Observational constraints on the redshift evolution of X-ray scaling relations of galaxy clusters out to z ~ 1.5
A&A, 535 (2011) A4
Published online: 2011-10-24
Articles citing this article
The Citing articles tool gives a list of articles citing the current article.
The citing articles come from EDP Sciences database, as well as other publishers participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking Program. You can set up your personal account to receive an email alert each time this article is cited by a new article (see the menu on the right-hand side of the abstract page).
Cited article:
This article has been cited by the following article(s):
Galaxy clusters as probes of cosmic isotropy
Konstantinos MigkasPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 383 (2290) (2025)
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2024.0030
The cosmological analysis of X-ray cluster surveys
N. Cerardi, M. Pierre, P. Valageas, C. Garrel and F. PacaudAstronomy & Astrophysics 682 A138 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202347699
Constraining the average magnetic field in galaxy clusters with current and upcoming CMB surveys
Vyoma Muralidhara and Kaustuv BasuJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2024 (11) 010 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2024/11/010
Simulating the LOcal Web (SLOW)
Elena Hernández-Martínez, Klaus Dolag, Benjamin Seidel, Jenny G. Sorce, Nabila Aghanim, Sergey Pilipenko, Stefan Gottlöber, Théo Lebeau and Milena ValentiniAstronomy & Astrophysics 687 A253 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202449460
4733 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-6960-7_118
XMM-SERVS X-ray extended Galaxy Cluster (XVXGC) catalog
Weiwei Xu, Linhua Jiang, Ran Li, Bin Luo, William Nielsen Brandt, Chaoli Zhang and Thomas ErbenAstronomy & Astrophysics 691 A300 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202451064
Measuring the X-ray luminosities of DESI groups from eROSITA Final Equatorial-Depth Survey – I. X-ray luminosity–halo mass scaling relation
Yun-Liang Zheng, Xiaohu Yang, Min He, Shi-Yin Shen, Qingyang Li and Xuejie LiMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 523 (4) 4909 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad1684
FEASTS: IGM Cooling Triggered by Tidal Interactions through the Diffuse H i Phase around NGC 4631
Jing 菁 Wang 王, Dong 冬 Yang 杨, S-H. Oh, Lister Staveley-Smith, Jie Wang, Q. Daniel Wang, Kelley M. Hess, Luis C. Ho, Ligang Hou, Yingjie Jing, Peter Kamphuis, Fujia Li, Xuchen 旭辰 Lin 林, Ziming Liu, Li Shao, Shun 舜 Wang 王 and Ming ZhuThe Astrophysical Journal 944 (1) 102 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/acafe8
Galaxy clusters at z ∼ 1 imaged by ALMA with the Sunyaev–Zel’dovich effect
Tetsu Kitayama, Shutaro Ueda, Nobuhiro Okabe, Takuya Akahori, Matt Hilton, John P Hughes, Yuto Ichinohe, Kotaro Kohno, Eiichiro Komatsu, Yen-Ting Lin, Hironao Miyatake, Masamune Oguri, Cristóbal Sifón, Shigehisa Takakuwa, Motokazu Takizawa, Takahiro Tsutsumi, Joshiwa van Marrewijk and Edward J WollackPublications of the Astronomical Society of Japan 75 (2) 311 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1093/pasj/psac110
The eROSITA Final Equatorial-Depth Survey (eFEDS)
N. Ota, N. T. Nguyen-Dang, I. Mitsuishi, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 669 A110 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202244260
Catalog of X-ray-selected extended galaxy clusters from the ROSAT All-Sky Survey (RXGCC)
Weiwei Xu, Miriam E. Ramos-Ceja, Florian Pacaud, Thomas H. Reiprich and Thomas ErbenAstronomy & Astrophysics 658 A59 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202140908
Dynamical state of galaxy clusters evaluated from X-ray images
Z S Yuan, J L Han and Z L WenMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 513 (2) 3013 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac1037
The eROSITA Final Equatorial-Depth Survey (eFEDS)
I-Non Chiu, Vittorio Ghirardini, Ang Liu, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 661 A11 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202141755
Redshift evolution of galaxy group X-ray properties in the Simba simulations
Dylan Robson and Romeel DavéMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 518 (4) 5826 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac2982
The 700 ks Chandra Spiderweb Field
P. Tozzi, R. Gilli, A. Liu, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 667 A134 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202244337
Tidal virialization of dark matter haloes with clustering dark energy
Francesco Pace and Carlo SchimdJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2022 (03) 014 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2022/03/014
