makes the difference
Valentina Salvatelli, Federico Piazza and Christian MarinoniJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2016 (09) 027 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2016/09/027
Constraining the halo mass function with observations
Tiago Castro, Valerio Marra and Miguel QuartinMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 463 (2) 1666 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw2072
Planck2015 results
P. A. R. Ade, N. Aghanim, M. Arnaud, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 594 A13 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201525830
Planck2015 results
P. A. R. Ade, N. Aghanim, M. Arnaud, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 594 A24 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201525833
Reconciling CMB and structure growth measurements with dark energy interactions
Alkistis Pourtsidou and Thomas TramPhysical Review D 94 (4) (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.94.043518
Toward cosmological-model-independent calibrations for the luminosity relations of Gamma-Ray Bursts
Xuheng Ding, Zhengxiang Li and Zong-Hong ZhuInternational Journal of Modern Physics D 24 (07) 1550057 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218271815500571
Perspective on the Cosmic Microwave Background
J. DunkleyEPL (Europhysics Letters) 111 (4) 49001 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/111/49001
Constraints on the geometric and dynamic spatial curvature
Bo YuPhysical Review D 92 (8) (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.92.083514
A unified explanation for the supernova rate-galaxy mass dependence based on supernovae detected in Sloan galaxy spectra
Or Graur, Federica B. Bianco and Maryam ModjazMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 450 (1) 905 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv713
A general reconstruction of the recent expansion history of the universe
S.D.P. Vitenti and M. Penna-LimaJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2015 (09) 045 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2015/9/045
AHUBBLEDIAGRAM FROM TYPE II SUPERNOVAE BASED SOLELY ON PHOTOMETRY: THE PHOTOMETRIC COLOR METHOD
T. de Jaeger, S. González-Gaitán, J. P. Anderson, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 815 (2) 121 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/815/2/121
The Square Kilometer Array: cosmology, pulsars and other physics with the SKA
F. CombesJournal of Instrumentation 10 (09) C09001 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/10/09/C09001
Robust model comparison disfavors power law cosmology
Daniel L. ShaferPhysical Review D 91 (10) (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.91.103516
No evidence for bulk velocity from type Ia supernovae
Dragan Huterer, Daniel L. Shafer and Fabian SchmidtJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2015 (12) 033 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2015/12/033
DES13S2cmm: the first superluminous supernova from the Dark Energy Survey
A. Papadopoulos, C. B. D'Andrea, M. Sullivan, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 449 (2) 1215 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv174
The DICE calibration project Design, characterization, and first results
N. Regnault, A. Guyonnet, K. Schahmanèche, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 581 A45 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201424471
SUPERCAL: CROSS-CALIBRATION OF MULTIPLE PHOTOMETRIC SYSTEMS TO IMPROVE COSMOLOGICAL MEASUREMENTS WITH TYPE Ia SUPERNOVAE
D. Scolnic, S. Casertano, A. Riess, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 815 (2) 117 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/815/2/117
The m–z relation for Type Ia supernovae, locally inhomogeneous cosmological models, and the nature of dark matter
Phillip HelbigMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 451 (2) 2097 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv1074
A HUBBLE DIAGRAM FOR QUASARS
G. Risaliti and E. LussoThe Astrophysical Journal 815 (1) 33 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/815/1/33
RECONSIDERING THE EFFECTS OF LOCAL STAR FORMATION ON TYPE Ia SUPERNOVA COSMOLOGY
David O. Jones, Adam G. Riess and Daniel M. ScolnicThe Astrophysical Journal 812 (1) 31 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/812/1/31
TYPE Ia SUPERNOVA DISTANCE MODULUS BIAS AND DISPERSION FROMK-CORRECTION ERRORS: A DIRECT MEASUREMENT USING LIGHT CURVE FITS TO OBSERVED SPECTRAL TIME SERIES
C. Saunders, G. Aldering, P. Antilogus, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 800 (1) 57 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/800/1/57
Hubble’s Law and the expanding universe
Neta A. BahcallProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112 (11) 3173 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1424299112
Probing cosmology with weak lensing selected clusters – I. Halo approach and all-sky simulations
Masato Shirasaki, Takashi Hamana and Naoki YoshidaMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 453 (3) 3044 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv1854
Calibrating the cosmic distance scale ladder: the role of the sound-horizon scale and the local expansion rate as distance anchors
Antonio J. Cuesta, Licia Verde, Adam Riess and Raul JimenezMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 448 (4) 3463 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv261
Constraining spacetime variations of nuclear decay rates from light curves of type Ia supernovae
Ivan Karpikov, Maxim Piskunov, Anton Sokolov and Sergey TroitskyPhysical Review D 91 (12) (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.91.127301
Dark Energy, a Summary
G. GutierrezNuclear and Particle Physics Proceedings 267-269 332 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2015.10.127
A TEST OF COSMOLOGICAL MODELS USING HIGH-zMEASUREMENTS OFH(z)
Fulvio Melia and Thomas M. McClintockThe Astronomical Journal 150 (4) 119 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-6256/150/4/119
Disformal gravity theories: A Jordan frame analysis
Jeremy Sakstein and Sarunas VernerPhysical Review D 92 (12) (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.92.123005
Reconciling Planck results with low redshift astronomical measurements
Zurab Berezhiani, A. D. Dolgov and I. I. TkachevPhysical Review D 92 (6) (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.92.061303
Consistency test on the cosmic evolution
Yan Gong, Yin-Zhe Ma, Shuang-Nan Zhang and Xuelei ChenPhysical Review D 92 (6) (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.92.063523
Mapping the Chevallier-Polarski-Linder parametrization onto physical dark energy Models
Robert J. ScherrerPhysical Review D 92 (4) (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.92.043001
Diversity in extinction laws of Type Ia supernovae measured between 0.2 and 2 μm
R. Amanullah, J. Johansson, A. Goobar, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 453 (3) 3301 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv1505
CfAIR2: NEAR-INFRARED LIGHT CURVES OF 94 TYPE Ia SUPERNOVAE
Andrew S. Friedman, W. M. Wood-Vasey, G. H. Marion, et al.The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 220 (1) 9 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0067-0049/220/1/9
Probing the nature of dark energy
Yun WangInternational Journal of Modern Physics A 30 (28n29) 1545010 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217751X15450104
Quintessence’s last stand?
