\begin{table}%t1
\caption{\label{tab1}Table of runs.}\vspace*{-2.5mm}
\small%\centering
\par
\begin{tabular}{cccccccccc}
\hline
\hline
Model& $h$ & $\alpha$ & $\gamma_{\rm F}$ & $R$ & Frame& $\tau_{\rm W}$ & $\tau_{\rm P}$ & Predicted & Observed\\
label&     &          &            &     &      &          &          & behaviour & behaviour\\
\hline
1&0.05&0.025&45&9&precessing&5.43&48.01&rigid precession & rigid precession\\
2&0.05&0.1&45&9&precessing&10.87&47.60&rigid precession& rigid precession\\
3&0.03&0.015&45&9&precessing&9.05&43.90&rigid precession& rigid precession\\
4&0.03&0.1&45&9&precessing&30.19&47.02&rigid precession& rigid precession\\
5&0.03&0.1&25&9&precessing&30.19&36.37&rigid precession& rigid precession\\
6&0.01&0.005&10&8&binary&22.77&33.87&rigid precession& rigid precession\\
7&0.01&0.1&10&8&binary&227.7&36.25&disrupted/broken& rigid precession\\
6a&0.01&0.005&10&10&binary&31.83&21.48&disrupted/broken& broken\\
7a&0.01&0.1&10&10&binary&318.32&19.12&disrupted/broken& disrupted \\
\hline
\end{tabular} 
\vspace*{-2mm}
\tablefoot{The disc is characterized by the aspect ratio, $h$,
viscosity parameter, $\alpha$, and initial inclination angle $\gamma_{\rm F}$.
We also list the initial disc outer radius $R$ and the reference frame in
which the simulation was performed. The warp propagation times, $\tau_{\rm W}$ and
differential precession times, $\tau_{\rm P}$, for each of the models are also listed
and indicate the theoretically expected and observed behaviours.}
\end{table}