Handbook of X-ray and Gamma-ray Astrophysics
Lorenzo Lovisari and Ben J. MaughanHandbook of X-ray and Gamma-ray Astrophysics 1 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4544-0_118-1
CS-ROMER: a novel compressed sensing framework for Faraday depth reconstruction
Miguel Cárcamo, Anna M M Scaife, Emma L Alexander and J Patrick LeahyMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 518 (2) 1955 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac3031
Baryon cycles in the biggest galaxies
Megan Donahue and G. Mark VoitPhysics Reports 973 1 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2022.04.005
The thermalization of massive galaxy clusters
Mauro Sereno, Lorenzo Lovisari, Weiguang Cui and Gerrit SchellenbergerMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 507 (4) 5214 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab2435
Cosmological implications of the anisotropy of ten galaxy cluster scaling relations
K. Migkas, F. Pacaud, G. Schellenberger, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 649 A151 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202140296
X-ray properties of high-richness CAMIRA clusters in the Hyper Suprime-Cam Subaru Strategic Program field
Naomi Ota, Ikuyuki Mitsuishi, Yasunori Babazaki, Hiroki Akamatsu, Yuto Ichinohe, Shutaro Ueda, Nobuhiro Okabe, Masamune Oguri, Ryuichi Fujimoto, Takashi Hamana, Keita Miyaoka, Satoshi Miyazaki, Hanae Otani, Keigo Tanaka, Ayumi Tsuji and Atsushi YoshidaPublications of the Astronomical Society of Japan 72 (1) (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/pasj/psz118
X-Ray Scaling Relations for a Representative Sample of Planck-selected Clusters Observed with XMM-Newton
Lorenzo Lovisari, Gerrit Schellenberger, Mauro Sereno, Stefano Ettori, Gabriel W. Pratt, William R. Forman, Christine Jones, Felipe Andrade-Santos, Scott Randall and Ralph KraftThe Astrophysical Journal 892 (2) 102 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab7997
Deeply cooled core of the Phoenix galaxy cluster imaged by ALMA with the Sunyaev–Zel’dovich effect
Tetsu Kitayama, Shutaro Ueda, Takuya Akahori, Eiichiro Komatsu, Ryohei Kawabe, Kotaro Kohno, Shigehisa Takakuwa, Motokazu Takizawa, Takahiro Tsutsumi and Kohji YoshikawaPublications of the Astronomical Society of Japan 72 (2) (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/pasj/psaa009
Mock catalogs for the extragalactic X-ray sky: Simulating AGN surveys with ATHENA and with the AXIS probe
S. Marchesi, R. Gilli, G. Lanzuisi, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 642 A184 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202038622
Mapping the relativistic electron gas temperature across the sky
Jens Chluba and Mathieu RemazeillesMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 494 (4) 5734 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa1135
Probing cosmic isotropy with a new X-ray galaxy cluster sample through theLX–Tscaling relation
K. Migkas, G. Schellenberger, T. H. Reiprich, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 636 A15 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201936602
Aging haloes: implications of the magnitude gap on conditional statistics of stellar and gas properties of massive haloes
Arya Farahi, Matthew Ho and Hy TracMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 493 (1) 1361 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa291
Multiwavelength cross-correlation analysis of the simulated cosmic web
C Gheller and F VazzaMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 494 (4) 5603 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa1032
High-redshift galaxy groups as seen by ATHENA/WFI
Chaoli Zhang, Miriam E. Ramos-Ceja, Florian Pacaud and Thomas H. ReiprichAstronomy & Astrophysics 642 A17 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201937329
A survey of the thermal and non-thermal properties of cosmic filaments
C Gheller and F VazzaMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 486 (1) 981 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz843
The YSZ,Planck – YSZ,XMM scaling relation and its difference between cool-core and non-cool-core clusters
Yue Zhu, Yuan-Hao Wang, Hai-Hui Zhao, et al.Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics 19 (7) 104 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-4527/19/7/104
Characterization of diffuse X-ray emission from IGR J17448–3232: an implication of a line-of-sight merging activity
Shoko Watanabe, Shigeo Yamauchi, Kumiko K Nobukawa and Hiroki AkamatsuPublications of the Astronomical Society of Japan 71 (6) (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1093/pasj/psz098
Can we neglect relativistic temperature corrections in thePlanckthermal SZ analysis?
