\begin{table}%t10
\caption{\label{table:logitres_10 columns}Results of the logit analysis for the fiducial model with
  50~000 model planets and 31 observations.}				\small						 %\centering
						 \begin{tabular}{cccccccccccc}					\hline
 \hline						&		&	All variables	&	\multicolumn{9}{c}{Missing variable}			\\							&		&		&	{\rm [Fe/H]}	&	$T_{\rm eff}$	&	$R_{\star}$	&	$M_{\star}$	&	$P$	&	$R_{\rm p}$	&	$M_{\rm p}$	&	$\theta$	&	$T_{\rm eq}$	\\
\noalign{\smallskip} \hline\noalign{\smallskip}						{\rm [Fe/H]}	&	${\hat b}_{{\rm [Fe/H]}}$	&	0.415	&		&	0.435	&	0.413	&	0.430	&	0.421	&	0.229	&	0.385	&	0.371	&	0.369	\\
	&	${\cal P}_{{\rm [Fe/H]}}$	&	[0.164]	&		&	[0.148]	&	[0.164]	&	[0.150]	&	[0.157]	&	[0.242]	&	[0.177]	&	[0.196]	&	[0.182]	\\
$T_{\rm eff}$	&	${\hat b}_{T_{\rm eff}}$	&	--0.517	&	--0.579	&		&	--0.541	&	--0.191	&	--0.569	&	--0.563	&	--0.541	&	--0.537	&	--0.618	\\
	&	${\cal P}_{T_{\rm eff}}$	&	[0.417]	&	[0.366]	&		&	[0.372]	&	[0.601]	&	[0.355]	&	[0.378]	&	[0.391]	&	[0.395]	&	[0.298]	\\
$R_{\star}$	&	${\hat b}_{R_{\rm {\star}}}$	&	0.059	&	0.046	&	0.190	&		&	0.212	&	--0.009	&	0.061	&	0.027	&	0.023	&	--0.063	\\
	&	${\cal P}_{R_{\rm {\star}}}$	&	[0.901]	&	[0.924]	&	[0.681]	&		&	[0.609]	&	[0.984]	&	[0.898]	&	[0.953]	&	[0.961]	&	[0.871]	\\
$M_{\star}$	&	${\hat b}_{M_{\rm {\star}}}$	&	0.467	&	0.541	&	--0.001	&	0.511	&		&	0.472	&	0.524	&	0.483	&	0.486	&	0.497	\\
	&	${\cal P}_{M_{\rm {\star}}}$	&	[0.528]	&	[0.468]	&	[0.998]	&	[0.433]	&		&	[0.523]	&	[0.481]	&	[0.512]	&	[0.508]	&	[0.499]	\\
$P$	&	${\hat b}_{P}$	&	--0.236	&	--0.288	&	--0.425	&	--0.199	&	--0.250	&		&	--0.281	&	--0.269	&	--0.356	&	--0.070	\\
	&	${\cal P}_{P}$	&	[0.746]	&	[0.698]	&	[0.605]	&	[0.754]	&	[0.737]	&		&	[0.706]	&	[0.708]	&	[0.618]	&	[0.883]	\\
$R_{\rm p}$	&	${\hat b}_{R_{\rm p}}$	&	0.305	&	--0.069	&	0.331	&	0.305	&	0.328	&	0.316	&		&	0.261	&	0.246	&	0.241	\\
	&	${\cal P}_{R_{\rm p}}$	&	[0.370]	&	[0.778]	&	[0.332]	&	[0.370]	&	[0.336]	&	[0.352]	&		&	[0.416]	&	[0.456]	&	[0.443]	\\
$M_{\rm p}$	&	${\hat b}_{M_{\rm p}}$	&	0.329	&	--0.032	&	0.432	&	0.306	&	0.379	&	0.386	&	0.055	&		&	--0.229	&	0.118	\\
	&	${\cal P}_{M_{\rm p}}$	&	[0.726]	&	[0.968]	&	[0.656]	&	[0.737]	&	[0.693]	&	[0.674]	&	[0.947]	&		&	[0.474]	&	[0.876]	\\
$\theta$	&	${\hat b}_{\theta}$	&	--0.904	&	--0.496	&	--1.005	&	--0.879	&	--0.971	&	--1.049	&	--0.625	&	--0.422	&		&	--0.653	\\
	&	${\cal P}_{\theta}$	&	[0.563]	&	[0.706]	&	[0.540]	&	[0.567]	&	[0.548]	&	[0.497]	&	[0.658]	&	[0.410]	&		&	[0.620]	\\
$T_{\rm eq}$	&	${\hat b}_{T_{\rm eq}}$	&	--0.296	&	--0.023	&	--0.520	&	--0.250	&	--0.339	&	--0.169	&	--0.089	&	--0.186	&	--0.150	&		\\
	&	${\cal P}_{T_{\rm eq}}$	&	[0.648]	&	[0.970]	&	[0.414]	&	[0.635]	&	[0.605]	&	[0.744]	&	[0.882]	&	[0.742]	&	[0.801]	&		\\
\multicolumn{12}{c}{overall assessment of the fit}				\\
\multicolumn{2}{c}{Log likelihood}			&	--257.059	&	--258.123	&	--257.410	&	--257.066	&	--257.275	&	--257.129	&	--257.439	&	--257.126	&	--257.316	&	--257.171	\\
\multicolumn{2}{c}{$c_{\rm LL}$}			&	5.821	&	3.692	&	5.119	&	5.805	&	5.389	&	5.681	&	5.060	&	5.687	&	5.307	&	5.597	\\
\multicolumn{2}{c}{${\cal{P}}_{\chi^2}$}		& 0.758	&	0.884	&	 0.745	&	 0.669	&	 0.715	&	 0.683	&	0.751	&	 0.682	&	 0.724	&	0.692	\\
\noalign{\smallskip}\hline
\end{tabular}						\end{table}