Improved cosmological constraints from a joint analysis of the SDSS-II and SNLS supernova samples
A&A, 568 (2014) A22
Published online: 2014-08-08
Articles citing this article
The Citing articles tool gives a list of articles citing the current article.
The citing articles come from EDP Sciences database, as well as other publishers participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking Program. You can set up your personal account to receive an email alert each time this article is cited by a new article (see the menu on the right-hand side of the abstract page).
Cited article:
This article has been cited by the following article(s):
Cosmological implications of ultralight axionlike fields
Vivian Poulin, Tristan L. Smith, Daniel Grin, Tanvi Karwal and Marc KamionkowskiPhysical Review D 98 (8) (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.98.083525
Phase space description of nonlocal teleparallel gravity
Kazuharu Bamba, Davood Momeni and Mudhahir Al AjmiThe European Physical Journal C 78 (9) (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-6240-z
Neutrino Mass Ordering from Oscillations and Beyond: 2018 Status and Future Prospects
Pablo F. de Salas, Stefano Gariazzo, Olga Mena, Christoph A. Ternes and Mariam TórtolaFrontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences 5 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.3389/fspas.2018.00036
Constraints on the sum of the neutrino masses in dynamical dark energy models with w(z)≥−1 are tighter than those obtained in ΛCDM
Sunny Vagnozzi, Suhail Dhawan, Martina Gerbino, et al.Physical Review D 98 (8) (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.98.083501
How Many Kilonovae Can Be Found in Past, Present, and Future Survey Data Sets?
D. Scolnic, R. Kessler, D. Brout, P. S. Cowperthwaite, M. Soares-Santos, J. Annis, K. Herner, H.-Y. Chen, M. Sako, Z. Doctor, R. E. Butler, A. Palmese, H. T. Diehl, J. Frieman, D. E. Holz, E. Berger, R. Chornock, V. A. Villar, M. Nicholl, R. Biswas, R. Hounsell, R. J. Foley, J. Metzger, A. Rest, J. García-Bellido, et al.The Astrophysical Journal Letters 852 (1) L3 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/aa9d82
The observational constraints on the flat $$\phi $$ϕCDM models
Olga Avsajanishvili, Yiwen Huang, Lado Samushia and Tina KahniashviliThe European Physical Journal C 78 (9) (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-6233-y
Constraints on the sum of neutrino masses using cosmological data including the latest extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey DR14 quasar sample
Sai Wang, Yi-Fan Wang and Dong-Mei XiaChinese Physics C 42 (6) 065103 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1137/42/6/065103
MassiveNuS: cosmological massive neutrino simulations
Jia Liu, Simeon Bird, José Manuel Zorrilla Matilla, et al.Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2018 (03) 049 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2018/03/049
The effects of a varying cosmological constant on the particle horizon
Ahmet M ÖztaşMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 481 (2) 2228 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty2375
Dynamical systems analysis of the cubic galileon beyond the exponential potential and the cosmological analogue of the vDVZ discontinuity
Roberto De Arcia, Tame Gonzalez, Francisco Antonio Horta-Rangel, et al.Classical and Quantum Gravity 35 (14) 145001 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/aac6a5
Bayesian optimization for likelihood-free cosmological inference
Florent LeclercqPhysical Review D 98 (6) (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.98.063511
Statistical Test of Distance–Duality Relation with Type Ia Supernovae and Baryon Acoustic Oscillations
Cong Ma and Pier-Stefano CorasanitiThe Astrophysical Journal 861 (2) 124 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aac88f
Effects of Low Anisotropy on Generalized Ghost Dark Energy in Galileon Gravity
H. Hossienkhani, V. Fayaz, A. Jafari and H. YousefiCommunications in Theoretical Physics 69 (4) 467 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0253-6102/69/4/467
Tale of stable interacting dark energy, observational signatures, and the H0 tension
Weiqiang Yang, Supriya Pan, Eleonora Di Valentino, et al.Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2018 (09) 019 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2018/09/019
Cluster counts: Calibration issue or new physics?
