\begin{table}%t8
\caption{\label{tother}Comparison of outflow mass, momentum and kinetic energy between this study and that of Beuther et~al. (\cite{beut}).}
%\centering
\par
\begin{tabular}{lcccccc}
\hline \hline \noalign{\smallskip}
Source & $M_{\rm beu}$ & $M_{\rm our}$ & $p_{\rm beu}$ & $p_{\rm our}$ & $E_{\rm beu}$ & $E_{\rm our}$ \\
 & ($M_{\odot}$) & ($M_{\odot}$) & ($M_{\odot}$~km~s$^{-1}$) & ($M_{\odot}$~km~s$^{-1}$) & (10$^{46}$~erg) & (10$^{46}$~erg)\\
\hline
05358+3543 & 21 & 10 & 288 & 68 & 4.0 & 0.45\\
18151--1208\_1 & 12 & 29 & 106 & 81 & 0.9 & 0.27\\
19035+0641 & 3 & 2 & 28 & 15 & 0.3 & 0.11\\
20216+4107 & 6 & 4 & 43 & 17 & 0.3 & 0.07\\ 
22134+5834 & 17 & 5 & 242 & 17 & 3.4 & 0.06\\
23033+5951 & 32 & 44 & 566 & 214 & 10.0 & 1.18\\
23139+5939 & 57 & 29 & 662 & 176 & 7.7 & 1.22\\
23151+5912 & 21 & 20 & 597 & 86 & 18.0 & 0.42\\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\end{table}