\begin{table}%t7
\caption{\label{ww3}Oppolzer terms in longitude depending on triaxiality.}
%\centering
\par
\begin{tabular}{crrr}
\hline \hline \noalign{\smallskip}
&&Oppolzer&A.M \\
 Argument & Period & $\sin(\omega t)$ &LC $sin(\omega t)$  \\
  & d & arcsec & arcsec  \\
&&$10^-7$&$10^-7$\\
\hline 
$2\Phi$ & --121.51 &--11~967~515&5~994~459  \\
$2L_{\rm S}-2\Phi$ &58.37&--3~784~751&2~880~826\\
$M+2\Phi$ & --264.6& 1~490~497&132~590\\
$M-2\Phi+2L_{\rm S}$&46.34& --66~849&54~201 \\
$M-2\Phi$ & 78.86&58~400 &--39~519 \\
$2L_{\rm S}+2\Phi$ &1490.35&5448 &--38~866 \\
$-M-2\Phi+2L_{\rm S}$&78.86& 19~476&--13~179\\
$2M+2\Phi$ & 1490.35&1062 &--7587  \\
$2M-2\Phi+2L_{\rm S}$ &38.41&--876&739\\
$2M-2\Phi$&58.37&390&--297  \\
$M +2\Phi+2L_{\rm S}$ & 195.26&67 &121 \\
$-M+2\Phi+2L_{\rm S}$&--264.66&--263&--23 \\
$2M+2\Phi+2L_{\rm S}$ &104.47&1&--1 \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\tablefoot {Comparison with the corresponding nutation coefficients of the AMA in the tables of Cottereau \& Souchay (\cite{Cott09}).}
\end{table}