Volume 466, Number 1, April IV 2007
|Page(s)||31 - 40|
|Published online||22 January 2007|
VIII. Optical identifications of the extended sample
INAF – Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma, via Frascati 33, Monteporzio-Catone (RM) 00040, Italy e-mail: email@example.com
2 Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Roma Tor Vergata, via della Ricerca Scientifica 1, 00133 Rome, Italy
3 INAF – Osservatorio Astronomico di Brera, via Brera 28, 20121 Milano, Italy
4 Dipartimento di Astronomia, Università di Bologna, via Ranzani 1, 40127 Bologna, Italy
5 INAF – Osservatorio Astronomico di Bologna, via Ranzani 1, 40127 Bologna, Italy
6 Max Planck Institüt für Extraterrestrische Physik (MPE), Giessenbachstr. 1, 85748 Garching, Germany
7 Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics (CfA), 60 Garden str, Cambridge 02138 MA, USA
8 INAF – IASF, via Bassini 15, 20133 Milano, Italy
9 Dipartimento di Fisica, Università Roma Tre, via della Vasca Navale 84, 00146 Roma, Italy
10 INAF – Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri, Largo Enrico Fermi 5, 50125 Firenze, Italy
11 ASI Science Data Center, ASDC c/o ESRIN, via G. Galilei, 00044 Frascati, Italy
Accepted: 1 December 2006
Aims.Hard X-ray, large-area surveys are a fundamental complement to ultra-deep, pencil-beam surveys in obtaining more complete coverage of the AGN luminosity-redshift plane and finding sizeable samples of “rare” AGN.
Methods.We present the results of the photometric and spectroscopic identification of 110 hard X-ray selected sources from 5 additional XMM-Newton fields, nearly doubling the original HELLAS2XMM sample. Their 2–10 keV fluxes cover the range 6 10-13 and the total area surveyed is ~0.5 deg2 at the bright flux limit. We spectroscopically identified 59 new sources, bringing the spectroscopic completeness of the full HELLAS2XMM sample to almost 70% over a total area of ~1.4 deg2 at the bright flux limit. We found optical counterparts for 214 out of the 232 X-ray sources of the full sample down to . We measured the flux and luminosity of the [OIII] emission line for 59 of these sources.
Results.Assuming that most high X-ray-to-optical flux ratio sources are obscured QSOs, we used the full HELLAS2XMM sample and the CDF samples to estimate their . We find obscured QSOs surface density of 45 ± 15 and 100–350 deg-2 down to flux limits of 10-14 and 10-15 , respectively. At these flux limits, the fraction of X-ray-selected obscured QSOs turns out to be similar to that of unobscured QSOs. Since X-ray selection misses most Compton-thick AGN, the number of obscured QSOs may well outnumber the unobscured QSOs. We find that hard X-ray selected AGNs with a detected [OIII] emission span a wide range of with a logarithmic median of 2.14 and interquartile range of 0.38. This is marginally higher than for a sample of optically selected AGNs (median 1.69 and interquatile range 0.30), suggesting that optically selected samples are at least partly incomplete andor that [OIII] emission is not a perfect isotropic indicator of the nuclear power. The seven X-ray bright, optically normal galaxy (XBONG) candidates in the sample have , while their X-ray and optical luminosities and obscuring column density are similar to those of narrow-line AGNs in the same redshift interval (0.075–0.32). This suggests that, while the central engine of narrow-line AGNs and XBONGs looks similar, the narrow-line region in XBONGs could be strongly inhibited or obscured.
Key words: X-rays: diffuse background / surveys / galaxies: active / galaxies: evolution
Based on observations collected at the European Southern Observatory, Prog. ID 67.A-0401, 68.A-0514, 69.A-0563 and 072.A-0633, and at the Telescopio Nazionale Galileo, Prog. ID 1_15_083. Based also on observations made with XMM-Newton, an ESA science mission.
© ESO, 2007
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.