Volume 489, Number 1, October I 2008
|Page(s)||L1 - L4|
|Published online||08 August 2008|
Letter to the Editor
Classification of Swift's gamma-ray bursts
Dept. of Physics, Bolyai Military University, POB 15, 1581 Budapest, Hungary e-mail: email@example.com
2 Konkoly Observatory, POB 67, 1525 Budapest, Hungary
3 Dept. of Physics of Complex Systems, Eötvös University, Pázmány P. s. 1/A, 1117 Budapest, Hungary
Accepted: 1 August 2008
Context. Two classes of gamma-ray bursts have been identified in the BATSE catalogs characterized by durations shorter and longer than about 2 s. There are, however, some indications for the existence of a third class. Swift satellite detectors have different spectral sensitivity than pre-Swift ones for gamma-ray bursts. Therefore we reanalyze the durations and their distribution and also the classification of GRBs.
Aims. We analyze the bursts duration distribution, published in The First BAT Catalog, whether it contains two, three or more groups.
Methods. Using The First BAT Catalog the maximum likelihood estimation was used to analyze the duration distribution of GRBs.
Results. The three log-normal fit is significantly (99.54% probability) better than the two for the duration distribution. Monte-Carlo simulations also confirm this probability (99.2%). Similarly, in previous results we found that the fourth component is not needed. The relative frequencies of the distribution of the groups are 7% short 35% intermediate and 58% long.
Conclusions. Similarly to the BATSE data, three components are needed to explain the BAT GRBs' duration distribution. Although the relative frequencies of the groups are different than in the BATSE GRB sample, the difference in the instrument spectral sensitivities can explain this bias. This means theoretical models may be needed to explain three different type of gamma-ray bursts.
Key words: gamma rays: bursts / gamma rays: theory / gamma rays: observations
© ESO, 2008
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.