Ziad Sakr, Stéphane Ilić, Alain Blanchard, Jamal Bittar and Wehbeh FarahAstronomy & Astrophysics 620 A78 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201833151
Measuring the Hubble constant with Type Ia supernovae as near-infrared standard candles
Suhail Dhawan, Saurabh W. Jha and Bruno LeibundgutAstronomy & Astrophysics 609 A72 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201731501
Two transitional type Ia supernovae located in the Fornax cluster member NGC 1404: SN 2007on and SN 2011iv
C. Gall, M. D. Stritzinger, C. Ashall, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 611 A58 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201730886
Cosmological tests with the joint lightcurve analysis
F. Melia, J.-J. Wei, R. S. Maier and X.-F. WuEPL (Europhysics Letters) 123 (5) 59002 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/123/59002
Dynamical dark energy vs. Λ = const in light of observations
Joan Solà Peracaula, Javier de Cruz Pérez and Adrià Gómez-ValentEPL (Europhysics Letters) 121 (3) 39001 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/121/39001
The Foundation Supernova Survey: motivation, design, implementation, and first data release
Ryan J Foley, Daniel Scolnic, Armin Rest, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 475 (1) 193 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx3136
Testing the isotropy of the Universe with Type Ia supernovae in a model-independent way
F Y Wang and Yu-Yang WangMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 474 (3) 3516 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx2982
Physical condition for the slowing down of cosmic acceleration
Ming-Jian Zhang and Jun-Qing XiaNuclear Physics B 929 438 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2018.02.020
Measuring growth index in a universe with massive neutrinos: A revisit of the general relativity test with the latest observations
Ming-Ming Zhao, Jing-Fei Zhang and Xin ZhangPhysics Letters B 779 473 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2018.02.042
Evolution of Dark Energy Reconstructed from the Latest Observations
Yuting Wang, Levon Pogosian, Gong-Bo Zhao and Alex ZuccaThe Astrophysical Journal Letters 869 (1) L8 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/aaf238
Cosmological parameter forecasts for H i intensity mapping experiments using the angular power spectrum
L. C. Olivari, C. Dickinson, R. A. Battye, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 473 (3) 4242 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx2621
Observational constraints on oscillating dark-energy parametrizations
Supriya Pan, Emmanuel N. Saridakis and Weiqiang YangPhysical Review D 98 (6) (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.98.063510
Updated bounds on sum of neutrino masses in various cosmological scenarios
Shouvik Roy Choudhury and Sandhya ChoubeyJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2018 (09) 017 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2018/09/017
Wide-area tomography of CMB lensing and the growth of cosmological density fluctuations
J A Peacock and M BilickiMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 481 (1) 1133 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty2314
Exploring the Tension between Current Cosmic Microwave Background and Cosmic Shear Data
Eleonora Di Valentino and Sarah BridleSymmetry 10 (11) 585 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.3390/sym10110585
The First Data Release from SweetSpot: 74 Supernovae in 36 Nights on WIYN+WHIRC
Anja Weyant, W. M. Wood-Vasey, Richard Joyce, Lori Allen, Peter Garnavich, Saurabh W. Jha, Jessica R. Kroboth, Thomas Matheson and Kara A. PonderThe Astronomical Journal 155 (5) 201 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/aab901
Euclid: Superluminous supernovae in the Deep Survey
C. Inserra, R. C. Nichol, D. Scovacricchi, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 609 A83 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201731758
Model-independent predictions for smooth cosmic acceleration scenarios
V. Miranda and Cora DvorkinPhysical Review D 98 (4) (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.98.043537
Dark Energy Survey year 1 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and weak lensing
T. M. C. Abbott, F. B. Abdalla, A. Alarcon, et al.Physical Review D 98 (4) (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.98.043526
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 results: Cosmological constraints from cosmic shear
M. A. Troxel, N. MacCrann, J. Zuntz, et al.Physical Review D 98 (4) (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.98.043528
Physical constraints on interacting dark energy models
J. E. Gonzalez, H. H. B. Silva, R. Silva and J. S. AlcanizThe European Physical Journal C 78 (9) (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-6212-3
Latest astronomical constraints on some non-linear parametric dark energy models
Weiqiang Yang, Supriya Pan and Andronikos PaliathanasisMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 475 (2) 2605 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty019
Does the Hubble constant tension call for new physics?
