Free Access
Table 3
Core properties, method comparison.
IRDC | ID |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Notes |
No. a | (M⊙) | (M⊙) | (M⊙) | (K) | (K) | (L⊙) | (L⊙) | ||
|
|||||||||
IRDC 310.39–0.30 | |||||||||
1d | 303 | 229 (2054) | 246 (391) | 17 | 18 (16) | 716 | 660 (793) | ||
|
|||||||||
IRDC 316.72+0.07 | |||||||||
6 | 9 | 3 (30) | 4 (81) | 17 | 18 (12) | 19 | 14 (32) | ||
7 | – | 93 (462) | 93 (659) | – | 12 (10) | – | 31 (78) | ||
8 | 6 | 2 (17) | 2 (44) | 20 | 22 (14) | 34 | 31 (55) | ||
9 | 8 | 8 (36) | 9 (64) | 18 | 17 (13) | 26 | 25 (42) | ||
16 | 1 | 1 (5) | 1 (8) | 20 | 19 (14) | 5 | 9 (12) | ||
18 | – | 14 | 12 | – | 14 | – | 7 | ||
19 | – | 22 (50) | 26 (70) | – | 12 (11) | – | 9 (14) | ||
22d | 7 | 25 (177) | 18 (72) | 16 | 15 (13) | 12 | 19 (38) | ||
24 | – | 8 (25) | 10 (40) | – | 15 (13) | – | 11 (17) | ||
25 | – | 2 (10) | 2 (10) | – | 19 (14) | – | 10 (16) | ||
29 | 12 | 8 | 8 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 14 | ||
32 | 22 | 7 | 9 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 10 | ||
35 | 13 | 23 | 24 | 19 | 17 | 54 | 63 | ||
36 | 16 | 7 | 10 | 16 | 16 | 21 | 17 | ||
38 | 79 | 90 (228) | 86 (201) | 25 | 25 (21) | 1650 | 1672 (1972) | ||
42 | – | 17 | 15 | – | 14 | – | 11 | ||
|
|||||||||
IRDC 320.27+0.29 | |||||||||
3 | – | 2 (7) | 2 (11) | – | 16 (13) | – | 3 (5) | ||
4 | 5 | 3 (10) | 3 (14) | 18 | 18 (15) | 14 | 13 (20) | ||
|
|||||||||
IRDC 321.73+0.05 | |||||||||
2 | 3 | 34 | 28 | 22 | 15 | 32 | 62 | ||
3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 23 | 22 | 16 | 21 | ||
4 | 24 | 43 | 36 | 18 | 17 | 71 | 84 | ||
5 | 4 | 9 | 8 | 18 | 16 | 12 | 15 | ||
|
|||||||||
IRDC 009.86–0.04 | |||||||||
2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 24 | 22 | 37 | 70 | ||
|
|||||||||
IRDC 011.11–0.12 | |||||||||
4 | 5 | 36 | 30 | 23 | 17 | 68 | 119 | ||
7 | 25 | 10 (35) | 13 (55) | 20 | 22 (17) | 152 | 142 (197) | ||
14 | 2 | 17 | 14 | 21 | 15 | 16 | 27 | ||
17 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 23 | 21 | 51 | 72 | ||
18 | 80 | 183 (302) | 169 (365) | 24 | 21 (17) | 1444 | 1857 (2064) | ||
24 | 3 | 1 (5) | 1 (10) | 22 | 26 (17) | 32 | 32 (47) | ||
27 | – | 116 | 75 | – | 12 | – | 21 | ||
28 | – | 6 (23) | 7 (34) | – | 18 (15) | – | 24 (34) | ||
33 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 24 | 24 | 73 | 80 | ||
|
|||||||||
IRDC 18223 | |||||||||
2 | 10 | 17 (44) | 17 (62) | 21 | 19 (15) | 79 | 104 (130) | ||
3 | 9 | 25 | 23 | 20 | 17 | 51 | 62 | ||
4 | 61 | 143 (240) | 122 (324) | 20 | 18 (15) | 323 | 383 (436) | ||
6 | 12 | 99 (211) | 86 (292) | 24 | 17 (13) | 200 | 349 (407) | ||
7 | 185 | 254 (450) | 256 (548) | 22 | 21 (18) | 1979 | 4814 (5154) | IRAS 18223-1243 | |
8 | 51 | 2 (15) | 4 (31) | 18 | 24 (18) | 156 | 81 (132) | ||
9 | – | 3 | 4 | – | 20 | – | 22 | ||
10 | 7 | 14 | 14 | 20 | 17 | 33 | 41 | ||
|
|||||||||
IRDC 019.30+0.07 | |||||||||
1 | 12 | 13 | 13 | 18 | 17 | 33 | 34 | ||
2 | 0.8 | 4 | 3 | 25 | 19 | 19 | 33 | ||
3 | 37 | 36 | 38 | 20 | 20 | 219 | 229 | ||
|
|||||||||
IRDC 028.34+0.06 | |||||||||
2 | 93 | 782 (1062) | 671 (1132) | 28 | 18 (16) | 3577 | 8058 (8470) | MSX G028.3373+00.1189 | |
4 | – | 22 (67) | 20 (80) | – | 17 (15) | – | 50 (71) | ||
7 | 14 | 37 | 34 | 20 | 17 | 85 | 106 | ||
8 | 49 | 1369 | 971 | 18 | 12 | 151 | 357 | ||
9d | 534 | 4490 (9249) | 3496 (6720) | 20 | 15 (14) | 2950 | 4703 (5488) | MSX G028.3937+00.0757 | |
11 | 265 | 110 (286) | 140 (332) | 14 | 15 (13) | 177 | 134 (201) | ||
15 | 9 | 5 (18) | 6 (25) | 20 | 21 (16) | 52 | 48 (66) | ||
18 | – | 19 (71) | 17 (87) | – | 17 (14) | – | 41 (64) |
Notes.
(a)
From Table B.1;
(b)
from Ragan et al. (2012b);
(d)
leaf overlaps with multiple Herschel cores. SABOCA flux is scaled according to luminosity ratio of cores (see Sect. 3.2).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.