Mathieu Remazeilles, Boris Bolliet, Aditya Rotti and Jens ChlubaMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 483 (3) 3459 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty3352
Halo Concentrations and the New Baseline X-Ray Luminosity–Temperature and Mass Relations of Galaxy Clusters
Yutaka Fujita and Han AungThe Astrophysical Journal 875 (1) 26 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab0e02
Weak-lensing mass calibration of the Sunyaev–Zel’dovich effect using APEX-SZ galaxy clusters
B Westbrook, C Tucker, C L Reichardt, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 488 (2) 1728 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty1904
Mass variance from archival X-ray properties of Dark Energy Survey Year-1 galaxy clusters
A Farahi, X Chen, A E Evrard, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 490 (3) 3341 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz2689
Projection effects in galaxy cluster samples: insights from X-ray redshifts
M. E. Ramos-Ceja, F. Pacaud, T. H. Reiprich, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 626 A48 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201935111
The redshift evolution of X-ray and Sunyaev–Zel’dovich scaling relations in the fable simulations
Nicholas A Henden, Ewald Puchwein and Debora SijackiMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 489 (2) 2439 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz2301
Evolutionary phases of merging clusters as seen by LOFAR
A. Wilber, M. Brüggen, A. Bonafede, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 622 A25 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201833884
Magnetic fields and extraordinarily bright radio emission in the X-ray faint galaxy group MRC 0116 + 111
J Jacob, S W Allen, H Böhringer, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 486 (4) 5430 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz1228
Mass–Richness Relations for X-Ray and SZE-selected Clusters at 0.4 < z < 2.0 as Seen by Spitzer at 4.5 μm
A. Rettura, R. Chary, J. Krick and S. EttoriThe Astrophysical Journal 867 (1) 12 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aad818
Forecasts on dark energy from the X-ray cluster survey with eROSITA: constraints from counts and clustering
Annalisa Pillepich, Thomas H Reiprich, Cristiano Porciani, Katharina Borm and Andrea MerloniMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 481 (1) 613 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty2240
Evaluating tests of virialization and substructure using galaxy clusters in the ORELSE survey
N Rumbaugh, B C Lemaux, A R Tomczak, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 478 (1) 1403 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty1181
Planck's view on the spectrum of the Sunyaev–Zeldovich effect
Jens Erler, Kaustuv Basu, Jens Chluba and Frank BertoldiMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 476 (3) 3360 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty327
Cosmological hydrodynamical simulations of galaxy clusters: X-ray scaling relations and their evolution
N Truong, E Rasia, P Mazzotta, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 474 (3) 4089 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx2927
Discovery of large-scale diffuse radio emission in low-mass galaxy cluster Abell 1931
M Brüggen, D Rafferty, A Bonafede, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 477 (3) 3461 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty851
XMM-Newton X-ray and HST weak gravitational lensing study of the extremely X-ray luminous galaxy cluster Cl J120958.9+495352 (z = 0.902)
Sophia Thölken, Tim Schrabback, Thomas H. Reiprich, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 610 A71 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201730913
A new X-ray-selected sample of very extended galaxy groups from the ROSAT All-Sky Survey
Weiwei Xu, Miriam E. Ramos-Ceja, Florian Pacaud, Thomas H. Reiprich and Thomas ErbenAstronomy & Astrophysics 619 A162 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201833062
Cluster mass calibration at high redshift: HST weak lensing analysis of 13 distant galaxy clusters from the South Pole Telescope Sunyaev–Zel'dovich Survey
T Schrabback, D Applegate, J P Dietrich, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 474 (2) 2635 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx2666
A sample of 1959 massive galaxy clusters at high redshifts
Z L Wen and J L HanMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 481 (3) 4158 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty2533
Simulations of extragalactic magnetic fields and of their observables
F Vazza, M Brüggen, C Gheller, et al.Classical and Quantum Gravity 34 (23) 234001 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/aa8e60
HICOSMO – cosmology with a complete sample of galaxy clusters – I. Data analysis, sample selection and luminosity–mass scaling relation