Edvard Mörtsell and Suhail DhawanJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2018 (09) 025 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2018/09/025
Model-independent cosmological constraints from growth and expansion
Benjamin L'Huillier, Arman Shafieloo and Hyungjin KimMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 476 (3) 3263 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty398
Viability of phantom dark energy as a quantum field in first-order perturbation theory of FLRW spacetime
Kevin J. LudwickPhysical Review D 98 (4) (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.98.043519
Constraining the expansion history and early dark energy with line intensity mapping
Kirit S. Karkare and Simeon BirdPhysical Review D 98 (4) (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.98.043529
Large-scale (in) stability analysis of an exactly solved coupled dark-energy model
Weiqiang Yang, Supriya Pan, Ramón Herrera and Subenoy ChakrabortyPhysical Review D 98 (4) (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.98.043517
Updated constraints on f(T) models using direct and indirect measurements of the Hubble parameter
Spyros Basilakos, Savvas Nesseris, Fotios K. Anagnostopoulos and Emmanuel N. SaridakisJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2018 (08) 008 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2018/08/008
Model independent inference of the expansion history and implications for the growth of structure
Shahab Joudaki, Manoj Kaplinghat, Ryan Keeley and David KirkbyPhysical Review D 97 (12) (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.97.123501
Cosmological constant constraints from observation-derived energy condition bounds and their application to bimetric massive gravity
M. E. S. Alves, F. C. Carvalho, J. C. N. de Araujo, M. Penna-Lima and S. D. P. VitentiThe European Physical Journal C 78 (9) (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-6190-5
Thermonuclear supernovae and cosmology⋆
Inma Domínguez and Lluís GalbanyThe European Physical Journal Plus 133 (8) (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/i2018-12176-9
Observational constraints on conformal time symmetry, missing matter and double dark energy
J. Alberto Vázquez, S. Hee, M.P. Hobson, et al.Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2018 (07) 062 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2018/07/062
New general parametrization of quintessence fields and its observational constraints
Nandan Roy, Alma X. Gonzalez-Morales and L. Arturo Ureña-LópezPhysical Review D 98 (6) (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.98.063530
Lecture Notes in Cosmology
Oliver PiattellaUNITEXT for Physics, Lecture Notes in Cosmology 365 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95570-4_11
Limits on Stellar-Mass Compact Objects as Dark Matter from Gravitational Lensing of Type Ia Supernovae
Miguel Zumalacárregui and Uroš SeljakPhysical Review Letters 121 (14) (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.141101
Cosmology in scalar-vector-tensor theories
Lavinia Heisenberg, Ryotaro Kase and Shinji TsujikawaPhysical Review D 98 (2) (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.98.024038
A tomographic test of cosmological principle using the JLA compilation of type Ia supernovae
Zhe Chang, Hai-Nan Lin, Yu Sang and Sai WangMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 478 (3) 3633 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty1120
Cosmological constraints on γ -gravity models
Clara Álvarez Luna, Spyros Basilakos and Savvas NesserisPhysical Review D 98 (2) (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.98.023516
The effect of inhomogeneities on dark energy constraints
Suhail Dhawan, Ariel Goobar and Edvard MörtsellJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2018 (07) 024 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2018/07/024
X-ray limits on the progenitor system of the Type Ia supernova 2017ejb
Charles D Kilpatrick, David A Coulter, Georgios Dimitriadis, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 481 (3) 4123 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty2503
