Table 1.
Basic information for the 21 galaxies from the SLUGGS survey modelled in this work.
NGC | d | log10M* | Re | Re | env | vsys | i | NGC | Kin. flags | Photometry source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mpc | M⊙ | arcsec | kpc | km s−1 | ° | |||||
(1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | (8) | (9) | (10) | (11) |
720 | 26.9 | 11.27 | 29.1 | 3.8 | F | 1745 | 90.0( ‡ ) | 65 | Good | SLUGGS (Kartha et al. 2014)(a) |
821 | 23.4 | 11.0 | 43.2 | 4.9 | F | 1718 | 75.0( † ) | 58 | Good w. rot. | SLUGGS (Forbes et al. 2017) |
1023 | 11.1 | 10.99 | 48.0 | 2.6 | G | 602 | 74.0( ‡ ) | 113 | Good w. rot. | Forbes et al. (2014) |
1400 | 26.8 | 11.08 | 25.6 | 3.3 | G | 558 | 32.5( ⋆ ) | 69 | Pecul. | SLUGGS (Forbes et al. 2017) |
1407 | 26.8 | 11.6 | 93.4 | 12.1 | G | 1779 | 30.3( ⋆ ) | 356 | Subpop. | SLUGGS (Forbes et al. 2017) |
2768 | 21.8 | 11.21 | 60.3 | 6.4 | G | 1353 | 90.0( † ) | 106 | Good | SLUGGS (Forbes et al. 2017) |
3115 | 9.4 | 10.93 | 36.5 | 1.7 | F | 663 | 90.0( † ) | 149 | Good w. rot. | SLUGGS (Forbes et al. 2017) |
3377 | 10.9 | 10.5 | 45.4 | 2.4 | G | 690 | 89.0( † ) | 122 | Good | SLUGGS (Forbes et al. 2017) |
3607 | 22.2 | 11.39 | 48.2 | 5.2 | G | 942 | 46.0( ‡ ) | 39 | Good | SLUGGS (Kartha et al. 2016)(a) |
3608 | 22.3 | 11.03 | 42.9 | 4.6 | G | 1226 | 88.0( ‡ ) | 29 | Good | SLUGGS (Kartha et al. 2016)(a) |
4278 | 15.6 | 10.95 | 28.3 | 2.1 | G | 620 | 88.0( ‡ ) | 256 | Good | SLUGGS (Forbes et al. 2017) |
4365 | 23.1 | 11.51 | 77.8 | 8.7 | G | 1243 | 88.0( ‡ ) | 251 | Good | SLUGGS (Forbes et al. 2017) |
4374 | 18.5 | 11.51 | 139.0 | 12.5 | C | 1017 | 88.0( ‡ ) | 41 | Pecul. | Jordán et al. (2009) |
4459 | 16.0 | 10.98 | 48.3 | 3.7 | C | 1192 | 48.0( ‡ ) | 36 | Pecul. | Jordán et al. (2009) |
4473 | 15.2 | 10.96 | 30.2 | 2.2 | C | 2260 | 81.0( † ) | 105 | Good | Jordán et al. (2009) |
4486 | 16.7 | 11.62 | 86.6 | 7.0 | C | 1284 | 84.0( ‡ ) | 650 | Subpop. | Jordán et al. (2009) |
4494 | 16.6 | 11.02 | 52.5 | 4.2 | G | 1342 | 86.0( ‡ ) | 105 | Good | Humphrey (2009) |
4526 | 16.4 | 11.26 | 32.4 | 2.6 | C | 617 | 77.0( ‡ ) | 107 | Pecul. | Jordán et al. (2009) |
4564 | 15.9 | 10.58 | 14.8 | 1.1 | C | 1155 | 76.0( ‡ ) | 26 | Good w. rot. | Jordán et al. (2009) |
5846 | 24.2 | 11.46 | 89.8 | 10.5 | G | 1712 | 89.0( ‡ ) | 176 | Subpop. | SLUGGS (Forbes et al. 2017) |
7457 | 12.9 | 10.13 | 34.1 | 2.1 | F | 844 | 74.0( ‡ ) | 21 | Pecul. | SLUGGS (Forbes et al. 2017) |
Notes. Column (1) gives the NGC identifier of each galaxy. Columns (2)–(7): distance, stellar mass, stellar effective radius in angular and physical units, environment (F - field, G - group, C - cluster), systemic velocity of the galaxy, all from Forbes et al. (2017) and references therein. Columns (8) and (9) show the inclination (sources listed below) and the number of GCs used in the dynamical modelling, respectively. Column (10) gives the kinematic quality flags discussed in Sect. 2.2. In Col. (11) we list the source of GC photometry. (a) Galaxies for which only the tracer density profile is available in the literature.
References. ( † )Bellstedt et al. (2018); ( ‡ )Cappellari et al. (2013); ( ⋆ )HyperLeda (http://leda.univ-lyon1.fr/).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.