G. Schellenberger and T. H. ReiprichMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 469 (3) 3738 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx1022
eROSITA cluster cosmology forecasts: Cluster temperature substructure bias
F. Hofmann, J. S. Sanders, N. Clerc, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 606 A118 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201730742
HIFLUGCS: X-ray luminosity-dynamical mass relation and its implications for mass calibrations with the SPIDERS and 4MOST surveys
Yu-Ying Zhang, Thomas H. Reiprich, Peter Schneider, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 599 A138 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201628971
The Extended Northern ROSAT Galaxy Cluster Survey (NORAS II). I. Survey Construction and First Results
Hans Böhringer, Gayoung Chon, Jörg Retzlaff, Joachim Trümper, Klaus Meisenheimer and Norbert SchartelThe Astronomical Journal 153 (5) 220 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/aa67ed
DISCOVERY OF A GALAXY CLUSTER WITH A VIOLENTLY STARBURSTING CORE AT z = 2.506
Tao Wang, David Elbaz, Emanuele Daddi, Alexis Finoguenov, Daizhong Liu, Corentin Schreiber, Sergio Martín, Veronica Strazzullo, Francesco Valentino, Remco van der Burg, Anita Zanella, Laure Ciesla, Raphael Gobat, Amandine Le Brun, Maurilio Pannella, Mark Sargent, Xinwen Shu, Qinghua Tan, Nico Cappelluti and Yanxia LiThe Astrophysical Journal 828 (1) 56 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.3847/0004-637X/828/1/56
Constraining the efficiency of cosmic ray acceleration by cluster shocks
F. Vazza, M. Brüggen, D. Wittor, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 459 (1) 70 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw584
Cosmology and astrophysics from relaxed galaxy clusters – III. Thermodynamic profiles and scaling relations
A. B. Mantz, S. W. Allen, R. G. Morris and R. W. SchmidtMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 456 (4) 4020 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv2899
Weighing the giants– V. Galaxy cluster scaling relations
Adam B. Mantz, Steven W. Allen, R. Glenn Morris, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 463 (4) 3582 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw2250
Next generation cosmology: constraints from theEuclidgalaxy cluster survey
B. Sartoris, A. Biviano, C. Fedeli, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 459 (2) 1764 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw630
High significance detection of the tSZ effect relativistic corrections
G. HurierAstronomy & Astrophysics 596 A61 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201629726
The XXL Survey
P. A. Giles, B. J. Maughan, F. Pacaud, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 592 A3 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201526886
A Gibbs sampler for multivariate linear regression
Adam B. MantzMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 457 (2) 1279 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv3008
Constraining the intracluster pressure profile from the thermal SZ power spectrum
M. E. Ramos-Ceja, K. Basu, F. Pacaud and F. BertoldiAstronomy & Astrophysics 583 A111 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201425534
Cosmological constraints from the observed angular cross-power spectrum between Sunyaev-Zel’dovich and X-ray surveys
G. Hurier, M. Douspis, N. Aghanim, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 576 A90 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201425555
The physics inside the scaling relations for X-ray galaxy clusters: gas clumpiness, gas mass fraction and slope of the pressure profile
S. EttoriMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 446 (3) 2629 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu2292
CoMaLit – IV. Evolution and self-similarity of scaling relations with the galaxy cluster mass
Mauro Sereno and Stefano EttoriMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 450 (4) 3675 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv814
CHANDRADEEP OBSERVATION OF XDCP J0044.0-2033, A MASSIVE GALAXY CLUSTER ATz> 1.5
P. Tozzi, J. S. Santos, M. J. Jee, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 799 (1) 93 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/799/1/93
KAT-7 detection of radio halo emission in the Triangulum Australis galaxy cluster
Anna M. M. Scaife, Nadeem Oozeer, Francesco de Gasperin, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 451 (4) 4021 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv911
PICACS: self-consistent modelling of galaxy cluster scaling relations
B. J. MaughanMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 437 (2) 1171 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stt1931
SCALING RELATIONS AND X-RAY PROPERTIES OF MODERATE-LUMINOSITY GALAXY CLUSTERS FROM 0.3
Thomas Connor, Megan Donahue, Ming Sun, et al.
