Volume 437, Number 2, July II 2005
|Page(s)||703 - 704|
|Published online||21 June 2005|
Reply to the Comments of Dikpati et al.
Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore-560012, India e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
2 Department of Physics, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA
Accepted: 21 March 2005
We respond to Dikpati et al.'s criticism of our recent solar dynamo model. A different treatment of the magnetic buoyancy is the most probable reason for their different results.
Key words: Sun: activity / Sun: magnetic fields
© ESO, 2005
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.