Table 2.
Results from the analysis of the tracer density profile fitting and completeness.
NGC | maglim | Re, max | PAGCS | qGCS | Re, GCS | nGCS |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
arcsec | ° | arcsec | ||||
(1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) |
720 | – | – | 50.0 | 0.77 | 118.2 ± 20.4(a) | 4.16 ± 1.21(a) |
821 | 23.79 | 10.0 | 56 | 0.77 |
![]() |
![]() |
1023 | 23.87 | 8.0 | 67 | 0.75 |
![]() |
![]() |
1400 | 23.34 | 8.0 | 26 | 0.71 |
![]() |
![]() |
1407 | 22.94 | 6.0 | 165 | 0.87 |
![]() |
![]() |
2768 | 22.9 | 10.0 | 52 | 0.74 |
![]() |
![]() |
3115 | 22.35 | 6.0 | 40 | 0.8 |
![]() |
![]() |
3377 | 22.89 | 8.0 | 36 | 0.82 |
![]() |
![]() |
3607 | – | – | 109 ± 8(b) | 0.61(b) | 119.4 ± 17.4(b) | 1.97 ± 1.19(b) |
3608 | – | – | 66 ± 7(b) | 0.8(b) | 90 ± 9(b) | 0.93 ± 0.56(b) |
4278 | 22.53 | 12.0 | 168 | 0.93 |
![]() |
![]() |
4365 | 22.83 | 10.0 | 39 | 0.73 |
![]() |
![]() |
4374 | 25.5 | 1.0 | 140 | 0.89 |
![]() |
![]() |
4459 | 24.57 | 2.0 | 46 | 0.85 |
![]() |
![]() |
4473 | 24.86 | 3.0 | 110 | 0.82 |
![]() |
![]() |
4486 | 25.85 | 1.0 | 19 | 0.94 |
![]() |
![]() |
4494 | 23.58 | 10.0 | 10 | 0.75 |
![]() |
![]() |
4526 | 24.54 | 3.0 | 128 | 0.74 |
![]() |
![]() |
4564 | 24.4 | 8.0 | 48 | 0.67 |
![]() |
![]() |
5846 | 22.25 | 10.0 | 12 | 0.87 |
![]() |
![]() |
7457 | 22.28 | 6.0 | 131 | 1.0 |
![]() |
![]() |
Notes. Column (1) lists the NGC identifier of the galaxy; Col. (2) the limiting magnitude for completeness as determined using GCLF; Col. (3) the outer radial limit for spatial completeness, as described above in units of Re of the stellar component of the galaxy. Columns (4) and (5) show the best-fit position angle and flattening for the magnitude complete sample of GCS. Columns (6) and (7) show the best-fit effective radius Re, GCS and Sérsic index and ne, GCS of the number density of the GCS with the associated 16th and 84th percentile. Galaxies NGC 720, NGC 3607, and NGC 3608 have only tracer density profiles presented in the literature, and we used the Sérsic parameters to perform the MGE for the dynamical models.
References. (a)Kartha et al. (2014), (b)Kartha et al. (2016).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.