\begin{table}%tb.1
\caption{\label{Tab_3a}Velocities and masses of gas detected at ``anomalous'' velocities as derived from fitting a double-Gaussian to several profiles of the data cube.}
%\centerline
{\tiny \begin{tabular}{r r r r r r r r r r}
\hline \hline
$ \rm RA $ & $ \rm Dec $ & $\Delta V_{\rm i,sys} $ & $\Delta V_{\rm i,max} $ & $\Delta V_{\rm i,bulk} $ & $\Delta V_{\rm o,max} $ & $\Delta V_{\rm o,bulk} $ & $F_{\rm {\ion{H}{i}},e}$ & $F_{\rm {\ion{H}{i}},i}$ & $F_{\rm {\ion{H}{i}},o}$ \\ 
(1)  & (2)   & (3) & (4) & (5) & (6)    & (7)                                 & (8)      & (9)              & (10) \\
\hline
$ \hmsm{08}{55}{29}{204} $ & $ \dmsm{58}{44}{23}{98} $ & $ 110.0  $ & $  71.5  $ & $  44.7  $ & $  82.8  $ & $  56.0  $ & $  0.21  $ & $  0.60  $ & $  0.34  $ \\
$ \hmsm{08}{55}{39}{994} $ & $ \dmsm{58}{43}{41}{99} $ & $ 112.3  $ & $  97.2  $ & $  58.1  $ & $  94.4  $ & $  55.2  $ & $  0.23  $ & $  0.47  $ & $  0.18  $ \\
$ \hmsm{08}{55}{29}{204} $ & $ \dmsm{58}{44}{30}{98} $ & $ 109.6  $ & $  75.2  $ & $  48.4  $ & $  82.1  $ & $  55.3  $ & $  0.21  $ & $  0.42  $ & $  0.47  $ \\
$ \hmsm{08}{55}{39}{993} $ & $ \dmsm{58}{43}{34}{99} $ & $ 114.0  $ & $  98.9  $ & $  57.7  $ & $ 102.2  $ & $  61.0  $ & $  0.29  $ & $  0.26  $ & $  0.26  $ \\
$ \hmsm{08}{55}{29}{204} $ & $ \dmsm{58}{44}{37}{99} $ & $ 109.9  $ & $  79.6  $ & $  48.7  $ & $  90.5  $ & $  59.6  $ & $  0.18  $ & $  0.22  $ & $  0.56  $ \\
$ \hmsm{08}{55}{39}{993} $ & $ \dmsm{58}{43}{27}{98} $ & $ 113.8  $ & $  98.7  $ & $  55.4  $ & $ 109.9  $ & $  66.6  $ & $  0.25  $ & $  0.12  $ & $  0.36  $ \\
$ \hmsm{08}{55}{28}{306} $ & $ \dmsm{58}{44}{23}{98} $ & $ 107.8  $ & $  69.3  $ & $  44.6  $ & $  74.6  $ & $  49.9  $ & $  0.21  $ & $  0.46  $ & $  0.42  $ \\
$ \hmsm{08}{55}{40}{893} $ & $ \dmsm{58}{43}{41}{99} $ & $ 113.1  $ & $  98.0  $ & $  56.8  $ & $  96.4  $ & $  55.2  $ & $  0.35  $ & $  0.32  $ & $  0.26  $ \\
$ \hmsm{08}{55}{28}{304} $ & $ \dmsm{58}{44}{30}{98} $ & $ 108.6  $ & $  70.1  $ & $  45.3  $ & $  78.6  $ & $  53.8  $ & $  0.21  $ & $  0.29  $ & $  0.50  $ \\
$ \hmsm{08}{55}{40}{893} $ & $ \dmsm{58}{43}{34}{99} $ & $ 111.8  $ & $  96.7  $ & $  55.5  $ & $  99.3  $ & $  58.1  $ & $  0.31  $ & $  0.21  $ & $  0.34  $ \\
$ \hmsm{08}{55}{28}{304} $ & $ \dmsm{58}{44}{37}{99} $ & $ 109.8  $ & $  75.5  $ & $  46.6  $ & $  87.0  $ & $  58.2  $ & $  0.17  $ & $  0.15  $ & $  0.54  $ \\
$ \hmsm{08}{55}{40}{893} $ & $ \dmsm{58}{43}{27}{98} $ & $ 109.1  $ & $  89.9  $ & $  50.8  $ & $ 102.8  $ & $  63.6  $ & $  0.22  $ & $  0.11  $ & $  0.40  $ \\
