Open Access

Table 5

Estimated difference in thickness of the Pt or TeO2 material.

Energy (keV) Peak1(a) Peak2(a) Peak difference µpt (/nm) Pt thickness difference (nm) (/nm) TeO2 thickness difference (nm)
4.5 0.888 (±5.41%) 1.063 (±4.63%) 0.175 ± 0.069 0.00171 105 ± 42 0.000337 534 ± 210
4.9 0.887 (±5.19%) 1.066 (±4.52%) 0.179 ± 0.067 0.00138 133 ± 50 0.000367 501 ± 189
5.4 0.911 (±4.17%) 1.052 (±3.80%) 0.141 ± 0.055 0.00109 132 ± 52 0.000335 430 ± 168
5.9 0.939 (±4.37%) 1.049 (±3.33%) 0.110 ± 0.054 0.000871 127 ± 63 0.00025 443 ± 220
6.4 0.953 (±3.15%) 1.035 (±2.99%) 0.082 ± 0.043 0.000713 116 ± 61 0.000211 391 ± 206

Notes. These results are deduced from Eq. (8) in a model where the efficiency difference between LEP and HEP population is due to the Pt thickness differences alone or to the TeO2 thickness differences alone. (a)Peak1 and Peak2 correspond to the mean values of the Gaussian fit in Fig. 2.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.