Hubble Parameter and Baryon Acoustic Oscillation Measurement Constraints on the Hubble Constant, the Deviation from the Spatially Flat ΛCDM Model, the Deceleration–Acceleration Transition Redshift, and Spatial Curvature
Hai Yu, Bharat Ratra and Fa-Yin WangThe Astrophysical Journal 856 (1) 3 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aab0a2
Testing Viable f(T) Models with Current Observations
Bing Xu, Hongwei Yu and Puxun WuThe Astrophysical Journal 855 (2) 89 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aaad12
SN 2012fr: Ultraviolet, Optical, and Near-infrared Light Curves of a Type Ia Supernova Observed within a Day of Explosion*
Carlos Contreras, M. M. Phillips, Christopher R. Burns, Anthony L. Piro, B. J. Shappee, Maximilian D. Stritzinger, C. Baltay, Peter J. Brown, Emmanuel Conseil, Alain Klotz, Peter E. Nugent, Damien Turpin, Stu Parker, D. Rabinowitz, Eric Y. Hsiao, Nidia Morrell, Abdo Campillay, Sergio Castellón, Carlos Corco, Consuelo González, Kevin Krisciunas, Jacqueline Serón, Brad E. Tucker, E. S. Walker, E. Baron, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 859 (1) 24 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aabaf8
Comparing dark energy models with current observational data
Sixiang Wen, Shuang Wang and Xiaolin LuoJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2018 (07) 011 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2018/07/011
Conservative cosmology: combining data with allowance for unknown systematics
José Luis Bernal and John A. PeacockJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2018 (07) 002 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2018/07/002
Can holographic dark energy models fit the observational data?
Mohammad Malekjani, Mehdi Rezaei and Iman A. AkhlaghiPhysical Review D 98 (6) (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.98.063533
Early Observations of the Type Ia Supernova iPTF 16abc: A Case of Interaction with Nearby, Unbound Material and/or Strong Ejecta Mixing
A. A. Miller, Y. Cao, A. L. Piro, N. Blagorodnova, B. D. Bue, S. B. Cenko, S. Dhawan, R. Ferretti, O. D. Fox, C. Fremling, A. Goobar, D. A. Howell, G. Hosseinzadeh, M. M. Kasliwal, R. R. Laher, R. Lunnan, F. J. Masci, C. McCully, P. E. Nugent, J. Sollerman, F. Taddia and S. R. KulkarniThe Astrophysical Journal 852 (2) 100 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aaa01f
Non-perturbative aspects of galileon duality
Peter Millington, Florian Niedermann and Antonio PadillaThe European Physical Journal C 78 (7) (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-6029-0
Dark energy, α-attractors, and large-scale structure surveys
Yashar Akrami, Renata Kallosh, Andrei Linde and Valeri VardanyanJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2018 (06) 041 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2018/06/041
Type Ia Supernova Distances at Redshift >1.5 from the Hubble Space Telescope Multi-cycle Treasury Programs: The Early Expansion Rate
Adam G. Riess, Steven A. Rodney, Daniel M. Scolnic, Daniel L. Shafer, Louis-Gregory Strolger, Henry C. Ferguson, Marc Postman, Or Graur, Dan Maoz, Saurabh W. Jha, Bahram Mobasher, Stefano Casertano, Brian Hayden, Alberto Molino, Jens Hjorth, Peter M. Garnavich, David O. Jones, Robert P. Kirshner, Anton M. Koekemoer, Norman A. Grogin, Gabriel Brammer, Shoubaneh Hemmati, Mark Dickinson, Peter M. Challis, Schuyler Wolff, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 853 (2) 126 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aaa5a9
Entropic gravity from noncommutative black holes
Rafael C. Nunes, Hooman Moradpour, Edésio M. Barboza, Everton M. C. Abreu and Jorge Ananias NetoInternational Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics 15 (01) 1850004 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219887818500044
Environmental Dependence of Type Ia Supernova Luminosities from a Sample without a Local–Global Difference in Host Star Formation
Young-Lo Kim, Mathew Smith, Mark Sullivan and Young-Wook LeeThe Astrophysical Journal 854 (1) 24 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aaa127
