\begin{table}%t1
      \caption{\label{table.rejected}Rejected wide binary candidates$^{a}$.} 
%\centerline
 {\small \begin{tabular}{l lllll l}
 \hline \hline
WDS  & $\mu$	&$d_{\rm phot}$	&$d_{\rm spec}$	& $d_\pi$ & $V_{\rm r}$	\\
identifier	& 	& 		& 		&		& \\
\hline
00152+2454	& No:	& No		& ...		& ...	        & ... \\
00400--1533	& No:	& No		& ...		& ...	        & ...		\\
00435+3351	& No	& No:		& No		& ...	        & ...		\\
00520+2035	& No	& No		& ...		& ...	        & ...		\\
01163--3217	& No:	& No		& ...		& ...	        & ...		\\
03442--6448	& No	& No		& No		& No	        & No		\\
07590--6338	& No	& No:		& ...		& ...	        & ...		\\
11125+3549	& No	& No		& No		& ...	        & ...		\\
13410+6808	& No:	& No		& No		& ...	        & ...		\\
13599+2520	& No	& No		& No		& ...	        & ...		\\
20084+1503	& No:	& No		& ...		& ...	        & ...		\\
20302+2651	& No	& No		& No		& ...	        & ...		\\
\hline
\end{tabular}}
\medskip
$^{a}$~Coordinates are provided in Table~\ref{verywidebinaries.1}. The colon after ``No'' indicates that the corresponding parameters of stars
in binary system candidates might be comparable if accounting for generous
error~bars.
   \end{table}