\begin{table}%t1
\caption{\label{data}Source fluxes in [Jy].}\vspace*{-2mm}
%\centering
\par
\begin{tabular}{lrrrr}
\hline \hline
\noalign{\smallskip}
& 18223-1243 & 18223-3 & 18223-south2 & 18223-south1 \\
\hline\\[-3.2mm]
$S_{12}$  & 16.2\tablefootmark{1} & --       & --       & --   \\
$S_{24}$  & 64.9\tablefootmark{1} & 12.1\tablefootmark{3} & --       & --   \\
$S_{70}$  & 756.6    & 7.5\tablefootmark{4}  & 0.39\tablefootmark{5} & --   \\
$S_{100}$ & 938.6    & 33.0     & 22.1\tablefootmark{6} & --   \\
$S_{160}$ & 811.0    & 77.7     & 22.6\tablefootmark{6} & 43.0 \\
$S_{250}$ & 222.0    & 60.6     & 19.1     & 48.9 \\
$S_{350}$ & 84.5     & 28.9     & 10.0     & 25.0 \\
$S_{500}$ & --\tablefootmark{2}   & 20.8     & 7.3      & 10.4 \\
$S_{850}$ & 4.4      & 1.9      & 0.65     & 1.2  \\
$S_{1200}$& 1.9      & 0.75     & --       & --   \\
\hline
\end{tabular}\vspace*{-1mm}
\tablefoot{The SCUBA 850~$\mu$m data and the 1.2~mm data are taken from \citet{difrancesco2008} and \citet{beuther2002a}, respectively.
\tablefoottext{1}{IRAS flux;} \tablefoottext{2}{artifact (see Fig.~\ref{continuum});} \tablefoottext{3}{\citet{beuther2007a};} \tablefoottext{4}{because the source is embedded in absorption filament, we selected smaller aperture just covering the emission source;} \tablefoottext{5}{because of absorption close to the source, here we applied PSF photometry based on the template by \citet{AetASpecialIssue-PACS};} \tablefoottext{6}{we corrected for the mapping artifact visible around the source in Fig.~\ref{continuum}.}}\vspace*{-3mm}
\end{table}