Table 4.
Forecast constraints on ΛCDM cosmological parameters.
| ΛCDM model, fsky = 70% case | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| σ(H0) | σ(Ωbh2) | σ(Ωch2) | σ(τ) | σ(ns) | σ(109As) | σ(ΩΛ) | |||
| CMB + CIB | 0.344 | 0.000121 | 0.000812 | 0.0162 | 0.00389 | 0.0710 | 0.00474 | ||
| +CIB×CMB lensing | 0.574% | 0.535% | 0.496% | 33.9% | 1.73% | 36.4% | 0.538% | ||
| +CIB×ISW | 19.2% | 39.0% | 17.0% | 38.7% | 8.05% | 34.5% | 17.4% | ||
| ΛCDM model, fsky = 40% case | |||||||||
| σ(H0) | σ(Ωbh2) | σ(Ωch2) | σ(τ) | σ(ns) | σ(109As) | σ(ΩΛ) | |||
| CMB + CIB | 0.412 | 0.000128 | 0.000950 | 0.0164 | 0.00410 | 0.0715 | 0.00565 | ||
| +CIB×CMB lensing | 0.485% | 0.410% | 0.458% | 24.4% | 1.24% | 26.3% | 0.474% | ||
| +CIB×ISW | 18.1% | 31.5% | 15.3% | 34.2% | 8.19% | 31.3% | 16.4% | ||
Notes. The upper and lower tables show our results in the fsky = 70% and fsky = 40% cases, respectively. In each table, the first line shows the predicted 1σ errors from CMB + CIB constraints. The second line shows the improvements on these errors (i.e. relative reduction in percent) after adding the CIB×CMB lensing constraints. The last line shows the further improvement thanks to CIB×ISW constraints, using the {CMB + CIB + CIB×CMB lensing} case as a reference. The constraints on ΩΛ are derived from the other parameters (and are not originally part of the Fisher analysis).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.