Volume 413, Number 2, January II 2004
|Page(s)||453 - 463|
|Section||Cosmology (including clusters of galaxies)|
|Published online||18 December 2003|
Comparison of two optical cluster finding algorithms for the new generation of deep galaxy surveys
Università degli Studi di Milano, via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122 Milano, Italy
2 Laboratoire d'Astrophysique de Marseille, 2 place Le Verrier, 13248 Marseille Cedex 4, France
3 INAF–Osservatorio Astronomico di Bologna, via Ranzani 1, 40127 Bologna, Italy
4 Institut d'Astrophysique de Paris – CNRS, 98 bis Boulevard Arago, 75014 Paris, France
5 Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca, Piazza dell'Ateneo Nuovo 1, 20126 Milano, Italy
6 INAF–Osservatorio Astronomico di Brera, via Bianchi 46, 23807 Merate, Italy
Corresponding author: D. Rizzo, firstname.lastname@example.org
Accepted: 29 September 2003
We present a comparison between two optical cluster finding methods: a matched filter algorithm using galaxy angular coordinates and magnitudes, and a percolation algorithm using also redshift information. We test the algorithms on two mock catalogues. The first mock catalogue is built by adding clusters to a Poissonian background, while the other is derived from N-body simulations. Choosing the physically most sensible parameters for each method, we carry out a detailed comparison and investigate advantages and limits of each algorithm, showing the possible biases on final results. We show that, combining the two methods, we are able to detect a large part of the structures, thus pointing out the need to search for clusters in different ways in order to build complete and unbiased samples of clusters, to be used for statistical and cosmological studies. In addition, our results show the importance of testing cluster finding algorithms on different kinds of mock catalogues to have a complete assessment of their behaviour.
Key words: galaxies: clusters: general / cosmology: large-scale structure of Universe
© ESO, 2004
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.