EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 681 (January 2024) A&A, 681 (2024) A86 References
Open Access
Issue
A&A
Volume 681, January 2024
Article Number A86
Number of page(s) 21
Section Numerical methods and codes
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202347118
Published online 19 January 2024
  1. Achille, A., Paolini, G., Mbeng, G., & Soatto, S. 2021, Inform. Inference, 10, 51 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Agrawal, P., Hurley, J., Stevenson, S., Szécsi, D., & Flynn, C. 2020, MNRAS, 497, 4549 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ba, J. L., Kiros, J. R., & Hinton, G. E. 2016, ArXiv e-prints [arXiv: 1607.06450] [Google Scholar]
  4. Barrett, J. W., Mandel, I., Neijssel, C. J., Stevenson, S., & Vigna-Gómez, A. 2017, in Astroinformatics, eds. M. Brescia, S. G. Djorgovski, E. D. Feigelson, G. Longo, & S. Cavuoti, 325, 46 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bazot, M., Bourguignon, S., & Christensen-Dalsgaard, J. 2012, MNRAS, 427, 1847 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bellinger, E. P., Angelou, G. C., Hekker, S., et al. 2016, ApJ, 830, 31 [Google Scholar]
  7. Brott, I., Evans, C. J., Hunter, I., et al. 2011, A&A, 530, A116 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  8. Choi, J., Dotter, A., Conroy, C., et al. 2016, ApJ, 823, 102 [Google Scholar]
  9. Church, R. P., Tout, C. A., & Hurley, J. R. 2009, PASA, 26, 92 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Creevey, O. L., Sordo, R., Pailler, F., et al. 2023, A&A, 674, A26 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  11. Dingle, K., Camargo, C. Q., & Louis, A. A. 2018, Nat. Commun., 9, 761 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Dotter, A. 2016, ApJS, 222, 8 [Google Scholar]
  13. Eldan, R., & Shamir, O. 2016, in Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, 49, 29th Annual Conference on Learning Theory, eds. V. Feldman, A. Rakhlin, & O. Shamir (Columbia University, New York, USA: PMLR), 907 [Google Scholar]
  14. Fix, E., & Hodges, J. L. 1989, Int. Stat. Rev., 57, 238 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Fragos, T., Andrews, J. J., Bavera, S. S., et al. 2023, ApJS, 264, 45 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Glorot, X., & Bengio, Y. 2010, in Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, 9, Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, eds. Y. W. Teh & M. Titterington (Chia Laguna Resort, Sardinia, Italy: PMLR), 249 [Google Scholar]
  17. Gneiting, T. 2011, J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 106, 746 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., Courville, A., & Bach, F. 2017, Deep Learning (MIT Press) [Google Scholar]
  19. Hahnloser, R. H. R., Sarpeshkar, R., Mahowald, M. A., Douglas, R. J., & Seung, H. S. 2000, Nature, 405, 947 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Ho, T. K. 1995, in Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition, 1, 278 [Google Scholar]
  21. Hornik, K., Stinchcombe, M., & White, H. 1989, Neural Netw., 2, 359 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Huber, P. J. 1964, Ann. Math. Stat., 35, 73 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Hurley, J. R., Pols, O. R., & Tout, C. A. 2000, MNRAS, 315, 543 [Google Scholar]
  24. Hurley, J. R., Tout, C. A., & Pols, O. R. 2002, MNRAS, 329, 897 [Google Scholar]
  25. Iorio, G., Mapelli, M., Costa, G., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 524, 426 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Ivakhnenko, A. G., & Lapa, V. 1967, Cybernetics and Forecasting Techniques, 8 (American Elsevier Publishing Company) [Google Scholar]
  27. Jacot, A., Gabriel, F., & Hongler, C. 2018, ArXiv e-prints [arXiv:1806.07572] [Google Scholar]
  28. Jørgensen, B. R., & Lindegren, L. 2005, A&A, 436, 127 [Google Scholar]
  29. Kamlah, A. W. H., Leveque, A., Spurzem, R., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 511, 4060 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Kaufman, C. G., Schervish, M. J., & Nychka, D. W. 2008, J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 103, 1545 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Kennedy, M. C., & O'Hagan, A. 2001, J. Roy. Stat. Soc.: Ser. B (Stat. Methodol.), 63, 425 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. Kerzendorf, W. E., & Sim, S. A. 2014, MNRAS, 440, 387 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Kerzendorf, W. E., Vogl, C., Buchner, J., et al. 2021, ApJ, 910, L23 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. 2014, ArXiv e-prints [arXiv: 1412.6980] [Google Scholar]