$ \hmsm{08}{55}{27}{405} $ & $ \dmsm{58}{44}{23}{98} $ & $ 103.8  $ & $  65.3  $ & $  40.5  $ & $  71.0  $ & $  46.2  $ & $  0.21  $ & $  0.31  $ & $  0.45  $ \\
$ \hmsm{08}{55}{41}{792} $ & $ \dmsm{58}{43}{41}{99} $ & $ 108.3  $ & $  76.8  $ & $  43.8  $ & $  86.0  $ & $  53.1  $ & $  0.25  $ & $  0.25  $ & $  0.45  $ \\
$ \hmsm{08}{55}{27}{405} $ & $ \dmsm{58}{44}{30}{98} $ & $ 105.4  $ & $  66.8  $ & $  42.1  $ & $  74.9  $ & $  50.2  $ & $  0.19  $ & $  0.18  $ & $  0.48  $ \\
$ \hmsm{08}{55}{41}{792} $ & $ \dmsm{58}{43}{34}{99} $ & $  91.5  $ & $  68.2  $ & $  43.4  $ & $  69.0  $ & $  44.2  $ & $  0.12  $ & $  0.30  $ & $  0.41  $ \\
$ \hmsm{08}{55}{27}{405} $ & $ \dmsm{58}{44}{37}{99} $ & $ 107.8  $ & $  69.3  $ & $  42.5  $ & $  83.6  $ & $  56.8  $ & $  0.13  $ & $  0.08  $ & $  0.46  $ \\
$ \hmsm{08}{55}{41}{792} $ & $ \dmsm{58}{43}{27}{98} $ & $ 102.1  $ & $  78.8  $ & $  43.8  $ & $  94.5  $ & $  59.5  $ & $  0.17  $ & $  0.09  $ & $  0.39  $ \\
\hline
\multicolumn{2}{c}{Mean} &$ 108.3  $ & $  80.3  $ & $  48.3  $ & $  87.8  $ & $  55.7  $ & $  0.22  $ & $  0.27  $ & $  0.40  $ \\
\multicolumn{2}{c}{Standard deviation} &$   5.3  $ & $  12.6  $ & $   5.9  $ & $  11.8  $ & $   5.7  $ & $  0.06  $ & $  0.14  $ & $  0.10  $ \\
\hline
\end{tabular}}
\smallskip
{(1)}  Position, right ascension (J2000) of profile; {(2)}  position, declination (J2000) of profile; {(3)} difference between peak position belonging to inner component and systemic velocity: assumed projected rotation velocity (${\rm km}~{\rm s}^{-1}$); {(4)} difference between peak position belonging to inner component and far side 20~percent peak position of residual: maximal excess motion with respect to inner component (${\rm km}~{\rm s}^{-1}$); {(5)} difference between peak position belonging to inner component and bulk velocity of residual: bulk excess motion with respect to inner component (${\rm km}~{\rm s}^{-1}$); {(6)}~difference between peak position belonging to outer component and far side 20~percent peak position of residual: maximal
excess motion with respect to inner component (${\rm km}~{\rm
s}^{-1}$); {(7)} difference between peak position belonging to outer
component and bulk velocity of residual: bulk excess motion with
respect to inner component (${\rm km}~{\rm s}^{-1}$); {(8)} total flux of residual within the boundaries set by 20~percent of the peak intensity (${\rm Jy}~{\rm km}~{\rm s}^{-1}$); {(9)} total flux derived from Gaussian fit to the inner component (${\rm Jy}~{\rm km}~{\rm s}^{-1}$); {(10)}~total flux derived from Gaussian fit to the outer component (${\rm Jy}~{\rm km}~{\rm s}^{-1}$).
\end{table}