Eric V. LinderPhysical Review D 91 (6) (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.91.063006
Testing the mutual consistency of different supernovae surveys
N. V. Karpenka, F. Feroz and M. P. HobsonMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 449 (3) 2405 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv415
Dark energy dependent test of general relativity at cosmological scales
Yves Zolnierowski and Alain BlanchardPhysical Review D 91 (8) (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.91.083536
UNITY: CONFRONTING SUPERNOVA COSMOLOGY’S STATISTICAL AND SYSTEMATIC UNCERTAINTIES IN A UNIFIED BAYESIAN FRAMEWORK
D. Rubin, G. Aldering, K. Barbary, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 813 (2) 137 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/813/2/137
The dependence of the AV prior for SN Ia on host mass and disc inclination
B. W. Holwerda, W. C. Keel, M. A. Kenworthy and K. J. MackMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 451 (3) 2390 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv1125
Transition redshift: new constraints from parametric and nonparametric methods
Nisha Rani, Deepak Jain, Shobhit Mahajan, Amitabha Mukherjee and Nilza PiresJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2015 (12) 045 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2015/12/045
Intermediate evolution using SNIa, and BAO
Víctor H. Cárdenas and O. HerreraAstrophysics and Space Science 359 (2) (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-015-2507-0
Neutrinos in the holographic dark energy model: constraints from latest measurements of expansion history and growth of structure
Jing-Fei Zhang, Ming-Ming Zhao, Yun-He Li and Xin ZhangJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2015 (04) 038 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2015/04/038
Constraining the growth of perturbations with lensing of supernovae
Luca Amendola, Tiago Castro, Valerio Marra and Miguel QuartinMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 449 (3) 2845 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv497
Multimodal Data Fusion: An Overview of Methods, Challenges, and Prospects
Dana Lahat, Tulay Adali and Christian JuttenProceedings of the IEEE 103 (9) 1449 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2015.2460697
PROBING COSMOLOGICAL ISOTROPY WITH TYPE Ia SUPERNOVAE
C. A. P. Bengaly Jr., A. Bernui and J. S. AlcanizThe Astrophysical Journal 808 (1) 39 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/808/1/39
Reconstruction of the null-test for the matter density perturbations
Savvas Nesseris, Domenico Sapone and Juan García-BellidoPhysical Review D 91 (2) (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.91.023004
DIAGNOSING MULTIPLICATIVE ERROR WITH LENSING MAGNIFICATION OF TYPE Ia SUPERNOVAE
Pengjie ZhangThe Astrophysical Journal 806 (1) 45 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/806/1/45
A general reconstruction of the recent expansion history of the universe
S.D.P. Vitenti and M. Penna-LimaJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2015 (09) 045 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2015/09/045
Can a void mimic the Λ in ΛCDM?
Peter Sundell, Edvard Mörtsell and Iiro ViljaJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2015 (08) 037 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2015/08/037
PHYSICAL DUST MODELS FOR THE EXTINCTION TOWARD SUPERNOVA 2014J IN M82
Jian Gao, B. W. Jiang, Aigen Li, Jun Li and Xiaofeng WangThe Astrophysical Journal 807 (2) L26 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/807/2/L26
ILLUMINATING A DARK LENS: A TYPE Ia SUPERNOVA MAGNIFIED BY THE FRONTIER FIELDS GALAXY CLUSTER ABELL 2744
Steven A. Rodney, Brandon Patel, Daniel Scolnic, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 811 (1) 70 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/811/1/70
Non-local gravity and comparison with observational datasets
Yves Dirian, Stefano Foffa, Martin Kunz, Michele Maggiore and Valeria PettorinoJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2015 (04) 044 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2015/04/044
Evidence for self-interaction of charge distribution in charge-coupled devices
A. Guyonnet, P. Astier, P. Antilogus, N. Regnault and P. DohertyAstronomy & Astrophysics 575 A41 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201424897
Backreaction in growing neutrino quintessence
Florian Führer and Christof WetterichPhysical Review D 91 (12) (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.91.123542
Type Ia supernova spectral features in the context of their host galaxy properties
Y.-C. Pan, M. Sullivan, K. Maguire, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 446 (1) 354 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu2121
High-velocity features of calcium and silicon in the spectra of Type Ia supernovae
Jeffrey M. Silverman, József Vinkó, G. H. Marion, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 451 (2) 1973 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv1011