\begin{table}%t3
\caption{\label{table3}Ratios of the ZAMS \omc\ per mass category of SMC Oe/Be~stars corrected for the effect of magnetic field from the comparison between \citet{ekstrom2008} and \citet{yoon2006} models.}
%\centering
\par
\begin{tabular}{llll}
\hline
\hline	
\noalign{\smallskip}
Mass category   & \omc          & \omc$-\sigma$ & \omc$+\sigma$  \\
\hline	
A               &    {\bf 0.77}  &      0.69    &    0.88  \\
A$-\sigma$M     &         0.82   &      0.72    &    0.90  \\
A$+\sigma$M     &         0.74   &      0.65    &    0.83  \\
\noalign{\medskip}
B               &    {\bf 0.76}  &      0.59    &    0.94  \\
B$-\sigma$M     &         0.81   &      0.63    &    0.99  \\
B$+\sigma$M     &         0.71   &      0.56    &    0.88  \\
\noalign{\medskip}
C               &    {\bf 0.80}  &      0.62    &    0.94  \\
C$-\sigma$M     &         0.82   &      0.62    &    0.95  \\
C$+\sigma$M     &         0.79   &      0.61    &    0.92  \\
\noalign{\medskip}
D               &    {\bf 0.79}  &      0.55    &    0.93  \\
D$-\sigma$M     &         0.82   &      0.57    &    0.98  \\
D$+\sigma$M     &         0.76   &      0.52    &    0.89  \\
\noalign{\medskip}
E               &    {\bf 0.83}  &      0.70    &    0.92  \\
E$-\sigma$M     &         0.93   &      0.79    &    1.03  \\
E$+\sigma$M     &         0.75   &      0.63    &    0.82  \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\tablefoot{Boldfaced values correspond to the average \omc\ ratios of subsamples.}
\end{table}