\begin{table}%t6
%\centering
\par
\caption {\label{tab-141}Comparison of our results for star 141 in M~67 with the analysis of
\citet{taut00} and \citet{yong05}. }             
%\centerline
 {\begin{tabular}{l r r r }     
\hline\hline  
\noalign{\smallskip}     
Parameter         & Here            & T00             & Y05     \\
\hline     	     
Resolution        & 30~000           & 30--60~000       & 28~000   \\
$S/N$               & 70--100          & $\geq$100       & 30--100 \\
$T_{\rm eff}$ (K)       & 4650            & 4730            & 4700    \\
log~$g$ (dex)      & 2.8             & 2.4             & 2.3     \\
$v_t$ (km~s$^{-1}$) & 1.3           & 1.8             & 1.3     \\                 
$[$FeI/H$]$       &   0.06~$\pm$~0.01($\pm$0.10) & --0.01~$\pm$~0.02 & --0.01~$\pm$~0.02 \\ 
$[$FeII/H$]$      &   0.01~$\pm$~0.03($\pm$0.10) & --0.01~$\pm$~0.05 &   0.01~$\pm$~0.03 \\
$[$$\alpha$/Fe$]$ &   0.01~$\pm$~0.01($\pm$0.07) &   0.01~$\pm$~0.03 &   0.12~$\pm$~0.06\\
$[$Al/Fe$]$       &   0.06~$\pm$~0.06($\pm$0.05) &   0.08~$\pm$~0.01 &   0.16~$\pm$~0.03 \\  
$[$Ba/Fe$]$       &   0.26~$\pm$~0.05($\pm$0.06) &   0.07~$\pm$~0.00 &   0.02~$\pm$~0.00 \\ 
$[$Ca/Fe$]$       & --0.13~$\pm$~0.02($\pm$0.03) &   0.09~$\pm$~0.05 &   0.09~$\pm$~0.02 \\  
$[$Co/Fe$]$       &   0.11~$\pm$~0.02($\pm$0.06) &   0.05~$\pm$~0.07 &   0.01~$\pm$~0.05 \\ 
$[$Cr/Fe$]$       &   0.01~$\pm$~0.03($\pm$0.06) &   0.12~$\pm$~0.05 &   --   	 \\ 
$[$La/Fe$]$       &   0.06~$\pm$~0.05($\pm$0.09) & --0.06~$\pm$~0.00 &   0.13~$\pm$~0.03 \\ 
$[$Mg/Fe$]$       &   0.29~$\pm$~0.03($\pm$0.10) &   0.11~$\pm$~0.00 &   0.18~$\pm$~0.02 \\ 
$[$Na/Fe$]$       &   0.10~$\pm$~0.02($\pm$0.04) &   0.25~$\pm$~0.00 &   0.24~$\pm$~0.06 \\ 
$[$Nd/Fe$]$       &   0.01~$\pm$~0.29($\pm$0.10) &     --          &   --   	 \\ 
$[$Ni/Fe$]$       &   0.06~$\pm$~0.02($\pm$0.03) &   0.05~$\pm$~0.04 &   0.06~$\pm$~0.03 \\ 
$[$O/Fe$]$        & --0.05~$\pm$~0.09($\pm$0.08) &   0.04~$\pm$~0.00 &   0.10~$\pm$~0.04 \\ 
$[$Sc/Fe$]$       & --0.02~$\pm$~0.08($\pm$0.08) &   0.09~$\pm$~0.05 &   -- 		\\ 
$[$Si/Fe$]$       &   0.09~$\pm$~0.02($\pm$0.08) &   0.11~$\pm$~0.04 &   0.11~$\pm$~0.04 \\ 
$[$TiI/Fe$]$      & --0.07~$\pm$~0.02($\pm$0.07) &   0.04~$\pm$~0.05 &   0.05~$\pm$~0.03 \\
$[$TiII/Fe$]$     & --0.07~$\pm$~0.08($\pm$0.06) &   0.11~$\pm$~0.07 &   --  \\
$[$V/Fe$]$        &   0.13~$\pm$~0.04($\pm$0.14) &   0.09~$\pm$~0.03 &   --  \\
$[$Y/Fe$]$        & --0.04~$\pm$~0.02($\pm$0.12) & --0.12~$\pm$~0.08 &   --  \\
 \hline 
\end{tabular}}
\par
\tablefoot {The {\it internal} uncertainties are those
reported by the authors, where a value of 0.00~means that the abundance
calculation was based on one line only.}
\end{table}