Free Access

Table 2

Best-fitting values, and relative errors for the pressure profiles modelled with the generalized NFW in Eq. (6).

Subset P 0 c 500 γ α β

z ∈ [ 0.4,0.52 ] 9.1 ± 0.3 1.08 ± 0.08 0.308 0.87 ± 0.04 5.49 2.1
z ∈ [ 0.52,0.77 ] 9.2 ± 0.2 1.48 ± 0.05 0.308 1.11 ± 0.04 5.49 4.6
z> 0.77 3.6 ± 0.2 1.5 ± 0.1 0.308 1.59 ± 0.14 5.49 0.8
CC 11.3 ± 0.3 1.30 ± 0.07 0.308 0.92 ± 0.03 5.49 2.1
NCC 5.46 ± 0.14 1.57 ± 0.05 0.308 1.43 ± 0.06 5.49 1.9
Universal 8.403 1.177 0.308 1.0510 5.49

Notes. The parameters β and γ are frozen to their “universal” values to break some degeneracy and facilitate the comparison between the results. The first column indicates the subset of our sample chosen to fit the data. We observe that the results on c500 and α of NCC subsample and the result of high redshift subset are compatible within 1σ. The goodness of the fit is indicated in the last column on the right. In general the value of the parameters are very close to the “universal” results of Arnaud et al. (2010), considering that they are highly degenerate. We point out that the parameter P0 for the high redshift bin is significantly smaller than its value for the other bins and the “universal” value.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.