The KBC Void: Consistency with Supernovae Type Ia and the Kinematic SZ Effect in a ΛLTB Model
Benjamin L. Hoscheit and Amy J. BargerThe Astrophysical Journal 854 (1) 46 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aaa59b
Constraining the Dark Matter Vacuum Energy Interaction Using the EDGES 21 cm Absorption Signal
Yuting Wang and Gong-Bo ZhaoThe Astrophysical Journal 869 (1) 26 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aaeb9c
SNEMO: Improved Empirical Models for Type Ia Supernovae
C. Saunders, G. Aldering, P. Antilogus, S. Bailey, C. Baltay, K. Barbary, D. Baugh, K. Boone, S. Bongard, C. Buton, J. Chen, N. Chotard, Y. Copin, S. Dixon, P. Fagrelius, H. K. Fakhouri, U. Feindt, D. Fouchez, E. Gangler, B. Hayden, W. Hillebrandt, A. G. Kim, M. Kowalski, D. Küsters, P.-F. Leget, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 869 (2) 167 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aaec7e
Observational constraints on the interaction between dark matter and dark energy
Daniela Grandón and Víctor H. CárdenasJournal of Physics: Conference Series 1043 012025 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1043/1/012025
Asymmetry and dark energy evolution
Víctor H. CárdenasJournal of Physics: Conference Series 1043 012019 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1043/1/012019
Interacting Dark Energy in the Dark SU(2) R Model
Ricardo G. Landim, Rafael J. F. Marcondes, Fabrízio F. Bernardi and Elcio AbdallaBrazilian Journal of Physics 48 (4) 364 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13538-018-0572-x
A spectroscopic look at the gravitationally lensed Type Ia supernova 2016geu at z = 0.409
Zach Cano, Jonatan Selsing, Jens Hjorth, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 473 (3) 4257 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx2624
The ESO’s VLT type Ia supernova spectral set of the final two years of SNLS
C. Balland, F. Cellier-Holzem, C. Lidman, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 614 A134 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201731924
Cosmological Constraints from Low-Redshift Data
Vladimir V. Luković, Balakrishna S. Haridasu and Nicola VittorioFoundations of Physics 48 (10) 1446 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-018-0202-z
Simulations of the WFIRST Supernova Survey and Forecasts of Cosmological Constraints
R. Hounsell, D. Scolnic, R. J. Foley, R. Kessler, V. Miranda, A. Avelino, R. C. Bohlin, A. V. Filippenko, J. Frieman, S. W. Jha, P. L. Kelly, R. P. Kirshner, K. Mandel, A. Rest, A. G. Riess, S. A. Rodney and L. StrolgerThe Astrophysical Journal 867 (1) 23 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aac08b
Spatial variation of fundamental constants: Testing models with thermonuclear supernovae
C. Negrelli, L. Kraiselburd, S. Landau and E. García-BerroInternational Journal of Modern Physics D 27 (09) 1850099 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218271818500992
Constraint on the generalized Chaplygin gas as an unified dark fluid model after Planck 2015
Hang Li, Weiqiang Yang and Yabo WuPhysics of the Dark Universe 22 60 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dark.2018.09.001
Understanding type Ia supernovae through their U-band spectra
J. Nordin, G. Aldering, P. Antilogus, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 614 A71 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201732137
New parametrization for unified dark matter and dark energy
Zahra Davari, Mohammad Malekjani and Michal ArtymowskiPhysical Review D 97 (12) (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.97.123525
Dark energy with w→−1 : Asymptotic Λ versus pseudo- Λ
Robert J. ScherrerPhysical Review D 97 (12) (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.97.123521
Theoretical and Observational Constraints of Bound Dark Energy with Precision Cosmological Data
Axel de la Macorra and Erick AlmarazPhysical Review Letters 121 (16) (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.161303
Testing the cosmic anisotropy with supernovae data: Hemisphere comparison and dipole fitting
Hua-Kai Deng and Hao WeiPhysical Review D 97 (12) (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.97.123515
