Open Access

Table 1

Observational constraints of the targets from our testing set.

Nickname KIC Teff (K) [Fe/H] (dex) L (L) νmax (µHz) References
(K) (dex) (L) (µHz)
Model A 5775.1 ± 90 0.027 ± 0.10 1.003 ± 0.191 1
Model B 6725.8 ± 100 0.027 ± 0.10 3.862 ± 0.425 1
Model C 6485.8 ± 100 0.027 ± 0.10 6.399 ± 0.704 1
Model D 6431.9 ± 100 0.027 ± 0.10 2.969 ± 0.564 1
Model E 6227.0 ± 100 0.027 ± 0.10 5.075 ± 0.558 1
Model F 6103.3 ± 100 0.027 ± 0.10 2.137 ± 0.406 1
Model G 5861.0 ± 90 0.027 ± 0.10 0.990 ± 0.188 1
Sun 5772 ± 85 0.00 ± 0.10 1.00 ± 0.03 2
α Cen A 5795 ± 19 0.24 ± 0.01 1.521 ± 0.015 3
α Cen B 5231 ± 21 0.24 ± 0.01 0.503 ± 0.007 3
Kepler-93 3544595 5718 ± 100 −0.18 ± 0.10 0.82 ± 0.03 4
Nunny 6116048 6033 ± 100 −0.23 ± 0.10 1.85 ± 0.07 2126.9 ± 5.3 4
Saxo2 6225718 6203 ± 100 −0.17 ± 0.10 2.13 ± 0.08 2364.2 ± 4.8 5
Baloo 6508366 6331 ± 100 −0.05 ± 0.10 6.78 ± 0.27 958.3 ± 4.1 5
Doris 8006161 5488 ± 100 0.34 ± 0.10 0.69 ± 0.03 3574.7 ± 11.0 4
Arthur 8379927 6067 ± 150 −0.10 ± 0.15 2795.3 ± 6.0 6
Carlsberg 9139151 6043 ± 100 0.05 ± 0.10 1.60 ± 0.06 2690.4 ± 11.8 5
Punto 9139163 6400 ± 60 0.15 ± 0.10 3.68 ± 0.13 1729.8 ± 6.1 5
Pinocha 10454113 6177 ± 100 −0.07 ± 0.10 2357.2 ± 8.7 4
Tinky 11253226 6642 ± 100 −0.08 ± 0.10 4.44 ± 0.16 1590.6 ± 8.7 4
Dushera 12009504 6179 ± 100 −0.08 ± 0.10 2.70 ± 0.11 1865.6 ± 7.0 4
16 Cyg A 12069424 5839 ± 42 0.096 ± 0.026 1.56 ± 0.02 7
16 Cyg B 12069449 5809 ± 39 0.052 ± 0.021 1.27 ± 0.02 7
Barney 12258514 5964 ± 60 0.00 ± 0.10 2.95 ± 0.11 1512.7 ± 3.1 4

Notes. (1) Sonoi et al. (2015); (2) frequencies from measurement n°01 of Salabert et al. (2015) and Teff from Prša et al. (2016), the uncertainty of the classical constraints is adapted to match the expectation from a Kepler observation; (3) see Salmon et al. (2021) and references therein; (4) Lund et al. (2017); (5) frequencies and νmax from Lund et al. (2017), Teff and [Fe/H] from Furlan et al. (2018)); (6) frequencies from Roxburgh (2017), Teff, [Fe/H], and νmax from Lund et al. (2017); (7) Teff from White et al. (2013), [Fe/H] from Ramirez et al. (2009), and L from Metcalfe et al. (2012). Models A to G are synthetic models whose classical constraints are known exactly. The uncertainty was chosen to match the expectation from a Kepler observation. The other targets are actual observations for which the luminosity was estimated using the spectroscopic parameters and Eq. (13) in JB23. The RUWE indicator of Gala flags the parallax measurement of Arthur as unreliable, and the Ks-magnitude measurement of Pinocha is unreliable as well.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.