\begin{table}%t6
\caption{\label{tab:veiled}Fits to $I_{\rm C}z_{\rm WFI}JHK_S$ photometry of stars with suspected veiling.}
%\centerline
 {\small \begin{tabular}{lcccccl}
\hline\hline
Object (SSTc2dJ) & $T_{\rm eff}$ & $L$ ($L_\odot$) & $A_V$ & $M$ ($M_\odot$) & Age (Myr) & Notes\\
\hline
\noalign{\smallskip}
160708.6-391407 & 4000 &  0.086 &   8.1 &  0.62 &  80 &  \\
160754.7-391545 & 3200 &  0.0037 &   5.0 & 0.13 & 101 &  \\
160829.7-390311 & 4000 &  0.020 & 1.7 & -- & -- & 2, 4 \\
160837.3-392311 & 2300 &  0.0061 & 1.5 &    --    &  $<$1 & 1, 2 \\
160851.4-390530 & 4000 &  0.020 & 5.9 & -- & -- & 2, 3\\
160927.0-383628 & 3300 &   0.11 &  2.5 & 0.25 & 2.8 \\
161204.5-380959 & 3400 &  0.0033 & 2.6 & -- & -- & 2 \\
\noalign{\smallskip}
\hline
\end{tabular}}
\medskip
Notes - 1: the fit excluding $R_{\rm C}$ leads to a good agreement with the very late spectral type~(L0) assigned by \citet{Lop05}; 2~apparently below the main sequence;
3~par-Lup3-4. Best-fitting temperature is still higher than corresponding to its M~5~type \citep{Com03}, possibly due to a combination of veiling, emission lines, the known infrared excess, and variability of this object; 4~Sz~102. The temperature is consistent with the poorly constrained spectral type~(K:) proposed by \citet{Hug94}. The object is well known to be underluminous, perhaps due to blocking due to a disk close to edge-on. 
\end{table}