Prediction of Supernova Rates in Known Galaxy–Galaxy Strong-lens Systems
Yiping Shu, Adam S. Bolton, Shude Mao, Xi Kang, Guoliang Li and Monika SoraisamThe Astrophysical Journal 864 (1) 91 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aad5ea
Gravitational birefringence and an exotic formula for redshifts
Christian Duval, Johanna Pasquet, Thomas Schücker and André TilquinPhysical Review D 97 (12) (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.97.123508
Neutron star merger GW170817 strongly constrains doubly coupled bigravity
Yashar Akrami, Philippe Brax, Anne-Christine Davis and Valeri VardanyanPhysical Review D 97 (12) (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.97.124010
Dark energy constraints in light of Pantheon SNe Ia, BAO, cosmic chronometers and CMB polarization and lensing data
Deng WangPhysical Review D 97 (12) (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.97.123507
Chandrasekhar and Sub-Chandrasekhar Models for the X-Ray Emission of Type Ia Supernova Remnants. I. Bulk Properties
Héctor Martínez-Rodríguez, Carles Badenes, Shiu-Hang Lee, Daniel J. Patnaude, Adam R. Foster, Hiroya Yamaguchi, Katie Auchettl, Eduardo Bravo, Patrick O. Slane, Anthony L. Piro, Sangwook Park and Shigehiro NagatakiThe Astrophysical Journal 865 (2) 151 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aadaec
Implications of an extended dark energy cosmology with massive neutrinos for cosmological tensions
Vivian Poulin, Kimberly K. Boddy, Simeon Bird and Marc KamionkowskiPhysical Review D 97 (12) (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.97.123504
What do parameterized Om(z) diagnostics tell us in light of recent observations?
Jing-Zhao Qi, Shuo Cao, Marek Biesiada, et al.Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics 18 (6) 066 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-4527/18/6/66
The H0 Tension in Non-flat QCDM Cosmology
Haitao Miao and Zhiqi HuangThe Astrophysical Journal 868 (1) 20 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aae523
Super-Eddington accreting massive black holes explore high- z cosmology: Monte-Carlo simulations
Rong-Gen Cai, Zong-Kuan Guo, Qing-Guo Huang and Tao YangPhysical Review D 97 (12) (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.97.123502
Can the apparent expansion of the universe be attributed to an increasing vacuum refractive index ?
X. Sarazin, F. Couchot, A. Djannati-Ataï and M. UrbanThe European Physical Journal C 78 (6) (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-5932-8
The Standard Cosmological Model: Achievements and Issues
George EllisFoundations of Physics 48 (10) 1226 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-018-0176-x
Observational constraints on Gauss–Bonnet cosmology
Micol Benetti, Simony Santos da Costa, Salvatore Capozziello, Jailson S. Alcaniz and Mariafelicia De LaurentisInternational Journal of Modern Physics D 27 (08) 1850084 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218271818500840
New limits on coupled dark energy model after Planck 2015
Hang Li, Weiqiang Yang, Yabo Wu and Ying JiangPhysics of the Dark Universe 20 78 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dark.2018.04.001
Cosmic acceleration from a single fluid description
Salvatore Capozziello, Rocco D’Agostino and Orlando LuongoPhysics of the Dark Universe 20 1 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dark.2018.02.002
Model independent constraints on transition redshift
J.F. Jesus, R.F.L. Holanda and S.H. PereiraJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2018 (05) 073 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2018/05/073
Self-acceleration in scalar-bimetric theories
Philippe Brax and Patrick ValageasPhysical Review D 97 (10) (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.97.103516
Degeneracy between nonadiabatic dark energy models and ΛCDM : Integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect and the cross correlation of CMB with galaxy clustering data
Hermano Velten, Raquel Emy Fazolo, Rodrigo von Marttens and Syrios GomesPhysical Review D 97 (10) (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.97.103514