The Astrophysical Journal 794 (1) 48 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/794/1/48
The Astrophysical Journal 794 (1) 48 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/794/1/48
Planck2013 results. XXIX. ThePlanckcatalogue of Sunyaev-Zeldovich sources
P. A. R. Ade, N. Aghanim, C. Armitage-Caplan, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 571 A29 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201321523
The extended ROSAT-ESO Flux Limited X-ray Galaxy Cluster Survey (REFLEX II)
Hans Böhringer, Gayoung Chon and Chris A. CollinsAstronomy & Astrophysics 570 A31 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201323155
The 400d Galaxy Cluster Survey weak lensing programme
Holger Israel, Thomas H. Reiprich, Thomas Erben, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 564 A129 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201322870
Kinematic analysis of a sample of X-ray luminous distant galaxy clusters
A. Nastasi, H. Böhringer, R. Fassbender, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 564 A17 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201322321
The XMM-LSS survey: the Class 1 cluster sample over the extended 11 deg2 and its spatial distribution
N. Clerc, C. Adami, M. Lieu, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 444 (3) 2723 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu1625
Multifrequency constraints on the nonthermal pressure in galaxy clusters
S. Colafrancesco, M. S. Emritte, N. Mhlahlo and P. MarchegianiAstronomy & Astrophysics 566 A42 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201321605
Constraints on the winds of hot subdwarf stars from X-ray observations of two sdB binaries with compact companions: CD -30 11223 and PG 1232-136
S. Mereghetti, N. La Palombara, P. Esposito, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 441 (3) 2684 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu773
Constraining galaxy cluster temperatures and redshifts with eROSITA survey data
K. Borm, T. H. Reiprich, I. Mohammed and L. LovisariAstronomy & Astrophysics 567 A65 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201322643
Galaxy population properties of the massive X-ray luminous galaxy cluster XDCP J0044.0-2033 atz= 1.58
R. Fassbender, A. Nastasi, J. S. Santos, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 568 A5 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201423941
Initial conditions for idealized clusters mergers, simulating ‘El Gordo’
J. M. F. DonnertMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 438 (3) 1971 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stt2291
Modeling the cross power spectrum of the Sunyaev-Zel’dovich and X-ray surveys
G. Hurier, N. Aghanim and M. DouspisAstronomy & Astrophysics 568 A57 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201423761
Scaling Relations for Galaxy Clusters: Properties and Evolution
S. Giodini, L. Lovisari, E. Pointecouteau, et al.Space Science Reviews 177 (1-4) 247 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-013-9994-5
THE X-RAY-OPTICAL RELATIONS FOR NINE CLUSTERS ATz= 0.7-1.1 FROM THE ORELSE SURVEY
N. Rumbaugh, D. D. Kocevski, R. R. Gal, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 763 (2) 124 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/763/2/124
Distant galaxy clusters in a deepXMM-Newtonfield within the CFTHLS D4
A. de Hoon, G. Lamer, A. Schwope, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 551 A8 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201220389
Distant galaxy clusters in the XMM Large Scale Structure survey
J. P. Willis, N. Clerc, M. N. Bremer, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 430 (1) 134 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sts540
MAPPING COMPOUND COSMIC TELESCOPES CONTAINING MULTIPLE PROJECTED CLUSTER-SCALE HALOS
S. Mark Ammons, Kenneth C. Wong, Ann I. Zabludoff and Charles R. KeetonThe Astrophysical Journal 781 (1) 2 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/781/1/2
Distant clusters of galaxies in a deep XMM‐Newton observation
A. de Hoon, G. Lamer, A. Schwope, M. Mühlegger, R. Fassbender, H. Böhringer, M. Lerchster, A. Nastasi, R. Šuhada, P. Rosati, D. Pierini, J.S. Santos and H. QuintanaAstronomische Nachrichten 334 (4-5) 470 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1002/asna.201211883
A GOOD MASS PROXY FOR GALAXY CLUSTERS WITHXMM-NEWTON
Hai-Hui Zhao, Shu-Mei Jia, Yong Chen, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 778 (2) 124 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/778/2/124
Detection and characterisation of the first Planck high‐z candidates
I. Flores‐CachoAstronomische Nachrichten 334 (4-5) 449 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1002/asna.201211878
The generalized scaling relations for X-ray galaxy clusters: the most powerful mass proxy
S. EttoriMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 435 (2) 1265 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stt1368
The 2XMMi/SDSS Galaxy Cluster Survey
A. Takey, A. Schwope and G. LamerAstronomy & Astrophysics 558 A75 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201220213
Sunyaev-Zel'dovich observations with AMI of the hottest galaxy clusters detected in the XMM-Newton Cluster Survey
A. C. T. W. Shimwell, C. Rodriguez-Gonzalvez, F. Feroz, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 433 (4) 2920 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stt932
The extended ROSAT-ESO flux limited X-ray galaxy cluster survey (REFLEX II) II. Construction and properties of the survey
H. Böhringer, G. Chon, C. A. Collins, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 555 A30 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201220722
TheSwiftX-ray Telescope Cluster Survey: data reduction and cluster catalog for the GRB fields
E. Tundo, A. Moretti, P. Tozzi, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 547 A57 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201219038
Modelling self-similar appearance of galaxy clusters in X-rays
H. Böhringer, K. Dolag and G. ChonAstronomy & Astrophysics 539 A120 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201118000
First simultaneous optical/near-infrared imaging of an X-ray selected, high-redshift cluster of galaxies with GROND
D. Pierini, R. Šuhada, R. Fassbender, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 540 A45 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201116674
The XMM-BCS galaxy cluster survey
R. Šuhada, J. Song, H. Böhringer, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 537 A39 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201117214
The polytropic approximation and X-ray scaling relations: constraints on gas and dark matter profiles for galaxy groups and clusters
Pedro R. Capelo, Paolo S. Coppi and Priyamvada NatarajanMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 422 (1) 686 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20648.x