  35. Kolmogorov, A. N. 1963, Sankhya, 25, 369 [Google Scholar]
  36. Kruckow, M. U., Tauris, T. M., Langer, N., Kramer, M., & Izzard, R. G. 2018, MNRAS, 481, 1908 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. Ksoll, V. F., Ardizzone, L., Klessen, R., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 499, 5447 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. Lee, J., Xiao, L., Schoenholz, S., et al. 2019, in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 32, eds. H. Wallach, H. Larochelle, A. Beygelzimer, F. d'Alché-Buc, E. Fox, & R. Garnett (Curran Associates, Inc.) [Google Scholar]
  39. Li, T., Davies, G. R., Lyttle, A. J., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 511, 5597 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. Liu, H., Ong, Y.-S., Shen, X., & Cai, J. 2020, IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst., 31, 4405 [Google Scholar]
  41. Lyttle, A. J., Davies, G. R., Li, T., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 505, 2427 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. McKay, M. D., Beckman, R. J., & Conover, W. J. 1979, Technometrics, 21, 239 [Google Scholar]
  43. Ni, W., Tan, S. K., Ng, W. J., & Brown, S. D. 2012, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 51, 6416 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. Nichani, E., Radhakrishnan, A., & Uhler, C. 2020, ArXiv e-prints [arXiv:2010.09610] [Google Scholar]
  45. O’Brien, J. T., Kerzendorf, W. E., Fullard, A., et al. 2021, ApJ, 916, L14 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  46. Paxton, B., Bildsten, L., Dotter, A., et al. 2011, ApJS, 192, 3 [Google Scholar]
  47. Pols, O. R., Schröder, K.-P., Hurley, J. R., Tout, C. A., & Eggleton, P. P. 1998, MNRAS, 298, 525 [Google Scholar]
  48. Riley, J., Agrawal, P., Barrett, J. W., et al. 2022, ApJS, 258, 34 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  49. Rocha, K. A., Andrews, J. J., Berry, C. P. L., et al. 2022, ApJ, 938, 64 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  50. Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., & Williams, R. J. 1985, Learning Internal Representations by Error Propagation, Tech. rep., California Univ San Diego La Jolla Inst for Cognitive Science [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  51. Ryabchikova, T., Piskunov, N., Pakhomov, Y., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 456, 1221 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  52. Sacks, J., Welch, W. J., Mitchell, T. J., & Wynn, H. P. 1989, Stat. Sci., 4, 409 [Google Scholar]
  53. Sana, H., de Mink, S. E., de Koter, A., et al. 2012, Science, 337, 444 [Google Scholar]
  54. Schneider, F. R. N., Langer, N., de Koter, A., et al. 2014, A&A, 570, A66 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  55. Schneider, F. R. N., Ramírez-Agudelo, O. H., Tramper, F., et al. 2018a, A&A, 618, A73 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  56. Schneider, F. R. N., Sana, H., Evans, C. J., et al. 2018b, Science, 359, 69 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  57. Scutt, O. J., Murphy, S. J., Nielsen, M. B., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 525, 5235 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  58. Settles, B. 2009, Active Learning Literature Survey, Computer Sciences, Tech rep. 1648, University of Wisconsin-Madison [Google Scholar]
  59. Springel, V., Pakmor, R., Pillepich, A., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 475, 676 [Google Scholar]
  60. Taggart, R. J. 2022, Electron. J. Stat., 16, 201 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  61. Tanikawa, A., Yoshida, T., Kinugawa, T., Takahashi, K., & Umeda, H. 2020, MNRAS, 495, 4170 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  62. Taylor, S. R., & Gerosa, D. 2018, Phys. Rev. D, 98, 083017 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  63. Tofallis, C. 2015, J. Oper. Res. Soc., 66, 1352 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  64. Van Tooren, C., & Haas, T. 1993, in Contaminated Soil’93: Fourth International KfK/TNO Conference on Contaminated Soil, 3–7 May 1993, Berlin, Germany, Springer, 609 [Google Scholar]
  65. Varin, C., Reid, N., & Firth, D. 2011, Statistica Sinica, 21, 5 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.