\begin{table}%t11
\caption{\label{tab3}Linear Pearson correlation coefficients.}
\par
%\centering
\par
\begin{tabular}{lccc}
\hline \hline \noalign{\smallskip}
&$\sigma_{\rm PA}-k_{3,5}/k_{1}$ & $\Delta \phi-\sigma_{\rm PA}$ & $k_{3,5}/k_{1}-\Delta \phi$   \\
c+f &   	\bf{0.5} (Fig.~\ref{cop2}a)		   & 		0.0       & 		0.0	         \\
\hline
&$\sigma_{\rm PA}-R/R_{\rm vir}$ & $\Delta \phi-R/R_{\rm vir}$ & $k_{3,5}/k_{1}-R/R_{\rm vir}$   \\
c &   		0.1	   & 		0.2       & 	0.4		         \\
\hline
& $R_{\rm d}-k_{3,5}/k_{1}$ & $R_{\rm d}-\sigma_{\rm PA}$ & $R_{\rm d}-\Delta \phi$		 \\
c+f &  	0.2	 &  	0.3       & 		--0.4		     \\
c &  	0.1	 &  	 \bf{0.5} (Fig.~\ref{cor_clus}b)    & 	        --0.1		     \\
\hline
&   $M_{B}-k_{3,5}/k_{1}$	 &  $M_{B}-\sigma_{\rm PA}$   &  $M_{B}-\Delta \phi$		 \\
c+f &  	0.0	     &	      	--0.1	  &	   	0.4	    \\
c &  	--0.3	 &  	\bf{--0.5} (Fig.~\ref{cor_clus}c)      & 		0.1		     \\
\hline
& $A-k_{3,5}/k_{1}$ &  $A-\sigma_{\rm PA}$ & $A-\Delta \phi$		 \\
c+f &  	 --0.2    & 	0.1	 &   	--0.1	     \\
c &  	--0.1	 &  	 0.2      & 	0.0			     \\
\hline
& $C-k_{3,5}/k_{1}$ & $C-\sigma_{\rm PA}$  & 	$C-\Delta \phi$	 \\
c+f & 	0.0  &  	--0.1    & 	   0.2 		      \\
c &  	0.1	 &  	 0.0      & 	   --0.2			\\
\hline
 & $\log(L_{\rm H_\alpha})-k_{3,5}/k_{1}$ & $\log(L_{\rm H_\alpha})-\sigma_{\rm PA}$ & 	$\log(L_{\rm H_\alpha})-\Delta \phi$\\
c+f &    0.1		 &	0.1		& 		--0.1		     \\
c &  	\bf{0.8} (Fig.~\ref{halphalum}b)	 &  	 \bf{0.8} (Fig.~\ref{halphalum}a)     & 		0.0		     \\
\hline
 & $z-k_{3,5}/k_{1}$ & $z-\sigma_{\rm PA}$ & 	$z-\Delta \phi$\\
 f & 0.1 & 0.0 & 0.1 \\
\hline
 & $(B-V)-k_{3,5}/k_{1}$ & $(B-V)-\sigma_{\rm PA}$ & 	$(B-V)-\Delta \phi$\\
c+f & --0.1 & --0.2 & --0.2\\
c &  --0.2	 &  	 --0.1      & 		--0.2		     \\
\hline
 & $(V-I)-k_{3,5}/k_{1}$ & $(V-I)-\sigma_{\rm PA}$ & 	$(V-I)-\Delta \phi$\\
c+f & 0.0 & 0.2 & 0.0 \\
c &  	0.4	 &  	 0.2      & 		0.1		     \\
\hline
 & $(R-I)-k_{3,5}/k_{1}$ & $(R-I)-\sigma_{\rm PA}$ & 	$(R-I)-\Delta \phi$\\
c+f & --0.1 & --0.2 & 0.0 \\
c &  --0.3	 &  	--0.3       & 		--0.2		     \\
\hline
 & ${\rm Gini}-k_{3,5}/k_{1}$ & ${\rm Gini}-\sigma_{\rm PA}$ & 	${\rm Gini}-\Delta \phi$\\
c+f & --0.1 & 0.0 & 0.3 \\
c &  	0.2	 &  	 0.1      & 	0.1			     \\
\hline
 & $M_{20}-k_{3,5}/k_{1}$ & $M_{20}-\sigma_{\rm PA}$ & 	$M_{20}-\Delta \phi$\\
c+f & 0.1 & 0.2  & 0.0 \\
c &  	0.1	 &  	 0.3      & 	\bf{0.5} (Fig.~\ref{cor_clus}a)			     \\
\hline
 & $\log(M_{*}[M_{\odot}])-k_{3,5}/k_{1}$ & $\log(M_{*}[M_{\odot}])-\sigma_{\rm PA}$ & 	$\log(M_{*}[M_{\odot}])-\Delta \phi$\\
c+f & --0.3 	 & 	 --0.2  	&	      --0.4				\\
c &   --0.2	 &  	   0.0      	& 	  --0.3			     	\\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\tablefoot {The figures where $\Delta \phi$ of the galaxies that have $\epsilon \leq 0.1$ (galaxies~1F2,~2F4,~2F12~and~4C3 in
``this sample'', NGC~628, NGC~3184, NGC~3938 and NGC~5713 in the local sample),
$k_{3,5}/k_{1}$ of galaxy~1F5 (this sample) and all parameters for galaxies~1F10,~2F5,~2F11~and~2F15\&16
(this sample) are doubtful as explained in Paper III for the MS~0451 sample and here, in Sect.~\ref{special} for the rest.  Therefore, they are
excluded while calculating the correlation coefficients.  For the calculation
of the correlations with the redshift, only field galaxies were used, so the
results do not have the bias of the environment.}
\end{table}