\begin{table}%t8
\caption{\label{ww5}Oppolzer terms in obliquity depending on triaxiality.}
%\centering
\par
\begin{tabular}{crrr}
\hline \hline \noalign{\smallskip}
&&Oppolzer&A.M \\
 Argument & Period & $\cos(\omega t)$&CS  $\cos(\omega t)$ \\
  & d & arcsec&arcsec\\
  &&$10^-7$&$10^-7$\\
\hline
$2\Phi$ & --121.51 &555~905&--275~453 \\
$2l_{\rm S}-2\Phi$ &58.37&--173~668&132~365\\
$M +2\Phi$ & --264.6& --68~544&--6093 \\
$M -2\Phi+2L_{\rm S}$&46.34& 3074&2491\\
$2l_{\rm S}+2\Phi$ &1490.35&--250&1786 \\
$M -2\Phi$ & 78.86&2686&1816\\
$-M -2\Phi+2L_{\rm S}$&78.86& 896&--606\\
$2M +2\Phi$ & 1490.35&--49&348  \\
$2M -2\Phi+2L_{\rm S}$& 38.41&--40&35\\
$2M-2\Phi$&58.37&18&14  \\
$M +2\Phi+2L_{\rm S}$ & 195.26&--3&6 \\
$-M+2\Phi+2L_{\rm S}$&--264.6&12&1 \\
$2M +2\Phi+2L_{\rm S}$ &104.47&0&0 \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\tablefoot {Comparison with the corresponding nutation coefficients of the AMA in the tables of Cottereau \& Souchay (\cite{Cott09}).}
\end{table}