Table 2.
Hα intensity, area and lifetime thresholds for Ellerman bomb selection and resulting detection rates in recent literature.
Intensity threshold | Size | Lifetime | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Single/ | Contrast value(s) | Hα wing | Reference | threshold | threshold | Detection rate | |
Study | Double | (IEB/Iref) | (Å) | (arcsec2) | (s) | (arcmin−2 min−1) | |
Zachariadis et al. 1987 (a) | Single | 1.28 | −0.75/−1.0 | Sub-FOV | 0.6 | 480 | 12.50 |
Georgoulis et al. 2002 | Single | 1.05/1.08/1.20 | −0.8 | Per pixel | N/A | N/A | 5.76/2.86/0.28 |
Watanabe et al. 2011 (b),(c) | Single | 1.16/1.27 | ±(0.9–1.1) | Sub-FOV | 0.025 | 240 | 1.42 |
Nelson et al. 2013 | Single | 1.30 | ±0.7 | Full FOV | 0.037 | N/A | 15.49 |
Vissers et al. 2013 (c) | Double | 1.55 & 1.40 | ±(0.9–1.1) | Full FOV | 0.018 | 45, 55 | 1.92, 1.30 |
Nelson et al. 2015 | Single | 1.50 | ±(0.9–1.2) | Nearby QS | 0.014 | N/A | 0.79 |
Vissers et al. 2015a (c), (d) | Double | 1.55 & 1.40 | ±(0.9–1.1) | Full FOV | 0.018 | 22 | 0.82, 1.08 |
1.45 & 1.30 | 23 | 1.14 | |||||
Reid et al. 2016 (e) | Double | 1.45 & 1.30 | ±1.0 | Nearby QS | 0.052 | 45 | 1.34 |
Chen et al. 2017 (f) | Single | 1.52 | +1.0 | Full FOV | 0.114 | 100 | 0.55 |
Present study(e) | Double | 1.45 & 1.30 | ±(0.9–1.1) | Masked QS | 0.035 | 60 | 1.11 |
Notes. The fourth column (Hα wing) specifies the wavelength offset with respect to line centre used for Ellerman bomb identification. Values in the last two columns that correspond to different data sets within a study are comma-separated, while in the last column the rates for different contrast thresholds are separated by slashes (/).
The values in this study are not formal thresholds, but rather the average of manually selected events.
This study specified a threshold of 3σ (for non-plage) and 5σ (for plage) above the local average of the considered sub-fields-of-view, corresponding to the contrast values given here.
Intensity thresholding was performed on the combined wing-average of the blue and red wings (Iw as defined in Sect. 3.1.2).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.